Editorial: Multiscale brain modelling

Editorial on the Research Topic
Multiscale brain modelling

This Special Topic touches one of the hottest fields in neuroscience, i.e., the capacity to build models of the brain crossing multiple scales. Building models can be done in many ways and addressing many different issues, spanning from theories of neuronal excitation to mesoscale models of network activity, whole-brain functions, and behavior. These models are now made feasible by recent developments in informatics and big data science.

Addressing the multiscale brain organization is fundamental not only to understand its inherent mechanisms of function but also to answer neuropathological questions and promote the development of new technologies for AI and health. A review on the issue is presented here in the paper by Krejcar and Namazi and additional information can be found in D'Angelo and Jirsa (2022) and Wang et al. (2024). The Authors have then covered two main areas of research: theoretical models of neuronal excitability, network oscillations, and brain activity, and models applied to the study of Alzheimer's disease.

Galinsky and Frank address the wave nature of the action potentials proposing an alternative framework to the standard Hodgkin-Huxley model for the action potential in axons. This is based on the Author's theory of electric field wave propagation in anisotropic and inhomogeneous brain tissues and addresses the limitations of the Hodgkin-Huxley model, including its inability to explain extracellular spiking, efficient brain synchronization, saltatory conduction along myelinated axons, and various other observed coherent macroscopic brain electrical phenomena. Pieramico et al. show how Hidden Markov Models can be used to analyze time series of neural activity. The study demonstrates that Time-Delay Embedded Hidden Markov Models performs better than Gaussian models in accurately detecting brain states from synthetic phase-coupled interaction data. Finally, Ghosh et al. present general trainable networks of Hopf oscillators to model high-dimensional electroencephalogram (EEG) signals across different sleep stages. The model, once embedded with a hidden layer, can faithfully predict the empirical EEG representing a step toward constructing a large-scale, biologically inspired model of brain dynamics.

Two papers address Alzheimer's disease. Fadel et al. present a model of functional connectivity changes with learning and memory in a mouse model based on data obtained from mutant mice. The APP/PS1 mice showed a pattern of hyperconnectivity, including the Default Mode Network, after learning. Modeling revealed functional connections that support learning and memory performance. These models show potential for early disease detection by identifying connectivity patterns associated with cognitive decline and may provide a means to understand how FC translates into learning and memory performance. Moravveji et al. show a sensitivity analysis of a mathematical model of Alzheimer's disease progression to unveil causal pathways. The study presents the first local sensitivity analysis of a multiscale ODE-based model of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and captures the multifactorial nature of AD incorporating neuronal, pathological, and inflammatory processes at the nano, micro and macro scales. This detailed framework enables realistic simulation of disease progression and identification of key biological parameters that influence system behavior. This analysis identifies the key drivers of disease progression across patient profiles, providing insight into targeted therapeutic strategies.

Author contributions

ED'A: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The ED'A declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

D'Angelo, E., and Jirsa, V. (2022). The quest for multiscale brain modeling. Trends Neurosci. 45, 777–790. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.06.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H. E., Triebkorn, P., Breyton, M., Dollomaja, B., Lemarechal, J. D., Petkoski, S., et al. (2024). Virtual brain twins: from basic neuroscience to clinical use. Natl. Sci. Rev. 11:nwae079. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwae079

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar