ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Chem. Eng.
Sec. Computational Methods in Chemical Engineering
Volume 7 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fceng.2025.1695423
This article is part of the Research TopicDecarbonizing the Chemical Industry: Integrating Renewable Energy, Advanced Materials, and Economic Feasibility PathwaysView all articles
Simulation and Thermodynamic Evaluation of Steam Cogeneration System Configurations for Energy Recovery from Exhaust Gases of a Carbo-Chemical Industry
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
- 2Instituto Federal de Educacao Ciencia e Tecnologia do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Energy efficiency is a critical factor in the transition toward sustainable energy systems and the decarbonization of industrial processes. In this context, the recovery of residual energy represents a key strategy. This study presents a case analysis of a Brazilian carbo-chemical plant, where calcination furnaces release gases containing both thermal and chemical energy. These gases, generated by six furnaces, have a total flow rate of 1.36 kg/s at 800 °C and a composition of 26% H₂, 4.2% CH₄, and 5% CO, resulting an energy potential of 8.30 MW—comprising 1.63 MW of thermal and 6.67 MW of chemical energy. The main objective of this study is to assess the potential for recovering this energy through various cogeneration system configurations based on steam cycles, aimed at process thermal oil heating and electricity generation. Simulations were conducted using IPSEpro, and system performance was evaluated according to the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics to identify opportunities for optimization. The results show that, in addition to providing 70 kW of useful heat for oil heating, the system can deliver up to 2.65 MW of power. The energy and exergy efficiencies of the steam cycles reach 43.35% and 80.45%, respectively, while the overall system achieves energy and exergy efficiencies of 32.8% and 32.03%. Exergy analysis highlights areas for improvement, particularly in combustion and heat exchange, due to high irreversibilities in combustion chambers and boilers (up to 821.50 kW and 3384.29 kW, respectively) and recoverable heat present in boiler exhaust gases. Environmental analysis indicates a significant reduction in stack gas temperatures (66–77% relative to the initial 800 °C) and the combustion of residual fuel components, especially CH₄, which markedly decreases thermal and chemical pollution. Quantitatively, electricity generation reduces grid dependency, preventing up to 3234 tons of CO₂ per year. These findings demonstrate a considerable theoretical potential for residual energy recovery, yielding substantial improvements in efficiency and environmental impact mitigation. Furthermore, an optimized technological approach could achieve energy efficiencies of up to 50%, producing 40% more electricity. These results highlight the importance of further studies, particularly to evaluate economic feasibility and potential integration into carbon markets.
Keywords: energy recovery, Waste energy, carbo-chemical, Exergy Analysis, Decarbonization, avoidedemissions
Received: 29 Aug 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Quintão, Sant'ana, Fonseca, Faria and Santos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: José Joaquim Conceição Soares Santos, jose.j.santos@ufes.br
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.