ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Chem. Eng.
Sec. Computational Methods in Chemical Engineering
This article is part of the Research TopicDecarbonizing the Chemical Industry: Integrating Renewable Energy, Advanced Materials, and Economic Feasibility PathwaysView all articles
4E Comparative Analysis of Energy Transition Scenarios for the Decarbonization of a Chocolate Factory Utilities in Brazil
Provisionally accepted- 1Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo - Campus de Goiabeiras, Vitoria, Brazil
- 2Instituto Federal de Educacao Ciencia e Tecnologia do Espirito Santo, Vitoria, Brazil
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The government of the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, has established that minimizing emissions, by considering the natural gas the best fossil fuel during the energy transition period, and energy efficiency are two of the four strategies for industries to competitively achieve the energy transition and decarbonization. In this framework, a major chocolate factory currently meets its chilled-water demand with electricity from the national grid and its hot-water demand with natural gas boilers. This study evaluates alternative configurations based on the integration of Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and/or Vapor Compression Refrigeration (VCR) systems, simultaneously generating electricity, chilled water and/or hot water. Three scenarios are proposed and comparatively evaluated using a 4E (energy, exergy, environmental, and economic) assessment. Thermodynamic and environmental modeling of the current and proposed scenarios was conducted using nominal and operational data, with simulations performed in EES software. Mass, energy, and exergy balances were carried out, along with associated CO₂ emissions. The economic analysis considered both operational costs and capital investments, the latter estimated through parametric equations for equipment sizing and costing. Feasibility indicators were applied, such as payback, net present value (NPV), and internal rate of return (IRR). The results indicate the VCR configuration, without ORC, as the most advantageous performance. This scenario requires an investment of US$ 2,679,612.19, resulting a payback period of 2 years and 3 months, an IRR of 51.40% and achieving the lowest CO₂ emissions (0.467 ton/h) due to the elimination of natural gas boilers, using total electrification of the process. Given the relatively low emission factors of the Brazilian interconnected electric grid and the competitive electricity tariffs, electrification of industrial utilities emerges as the most promising decarbonization pathway. Specifically, in this case, VCR simultaneously produces chilled and hot water with high efficiency and reduced environmental impact. Building on the conclusion that electrification is the most favorable option, new insights for research opportunities arise. Future studies could investigate the use of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) hybrid solar collectors for the simultaneous production of electricity and hot water, thereby reducing emissions, as well as the integration of energy storage systems to further enhance emission reductions
Keywords: ORC-VCR, grid electricity emission factor, gas natural emission factor, thermo- economic feasibility, Environmental analysis, Avoided emissions, Exergy destruction, Process electrification
Received: 30 Sep 2025; Accepted: 10 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Gonçalves, Fonseca, Morawski, Faria and Santos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: José Joaquim Conceição Soares Santos, jose.j.santos@ufes.br
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
