ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Detect. Sci. Technol.

Sec. Detector Physics

Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdest.2025.1614781

This article is part of the Research TopicFundamentals of luminescence and electroluminescence in particle detection technologies relying on noble-gas mediaView all 9 articles

Experimental characterization of Electron Transport and Electroluminescence in xenon-molecular mixtures

Provisionally accepted
Carlos  Alberto de Oliveira HenriquesCarlos Alberto de Oliveira Henriques1*Luis  M P FernandesLuis M P Fernandes1P  A O C SilvaP A O C Silva1D  González-DíazD González-Díaz2Carlos  AzevedoCarlos Azevedo3J  M F Dos SantosJ M F Dos Santos1C  M B MonteiroC M B Monteiro1
  • 1Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  • 2Instituto Gallego de Física de Altas Energías, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
  • 3Institute of Nanostructures, Nanomodeling and Nanofabrication, Department of Physics, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

We have developed a comprehensive methodology to measure electron transport and electroluminescence parameters in xenon-based gaseous detectors using photosensor waveform analysis.Our approach integrates measurements of the Fano factor, electroluminescence fluctuations (Q-factor), scintillation probability, electron drift velocity, diffusion, and attachment coefficients into a unified experimental framework, with particular focus on the effects of molecular additives.Using a driftless Gas Proportional Scintillation Counter and advanced event-depth analysis, we achieved an energy resolution of (7.42 ± 0.02)% FWHM with 5.9-keV X-rays, measured the Fano factor in pure xenon (0.222 ± 0.004), and characterized the impact of CF 4 , CH 4 , and CO 2 additives on detector performance. Electron transport measurements showed good agreement with Magboltz simulations, validating our methodology. Through Monte Carlo modeling of electron loss mechanisms, we quantified how attachment affects both electroluminescence yield and statistical fluctuations, enabling separation of attachment effects from other yield-degradation mechanisms for accurate determination of scintillation probabilities. For applications requiring optimal position resolution through reduced diffusion, we compared three molecular additives at concentrations providing equivalent electron cloud spread (2.75 mm after 1 m drift): Xe-CF 4 (0.015%) maintains near-100% scintillation probability but introduces significant electron attachment affecting energy resolution; Xe-CH 4 (0.220%) reduces the scintillation probability by approximately 30% with minimal attachment; while Xe-CO 2 (0.041%) combines reduced scintillation, moderate attachment, and VUV opacity. These findings provide a quantitative foundation for selecting optimal additives based on application-specific priorities in rare-event detection experiments.

Keywords: electroluminescence, Electron Transport, Electron attachment, Scintillation Probability, Xenon Electron Diffusion, Gas proportional scintillation counter, Time projection chamber, neutrinoless double beta decay

Received: 19 Apr 2025; Accepted: 14 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Henriques, Fernandes, Silva, González-Díaz, Azevedo, Dos Santos and Monteiro. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Carlos Alberto de Oliveira Henriques, Laboratory for Instrumentation, Biomedical Engineering and Radiation Physics, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, 3000-214, Coimbra, Portugal

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.