METHODS article
Front. Dev. Psychol.
Sec. Cognitive Development
Volume 3 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fdpys.2025.1644956
This article is part of the Research TopicInsights and Future Directions in Cognitive DevelopmentView all 7 articles
Dyadic neuroscience is the next scientific frontier of sociocognitive development: A proof-of-concept for a collaborative conversation task in clinical and underrepresented populations
Provisionally accepted- 1Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States
- 2Linguistics Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Developmental cognitive neuroscience studies the evolution of the bidirectional links between biology and cognition during development. An area of recent focus is the impact of social factors on the biology-cognition link. Indeed, recent calls-to-action encourage a more dynamic approach to investigating mechanisms related to the development of the social brain. To address this need, we utilized a burgeoning innovation in cognitive neuroscience known as “hyperscanning”, which allows for real-time synchronized measurements of biological signals (e.g., brain signals via electroencephalography, EEG; cardiac activity via electrocardiogram, ECG) across two people engaged in social interaction. The potential of hyperscanning has yet to be tapped for research with diverse and developmental populations underrepresented in neuroscience (and science broadly), including pediatric clinical and racial minority populations. The present manuscript provides proof-of-concept for the use of naturalistic and inclusive hyperscanning paradigms. For this research, we adapted a collaborative conversation task that allowed us to examine differences in synchronized measures of sociocognitive mechanisms (specifically, motivation and language) across different social contexts (familiar child dyads, stranger child dyads, familiar adult-child dyads, and stranger adult dyads). Preliminary results from a pilot study with 45 racially diverse autistic and non-autistic participants indicate that, at the group level, youth are less accurate and need more hints than adults, peer dyads (i.e., child-child, adult-adult) are more approach-motivated, and dyad features (e.g., familiarity) influence how linguistically aligned individuals are during the task. Additionally, we provide initial evidence for within-person biology-behavior links and asymmetrical between-person alignment of approach motivational brain states that indicate that one’s current motivation state was predicted to be opposite of their partner and vary subtly across social contexts. Overall, this hyperscanning task is sensitive to developmental and contextual factors and will propel our understanding of social and cognitive processes. We encourage cognitive developmentalists to consider recommendations laid out in the current proof-of-concept to take actionable steps in moving the field toward more inclusive and pervasive research.
Keywords: Sociocognitive development, EEG hyperscanning, Linguistic alignment, Clinically and Culturally Sensitive Methods, Collaborative conversation
Received: 11 Jun 2025; Accepted: 10 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Nelson, Wilson, Mcfadden, Almor and Hudac. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Cailee M Nelson, caileen@mailbox.sc.edu
Caitlin M Hudac, chudac@mailbox.sc.edu
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.