ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Connected Health
Value, Development Challenges, and Strategies for Gaining Internal Endorsement of Digitally Connected Subcutaneous Drug Delivery Devices: A Survey of Pharmaceutical Stakeholders
Aaron Swick 1
S. Prasad Peri 2
Tanisha Hill 3
Mohamed Datoo 4
David Morra 5
Mehul Desai 1
Omar Rahman 1
Terri Levine 6
1. Enable Injections Inc, Cincinnati, United States
2. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, United States
3. Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel
4. Johnson & Johnson Innovation LLC, New Brunswick, United States
5. Merck & Co Inc, Rahway, United States
6. ProPharma Group London, London, United Kingdom
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Connected drug delivery devices such as combination products that integrate traditional drug delivery systems with digital connectivity features represent an opportunity to improve treatment outcomes and disease management. This online survey study was conducted to explore the evolving landscape of digitally connected subcutaneous (SC) drug delivery devices, including the perspectives of pharmaceutical stakeholders regarding the promise of these technologies, particularly in relation to the expansion of traditional mobile companion applications and their integration in drug delivery systems. A total of 80 employees of pharmaceutical, biotechnology, or digital health companies with primary roles in medical affairs, commercial, combination product development, or digital health who had experience working on SC drug-device combination products completed the survey. Survey questions explored the value propositions of connected SC drug delivery devices for patients, providers, and payers; barriers to the adoption of these technologies; and strategies for gaining internal support for connected healthcare initiatives. Responses demonstrated that industry professionals recognize the potential value of connected SC drug delivery devices and associated companion mobile applications and are investing in bringing them to market. Nearly all respondents (97.5%) reported that connectivity is at least moderately important to achieving important objectives, including acquiring real-world data, improving medication adherence, and enhancing ease-of-use for patients. Equal potential value was noted for using connectivity in clinical trials or commercial settings, with neither considered more beneficial than the other. Indications in oncology and endocrinology were considered to be the most likely to benefit from connected SC drug delivery devices. Key barriers to the adoption of connected SC drug delivery devices were development cost, data security, and patient and payer acceptance, while generating evidence of internal and external value was noted as a significant barrier to gaining company endorsement. These results should guide strategies for the effective integration of connected healthcare solutions within the pharmaceutical sector.
Summary
Keywords
Connected Health, Connected healthcare, connectivity, Digital Health, Digital medicine, Drug-device combination product
Received
12 August 2025
Accepted
30 January 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Swick, Peri, Hill, Datoo, Morra, Desai, Rahman and Levine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Omar Rahman
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.