ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Digit. Health

Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health

Evaluating a Digital Health Ecosystem for Asthma and Air Quality: An Early Feasibility Study based on clinicians and patient-reported measures

  • 1. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • 2. Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain

  • 3. Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Deu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain

  • 4. Hospital Sant Joan de Deu, Barcelona, Spain

  • 5. Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

  • 6. Universita degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy

Article metrics

View details

186

Views

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract

Introduction: Asthma remains a major global health burden, particularly in contexts of poor air quality where managing moderate and severe diagnosis ideally requires continuous, coordinated care and remote monitoring beyond episodic clinic visits. In this setting, this early feasibility study evaluates a novel digital health platform, developed as part of an integrative eHealth Monitoring Ecosystem for patients diagnosed with moderate or severe asthma, aimed at supporting personalised, continuous asthma care through remote physiological and air quality monitoring. Methods: The system was conceptualized, designed, refined, and assessed throughout the study, integrating wearable physiological sensors, individualised portable air quality monitors, and a digital interface with separate portals for patients and clinicians. Thirteen patients and seven clinicians participated in a six-month pilot, interacting with the platform through their respective user interfaces. Their views on system use, care processes, emotional responses, overall satisfaction, and the anticipated integration of the system into routine care were assessed using a 26-item Likert-scale Patient-Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questionnaire, administered to both patients and clinicians and organized into five domains: user experience (including both patients and clinicians), patient experience, emotional experience, overall satisfaction, and future implementation expectations. An additional open-ended comment (item 27) was included and analyzed using inductive qualitative methods in NVivo, with themes aligned to the same five clusters. Results: The findings indicate a high level of positive experience with the eHealth Monitoring Ecosystem across all PREMs domains, with patients requesting more clinical and technical information and clinicians identifying the need for enhanced functionality and additional tools. Conclusion: These results support the feasibility and acceptability of the eHealth Monitoring Ecosystem for moderate and severe asthma management and suggest directions for further refinement, broader clinical evaluation, and potential adaptation to other chronic disease monitoring contexts. KEYWORDS: digital health, asthma, remote monitoring, air quality, eHealth Monitoring Ecosystem, patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), early feasibility study

Summary

Keywords

Air Quality, Asthma, Digital Health, early feasibility study, eHealth MonitoringEcosystem, Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs), remote monitoring

Received

11 December 2025

Accepted

06 February 2026

Copyright

© 2026 Escalona-López, Haddi, Lores Obradors, Vinyets Rejón, GRESLE, De Rosis and Hernando Salvador. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sergio-Vidal Escalona-López; Zouhair Haddi

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Share article

Article metrics