MINI REVIEW article
Front. Digit. Health
Sec. Human Factors and Digital Health
From Bedside to Bytes: The Digital Transformation of the Healthcare Workforce
School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Digital transformation is reshaping healthcare work, whereas research on workforce implications remains fragmented across disciplines. Effects like burnout, resistance, and workflow disruption are often framed as implementation failures rather than systematic outcomes of how work is reorganized. This Mini Review advances a four-dimensional analytical lens distinguishing work execution (task distribution, sequencing, temporal organization), work experience (autonomy, cognitive load, dignity), work governance (standardization, monitoring, accountability), and work learning and adaptation (workarounds, skill development, technology reshaping). The framework's specifies information-mediated work, including documenting, coding, classifying, and verifying data, as the coupling mechanism binding these dimensions. This coupling is constitutive, in that documentation defines legitimate work;, transductive, in that changes spread across dimensions; and asymmetric, in that non-datafied work becomes invisible. Four characteristic paradoxes emerge: efficiency-intensification (execution–experience), empowerment–surveillance (experience–governance), innovation–compliance (learning–governance), and adaptation–deviation (learning–execution). These are structural features rather than design flaws, since informational practices that generate benefits in one dimension produce costs in another. Digital transformation also redistributes burdens unequally, concentrating execution demands, surveillance intensity, and learning constraints among lower-status workers. The framework reframes persistent tensions as predictable outcomes of dimensional misalignment rather than individual or technological shortcomings, and offers a diagnostic orientation for research and practice. Sustainable transformation depends on managing cross-dimensional trade-offs rather than eliminating them, with deliberate attention to whether digital systems support dignified, expert work.
Summary
Keywords
Algorithmic governance, digital transformation, Healthcare workforce, information-mediated work, Organizational paradox, Professional expertise, Work design, work governance
Received
29 December 2025
Accepted
19 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Kyratsis. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yiannis Kyratsis
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.