Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Environ. Econ.

Sec. Economics of Climate Change

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/frevc.2025.1410077

This article is part of the Research TopicEconomic visions to mitigate Climate ChangeView all 7 articles

Investigating climate change and emerging theoretical perspectives: A systematic theoretical review and thematic analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda
  • 2School of Economics, College of Business and Management Sciences (CoBAMS), Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 3College Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study aims to review existing studies on climate change theories, as well as other theories from other disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, management, cultural studies, and psychology that have been used to explain climate change. Furthermore, it seeks to identify emerging theoretical perspectives in climate change research. This study analyzed and reviewed 73 articles and reports on climate change theories and emerging theoretical perspectives using systematic theoretical review and thematic analysis methodologies. Data sources included Science Direct, Taylor & Francis, Emerald, Google Scholar, and Google general. The findings indicate the multidimensional nature of climate change theories, encompassing four primary climate change theories, interdisciplinary theories, and emerging theoretical perspectives. This variation suggests that no single theory can fully explain the complexity of climate change, necessitating an integrated approach. The review revealed that anthropogenic climate change theory dominates the literature, representing 37.5% (12 papers) of the reviewed literature, reinforcing the strong scientific consensus among academics, environmentalists, and policymakers that human-induced greenhouse gas emissions are the primary drivers of climate change. The paper concludes by identifying four critical knowledge gaps. In addition, the findings will be useful for policymakers, industry stakeholders, and educators in developing effective mitigation and adaptation strategies.

Keywords: greenhouse gases, Climate change theories, Anthropogenic climate change theory, interdisciplinary theories, Mitigation and adaptation strategies

Received: 31 Mar 2024; Accepted: 02 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mubangizi, Ntayi, Adaramola, Buyinza, Atukunda and Echegu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: James Mubangizi, Makerere University Business School, Kampala, Uganda

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.