- 1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
- 2Crop Bioprotection Research Unit, National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Peoria, IL, United States
- 3San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center, United States Department of Agriculture – Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Parlier, CA, United States
- 4Department of Animal Parasitology, Veterinary Institute, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, RJ, Brazil
Editorial on the Research Topic
Current perspectives on the use of entomopathogenic fungi for pest control
Scientific and technological advancements since 1835 when Dr. Agostino Bassi discovered the entomopathogenic fungus now known as Beauveria bassiana continue to expand the research and development of mycopesticides as sustainable alternatives to synthetic chemical pesticides for arthropod pest management in agricultural, veterinary, and public health settings (Bassi, 1836; Angelo et al., 2022). Progress in the formulation of mycopesticides allows their integrated use with other management technologies to mitigate overreliance on synthetic pesticides and the emergence of pest resistant populations, which contributes to human and environmental health (Bamisile et al., 2021; Mascarin et al., 2024). This Research Topic encompasses 4 studies (Figure 1) that highlight novel applications of entomopathogenic fungi, from optimizing fungal formulations and expanding the diversity of applicable strains to integrating innovative techniques for arthropod pest and vector control with broad agricultural and public health implications. The contributions of Wallis and Sisterson, Miranda et al., Ombura et al., and Hidalgo et al. synthesized in this editorial showcase significant progress with, and underscore key challenges on the use of entomopathogenic fungi for arthropod pest control.

Figure 1. Illustration of editorial for publications in the Research Topic, “Current perspectives on the use of entomopathogenic fungi for pest control”. Quadrants synthesize topics covered in each publication. This figure was assembled using elements from Canva.com.
Wallis and Sisterson examined the use of fungal-based agents for pest management in orchards and vineyards stressing the importance of expanding the diversity of available strains by standardizing screening and testing methods, which could lead to the discovery of more virulent and resilient isolates. Another critical point is the development of innovative formulations, such as microencapsulation, the use of UV protectants, and slow-release carriers, to enhance fungal environmental persistence. Notably, a multidisciplinary approach that integrates biotechnology, microbial ecology, and agricultural sciences is needed to transition mycopesticidal formulations from the laboratory to large-scale field applications.
Miranda et al. complemented this perspective providing a comprehensive review of host-pathogen interactions with Metarhizium species that details the mechanisms of cuticle penetration and the production of virulence factors demonstrating their potential for controlling a wide range of insect pests and disease vectors. Recent advances in genomics and genetic engineering enabled the development of strains with enhanced specificity and environmental tolerance. This review bridged molecular insights with practical biocontrol strategies and linked advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and genetic manipulation to real-world applications.
Ombura et al. explored an innovative strategy for controlling the tsetse fly, which is the vector of pathogens causing African trypanosomiasis, that combines sterile insect technique (SIT) with fungal infection using M. anisopliae strains ICIPE 20 and 78. Sterilized male flies inoculated with fungal conidia enabled horizontal transmission to females and other males during mating or social interactions. This dual approach could significantly reduce the vector population via sterility and the intensified pesticidal effect through horizontal transmission of entomopathogenic fungus. If validated in the field, this approach would be a cost-effective and environmentally-friendly alternative to chemical trypanocides thus contributing to One Health objectives by reducing the reliance on synthetic chemical pesticides and mitigating the development of antimicrobial resistance (Percoma et al., 2018; Kasozi et al., 2024).
Hidalgo et al. summarized efforts in Ecuador addressing the growing challenge of acaricide-resistant populations of the one-host tick Rhipicephalus microplus, an economically important ectoparasite and disease vector affecting cattle. Their work focused on the development of a mycopesticide using B. bassiana sensu lato strain INIAP L3B3. A phased approach going from strain selection and efficacy testing to formulation optimization and safety assessment demonstrated the acaricidal potential of INIAP L3B3 against various life stages of R. microplus. Pilot field trials indicated comparable efficacy to conventional chemical acaricides, and additional studies showed synergistic effects when B. bassiana INIAP L3B3 was combined with certain botanical extracts and synthetic acaricides. Advances in conidial production and formulation that will support its practical application and commercialization were documented. These findings underscore the viability of B. bassiana INIAP L3B3 as a component of integrated tick management strategies but also provides a model for other entomopathogenic fungi as part of sustainable pest control solutions in livestock systems.
Collectively, the 4 studies revealed a promising scenario for the use of entomopathogenic fungi as tools for integrated pest and disease vector management. Each work presented a unique perspective, from optimizing biological agents and expanding the strain repertoire to implementing combined strategies and validating sustainable alternatives across agriculture, public health, and livestock production. This diversity of approaches underscores the importance of investing in research that spans from molecular mechanisms and genomic insights to practical applications and product formulation designed for real-world environments.
The need to develop more robust entomopathogenic fungal strains capable of withstanding climatic variations and adapting to different environmental conditions is a common theme identified by Wallis and Sisterson and reinforced by the other studies. Biotechnological enhancement through the integration of innovative techniques, such as combining SIT with fungal infection as proposed by Ombura et al., opens new perspectives for the sustainable suppression of vector populations without the adverse effects associated with intense chemical use. Meanwhile, the reviews by Miranda et al. and Hidalgo et al. demonstrated that strains of entomopathogenic fungi like Metarhizium and Beauveria have comparable efficacy to conventional control methods, and under certain circumstances could potentially replace or complement synthetic insecticides and acaricides, thereby contributing to the sustainability of production systems and mitigation of environmental and health risks. Collectively, these studies also emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research that incorporates biotechnology, microbial ecology, genetic engineering, and agronomic management to overcome the inherent challenges in the development and commercialization of mycopesticides.
Studies in this Research Topic demonstrated the central role entomopathogenic fungi can play in sustainable pest control. The diverse approaches and innovative solutions discussed emphasize how basic and applied research can deliver robust solutions to the challenges of pest and disease vector management. Interdisciplinary and collaborative efforts among universities, research institutions, and industry are essential to develop effective formulations of entomopathogenic fungi that are used globally for safer pest control. This will fully realize the contribution of mycopesticides to food security, public health, and animal welfare.
Author contributions
IA: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. JR: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AP: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. PG: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Angelo I. C., Ramirez J. L., Golo P. S., Fernandes É. K. K, Pedrini N., Bittencourt V. R. E. P. (2022). Editorial: entomopathogenic fungi for the control of arthropod pests. Front. Physiol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.885131
Bamisile B. S., Akutse K. S., Siddiqui J. A., Xu Y. (2021). Model application of entomopathogenic fungi as alternatives to chemical pesticides: prospects, challenges, and insights for next-generation sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.741804
Bassi A. (1836). Del mal del segno, calcinaccio o moscardino: malattia che affligge i bachi da seta [On “the bad sign”, “rubble” or “muscardine”: a disease that afflicts silkworms] (in Italian) (Lodi, (Italy: Orcesi). Available online at: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/257074page/3/mode/1up (Accessed April 5, 2025).
Kasozi K. I., MacLeod E. T., Welburn S. C. (2024). One Health policy for combatting African trypanocide resistance. One Health 19, 100871. doi: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100871
Mascarin G. M., Golo P. S., de Souza Ribeiro-Silva C., Muniz E. R., de Oliveira Franco A., Kobori N. N., et al. (2024). Advances in submerged liquid fermentation and formulation of entomopathogenic fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 108, 451. doi: 10.1007/s00253-024-13287-z
Keywords: biological control, mycopesticide formulation, characterization of entomopathogenic fungi, Metarhizium genomics, Beauveria sp., sustainability, biopesticide
Citation: Angelo IC, Ramírez JL, Pérez de León AÁ and Gôlo PS (2025) Editorial: Current perspectives on the use of entomopathogenic fungi for pest control. Front. Fungal Biol. 6:1609506. doi: 10.3389/ffunb.2025.1609506
Received: 10 April 2025; Accepted: 15 April 2025;
Published: 07 May 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Chengshu Wang, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), ChinaCopyright © 2025 Angelo, Ramírez, Pérez de León and Gôlo. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Isabele Costa Angelo, aXNhYmVsZWFuZ2Vsb0B5YWhvby5jb20uYnI=