Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Gastroenterol.

Sec. Gastroenterology and Cancer

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgstr.2025.1598916

Bioinformatic Analysis of the Potential Common Pathogenic Mechanisms for Gastric Precancerous Lesions and Helicobacter pylori

Provisionally accepted
Liufeng  YiLiufeng Yi1,2Tiantong  JiangTiantong Jiang1Siyu  TaoSiyu Tao1,2Nachuan  LiNachuan Li2Yuan  DingYuan Ding1Meng  LiMeng Li1ShaoLi  WangShaoLi Wang1Zhen  LiuZhen Liu1*
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, Guang’anmen Hospital, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: Gastric precancerous lesions (GPL) represent a critical stage in the progression from gastritis to gastric cancer (GC). Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a significant etiological factor exacerbating the inflammatory-cancerous transformation. The host immune status is a central regulatory mechanism for GPL, while persistent H. pylori infection drives changes in the immune microenvironment (IME). However, the potential pathological link between GPL and H. pylori remains unclear. This study aims to identify common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between GPL and H. pylori using bioinformatics analysis, thereby elucidating their shared pathogenic mechanisms. Methods: DEGs were extracted from GPL datasets (GSE87666) and H. pylori datasets (GSE60427) sourced from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database through GEO2R and R software. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks were generated using the STRING database and analyzed with Cytoscape software to identify hub genes. The diagnostic value of these hub genes was evaluated through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis, validated with datasets GSE130823, GSE60662, and GSE5081. Immune infiltration analysis of key genes was conducted using the CIBERSORT algorithm and ssGSEA. Gene mutation analysis was carried out using the cBioPortal database, and small molecule drugs were detected using the Connectivity Map (CMap) database. Results: The analysis revealed 189 DEGs. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted pathways related to immune system regulation, leukocyte migration and chemotaxis, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and chemokine signaling. Seven hub genes were identified: IL6, FCGR3A, CCL3, CXCR4, CXCL9, CCL4, and CCR1. High AUC values for these hub genes indicated their potential for predicting disease occurrence. Conclusions: This research identified seven hub genes closely related to GPL and H. pylori, elucidating potential mechanisms of disease progression, particularly emphasizing the roles of the IME and chemokine activity. These findings may provide insights for identifying disease biomarkers, inhibiting the "inflammation-cancer" transformation, and preventing GC. Furthermore, the targets and molecular mechanisms identified in this study require further experimental validation to confirm their therapeutic potential.

Keywords: bioinformatics analysis1, gastric precancerous lesions2, Helicobacter pylori3, hubgenes4, differentially expressed genes5

Received: 24 Mar 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yi, Jiang, Tao, Li, Ding, Li, Wang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Zhen Liu, drliuzhenky@163.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.