Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Gastroenterol.

Sec. Gastrointestinal Infection

Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fgstr.2025.1634183

This article is part of the Research TopicWomen In Gastroenterology: 2024/2025View all 3 articles

Improving 13 C-Urea Breath Test Performance Metrics for Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Provisionally accepted
Paula  ManteroPaula Mantero1Germán  Rodolfo FlekensteinGermán Rodolfo Flekenstein1Mariana  Andrea JanjeticMariana Andrea Janjetic1,2,3,4Julián  Andrés FudaJulián Andrés Fuda1Horacio  Emilio TortiHoracio Emilio Torti1Gustavo  CernadasGustavo Cernadas5Marcela  Beatriz ZubillagaMarcela Beatriz Zubillaga1,3Cinthia  G. GoldmanCinthia G. Goldman1,3*
  • 1Cátedra de Física, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 2Escuela de Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 4Centro de Investigación sobre Problemáticas Alimentarias y Nutricionales (CISPAN), Escuela de Nutrición, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 5Cátedra de Anatomía e Histología, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The 13C-Urea Breath Test ( 13C-UBT) is a popular, non-invasive method used for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection. This work evaluates its performance for the initial diagnosis and posttreatment follow-up in dyspeptic adults from Buenos Aires, Argentina. We retrospectively analyzed data from two earlier studies, which evaluated H. pylori infection using 13C-UBT and histology of gastric biopsies. Additionally, we assessed the 13C-UBT performance against the concordant results of both histology and PCR in a subsample with available data. The 13C-UBT was performed using a commercial kit, with isotope-ratio-mass-spectrometry (IRMS) as the measurement technique. Results from 154 volunteers were evaluated to assess the performance of 13C-UBT for the initial diagnosis of H. pylori infection, with histological evaluation as the reference method. For a cut-off value set at 3.5‰, sensitivity was 93.0%, specificity was 95.6%, accuracy was 94.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 96.4% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 91.5%. The subsample analysis of 13C-UBT vs. histology and PCR showed improved results: sensitivity 98.8%, specificity 98.3%, accuracy 98.6%, PPV 98.8% and NPV 98.3%. In contrast, 13C-UBT performance for confirming H. pylori eradication was studied in 46 patients, showing a sensitivity of 94.4%, specificity 100.0%, accuracy 97.8%, PPV 100.0% and NPV 96.6%. The analysis of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy as a function of the cut-off revealed that the optimal value could be lowered to 3.0‰ in our laboratory. These results demonstrate that the 13C-UBT is a non-invasive, highly accurate method for both the initial and post-treatment diagnosis of H. pylori infection.

Keywords: H. pylori, 13 C-UBT, diagnosis, Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, cut-off

Received: 23 May 2025; Accepted: 18 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Mantero, Flekenstein, Janjetic, Fuda, Torti, Cernadas, Zubillaga and Goldman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Cinthia G. Goldman, Cátedra de Física, Facultad de Farmacia y Bioquímica, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.