Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding regulatory RNAs that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, are master regulators of a wide array of cellular processes. Altered miRNA expression could be a determinant of disease development and/or progression and manipulation of miRNA expression represents a potential avenue of therapy. Exosomes are cell-derived extracellular vesicles that promote cell–cell communication and immunoregulatory functions. These “bioactive vesicles” shuttle various molecules, including miRNAs, to recipient cells. Inappropriate release of miRNAs from exosomes may cause significant alterations in biological pathways that affect disease development, supporting the concept that miRNA-containing exosomes could serve as targeted therapies for particular diseases. This review briefly summarizes recent advances in the biology, function, and therapeutic potential of exosomal miRNAs.
Introduction
Exosomes are small (30–90 nm) extracellular vesicles derived from the multivesicular body (MVB) sorting pathway. These vesicles are produced by a wide variety of cell types including reticulocytes, epithelial cells, neurons, and tumor cells (Thery et al., 2009). Exosomes have been isolated from bronchoalveolar lavage, urine, serum, bile, and breast milk (Thery, 2011). Although previously considered to be cellular waste products (Thery, 2011), recent studies have demonstrated that exosomes are “bioactive vesicles” that promote intercellular communication and immunoregulatory processes by shuttling molecules between cells (Thery et al., 2009; Pegtel et al., 2010).
One of the most recent exciting findings is that microRNAs (miRNAs) exist in exosomes and these exosomal miRNAs can be functionally delivered to target cells (Montecalvo et al., 2012). miRNAs are small non-coding regulatory RNAs that bind to complementary sequences in the 3′-untranslated region (3′UTR) of target mRNAs, leading to either translational repression or target degradation of the specific mRNA (Bartel, , ). miRNAs play a pivotal regulatory role in diverse biological processes including but not limited to, development and cell signaling, proliferation and differentiation (Bartel, , ). While miRNA expression patterns are incompletely defined in most cell types under normal conditions, aberrant expression of certain miRNAs has been described in diverse human diseases, suggesting that miRNAs can be used as biomarkers for disease development and as a potential target of therapy (Jiang et al., ). Several publicly available databases (e.g., miR2Disease) have been established which document the relationships between the expression of specific miRNAs and the development and/or progression of specific human diseases (Jiang et al., ). Identification of miRNAs key to disease pathogenesis provides new insights into the development of therapeutic targets in the treatment of human diseases, particularly for some forms of cancer. Currently, several approaches to manipulate miRNA function are being studied in clinical trials (Kasinski and Slack, ). Because inappropriately released miRNA-containing exosomes have been shown to significantly alter biological pathways integral to disease development (Record et al., 2011), it is postulated that exosomes could be used to deliver therapeutic molecules in a variety of human diseases. Here, we briefly summarize recent advances in the biology, function and therapeutic potential of exosomal miRNAs.
Exosomes are Cell–Cell Mediators with Physiological and Pathological Significance
Exosomes are the newest family member of “bioactive vesicles.” These bioactive vesicles were originally described during maturation of reticulocytes into erythrocytes. These small vesicles contained the transferrin receptor which is downregulated in mature erythrocytes (Pan and Johnstone, 1983). Exosomes are also secreted by a variety of cell types including mast cells (Laulagnier et al., ), B lymphocyte cell lines, dendritic cells (Laulagnier et al., ), platelets, astrocytes, neurons, and epithelial cells (Hogan et al., ; Zhou et al., 2011). Exosomes enter the circulatory system and bodily fluids and have been detected in plasma, bronchoalveolar lavage, blood, urine, bile (Masyuk et al., ), ascites (Rupp et al., 2011), breast milk, and cerebrospinal fluid. Tumor-derived exosomes have been identified in the plasma of patients with lung adenocarcinoma, glioblastoma multiforme, malignant glioma, and ovarian carcinoma ascites (Skog et al., 2008; Rabinowits et al., 2009; Rupp et al., 2011).
The formation and release of exosomes are tightly regulated processes governed by multiple signaling mechanisms. Various stimuli influence exosome secretion including activation of a variety of receptors including the P2X receptor by ATP on monocytes and neutrophils, the thrombin receptor on platelets, and toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) on dendritic cells (Bhatnagar and Schorey, ). Morphological studies suggest that exosomes are derived from the MVB sorting pathway. The MVBs fuse with the plasma membrane and release the vesicles into the extracellular milieu as exosomes. The exosomes consist of a lipid bilayer membrane surrounding a small cytosol that lacks cellular organelles such as mitochondria, lysosomes, endoplasmic reticulum, nucleus, and Golgi apparatus.
The formation and release of exosomes involves contractile machinery that draws opposing membranes together before pinching off the membrane connection and releasing the vesicle into the extracellular space (Cocucci et al., ). SNARE (soluble NSF attachment protein receptor) complexes are proposed to be involved in bringing the membranes together in opposition, as there is an energy requirement for the membrane fusion process (Sudhof and Rothman, 2009). SNAREs can be divided into vesicle (v-SNAREs) and target SNARES (t-SNAREs; Fukuda et al., ). The complex begins assembling at the N-terminal region of the SNARE motifs and proceeds toward the C-termini which anchors the interacting proteins in the membranes (Sutton et al., 1998). An intermediate complex composed of SNAP-25 and syntaxin-1, which interacts with synaptobrevin-2 then forms. Recent studies from Thery’s group demonstrated that several Rab family proteins, including Rab27a and Rab27b, are key regulators of the exosome secretion pathway (Ostrowski et al., 2010). Several lines of evidence support a role for Rab27a and Rab27b in MVB docking at the plasma membrane. Rab27a silencing increases the size of MVBs; alternatively, Rab27b silencing results in redistribution of the MVBs to the perinuclear region (Ostrowski et al., 2010). Another Rab family member protein, Rab35, is a target of TBC1D10A-C, which regulates exosome secretion and inhibiting Rab35 activity induces intracellular accumulation of endosomal vesicles and impaired exosome secretion (Hsu et al., ). Recent studies revealed that exosomes can be released into the extracellular environment by the outward budding and fission of the plasma membrane, a pathway called the exosome and microvesicle (EMV) budding pathway. The progression of the EMV pathway is regulated by multiple processes including the elevation of intracellular calcium and reorganization of the cell’s structural scaffolding. The current model of exosome formation and release of exosomes is diagrammed in Figure 1.
Figure 1
Exosomes released from donor cells can be taken up by recipient cells, where an array of biological processes can be impacted in the recipient cells, including cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, and the immune response (Abusamra et al., ; Yu et al., 2007). Exosomes have been implicated as mediators in the communication between T cells and antigen-presenting cells (APCs) at the immune synapse. Professional APCs secrete major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) carrying exosomes (Buschow et al., ), and these exosomes can stimulate antigen-specific MHC class II-restricted T cell responses (Raposo et al., 1996). Intestinal epithelial cell-derived exosomes containing αvβ6 integrin and food antigen induced dendritic cell tolerance and tolerogenic DCs in a model of tolerance induction. In addition, the presence of these intestinal epithelial cell-derived exosomes alsoimpacted the development of antigen-specific T regulatory cells (Chen et al., ). Additional normal cellular processes influenced by exosomal contents include myelin membrane biogenesis and neuronal plasticity (Bakhti et al., ) in the central nervous system (CNS) and decreasing cholangiocyte proliferation via interactions with cholangiocyte cilia (Masyuk et al., ).
Exosomes may also be involved in pathogenic processes. Extracellular amyoid fibril formation, a key feature of Alzheimer’s disease, occurs at an accelerated rate in the presence of GM1 ganglioside-containing exosomes (Yuyama et al., 2008). These data suggest that targeting GM1 in exosomes may provide a mechanism to slow the rate of plaque formation. Tumor-derived exosomes may also significantly influence the development and effectiveness of anti-tumor immune responses (Rupp et al., 2011). Exposure of peripherial blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) to exosomes isolated from ascites of ovarian cancer patients impaired the cytotoxic activity of the PBMCs in the presence of dendritic cells. In addition to containing tumor antigens, exosomes secreted from cancer cells also have been shown to contain two molecules critical to immunoregulation, PD-L1 and FasL. The presence of FasL and TRAIL in exosomes may contribute to apoptosis of cells of the immune response, thereby serving as a mechanism of tumor escape from immunosurveillance (Peng et al., 2011). For example, exosomes from plasma of cancer patients have been shown to induce T cell apoptosis (Ichim et al., ), reminiscent of Fas-FasL counterattack that has been described in some cancers (Alderson et al., ; O’Connell et al., 1998). Intercellular communication via exosomes is not limited to communications between mammalian cells. Interestingly, exosomes have been isolated from the protozoan parasite, Leishmania, and these exosomes deliver protozoan proteins to macrophages in the vertebrate host. Similar to what is observed with mammalian-derived exosomes, protozoan exosomes may influence the host immune response and regulate cell signaling pathways (Silverman et al., 2010). Exosomes can also transport pathogen or virus proteins to neighboring and/or distant cells and enhance disease spread (Schorey and Bhatnagar, 2008). The infectious form of the prion protein, PrPsc, has been found in exosomes. Exosomally derived PrPsc is infectious to mice (Vella et al., 2007). This finding suggests that in humans or wildlife, exosomally derived PrPSc could serve as a source of infectious material in the host which accelerates the spread of the misfolded protein through the body. Also, because exosomes are in mucus, urine, and blood, disease spread between hosts may be enhanced by the presence of PrPSc-containing exosomes.
Exosomes are considered extracellular organelles which can affect neighboring cells following delivery of their contents into target cells (Silverman and Reiner, 2011). It has been speculated that the composition of exosomes is quite heterogenic, depending on the cellular origin of the exosome. Large-scale proteomics and phosphoproteomics studies of exosomes derived from various cell types suggest that the exosomes shuttle wide array of biologically relevant molecules, including lipids, carbohydrates, RNAs, and proteins (Schorey and Bhatnagar, 2008), as outlined in Figure 2. Detailed information regarding the contents of exosomes is available (http://dir.nhlbi.nih.gov/papers/lkem/exosome). The contents of urinary exosomes have been characterized by Knepper’s group. This study identified 1132 proteins contained within the exosomes. In addition, phosphoproteomic studies identified several unique phosphorylation sites (Gonzales et al., ). This study, along with others, support the potential for exosomes obtained from bodily fluids to serve as biomarkers of disease development and/or progression.
Figure 2
MicroRNAs are Gene Regulators and Important Biomarkers with Therapeutic Potential
To date, over 1000 human miRNAs have been identified and it is predicted that miRNAs control the expression of approximately 60% of all human genes (Bentwich et al., ; Krol et al., ). Accumulating data indicate that miRNAs comprise an essential component in the complex regulatory networks controlling a wide array of cellular processes, including the timing of developmental processes, cell proliferation/differentiation, apoptosis, organ development (Tiscornia and Izpisua Belmonte, 2010), and immune regulation (O’Neill et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2011). Several excellent reviews have been recently published on these topics (O’Neill et al., 2011; Zhou et al., 2011).
Aberrant miRNA expression has been linked to the initiation and progression of certain cancers (Mencia et al., ). An example of a miRNA associated with cancer development (that is, an oncogenic miRNA or oncomiR) is miR-21. miRNA-21 targets tumor suppressor genes and upregulation of miR-21 is associated with a wide variety of cancers including breast, ovaries, cervix, colon, lung, liver, brain, esophagus, prostate, pancreas, and thyroid cancers (Volinia et al., 2006; Lui et al., ). miRNAs are also involved in developmental processes in vertebrates. Studies utilizing genetically modified mice have demonstrated the critical requirement for miRNAs in cardiac development, as mice deficient in Dicer experience cardiac failure (Chen et al., ). In the CNS, the role of miRNAs in regulating neuronal development, plasticity and differentiation is under exploration (Guo et al., ; Gao et al., ). In Parkinson’s disease, miR-34b and miR-34c are decreased and this decrease in expression is accompanied by a decrease in cell viability of dopaminergic neurons (Minones-Moyano et al., ). In Huntington’s disease, both murine models of the disease as well as human tissue samples have demonstrated that RE1 silencing transcription (REST) factor, a transcriptional repressor, is not appropriately expressed, and can be found in the nucleus of neurons rather than the cytoplasm. REST dysregulation results in a wide array of miRNAs are repressed, thereby resulting in an overexpression of mRNAs in the CNS of individuals with Huntington’s disease (Johnson et al., ; Buckley et al., ).
The small size (23–24 nucleotides in length) of mature miRNA molecules makes them very attractive targets for drug development. It may be possible to restore normal levels of mature forms of dysregulated miRNAs in disease states and provide therapeutic benefits to the host by appropriately regulating the level of expression of their target genes. A variety of delivery approaches have been used to deliver miRNA precursors into cells to overexpress miRNAs of interest in vitro (Hu et al., ; Kota et al., ). In vivo studies have been performed in mice to test the therapeutic potential of miRNAs. Intranasal administration of cholesterol-conjugated anti-miR-126 to the asthmatic mice resulted in reduced airway disease characterized by decreased T-helper-2 cytokine production, decreased airway hyperresponsiveness and muscus hypersecretion, and a reduction in airway-infiltrating eosinophils and neutrophils compared to control-treated asthmatic mice (Mattes et al., ). Other means of delivery of antisense miRNAs has also been successful. Inhibition of miR-122 by systemic administration of a miR-122 antisense oligonucleotide reduced plasma cholesterol levels and decreased hepatic fatty acid and cholesterol synthesis rates in normal mice. Therapeutic administration of anti-miR-122 also reduced levels of triglycerides and improved hepatic steatosis in diet-induced obese mice (Esau et al., ). Mice appeared healthy after one month of antisense therapy. The lack of obvious toxicity further cements the potential of miRNAs as therapeutic molecules.
The potential for use of miRNAs against cancer has been extensively studied. A recent study using plasmid-expressed miR-155 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells demonstrated decreased expression of manganese superoxide dismutase in miR-155 overexpressing CNE1 cells and reduced resistance to ionizing radiation (Du et al., ). In vivo administration of a lentivirus-expressing miR-26a resulted in inhibited tumorigenicity of nasopharyngeal cells in nude mice (Lu et al., ). Systemic delivery of synthetic miR-16 reduced the growth of metastatic prostate tumors by downregulating multiple cell-cycle genes in a prostate cancer xenograft model (Takeshita et al., 2010). Let-7 miRNAs are proposed to function as tumor suppressors by negatively regulating multiple oncogenes (RAS, MYC, HMGA2) and cell-cycle promoters (CDC25A, CDK6, CCND2; Johnson et al., ; Mayr et al., ). Administration of let-7 miRNA prevented tumor formation in a mouse model of non-small cell lung cancer (Kumar et al., ). Intratumoral injection of synthetic let-7b miRNA significantly reduced tumor growth, induced necrotic cores in the tumors, and reduced NRAS and CDK6 expression in tumors in a mouse model of lung cancer (Trang et al., 2010). Such approaches to manipulate the expression of miRNA targets in the context of disease are currently being explored in clinical trials (Kasinski and Slack, ).
Exosomal Shuttle miRNAs
A recent breakthrough in exosome biology is that RNA molecules, in particular, miRNAs, are present in these vesicles. To date, studies have demonstrated that miRNAs in exosomes can influence target cell function (Kosaka et al., ; Mittelbrunn et al., ). Hunter et al. () identified miRNAs expressed in circulating plasma microvesicles from normal subjects, providing the basis for future work examining the predictive role of peripheral blood miRNA signatures in human disease, as well as defining the biological processes regulated by particular miRNAs. Koh et al. demonstrated that miRNAs are also found in the extracellular environment of human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hES-MSC). Significant differences in expression profile of miRNAs in the intracellular and extracellular environment of hES-MSC cultures were identified. Interestingly, the let-7 miRNA family is highly expressed in both intra- and extra-cellular samples of hES-MSC (Koh et al., ). Advances in miRNA array techniques have provided significant advances in miRNA profiling of exosomes. Exosomes contain a substantial amount of small RNAs, but little or no ribosomal RNA compared to the levels observed in the donor cells (Valadi et al., 2007). Moreover, selective packaging of miRNAs into exosomes appears to occur, as the miRNA profiles in exosomes do not reflect the miRNA profiles observed in the parental cells (Valadi et al., 2007; Skog et al., 2008; Taylor and Gercel-Taylor, 2008; Rabinowits et al., 2009; Mittelbrunn et al., ). Exosomes isolated from T cells, B cells, and dendritic cells had miRNA expression profiles unique from their parent cells. The authors also demonstrated that there was antigen-driven unidirectional transfer of miRNAs from the T cell to the APC mediated by CD63+ exosomes (Mittelbrunn et al., ). The mechanism for the selective packaging of RNAs into exosomes is unclear. Compared to cellular RNAs, exosomal RNAs are more stable (Keller et al., ), and are reportedly resistant to degradation during prolonged storage and freeze/thaw cycles (Reid et al., 2011). The stability of the contents of these membrane-bound structures adds to the attractiveness of exosomes as biomarkers of cancer and other diseases.
Exosomal miRNAs have been implicated in many of exosome-mediated biological functions (Wang et al., 2010). Exosomes derived from a human (HMC-1) and mouse (MC/9) mast cell lines transport RNA to neighboring mast cells, impacting the function of the recipient mast cells (Valadi et al., 2007; Schorey and Bhatnagar, 2008). Impairment of exosome production reduces the transfer of miRNAs to APCs. The miRNAs transferred at the immune synapse are functional and can alter gene expression in the recipient APCs (Mittelbrunn et al., ). Together, the current data make a strong case for role of exosomally-derived miRNAs as mediators of cell function.
Exosomal miRNAs as Biomarkers of Disease
Aberrant expression of miRNAs has been identified in numerous diseases (Table 1). In addition, exosomal miRNAs are considered as biomarkers for many pathological states (Michael et al., ; Ciesla et al., ). Exosomes from diseased individuals contain miRNAs not found in normal, healthy subjects (Taylor and Gercel-Taylor, 2008; Rabinowits et al., 2009). Many miRNAs, including virus miRNAs, are in exosomes. Nevertheless, it is unknown how exosomal miRNAs function in the recipient cells. Exosomes released from Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-infected B95-8 LCL cells were identified in monocyte-derived dendritic cells, resulting in gene silencing in recipient cells (Pegtel et al., 2010). Furthermore, exosomal-loaded viral miRNAs suggest that exosome may serve as a vesicle to contribute to disease spread or pathogenesis (Meckes et al., ; Pegtel et al., 2011). Interestingly, macrophages have been shown to influence the invasiveness of breast cancer cells through exosome-mediated delivery of oncogenic miRNAs from the macrophages to the cancerous cells (Yang et al., 2011). Exosomes released from dendritic cells can fuse with the target dendritic cells and release their contents into the target cells, resulting in mRNA silencing (Montecalvo et al., 2012). A recent report from the Lim group demonstrated that miRNA-containing stroma-derived exosomes contribute to B cell quiescence. The transfer of miRNAs from bone marrow stroma to B cells may participate in dormancy of bone marrow metastases (Lim et al., ).
Table 1
| Exosomal miRNAs | Pathological conditions | Potential pathological significance | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| miR-23a, 132, 181a, 215, 362-5p, 375, 513a-3p, 523 | Ovarian FF from estrous mares | Biomarker; oocyte growth and maturation | da Silveira et al. () |
| miR-20b, 22, 23b, 24, 135a, 135b, 152, 181c, 197, 223, 320a, 323-5p, 378, 433 | Ovarian FF from estrous mares | Biomarker; oocyte growth and maturation | da Silveira et al. () |
| miR-25, 188-5p, 192, 320b, 320c | Ovarian FF from estrous mares | Biomarker; oocyte growth and maturation | da Silveira et al. () |
| miR-223 | Human MDM and breast cancer cell lines, SKBR3 and MDA-MB-231 | Regulate the invasiveness of breast cancer cells | Yang et al. (2011) |
| miR-584, 517c, 378, 520f, 142-5p, 451, 518d, 215, 376a, 133b, 367 | HCC Hep3B, Human HCC cell line | Multiple oncogenic or tumor suppressor genes | Kogure et al. () |
| miR-142-5p, 15a, 129, 101, 296, 145, 361, 23b, 23a, 100, 99b, 324-5p, 30a-5p, 7, 15b, 27b, 615, 218, 328, 10a, 222, 342, 125a, 572, 149, 30d, 451, 25, let-7a, let-7c, let-7b, let-7f | Human CD105 + and CD105- renal carcinomas cells | Angiogenic switch and coordinating metastatic diffusion, downregulated in CD105+ exosome | Grange et al. () |
| miR-200c, 146a, 184, 335, 646, 449b, 650, 141, 183, 19b, 29c, 182, 19a, 92, 301, 151, 130b, 22, 186, 140, 486, 26b, 29a, let-7g | Human CD105+ and CD105− renal carcinomas cells | Angiogenic switch and coordinating metastatic diffusion, upregulated in CD105+ exosome | Grange et al. () |
| miR-1, 133a | Patient, acute myocardial infarction | Acute myocardial infarction | Kuwabara et al. () |
| miR-335 | The human Jurkat-derived T cell lines J77cl20 and the lymphoblastoid B cell lines Raji | Downregulates target gene expression in the APC | Mittelbrunn et al. () |
| miR-16, 27a, 146b and 222 | Rat primary and differentiated adipocytes | Lipid storage (metabolic diseases) | Müller et al. (2011) |
| EBV miRNAs | C666 cell, Human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells | Manipulate the tumor microenvironment and influence neighboring cell signaling | Meckes et al. () |
| Let-7 miRNA family | AZ-P7a, Hetastatic gastric cancer cell line | Tumorigenesis and metastasis | Ohshima et al. (2010) |
| miR-486, 328, 183, 32, 574, 27b, 222, 197, 151, 17-5p, 199a*, 133b, 320, 96, 103 | PBMC | Regulate homeostasis of hematopoietic cells and of metabolic function | Hunter et al. () |
| miR-219, 579, 515-5p, 29c, 15b, 483-5p, 29a, 22, 23a, 16, 30d, 302c, 452, 646, 488, 181c | A549, Human lung adenocarcinoma epithelial cell line | Cell–cell communication | Wang et al. (2010) |
| miR-204, 219, 483-5p, 26b, 16, 30d, 22, 646, 145, 29a, 23a, 373, 199b, 342, 29a | HepG2, Human hepatocellular liver carcinoma cell line | Cell–cell communication | Wang et al. (2010) |
| miR-517a, 21 | BeWo, Human placenta choriocarcinoma cell line | Signal transduction | Luo et al. () |
| let-7b, let-7c*, miR-128, 150*, 17, 1908, 212, 27b*, 29b, 29c, 335, 379*, 433, 454, 483-3p, 584, 621, 652, 760, 888* | parotid saliva from Sjogren’ syndrome patient and normal volunteer | Biomarkers of the diagnosis and prognosis of various salivary gland pathologies | Michael et al. () |
| let-7b, miR-150*, 23a*, 27b*, 29b, 29c, 335, 379*, 433, 454, 483-3p, 584, 621, 652, 760, 888*, miRPIus_17824, 17841, 17848, 17858, 17824, 17841, 17848, 17858, 42487, 42526 | Parotid saliva from Sjogren’ syndrome patient and normal volunteer | Biomarkers of the diagnosis and prognosis of various salivary gland pathologies | Michael et al. () |
| miR-16, 21, 155 | HEK293, Human embryonic kidney cell line | Signaling molecules in physiological and pathological events; exerted gene silencing in the recipient cells | Kosaka et al. () |
| Let-7a, miR-15b, 16, 19b, 21, 26a, 27a, 92, 93, 320, 20 | Glioblastoma patients, Human glioblastoma cell | Diagnostic information and aid in therapeutic decisions for cancer patients | Skog et al. (2008) |
| miR-214, 140, 147, 135b, 205, 150, 149, 370, 206, 197, 634, 485-5p, 612, 608, 202, 373, 324-3p, 103, 593, 574, 483, 527, 603, 649, 18a, 595, 193b, 642, 557, 801, let-7e | Patient with ovarian disease; primary ovarian tumor cell | Diagnostic biomarkers | Taylor and Gercel-Taylor (2008) |
Exosomal miRNAs as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.
Aberrant expression of exosomal miRNAs has been found under different pathological conditions, indicating that miRNAs could be potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets. This table describes exosomal miRNAs identified under different pathological conditions and their potential pathological significance. FF, follicular fluid; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; MDM, human monocyte-derived macrophage.
The levels of specific miRNAs in certain disease states may provide insight into disease pathogenesis and/or potential mechanisms of repair. miR-133a levels are elevated in circulating exosomes derived from injured myocardium in patients with cardiovascular diseases (Kuwabara et al., ). In addition, miR-133a is implicated to regulate NFATc4, a protein that contributes to cardiac hypertrophy (Li et al., ). Treatment with miR-133a inhibitors reduced the level of cardiac hypertrophy (Li et al., ).
Exosomal miRNA profiles of circulating tumor exosomes are unique from those in normal controls (Taylor and Gercel-Taylor, 2008). Because of this unique exosomal miRNA signature, screening tests utilizing circulating exosomal miRNAs as markers of disease might be used to identify tumor development. Unique miRNA profiles have been described in exosomes from patients with lung cancer, glioblastoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (Rabinowits et al., 2009). In cancer, a variety of processes are impacted by exosomal miRNAs. While in cases such as lung adenocarcinoma, the miRNA signatures are different between cancer patients and normal controls, the exosome-loaded miRNAs are similar in nature to the miRNAs isolated from the tumors. In the case of hepatocellular carcinoma, some of the miRNAs transferred by exosomes can downregulate transforming growth factor-β activated kinase-1 (TAK1) pathway in hepatocarcinogenesis. This finding suggests that miRNAs from the exosomes may be involved in the local spread, intrahepatic metastases, or multifocal growth in hepatocellular carcinoma (Kogure et al., ). Liu et al. () has demonstrated that tumor-derived exosomes are pivotal in promoting tumor metastasis via a proinflammatory cytokine-driven expansion of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via the MyD88 pathway. Taken together, current exosomal miRNA studies have opened a new window for the development of biomarkers for important human diseases.
Therapeutic Potential of Targeting Exosomal miRNAs
Due to their ability to efficiently shuttle small molecules between cells, exosomes are an extremely promising therapeutic tool for numerous diseases. Alternatively, because of the pathogenic significance of exosomal miRNAs in an array of diseases, drug development focusing on targeting the release of exosomal miRNA contents has begun. The use of exosomes as therapeutic delivery vehicles covers a wide array of diseases, including but not limited to cancer, virus-induced diseases, and parasitic diseases. Of particular note, the Wood laboratory successfully expressed Lamp2b, an exosomal membrane protein, fused to a neuron-penetrating RVG peptide in the dendritic cells isolated from mice. Exosomes released from these cells were loaded with exogenous siRNA to GAPDH by electroporation. Intravenously injected RVG-targeted exosomes delivered GAPDH siRNA specifically to neurons, microglia, oligodendrocytes in the brain, resulting in a specific gene knockdown (Alvarez-Erviti et al., ). Akao et al. reported that chemically modified miRNAs (i.e., miR-143BPs) are detectable in exosomes secreted from THP-1 macrophages following miR-143BP transfection. More importantly, increased miR-143BP levels were detected in the serum, tumor, and kidney of the host animals when the mice were intravenously injected with the THP-1 macrophages transfected with miR-143BP (Akao et al., ). These data suggest that manipulating exosomal miRNAs ex vivo may be an efficient tool to deliver miRNAs to target specific organs. Exosomes have also been utilized successfully to deliver siRNAs to specific cell types in vivo in mice (van den Boorn et al., 2011). Thus far, studies on manipulation of exosomal miRNAs are primarily in animal models and the clinical application of this work is unclear, although it is obvious that, (1) exosomes could serve as targets of therapy and (2), delivery miRNAs to target cells through exosomes is feasible. Therefore, functional manipulation of miRNAs in exosomes and in vivo delivery of exosomal miRNAs would be novel targets for therapeutic intervention for a variety of human diseases. With the advance of technology that allows us to manipulate the miRNA contents in exosomes as well as exosomal membrane proteins, the future studies on exosomal miRNAs will benefit all patients by providing efficient diagnosis and disease-specific therapy.
Conclusion and Perspectives
Currently, ExoCarta (Version 3.1) contains information on 11,261 protein entries, 2375 mRNA entries, and 764 miRNA entries that were obtained from 134 exosomal studies (Mathivanan et al., ). There are several advantages for the use of exosomes/microvesicles to deliver information to a target cell. Exosomes can shuttle mRNAs and miRNAs directly to recipient cells which increases the likelihood that this information will alter the function of target cells. The release of exosomes allows cell–cell communication regardless of the distance between the cells. Exosomes have been identified in body fluids and blood, indicating that this exchange of information between organs may occur via exosomes (Qazi et al., 2010). Additionally, exosomes may contain cell-specific factors that allow the exosomes to target specific cells for delivery of the exosomal contents (proteins, mRNAs, miRNAs, and DNAs) to recipient cells with a high degree of efficiency. Exosomal miRNAs may reflect disease specific-aberrations. Emerging evidence supports the hypothesis that disease diagnosis can occur by examining levels of miRNA in exosomes isolated from body fluids. Finally, manipulation of the miRNAs within exosomes may provide an effective tool to target therapy to specific cells and organs.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 31101809 (to Guoku Hu), the National Institute of Health AI095532, and Tobacco Settlement Foundation of Nebraska LB506 and CU LB595 (to Xian-Ming Chen).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbusamraA. J.ZhongZ.ZhengX.LiM.IchimT. E.ChinJ. L.MinW. P. (2005). Tumor exosomes expressing Fas ligand mediate CD8+ T-cell apoptosis. Blood Cells Mol. Dis.35, 169–173.10.1016/j.bcmd.2005.07.001
2
AkaoY.IioA.ItohT.NoguchiS.ItohY.OhtsukiY.NaoeT. (2011). Microvesicle-mediated RNA molecule delivery system using monocytes/macrophages. Mol. Ther.19, 395–399.10.1038/mt.2010.254
3
AldersonM. R.ToughT. W.Davis-SmithT.BraddyS.FalkB.SchooleyK. A.GoodwinR. G.SmithC. A.RamsdellF.LynchD. H. (1995). Fas ligand mediates activation-induced cell death in human T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med.181, 71–77.10.1084/jem.181.1.71
4
Alvarez-ErvitiL.SeowY.YinH.BettsC.LakhalS.WoodM. J. (2011). Delivery of siRNA to the mouse brain by systemic injection of targeted exosomes. Nat. Biotechnol.29, 341–345.10.1038/nbt.1807
5
BakhtiM.WinterC.SimonsM. (2011). Inhibition of myelin membrane sheath formation by oligodendrocyte-derived exosome-like vesicles. J. Biol. Chem.286, 787–796.10.1074/jbc.M110.190009
6
BartelD. P. (2004). MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell116, 281–297.10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00045-5
7
BartelD. P. (2009). MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell136, 215–233.10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.002
8
BentwichI.AvnielA.KarovY.AharonovR.GiladS.BaradO.BarzilaiA.EinatP.EinavU.MeiriE.SharonE.SpectorY.BentwichZ. (2005). Identification of hundreds of conserved and nonconserved human microRNAs. Nat. Genet.37, 766–770.10.1038/ng1590
9
BhatnagarS.SchoreyJ. S. (2007). Exosomes released from infected macrophages contain Mycobacterium avium glycopeptidolipids and are proinflammatory. J. Biol. Chem.282, 25779–25789.10.1074/jbc.M702277200
10
BuckleyN. J.JohnsonR.ZuccatoC.BithellA.CattaneoE. (2010). The role of REST in transcriptional and epigenetic dysregulation in Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis.39, 28–39.10.1016/j.nbd.2010.02.003
11
BuschowS. I.Van BalkomB. W.AalbertsM.HeckA. J.WaubenM.StoorvogelW. (2010). MHC class II-associated proteins in B-cell exosomes and potential functional implications for exosome biogenesis. Immunol. Cell Biol.88, 851–856.10.1038/icb.2010.64
12
ChenJ. F.MurchisonE. P.TangR.CallisT. E.TatsuguchiM.DengZ.RojasM.HammondS. M.SchneiderM. D.SelzmanC. H.MeissnerG.PattersonC.HannonG. J.WangD. Z. (2008). Targeted deletion of Dicer in the heart leads to dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 2111–2116.10.1073/pnas.0803391105
13
ChenX.SongC. H.FengB. S.LiT. L.LiP.ZhengP. Y.ChenX. M.XingZ.YangP. C. (2011). Intestinal epithelial cell-derived integrin {alpha}{beta}6 plays an important role in the induction of regulatory T cells and inhibits an antigen-specific Th2 response. J. Leukoc. Biol.90, 751–759.10.1189/jlb.0111006
14
CieslaM.SkrzypekK.KozakowskaM.LobodaA.JozkowiczA.DulakJ. (2011). MicroRNAs as biomarkers of disease onset. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.401, 2051–2061.10.1007/s00216-011-5001-8
15
CocucciE.RacchettiG.MeldolesiJ. (2009). Shedding microvesicles: artefacts no more. Trends Cell Biol.19, 43–51.10.1016/j.tcb.2008.11.003
16
da SilveiraJ. C.VeeramachaneniD. N.WingerQ. A.CarnevaleE. M.BoumaG. J. (2012). Cell-secreted vesicles in equine ovarian follicular fluid contain miRNAs and proteins: a possible new form of cell communication within the ovarian follicle. Biol. Reprod.86, 71.10.1095/biolreprod.111.093252
17
DuZ. M.HuL. F.WangH. Y.YanL. X.ZengY. X.ShaoJ. Y.ErnbergI. (2011). Upregulation of MiR-155 in nasopharyngeal carcinoma is partly driven by LMP1 and LMP2A and downregulates a negative prognostic marker JMJD1A. PLoS ONE6: e19137.10.1371/journal.pone.0019137
18
EsauC.DavisS.MurrayS. F.YuX. X.PandeyS. K.PearM.WattsL.BootenS. L.GrahamM.MckayR.SubramaniamA.ProppS.LolloB. A.FreierS.BennettC. F.BhanotS.MoniaB. P. (2006). miR-122 regulation of lipid metabolism revealed by in vivo antisense targeting. Cell Metab.3, 87–98.10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.005
19
FukudaR.McnewJ. A.WeberT.ParlatiF.EngelT.NickelW.RothmanJ. E.SollnerT. H. (2000). Functional architecture of an intracellular membrane t-SNARE. Nature407, 198–202.10.1038/35025084
20
GaoJ.WangW. Y.MaoY. W.GraffJ.GuanJ. S.PanL.MakG.KimD.SuS. C.TsaiL. H. (2010). A novel pathway regulates memory and plasticity via SIRT1 and miR-134. Nature466, 1105–1109.10.1038/nature09271
21
GonzalesP. A.PisitkunT.HoffertJ. D.TchapyjnikovD.StarR. A.KletaR.WangN. S.KnepperM. A. (2009). Large-scale proteomics and phosphoproteomics of urinary exosomes. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.20, 363–379.10.1681/ASN.2008040406
22
GrangeC.TapparoM.CollinoF.VitilloL.DamascoC.DeregibusM. C.TettaC.BussolatiB.CamussiG. (2011). Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung premetastatic niche. Cancer Res.71, 5346–5356.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0241
23
GuoC. J.LiY.TianS.WangX.DouglasS. D.HoW. Z. (2002). Morphine enhances HIV infection of human blood mononuclear phagocytes through modulation of beta-chemokines and CCR5 receptor. J. Investig. Med.50, 435–442.10.2310/6650.2002.32503
24
HoganM. C.ManganelliL.WoollardJ. R.MasyukA. I.MasyukT. V.TammachoteR.HuangB. Q.LeontovichA. A.BeitoT. G.MaddenB. J.CharlesworthM. C.TorresV. E.LarussoN. F.HarrisP. C.WardC. J. (2009). Characterization of PKD protein-positive exosome-like vesicles. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.20, 278–288.10.1681/ASN.2008060564
25
HsuC.MorohashiY.YoshimuraS.Manrique-HoyosN.JungS.LauterbachM. A.BakhtiM.GronborgM.MobiusW.RheeJ.BarrF. A.SimonsM. (2010). Regulation of exosome secretion by Rab35 and its GTPase-activating proteins TBC1D10A-C. J. Cell Biol.189, 223–232.10.1083/jcb.200911018
26
HuG.ZhouR.LiuJ.GongA. Y.EischeidA. N.DittmanJ. W.ChenX. M. (2009). MicroRNA-98 and let-7 confer cholangiocyte expression of cytokine-inducible Src homology 2-containing protein in response to microbial challenge. J. Immunol.183, 1617–1624.10.4049/jimmunol.0902181
27
HunterM. P.IsmailN.ZhangX.AgudaB. D.LeeE. J.YuL.XiaoT.SchaferJ.LeeM. L.SchmittgenT. D.Nana-SinkamS. P.JarjouraD.MarshC. B. (2008). Detection of microRNA expression in human peripheral blood microvesicles. PLoS ONE3: e3694.10.1371/journal.pone.0003694
28
IchimT. E.ZhongZ.KaushalS.ZhengX.RenX.HaoX.JoyceJ. A.HanleyH. H.RiordanN. H.KoropatnickJ.BoginV.MinevB. R.MinW. P.TullisR. H. (2008). Exosomes as a tumor immune escape mechanism: possible therapeutic implications. J. Transl. Med.6, 37.10.1186/1479-5876-6-37
29
JiangQ.WangY.HaoY.JuanL.TengM.ZhangX.LiM.WangG.LiuY. (2009). miR2Disease: a manually curated database for microRNA deregulation in human disease. Nucleic Acids Res.37, D98–D104.10.1093/nar/gkp480
30
JohnsonR.ZuccatoC.BelyaevN. D.GuestD. J.CattaneoE.BuckleyN. J. (2008). A microRNA-based gene dysregulation pathway in Huntington’s disease. Neurobiol. Dis.29, 438–445.10.1016/j.nbd.2007.11.001
31
JohnsonS. M.GrosshansH.ShingaraJ.ByromM.JarvisR.ChengA.LabourierE.ReinertK. L.BrownD.SlackF. J. (2005). RAS is regulated by the let-7 microRNA family. Cell120, 635–647.10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.014
32
KasinskiA. L.SlackF. J. (2011). MicroRNAs en route to the clinic: progress in validating and targeting microRNAs for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer11, 849–864.10.1038/nrc3166
33
KellerS.RidingerJ.RuppA. K.JanssenJ. W.AltevogtP. (2011). Body fluid derived exosomes as a novel template for clinical diagnostics. J. Transl. Med.9, 86.10.1186/1479-5876-9-86
34
KogureT.LinW. L.YanI. K.BraconiC.PatelT. (2011). Intercellular nanovesicle-mediated microRNA transfer: A mechanism of environmental modulation of hepatocellular cancer cell growth. Hepatology54, 1237–1248.10.1002/hep.24504
35
KohW.ShengC. T.TanB.LeeQ. Y.KuznetsovV.KiangL. S.TanavdeV. (2010). Analysis of deep sequencing microRNA expression profile from human embryonic stem cells derived mesenchymal stem cells reveals possible role of let-7 microRNA family in downstream targeting of hepatic nuclear factor 4 alpha. BMC Genomics11(Suppl. 1), S6.10.1186/1471-2164-11-S5-S6
36
KosakaN.IguchiH.YoshiokaY.TakeshitaF.MatsukiY.OchiyaT. (2010). Secretory mechanisms and intercellular transfer of microRNAs in living cells. J. Biol. Chem.285, 17442–17452.10.1074/jbc.M110.107821
37
KotaJ.ChivukulaR. R.O’donnellK. A.WentzelE. A.MontgomeryC. L.HwangH. W.ChangT. C.VivekanandanP.TorbensonM.ClarkK. R.MendellJ. R.MendellJ. T. (2009). Therapeutic microRNA delivery suppresses tumorigenesis in a murine liver cancer model. Cell137, 1005–1017.10.1016/j.cell.2009.04.021
38
KrolJ.LoedigeI.FilipowiczW. (2010). The widespread regulation of microRNA biogenesis, function and decay. Nat. Rev. Genet.11, 597–610.
39
KumarM. S.ErkelandS. J.PesterR. E.ChenC. Y.EbertM. S.SharpP. A.JacksT. (2008). Suppression of non-small cell lung tumor development by the let-7 microRNA family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.105, 3903–3908.10.1073/pnas.0711480105
40
KuwabaraY.OnoK.HorieT.NishiH.NagaoK.KinoshitaM.WatanabeS.BabaO.KojimaY.ShizutaS.ImaiM.TamuraT.KitaT.KimuraT. (2011). Increased microRNA-1 and microRNA-133a levels in serum of patients with cardiovascular disease indicate myocardial damage. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet.4, 446–454.10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958975
41
LaulagnierK.MottaC.HamdiS.RoyS.FauvelleF.PageauxJ. F.KobayashiT.SallesJ. P.PerretB.BonnerotC.RecordM. (2004). Mast cell- and dendritic cell-derived exosomes display a specific lipid composition and an unusual membrane organization. Biochem. J.380, 161–171.10.1042/BJ20031594
42
LiQ.LinX.YangX.ChangJ. (2010). NFATc4 is negatively regulated in miR-133a-mediated cardiomyocyte hypertrophic repression. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.298, H1340–H1347.10.1152/ajpheart.00592.2009
43
LimP. K.BlissS. A.PatelS. A.TaborgaM.DaveM. A.GregoryL. A.GrecoS. J.BryanM.PatelP. S.RameshwarP. (2011). Gap junction-mediated import of microRNA from bone marrow stromal cells can elicit cell cycle quiescence in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res.71, 1550–1560.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2015
44
LiuY.XiangX.ZhuangX.ZhangS.LiuC.ChengZ.MichalekS.GrizzleW.ZhangH. G. (2010). Contribution of MyD88 to the tumor exosome-mediated induction of myeloid derived suppressor cells. Am. J. Pathol.176, 2490–2499.10.2353/ajpath.2010.090777
45
LuJ.HeM. L.WangL.ChenY.LiuX.DongQ.ChenY. C.PengY.YaoK. T.KungH. F.LiX. P. (2011). MiR-26a inhibits cell growth and tumorigenesis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma through repression of EZH2. Cancer Res.71, 225–233.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-2460
46
LuiW. O.PourmandN.PattersonB. K.FireA. (2007). Patterns of known and novel small RNAs in human cervical cancer. Cancer Res.67, 6031–6043.10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0561
47
LuoS. S.IshibashiO.IshikawaG.IshikawaT.KatayamaA.MishimaT.TakizawaT.ShigiharaT.GotoT.IzumiA.OhkuchiA.MatsubaraS.TakeshitaT. (2009). Human villous trophoblasts express and secrete placenta-specific microRNAs into maternal circulation via exosomes. Biol. Reprod.81, 717–729.10.1095/biolreprod.108.075481
48
MasyukA. I.HuangB. Q.WardC. J.GradiloneS. A.BanalesJ. M.MasyukT. V.RadtkeB.SplinterP. L.LarussoN. F. (2010). Biliary exosomes influence cholangiocyte regulatory mechanisms and proliferation through interaction with primary cilia. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.299, G990–G999.10.1152/ajpgi.00093.2010
49
MathivananS.FahnerC. J.ReidG. E.SimpsonR. J. (2011). ExoCarta 2012: database of exosomal proteins, RNA and lipids. Nucleic Acids Res.40, D1241–D1244.10.1093/nar/gkr828
50
MattesJ.CollisonA.PlankM.PhippsS.FosterP. S. (2009). Antagonism of microRNA-126 suppresses the effector function of TH2 cells and the development of allergic airways disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.106, 18704–18709.10.1073/pnas.0905063106
51
MayrC.HemannM. T.BartelD. P. (2007). Disrupting the pairing between let-7 and Hmga2 enhances oncogenic transformation. Science315, 1576–1579.10.1126/science.1137999
52
MeckesD. G.Jr.ShairK. H.MarquitzA. R.KungC. P.EdwardsR. H.Raab-TraubN. (2010). Human tumor virus utilizes exosomes for intercellular communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 20370–20375.10.1073/pnas.1014194107
53
MenciaA.Modamio-HoybjorS.RedshawN.MorinM.Mayo-MerinoF.OlavarrietaL.AguirreL. A.Del CastilloI.SteelK. P.DalmayT.MorenoF.Moreno-PelayoM. A. (2009). Mutations in the seed region of human miR-96 are responsible for nonsyndromic progressive hearing loss. Nat. Genet.41, 609–613.10.1038/ng.355
54
MichaelA.BajracharyaS. D.YuenP. S.ZhouH.StarR. A.IlleiG. G.AlevizosI. (2010). Exosomes from human saliva as a source of microRNA biomarkers. Oral. Dis.16, 34–38.10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01604.x
55
Minones-MoyanoE.PortaS.EscaramisG.RabionetR.IraolaS.KagerbauerB.Espinosa-ParrillaY.FerrerI.EstivillX.MartiE. (2011). MicroRNA profiling of Parkinson’s disease brains identifies early downregulation of miR-34b/c which modulate mitochondrial function. Hum. Mol. Genet.20, 3067–3078.10.1093/hmg/ddr210
56
MittelbrunnM.Gutierrez-VazquezC.Villarroya-BeltriC.GonzalezS.Sanchez-CaboF.GonzalezM. A.BernadA.Sanchez-MadridF. (2011). Unidirectional transfer of microRNA-loaded exosomes from T cells to antigen-presenting cells. Nat. Commun.2, 282.10.1038/ncomms1285
57
MontecalvoA.LarreginaA. T.ShufeskyW. J.Beer StolzD.SullivanM. L.KarlssonJ. M.BatyC. J.GibsonG. A.ErdosG.WangZ.MilosevicJ.TkachevaO. A.DivitoS. J.JordanR.Lyons-WeilerJ.WatkinsS. C.MorelliA. E. (2012). Mechanism of transfer of functional microRNAs between mouse dendritic cells via exosomes. Blood119, 756–766.10.1182/blood-2011-02-338004
58
MüllerG.SchneiderM.Biemer-DaubG.WiedS. (2011). Microvesicles released from rat adipocytes and harboring glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins transfer RNA stimulating lipid synthesis. Cell. Signal.23, 1207–1223.10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.03.013
59
O’ConnellJ.BennettM. W.O’sullivanG. C.RocheD.KellyJ.CollinsJ. K.ShanahanF. (1998). Fas ligand expression in primary colon adenocarcinomas: evidence that the Fas counterattack is a prevalent mechanism of immune evasion in human colon cancer. J. Pathol.186, 240–246.10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199811)186:3<240::AID-PATH173>3.3.CO;2-C
60
O’NeillL. A.SheedyF. J.MccoyC. E. (2011). MicroRNAs: the fine-tuners of Toll-like receptor signalling. Nat. Rev. Immunol.11, 163–175.10.1038/nri2957
61
OhshimaK.InoueK.FujiwaraA.HatakeyamaK.KantoK.WatanabeY.MuramatsuK.FukudaY.OguraS.YamaguchiK.MochizukiT. (2010). Let-7 microRNA family is selectively secreted into the extracellular environment via exosomes in a metastatic gastric cancer cell line. PloS ONE5, e13247.10.1371/journal.pone.0013247
62
OstrowskiM.CarmoN. B.KrumeichS.FangetI.RaposoG.SavinaA.MoitaC. F.SchauerK.HumeA. N.FreitasR. P.GoudB.BenarochP.HacohenN.FukudaM.DesnosC.SeabraM. C.DarchenF.AmigorenaS.MoitaL. F.TheryC. (2010). Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nat. Cell Biol.12, 19–30; sup pp. 11–13.10.1038/ncb2000
63
PanB. T.JohnstoneR. M. (1983). Fate of the transferrin receptor during maturation of sheep reticulocytes in vitro: selective externalization of the receptor. Cell33, 967–978.10.1016/0092-8674(83)90040-5
64
PegtelD. M.CosmopoulosK.Thorley-LawsonD. A.Van EijndhovenM. A.HopmansE. S.LindenbergJ. L.De GruijlT. D.WurdingerT.MiddeldorpJ. M. (2010). Functional delivery of viral miRNAs via exosomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 6328–6333.10.1073/pnas.0914843107
65
PegtelD. M.Van De GardeM. D.MiddeldorpJ. M. (2011). Viral miRNAs exploiting the endosomal-exosomal pathway for intercellular cross-talk and immune evasion. Biochim. Biophys. Acta1809, 715–721.
66
PengP.YanY.KengS. (2011). Exosomes in the ascites of ovarian cancer patients: origin and effects on anti-tumor immunity. Oncol. Rep.25, 749–762.
67
QaziK. R.Torregrosa ParedesP.DahlbergB.GrunewaldJ.EklundA.GabrielssonS. (2010). Proinflammatory exosomes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of patients with sarcoidosis. Thorax65, 1016–1024.10.1136/thx.2009.132027
68
RabinowitsG.Gercel-TaylorC.DayJ. M.TaylorD. D.KloeckerG. H. (2009). Exosomal microRNA: a diagnostic marker for lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer10, 42–46.10.3816/CLC.2009.n.006
69
RaposoG.NijmanH. W.StoorvogelW.LiejendekkerR.HardingC. V.MeliefC. J.GeuzeH. J. (1996). B lymphocytes secrete antigen-presenting vesicles. J. Exp. Med.183, 1161–1172.10.1084/jem.183.3.1161
70
RecordM.SubraC.Silvente-PoirotS.PoirotM. (2011). Exosomes as intercellular signalosomes and pharmacological effectors. Biochem. Pharmacol.81, 1171–1182.10.1016/j.bcp.2011.02.011
71
ReidG.KirschnerM. B.Van ZandwijkN. (2011). Circulating microRNAs: Association with disease and potential use as biomarkers. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol.80, 193–208.10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.11.004
72
RuppA. K.RuppC.KellerS.BraseJ. C.EhehaltR.FogelM.MoldenhauerG.MarmeF.SultmannH.AltevogtP. (2011). Loss of EpCAM expression in breast cancer derived serum exosomes: role of proteolytic cleavage. Gynecol. Oncol.122, 437–446.10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.035
73
SchoreyJ. S.BhatnagarS. (2008). Exosome function: from tumor immunology to pathogen biology. Traffic9, 871–881.10.1111/j.1600-0854.2008.00734.x
74
SilvermanJ. M.ClosJ.De’oliveiraC. C.ShirvaniO.FangY.WangC.FosterL. J.ReinerN. E. (2010). An exosome-based secretion pathway is responsible for protein export from Leishmania and communication with macrophages. J. Cell. Sci.123, 842–852.10.1242/jcs.056465
75
SilvermanJ. M.ReinerN. E. (2011). Exosomes and other microvesicles in infection biology: organelles with unanticipated phenotypes. Cell. Microbiol.13, 1–9.10.1111/j.1462-5822.2010.01537.x
76
SkogJ.WurdingerT.Van RijnS.MeijerD. H.GaincheL.Sena-EstevesM.CurryW. T.Jr.CarterB. S.KrichevskyA. M.BreakefieldX. O. (2008). Glioblastoma microvesicles transport RNA and proteins that promote tumour growth and provide diagnostic biomarkers. Nat. Cell Biol.10, 1470–1476.10.1038/ncb1800
77
SudhofT. C.RothmanJ. E. (2009). Membrane fusion: grappling with SNARE and SM proteins. Science323, 474–477.10.1126/science.1161748
78
SuttonR. B.FasshauerD.JahnR.BrungerA. T. (1998). Crystal structure of a SNARE complex involved in synaptic exocytosis at 2.4 A resolution. Nature395, 347–353.10.1038/26412
79
TakeshitaF.PatrawalaL.OsakiM.TakahashiR. U.YamamotoY.KosakaN.KawamataM.KelnarK.BaderA. G.BrownD.OchiyaT. (2010). Systemic delivery of synthetic microRNA-16 inhibits the growth of metastatic prostate tumors via downregulation of multiple cell-cycle genes. Mol. Ther.18, 181–187.10.1038/mt.2009.207
80
TaylorD. D.Gercel-TaylorC. (2008). MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.110, 13–21.10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.04.033
81
TheryC. (2011). Exosomes: secreted vesicles and intercellular communications. F1000 Biol. Rep.3, 15.10.3410/B3-15
82
TheryC.OstrowskiM.SeguraE. (2009). Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol.9, 581–593.10.1038/nri2567
83
TiscorniaG.Izpisua BelmonteJ. C. (2010). MicroRNAs in embryonic stem cell function and fate. Genes Dev.24, 2732–2741.10.1101/gad.1982910
84
TrangP.MedinaP. P.WigginsJ. F.RuffinoL.KelnarK.OmotolaM.HomerR.BrownD.BaderA. G.WeidhaasJ. B.SlackF. J. (2010). Regression of murine lung tumors by the let-7 microRNA. Oncogene29, 1580–1587.10.1038/onc.2009.445
85
ValadiH.EkstromK.BossiosA.SjostrandM.LeeJ. J.LotvallJ. O. (2007). Exosome-mediated transfer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells. Nat. Cell Biol.9, 654–659.10.1038/ncb1596
86
van den BoornJ. G.SchleeM.CochC.HartmannG. (2011). SiRNA delivery with exosome nanoparticles. Nat. Biotechnol.29, 325–326.10.1038/nbt.1830
87
VellaL. J.SharplesR. A.LawsonV. A.MastersC. L.CappaiR.HillA. F. (2007). Packaging of prions into exosomes is associated with a novel pathway of PrP processing. J. Pathol.211, 582–590.10.1002/path.2145
88
VoliniaS.CalinG. A.LiuC. G.AmbsS.CimminoA.PetroccaF.VisoneR.IorioM.RoldoC.FerracinM.PrueittR. L.YanaiharaN.LanzaG.ScarpaA.VecchioneA.NegriniM.HarrisC. C.CroceC. M. (2006). A microRNA expression signature of human solid tumors defines cancer gene targets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.103, 2257–2261.10.1073/pnas.0510565103
89
WangK.ZhangS.WeberJ.BaxterD.GalasD. J. (2010). Export of microRNAs and microRNA-protective protein by mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res.38, 7248–7259.10.1093/nar/gkq069
90
YangM.ChenJ.SuF.YuB.LinL.LiuY.HuangJ. D.SongE. (2011). Microvesicles secreted by macrophages shuttle invasion-potentiating microRNAs into breast cancer cells. Mol. Cancer10, 117.10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-10-0438
91
YuS.LiuC.SuK.WangJ.LiuY.ZhangL.LiC.CongY.KimberlyR.GrizzleW. E.FalksonC.ZhangH. G. (2007). Tumor exosomes inhibit differentiation of bone marrow dendritic cells. J. Immunol.178, 6867–6875.
92
YuyamaK.YamamotoN.YanagisawaK. (2008). Accelerated release of exosome-associated GM1 ganglioside (GM1) by endocytic pathway abnormality: another putative pathway for GM1-induced amyloid fibril formation. J. Neurochem.105, 217–224.10.1111/j.1471-4159.2007.05128.x
93
ZhouR.O’HaraS. P.ChenX. M. (2011). MicroRNA regulation of innate immune responses in epithelial cells. Cell. Mol. Immunol.8, 371–379.10.1038/cmi.2011.27
Summary
Keywords
microRNAs, exosomes, post-transcriptional regulation, cancer, therapy
Citation
Hu G, Drescher KM and Chen X-M (2012) Exosomal miRNAs: Biological Properties and Therapeutic Potential. Front. Gene. 3:56. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00056
Received
10 January 2012
Accepted
27 March 2012
Published
20 April 2012
Volume
3 - 2012
Edited by
Michael Rossbach, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore
Reviewed by
Chris Sullivan, University of Texas at Austin, USA; Flavia Pichiorri, The Ohio State University, USA
Copyright
© 2012 Hu, Drescher and Chen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial License, which permits non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited.
*Correspondence: Xian-Ming Chen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Creighton University, Criss II, Room 529, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA. e-mail: xianmingchen@creighton.edu
This article was submitted to Frontiers in Non-Coding RNA, a specialty of Frontiers in Genetics.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.