Abstract
As an adaptive response to the overloading with misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), ER stress plays critical roles in maintaining protein homeostasis in the secretory pathway to avoid damage to the host. Such a conserved mechanism is accomplished through three well-orchestrated pathways known collectively as unfolded protein response (UPR). Persistent and pathological ER stress has been implicated in a variety of diseases in metabolic, inflammatory, and malignant conditions. Furthermore, ER stress is directly linked with inflammation through UPR pathways, which modulate transcriptional programs to induce the expression of inflammatory genes. Importantly, the inflammation induced by ER stress is directly responsible for the pathogenesis of metabolic and inflammatory diseases. In this review, we will discuss the potential signaling pathways connecting ER stress with inflammation. We will also depict the interplay between ER stress and inflammation in the pathogenesis of hepatic steatosis, inflammatory bowel diseases and colitis-associated colon cancer.
INTRODUCTION
The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is an intracellular organelle involving in folding of membrane and secreted proteins, synthesis of lipids and sterols, and maintenance of intracellular calcium homeostasis (Kleiner and Brunt, 2012; Milic and Stimac, 2012; Tuyama and Chang, 2012; Wierzbicki and Oben, 2012; ). ER chaperones, such as glucose-regulated protein of 78 kDa (GRP78) and 94 kDa (GRP94, also termed as gp96) function as a quality control system that monitors newly synthesized proteins, and ensures only correctly folded proteins to be transported out of ER (Yang and Li, 2005; Yang et al., 2007; Zhang et al., 2011; ; ; Lake et al., 2013). ER stress takes place when unfolded or misfolded proteins accumulate in the ER lumen. In response to stress conditions, ER initiates a series of unfolded protein response (UPR) signal transduction pathways, including inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1), double-stranded RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR)-like ER kinase (PERK), and activating transcription factor-6 (ATF6) pathways, eventually, leading to changes in translational and transcriptional programs (Urano et al., 2000; McGuckin et al., 2010; Schroder and Sutcliffe, 2010; ; Zha and Zhou, 2012). Cells that undergo constant ER stress include immune cells such as macrophages, plasma cells, and cells regulating metabolism such as hepatocytes, pancreatic β-cells, adipocytes, and mucosal epithelial cells. Those cells are sensitive to changes in the environments, protein traffic, and ER homeostasis (Ozcan et al., 2006; ; McAlpine et al., 2010; Schroder and Sutcliffe, 2010; Staron et al., 2010; Ye et al., 2010; ; Pfaffenbach and Lee, 2011). While UPR is an adaptive response for cells to restore ER homeostasis, severe or prolonged ER stress leads to cell death and tissue damage. Accumulating evidence indicates that ER stress is involved in various diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic diseases, inflammatory diseases, cancer, and so on.
Recently, ER stress has been recognized to induce inflammation (McGuckin et al., 2010; ; ; Osorio et al., 2014; Shenderov et al., 2014). Interestingly, many ER stress-associated diseases also display inflammatory phenotypes (McGuckin et al., 2010; ; ; Larrain and Rinella, 2012; Petrasek et al., 2012; Szabo and Csak, 2012; Wood, 2012). Inflammatory cytokines released from stressed cells may function as alarming or danger signals to communicate with other cells or to recruit immune cells. While ER stress-induced inflammation is essential for tissue remodeling, it can cause tissue damage and contributes to the pathogenesis of many inflammatory and metabolic diseases (; McGuckin et al., 2010; Malhi and Kaufman, 2011; ; ; Zha and Zhou, 2012). Inflammation can be induced directly by UPR pathways in stressed cells, or indirectly through interaction with innate immune cells. Induction of innate immunity is mediated by diverse families of Pattern Recognition Receptors (PRRs) that recognize molecular “signature” of the invading pathogens termed as pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs; Takeuchi and Akira, 2010; Kawai and Akira, 2011). Additionally, innate immune cells can be activated by various endogenous ligands from damaged or dead cells. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a major family of PRRs mainly expressed by cells of the innate immune system. TLRs can initiate distinct innate immune responses through recruitment of different MyD88 adaptor family members. Currently, at least 13 TLRs have been cloned in mammals, and each receptor is involved in the recognition of a unique set of PAMPs. Studies from our group had demonstrated that GRP94 is a master molecular chaperone in the ER for TLRs. Our results show that the function of most TLRs is dependent on the integrity of GRP94 in the ER (Yang et al., 2007; Liu and Li, 2008). In addition to TLRs, most nucleated cells are capable of sensing and responding to pathogens inside the cytoplasm via intracellular receptors including NOD-like receptors (NLRs) or RIG-I-like receptor family members, which recognize bacteria or viruses, respectively.
TLR activation triggers the recruitment of MyD88 via the Toll-interleukin-1 receptor (TIR) domain, allowing for subsequent recruitment of IL-1R associated kinase (IRAK) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor associated factor 6 (TRAF6), which leads to the activation of both the NF-κB and JNK pathways. In addition, TLRs are able to activate other signaling cascades including the PI3K, p38, and ERK pathways. Activation of these pathways leads to the expression of inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα and IL-6. Recent progress demonstrates that inflammasomes, signaling complexes essential for IL-1β production, are also involved in various inflammatory and metabolic diseases (Ting et al., 2010; ; Stienstra et al., 2011; ). Furthermore, pathogens can also induce ER stress directly or indirectly in host cells (; Merquiol et al., 2011; Muralidharan and Mandrekar, 2013; ; ; Liu and Dudley, 2014; Smith, 2014). Components of pathogen can interact with TLRs to influence cellular stress response. Martinon et al. (2010) showed that stimulation with TLR4 or TLR2 ligands activated the UPR sensor IRE1α and its downstream target, X box-binding protein (XBP1). The authors indicated that TLR-induced IRE1/XBP1 activation was required for optimal and sustained production of proinflammatory cytokines from macrophages. Notably, XBP1-deficient mice had reduced production of inflammatory mediators and significantly increased bacterial burden when infected with intracellular pathogen Francisella tularensis. This novel finding suggests that TLR and IRE1-XBP1 pathways acted in synergy to maximize innate immune responses to pathogens. Interestingly, Woo et al. (2009, 2012) found that the ATF4/CHOP branch of ER stress signaling pathways was selectively suppressed by TLR 3 or 4 through a TRIF-dependent pathway. In mice pretreated with LPS, a TLR4 ligand, ER stress-induced CHOP expression and apoptosis in macrophages, renal tubule cells, and hepatocytes were suppressed. Accordingly, TLR engagement protected mice from ER stress-induced renal dysfunction and hepatosteatosis. Results from those studies suggest that host innate immune pathways modulate ER-stress response to enhance inflammation, thereby the host defense response, while suppress apoptosis pathways during pathogen infections. In addition to the cross-talk of TLR and UPR pathways, viral infection is frequently associated with ER stress and UPR response because of viral protein synthesis and assembly during viral life cycle. A striking example is hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, which is a strong risk factor for chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. The ER stress and inflammation induced by HCV contribute to chronic liver diseases such as hepatic steatosis and cirrhosis though further studies are needed (; Merquiol et al., 2011; ).
Since there are a number of excellent reviewers on ER stress and UPR pathways (; ; McGuckin et al., 2010; Malhi and Kaufman, 2011; Pfaffenbach and Lee, 2011; ; ; ; Logue et al., 2013; ; Smith, 2014; Zhou and Liu, 2014), this review will focus on ER stress-associated inflammation. ER stress can initiate several signaling pathways that induce inflammation, including ROS production, NF-κB pathway, JNK pathway, and autophagy (McGuckin et al., 2010; ; Pagliassotti, 2012). Experimental evidence has indicated that all three major UPR sensors are involved in inflammatory response. However, the IRE1α pathway may play a dominant role in the upregulation of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and tissue remodeling molecules. The interaction between IRE1α and TRAF2 activates NF-κB and JNK pathways, which are critical for the expression of cytokines, chemokines, and other inflammatory mediators (Urano et al., 2000; Pincus et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011; Lerner et al., 2012; Oikawa et al., 2012; Tam et al., 2012; Upton et al., 2012; Qiu et al., 2013). Our following discussion will be centered on hepatic steatosis and inflammatory bowel diseases to illustrate the interplay between ER stress and inflammation (Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
ER STRESS-INDUCED INFLAMMATION IN HEPATIC STEATOSIS
As a vital organ for protein synthesis and detoxification, liver is especially susceptible to ER stress. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a spectrum of metabolic disorders ranging from steatosis (NAFL) to steatohepatitis (NASH) to cirrhosis, is the foremost cause of non-alcoholic and non-viral liver-associated illness and death in the US (Kleiner and Brunt, 2012; Larrain and Rinella, 2012; Milic and Stimac, 2012; Pagliassotti, 2012; Tuyama and Chang, 2012; Wierzbicki and Oben, 2012; ). Hepatic steatosis or fatty liver can progress to NASH, characterized by progressive liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. NASH is also associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and liver cancer development (Kleiner and Brunt, 2012; Tuyama and Chang, 2012; Wood, 2012). While ER stress is important for maintaining liver homeostasis, dysregulated ER stress contributes to the pathogenesis of various liver diseases. Accumulating evidence suggests that the interaction between ER stress and inflammation also promote liver steatosis and injury (Malhi and Kaufman, 2011; ; Pagliassotti, 2012; Lake et al., 2013).
ER STRESS AND HEPATIC STEATOSIS
Although clinical and experimental data implicate the involvement of ER stress in liver diseases, the role and mechanism of ER stress in liver diseases remain not fully understood. A number of studies indicate that ER stress induces liver steatosis through regulating lipid synthesis and inflammation (Malhi and Kaufman, 2011; Li et al., 2012; Pagliassotti, 2012; Wierzbicki and Oben, 2012). This notion is supported by mice carrying genetic mutations of ER stress molecules, or by directly inducing ER stress in vivo via administration of chemical reagents (; ; Zhang et al., 2011; Li et al., 2012; Nagarajan et al., 2012; Petrasek et al., 2012; ; ; ). For example, Tunicamycin (TM), a widely used ER stress inducer, is a nucleoside antibiotics that blocks N-linked glycosylation, causing accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen. Injection of TM into mice results in ER stress-mediated liver steatosis and lipogenesis (Zhang et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2012a, b). These findings indicate the potential pathological role of ER stress in the development of hepatic steatosis. On the other hand, obesity and liver steatosis have been shown to induce ER stress. For instance, mice with high fat feeding not only develop hepatic steatosis, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes, but also exhibit ER stress markers in liver and other tissues (Yang et al., 2010; Zhou and Liu, 2010; ). Thus ER stress and hepatic steatosis can form a positive feedback loop to further amplify liver inflammation and injury.
Several genetic strategies have been applied to tease out the roles of ER stress and chaperones in liver steatosis. The ER chaperone protein GRP78 is a critical regulator of ER homeostasis and stress responses, because it interacts and sequesters all major UPR sensors (Ye et al., 2010; Pfaffenbach and Lee, 2011). Kammoun et al. (2009) found that overexpression of GRP78 inhibited ER stress-induced sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) expression and steatosis in the livers of obese (ob/ob) mice. Conversely, showed that GRP78 deletion led to liver fat accumulation and steatosis. Using conditional GRP78 KO mouse model, found that liver-specific deletion of GRP78 led to ER stress and apoptosis. These conditional KO mice also displayed liver injury and steatosis. Furthermore, the authors showed that liver-specific deletion of GRP78 exacerbated liver injury and/or steatosis induced by alcohol, high-fat diet, drugs, and toxins (). These findings underscore the critical role of ER tress and GRP78 in liver homeostasis and viability in normal or disease conditions.
Results from Zhang et al. (2011) also demonstrate that ER is not only important for protein quality control, but also critical for lipid synthesis and metabolism. ER stress induces hepatic steatosis through upregulation of transcriptional factors essential for lipogenesis, including CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β (C/EBPβ), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ), and SREBP. Zhang et al. (2011) showed that the most conserved UPR sensor IRE1α protected animals from ER stress-induced hepatic steatosis. To study the role of IRE1 in liver steatosis, the authors generated a hepatocyte-specific IRE1α deficient mouse line. Deletion of IRE1α gene resulted in profound hepatosteatosis and hypolipidemia in mice under conditions of ER stress induced by proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib, or partial hepatectomy (Zhang et al., 2011). Results from this study further demonstrated that IRE1α represses the expression of transcriptional factors in lipid metabolism pathways, including C/EBPβ, C/EBPδ, and PPARγ (Zhang et al., 2011). The authors proposed that IRE1 is required for maintaining hepatic lipid homeostasis under ER stress conditions.
THE INTERACTION OF IRE1 AND TRAF PROTEINS IN NF-κB ACTIVATION
IRE1α plays a critical role in transcription of inflammatory genes due to its interaction with TRAF2, which promotes NF-κB activation and inflammatory response. The TRAF family proteins are intracellular adaptors that have been extensively studied in the signaling pathways of TNFR or IL-1/TLR super-families (; Oganesyan et al., 2006; ). All TRAF family proteins (TRAF1-7) have the most conserved TRAF domains in their carboxyl terminal region, which involve in binding to different receptor cytoplasmic tails and the formation of homo- or hetero-dimers between the family members. In addition, all TRAF proteins except TRAF1 have ring fingers, which may function as E3 ubiquitin ligase. Ubiquitination has been shown to play an important role in NF-κB and other signal pathways (; Pineda et al., 2007; ). NF-κB is a homo or heterodimeric transcription factor that binds to κB sites in the promoters of a large number of genes involved in cell survival, inflammation, and immune responses (Senftleben and Karin, 2002; ). The activity of NF-κB is tightly regulated by members of the IκB family. In the classical NF-κB pathway, receptor engagement leads to the activation of the IκB kinase (IKK) complex, which includes IKKα, IKKβ, and IKKγ (NEMO). The activated IKKs phosphorylate IκBs such as IκBα, leading to subsequent ubiquitination and degradation of IκBs. This releases NF-κB and allows it to enter the nucleus and activate transcription of appropriate gene targets (Razani and Cheng, 2010; ). NF-κB dimers are composed of the five Rel family members that include NF-κB1 (p50), NF-κB2 (p52), RelA (p65), RelB, and c-Rel. The function of each individual NF-κB molecule is influenced by binding partners and other upstream molecules. Several early studies suggested that UPR sensor IRE1α and signaling molecule TRAF2 are required for activation of NF-κB in response to ER stress-inducing agents, Thapsigargin and TM. Kaneko et al. (2003) showed that ER stress-induced NF-κB activation was inhibited by a dominant-negative form of IRE1 or TRAF2. also showed that ER stress-induced NF-κB activation was impaired in IRE1α knockdown cells and IRE1 KO MEFs. The authors further demonstrated that TRAF2 provided a critical link between UPR/IRE1 signaling and downstream IKK/NF-κB activation. Biochemical experiments showed that in response to ER stress, IRE1α formed a signaling complex with IKKs though the adapter protein TRAF2 (). Although those studies suggested that the interaction of IRE1, TRAF2, and IKK plays an important role in ER stress-induced NF-κB activation, how IRE1α activates the IKK complex is poorly characterized. Furthermore, the function of IRE1 and TRAF2 in ER stress-induced NF-κB activation in vivo needs to be further explored.
ER STRESS-INDUCED INFLAMMASOME ACTIVATION
IL-1β and other IL-1 family members are major mediators in inflammation. Production of mature IL-1β is regulated by at least two signals: TLR-mediated transcriptional upregulation of pro-IL-1β gene, and inflammasomes-mediated IL-1β maturation (; Leemans et al., 2011; Rathinam et al., 2012; Wen et al., 2012). An inflammasome is a multiprotein signaling complex, composed of NOD-like protein (NLR) such as NLRP3, the adaptor apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), and caspase-1. Activation of an inflammasome triggers autoproteolytic cleavage of pro-caspase-1 into its active form, which subsequently processes pro-IL-1β into its mature form (; ; Menu and Vince, 2011; Vandanmagsar et al., 2011). Although very diverse and unrelated stimuli are found to trigger the activation of inflammasomes, the molecular mechanisms responsible for inflammasome activation remain elusive.
Recent progress suggests that inflammasomes play a critical role in a number of autoimmune and metabolic diseases. However, inflammasome activities have been shown to promote or protect liver steatosis (; Petrasek et al., 2012; Szabo and Csak, 2012; Wood, 2012). Because of the important role of both ER stress and inflammasome in inflammation, we hypothesize that ER stress and inflammasome activity are interconnected during liver injury and steatosis. While several recent studies demonstrated that ER stress induces pro-IL-1β mRNA expression or NLRP3 inflammasome activation, whether or not UPR pathways are involved in inflammasome activation remains controversial (Lerner et al., 2012; Menu et al., 2012; Oslowski et al., 2012; Shenderov et al., 2014). For instance, an early study from Tschopp’s group suggested that ER stress triggered NLRP3 inflammasome activation in THP-1 cells, a macrophage/monocyte cell line, in a mechanism that is independent of the classical ER stress signaling pathways (Lerner et al., 2012; Menu et al., 2012; Oslowski et al., 2012), whereas other groups suggested that IRE1α under irremediable ER stress induced pro-IL-1β mRNA expression via thioredoxin-interacting protein, which was also associated with programmed cell death of pancreatic β cells. Further studies in our and other laboratories are ongoing to elucidate the molecule mechanisms by which ER stress induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation and IL-1β production.
URP SIGNALING PATHWAYS INVOLVED IN LIVER INFLAMMATION
In addition to NF-κB pathway, IRE1/TRAF2 can activate other transcription factors such as AP-1, which is also important for the expression of inflammatory cytokines. PERK and ATF6 pathways have also been reported to activate NF-κB (Yamazaki et al., 2009; Nakajima et al., 2011; Tam et al., 2012); however, the mechanisms of PERK or ATF6-medaited NF-κB activation remain unknown. In addition, activation of UPR leads to the generation of ROS, which can induce inflammatory response. All these UPR pathways potentially contribute to liver steatosis and inflammation. However, the relative contribution of each pathway is unclear. Furthermore, NFALD progression is associated with increased apoptosis of hepatocytes. It has been suggested that severe or chronic ER stress can cause cell death via induction of the CHOP pathway (Nishitoh, 2012; ). The UPR pathways PERK and ATF6 branches are responsible for the activation of CHOP. IRE1 pathway can also induce cell death through either IRE1/TRAF2-mediated JNK activation or direct interaction with Bac and Bak proapoptotic proteins (Kato et al., 2012). It is possible that cell death under severe ER stress conditions leads to sterile inflammation and tissue damage in liver.
INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES (IBD)
IBD, including Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a complex intestinal tract disease involving various immune cells, epithelial cells, and intestinal microflora (Strober et al., 2007; ; ; Papatriantafyllou, 2011; ). Genetic studies have identified many genes, most related with immune response such as IL-10, TLR, NOD2, and IL-23, autophagy and ER stress, that are associated with the development of intestinal inflammation (; Van Limbergen et al., 2007; Okazaki et al., 2008; ; Sarra et al., 2010; ; ). Intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) are constantly exposed to gut microflora. One of major functions of intestinal Paneth cells and goblet cells is secretion of various factors essential for the intestinal homeostasis and host defense. Furthermore, macrophages and DCs actively produce inflammatory cytokines in response to translocated bacteria or bacterial components. Therefore, the intestinal system is highly susceptible to ER stress. The interaction of innate and microflora contributes to intestinal inflammation in both acute and chronic colitis. Several excellent studies using genetic mutant mice have highlight the critical role of ER stress in the pathogenesis of colitis.
GRP94 IN GUT HOMEOSTASIS AND INFLAMMATION
Recent studies from others and our group have demonstrated that ER HSP protein GRP94 is a critical chaperone for multiple TLRs and integrins (Yang et al., 2007). To study the role of ER chaperones in the intestinal homeostasis and inflammation, Liu et al. (2013) generated conditional GRP94 KO mice and intestinal tissue-specific GRP 94 KO mice. In the tamoxifen-inducible GRP94 KO mice, deletion of GRP94 led to rapid weight loss, diarrhea, and ultimately death 12–14 days post-tamoxifen injection. While not affecting embryo development, gut-specific deletion of GRP94 was associated with postnatal death of mutant mice. Pathological analysis demonstrated that GRP94 loss compromised the intestinal barrier function with significant intestinal dilatation, edema and hemorrhage, and thickening of the intestinal wall. The authors further demonstrated that GRP94 maintained gut homeostasis through direct regulation of canonical Wnt-signaling pathway. The results showed that GRP94 interacted with mesoderm development (MesD), an ER chaperone essential for the Wnt coreceptor low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6; Liu et al., 2013). The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway has been shown previously to be critical for intestinal homeostasis (Krausova and Korinek, 2014). Mechanistically, GRP94 deletion impaired export of LRP6 from ER to the cell surface, leading to profound loss of gut intrinsic Wnt signaling and intestinal homeostasis. This finding underscores the importance of GRP94 in chaperoning the canonical LRP6/Wnt signal pathway.
THE IRE1-XBP1 PATHWAY IN INTESTINAL HOMEOSTASIS
Several studies implicated UPR pathways in intestinal inflammation and colitis. showed that IRE1β deficient mice exhibited increased sensitivity to acute colitis induced by dextran sodium sulfate (DSS). The authors found that expression of IRE1β was restricted to the epithelium of the gastrointestinal tract. DSS treatment led to elevated levels of ER stress markers and increased severity of colitis in IRE1β KO mice, compared with WT mice (). It is unclear whether increased ER stress in IECs was caused by espousing of gut epithelial cells to microflora or by intestinal inflammation after DSS treatment. Nevertheless, these results suggest that deletion of UPR sensor IRE1β disrupted intestinal homeostasis in response to environmental challenge. IRE1 has two forms, IRE1α and IRE1β, encoded by two distinct genes. It is noteworthy that untreated IRE1β deficient mice showed no sign of intestinal inflammation histologically (). One of reasons might be the redundant role of IRE1α and IRE1β. However, whether specific deletion of IRE1α in the IECs enhances the susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis has not been reported.
The involvement of IRE1 pathway in colitis is also supported by XBP1 conditional KO mice (Kaser et al., 2008). As a ribonuclease, an important substrate of IRE1 is the mRNA for transcriptional factor XBP1. Activated IRE1 splices the XBP1 mRNA by the excision of a 26bp fragment via an unconventional splicing mechanism, generating spliced XBP1 (XBP1s; ; Upton et al., 2012). XBP1s controls the transcription of a set of UPR target genes, including chaperones, protein disulfide isomerases (PDIs), and components of ERAD, essential for the maintenance of ER function. Furthermore, XBP1 plays a critical role in the development of highly secretory cells such as plasma cells and pancreatic cells (; Sha et al., 2011). Dr. Blumberg’s group reported that mice with tissue-specific deletion of XBP1 in IECs developed spontaneous enteritis and displayed increased susceptibility to DSS-induced colitis (Kaser et al., 2008). Kaser et al. (2008) showed that mice deficient in XBP-1 in intestinal tissues displayed spontaneous intestinal inflammation characterized by immune cell infiltration, loss of crypts, and ulceration. Strikingly, deletion of XBP1 in IECs also resulted in the reduced number of Paneth and goblet cells (Kaser et al., 2008; ). A major function of Paneth cells is to secret antimicrobial peptides. Goblet cells are IECs that produce protective mucus in the microbiota–intestine interface. The diminished function or number of both cell types rendered these XBP1 deficient mice more susceptible to DSS-induced colitis. The authors also found that XBP-1 deficient intestinal tissues had increased expression of ER stress mediators such as GRP78, ATF4, and CHOP (Kaser et al., 2008). Enhanced ER stress may lead to more inflammation in response to gut microflora. In addition, upregulation of CHOP may contribute to apoptosis of Paneth cells in XBP-1 deficient mice. Thus, dysregulated ER stress in IEC compartment induces intestinal inflammation and colitis. Kaser et al. (2008) also found the association of XBP1 variants with both CD and UC, indicating XBP1 as a genetic risk factor for human IBD.
INFLAMMASOME ACTIVATION IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF COLITIS
The role of inflammasomes as well as their interaction with microbiota in intestinal inflammation is an active area of research. Up to now, a number of publications have painted a more complex picture of inflammasomes in colitis and colitis-associated colon cancer (Sands, 2007; , ; Zaki et al., 2010; ). Moreover, the interaction between ER stress pathways and inflammasomes is still yet to be established. Several studies showed that mice deficient for inflammasome components including NLRP3, ASC, and caspase-1 were highly susceptible to acute colitis induced by DSS, indicating the protective role of inflammasome in acute colitis (; ; ). However, showed that that defective in NLRP3 inflammasome protected mice from DSS-induced acute colitis, indicating that inflammasomes contribute to the development of colitis. Our recent study showed that inflammasome activation promoted the intestinal inflammation in IL-10 KO mice, which develops chronic colitis resembling human IBD. We also found that inhibition of inflammasome activities with IL-1 receptor antagonist or caspase-1 inhibitors suppressed intestinal inflammation (Zhang et al., 2014). Our data further suggest that inflammasome-derived IL-1β promoted Th17 phenotype in intestinal tissues. Those results indicate that without inhibitory effects of IL-10, the interaction between inflammasomes and microbiota leads to intestinal inflammation and the development of colitis.
ER STRESS AND INFLAMMATION IN COLITIS-ASSOCIATED COLON CANCER
Inflammation contributes to tumor initiation and progression, especially for colitis-associated colon cancer. Because of unregulated growth and hypoxia environments, ER stress is associated with tumor development. Depending on type or stage of tumor development, ER stress can enhance or suppress tumor development (; ; ; ). Moreover, Mahadevan et al. (2011) found that ER stress from stressed tumor cells could be transmitted to other neighborhood cells via un-identified heat-stable molecules. Conditioned media derived from cancer cells with ER stress could induce ER stress markers such as XBP-1, GRP78, and CHOP in macrophages, leading to production of inflammatory molecules (Mahadevan et al., 2011). It is possible that this kind of transmissible ER stress could amplify inflammation in tumor microenvironments.
Because most studies on ER stress and tumor development are focused on tumor-intrinsic stress pathways, research on ER stress and inflammation in tumor microenvironments is limited so far. Using macrophage-specific KO mice, Morales et al. (2014) showed that mice with macrophage-specific deletion of GRP94/gp96 exhibited decreased colitis and inflammation-associated colon cancer induced by DSS/AOM, with reduced expression of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6, IL-17, and IL-23. These results demonstrate the macrophage-intrinsic role of chaperone GRP96 in promoting colitis and inflammation-associated colon tumorigenesis.
Similar to its controversial role in colitis, inflammasomes also have a complex role in tumor development. A study by showed that NLRP3-deficient mice were more sensitive to colorectal tumorigenesis. The authors found that mice deficient for NLRP3 inflammasome components including NLRP3, ASC or caspase-1 had severe colitis and increased tumorigenesis in AOM/DSS colon cancer model. But NLRC4 KO mice displayed similar incidence of colitis-associated colon cancer as WT mice. The authors further demonstrated that NLRP3-inflammasome activation in bone marrow-derived cells was critical for the tumor suppression. In contrast, found that caspase-1 KO and NLRC4 KO mice, but not NLRP3 KO mice, had increased tumorigenesis in the AOM/DSS colon cancer model. Furthermore, NLR6 and NLR12 also have been shown to suppress tumor development in AOM/DSS colon cancer model (; ). A possible explanation is that inflammasome-processed IL-1 and IL-18 signaling in IECs provides protection against apoptosis of gut epithelial cells. Those studies imply that the inflammasomes may promote or suppress colon cancer development depending on experimental conditions, possibly gut microflora.
ER STRESS AND INFLAMMATION IN OTHER DISEASES
ER stress-induced inflammation is also associated with other metabolic (Kawasaki et al., 2012; Papa, 2012; Tripathi and Pandey, 2012; McAlpine and Werstuck, 2013; Zhou and Tabas, 2013; ), inflammatory (; ; Yoo et al., 2012; Qiu et al., 2013; Savic et al., 2014), neurodegenerative diseases (; ; McMahon et al., 2012; Vidal et al., 2012; ; Mercado et al., 2013; Li et al., 2014), pathogen infections (Martinon et al., 2010; Merquiol et al., 2011; Tesh, 2012; Lee et al., 2013; ; ), and cancer (Shuda et al., 2003; Kubisch and Logsdon, 2008; Romero-Ramirez et al., 2009; ; Tang et al., 2012; ; Mahoney et al., 2013; Kharabi Masouleh et al., 2014; Martin-Perez et al., 2014; Shimodaira et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2014). While this review focuses on liver steatosis and inflammatory bowl diseases, Table 1 listed various diseases where pathogenesis has directly or indirectly been linked to ER stress.
Table 1
A list of diseases linked to dysregulated ER stress.
CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES
ER stress functions as an adaptive response to maintain cell homeostasis and survival when normal protein or lipid synthesis and metabolism are perturbed. Emerging evidence indicates that ER stress is also closely associated with inflammation, in addition to its classic role in protein quality control. We propose that the IRE1/TRAF2 axis represents a major pathway to link ER stress with key transcription factors such as NF-κB that controls the expression of inflammatory cytokine genes. We also speculate that the interaction between UPR pathways and inflammasomes provides another link between ER stress and inflammation. While the activation of UPR pathways can lead to resolving the ER stress and achieving new protein homeostasis, prolonged and severe ER stress can result in cell death and tissue damage, contributing to the pathogenesis of various diseases. In both scenarios, inflammation can be induced in stressed cells and surrounding cells. In a broad term, inflammatory diseases such as IBD and hepatic steatosis are the results of interaction amongst ER stress, inflammatory cytokines, metabolism, and gut microflora (Machado and Cortez-Pinto, 2012). Similarly, ER stress and inflammation can promote or inhibit the development of colitis-associated cancer depending on genetic background, environments, and intestinal microflora. A better understanding of ER stress and inflammation may lead to identification of potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of inflammatory and metabolic diseases as well as cancer.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by NIH grants AI070603, AI077283, and HL100556 (to Zihai Li); NIAID K22 AI87707, and Hollings Cancer Center the American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant 016623-016 (Beichu Guo).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
REFERENCES
1
AbrahamC.ChoJ. H. (2009). IL-23 and autoimmunity: new insights into the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease.Annu. Rev. Med.6097–110. 10.1146/annurev.med.60.051407.123757
2
AdolphT. E.NiederreiterL.BlumbergR. S.KaserA. (2012). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and inflammation.Dig. Dis.30341–346. 10.1159/000338121
3
AdolphT. E.TomczakM. F.NiederreiterL.KoH. J.BockJ.Martinez-NavesE.et al (2013). Paneth cells as a site of origin for intestinal inflammation.Nature503272–276. 10.1038/nature12599
4
AllenI. C.TekippeE. M.WoodfordR. M.UronisJ. M.HollE. K.RogersA. B.et al (2010). The NLRP3 inflammasome functions as a negative regulator of tumorigenesis during colitis-associated cancer.J. Exp. Med.2071045–1056. 10.1084/jem.20100050
5
BauerC.DuewellP.LehrH. A.EndresS.SchnurrM. (2012). Protective and aggravating effects of Nlrp3 inflammasome activation in IBD models: influence of genetic and environmental factors.Dig. Dis.30(Suppl. 1)82–90. 10.1159/000341681
6
BauerC.DuewellP.MayerC.LehrH. A.FitzgeraldK. A.DauerM.et al (2010). Colitis induced in mice with dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) is mediated by the NLRP3 inflammasome.Gut591192–1199. 10.1136/gut.2009.197822
7
BegueB.VerdierJ.Rieux-LaucatF.GouletO.MoraliA.CanioniD.et al (2011). Defective IL10 signaling defining a subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Am. J. Gastroenterol.1061544–1555. 10.1038/ajg.2011.112
8
BellucciA.NavarriaL.ZaltieriM.FalartiE.BodeiS.SigalaS.et al (2011). Induction of the unfolded protein response by alpha-synuclein in experimental models of Parkinson’s disease.J. Neurochem.116588–605. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07143.x
9
BertolottiA.WangX.NovoaI.JungreisR.SchlessingerK.ChoJ. H.et al (2001). Increased sensitivity to dextran sodium sulfate colitis in IRE1beta-deficient mice.J. Clin. Invest.107585–593. 10.1172/JCI11476
10
BertolottiA.ZhangY.HendershotL. M.HardingH. P.RonD. (2000). Dynamic interaction of BiP and ER stress transducers in the unfolded-protein response.Nat. Cell Biol.2326–332. 10.1038/35014014
11
BidenT. J.BoslemE.ChuK. Y.SueN. (2014). Lipotoxic endoplasmic reticulum stress, beta cell failure, and type 2 diabetes mellitus.Trends Endocrinol. Metab.10.1016/j.tem.2014.02.003[Epub ahead of print].
12
BirkenfeldA. L.LeeH. Y.MajumdarS.JurczakM. J.CamporezJ. P.JornayvazF. R.et al (2011). Influence of the hepatic eukaryotic initiation factor 2alpha (eIF2alpha) endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress response pathway on insulin-mediated ER stress and hepatic and peripheral glucose metabolism.J. Biol. Chem.28636163–36170. 10.1074/jbc.M111.228817
13
BishopG. A.MooreC. R.XieP.StunzL. L.KrausZ. J. (2007). TRAF proteins in CD40 signaling.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.597131–151. 10.1007/978-0-387-70630-6_11
14
BlazquezA. B.Escribano-RomeroE.Merino-RamosT.SaizJ. C.Martin-AcebesM. A. (2014). Stress responses in flavivirus-infected cells: activation of unfolded protein response and autophagy.Front. Microbiol.5:266. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00266
15
BlohmkeC. J.MayerM. L.TangA. C.HirschfeldA. F.FjellC. D.SzeM. A.et al (2012). Atypical activation of the unfolded protein response in cystic fibrosis airway cells contributes to p38 MAPK-mediated innate immune responses.J. Immunol.1895467–5475. 10.4049/jimmunol.1103661
16
Blumental-PerryA. (2012). Unfolded protein response in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: smoking, aging and disease: a SAD trifecta.Curr. Mol. Med.12883–898. 10.2174/156652412801318764
17
BruchardM.MignotG.DerangereV.ChalminF.ChevriauxA.VegranF.et al (2013). Chemotherapy-triggered cathepsin B release in myeloid-derived suppressor cells activates the Nlrp3 inflammasome and promotes tumor growth.Nat. Med.1957–64. 10.1038/nm.2999
18
BuonocoreS.AhernP. P.UhligH. H.IvanovI. I.LittmanD. R.MaloyK. J.et al (2010). Innate lymphoid cells drive interleukin-23-dependent innate intestinal pathology.Nature4641371–1375. 10.1038/nature08949
19
CasselS. L.JolyS.SutterwalaF. S. (2009). The NLRP3 inflammasome: a sensor of immune danger signals.Semin. Immunol.21194–198. 10.1016/j.smim.2009.05.002
20
ChanS. W. (2014). Unfolded protein response in hepatitis C virus infection.Front. Microbiol.5:233. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00233
21
ChenG. Y.LiuM.WangF.BertinJ.NunezG. (2011). A functional role for Nlrp6 in intestinal inflammation and tumorigenesis.J. Immunol.1867187–7194. 10.4049/jimmunol.1100412
22
ChenG. Y.NunezG. (2011). Inflammasomes in intestinal inflammation and cancer.Gastroenterology1411986–1999. 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.10.002
23
ChenW. T.ZhuG.PfaffenbachK.KanelG.StilesB.LeeA. S. (2013). GRP78 as a regulator of liver steatosis and cancer progression mediated by loss of the tumor suppressor PTEN.Oncogene10.1038/onc.2013.437[Epub ahead of print].
24
ChenZ. J. (2005). Ubiquitin signalling in the NF-kappaB pathway.Nat. Cell Biol.7758–765. 10.1038/ncb0805-758
25
ChungJ. Y.ParkY. C.YeH.WuH. (2002). All TRAFs are not created equal: common and distinct molecular mechanisms of TRAF-mediated signal transduction.J. Cell Sci.115679–688.
26
CnopM.FoufelleF.VellosoL. A. (2012). Endoplasmic reticulum stress, obesity and diabetes.Trends Mol. Med.1859–68. 10.1016/j.molmed.2011.07.010
27
CornejoV. H.HetzC. (2013). The unfolded protein response in Alzheimer’s disease.Semin. Immunopathol.35277–292. 10.1007/s00281-013-0373-379
28
CunneaP.MhailleA. N.McquaidS.FarrellM.McmahonJ.FitzgeraldU. (2011). Expression profiles of endoplasmic reticulum stress-related molecules in demyelinating lesions and multiple sclerosis.Mult. Scler.17808–818. 10.1177/1352458511399114
29
DavisB. K.WenH.TingJ. P. (2011). The inflammasome NLRs in immunity, inflammation, and associated diseases.Annu. Rev. Immunol.29707–735. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101405
30
DevA.IyerS.RazaniB.ChengG. (2011). NF-kappaB and innate immunity.Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.349115–143. 10.1007/82_2010_102
31
Dupaul-ChicoineJ.YeretssianG.DoironK.BergstromK. S.McintireC. R.LeblancP. M.et al (2010). Control of intestinal homeostasis, colitis, and colitis-associated colorectal cancer by the inflammatory caspases.Immunity32367–378. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.02.012
32
EizirikD. L.CnopM. (2010). ER stress in pancreatic beta cells: the thin red line between adaptation and failure.Sci. Signal.3:pe7. 10.1126/scisignal.3110pe7
33
EriR. D.AdamsR. J.TranT. V.TongH.DasI.RocheD. K.et al (2011). An intestinal epithelial defect conferring ER stress results in inflammation involving both innate and adaptive immunity.Mucosal. Immunol.4354–364. 10.1038/mi.2010.74
34
FritzT.NiederreiterL.AdolphT.BlumbergR. S.KaserA. (2011). Crohn’s disease: NOD2, autophagy and ER stress converge.Gut601580–1588. 10.1136/gut.2009.206466
35
GargA. D.KaczmarekA.KryskoO.VandenabeeleP.KryskoD. V.AgostinisP. (2012). ER stress-induced inflammation: does it aid or impede disease progression?Trends Mol. Med.18589–598. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.06.010
36
GhiringhelliF.ApetohL.TesniereA.AymericL.MaY.OrtizC.et al (2009). Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome in dendritic cells induces IL-1beta-dependent adaptive immunity against tumors.Nat. Med.151170–1178. 10.1038/nm.2028
37
GlimcherL. H. (2010). XBP1: the last two decades.Ann. Rheum. Dis.69(Suppl. 1)i67–i71. 10.1136/ard.2009.119388
38
GuoC. A.KoganS.AmanoS. U.WangM.DagdevirenS.FriedlineR. H.et al (2013). CD40 deficiency in mice exacerbates obesity-induced adipose tissue inflammation, hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance.Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.304E951–E963. 10.1152/ajpendo.00514.2012
39
HaH.HanD.ChoiY. (2009). TRAF-mediated TNFR-family signaling.Curr. Protoc. Immunol. Chap.11 Unit 11.19D. 10.1002/0471142735.im1109ds87
40
HamanoM.EzakiH.KisoS.FurutaK.EgawaM.KizuT.et al (2013). Lipid overloading during liver regeneration causes delayed hepatocyte DNA replication by increasing ER stress in mice with simple hepatic steatosis.J. Gastroenterol.49305–316. 10.1007/s00535-013-0780–787
41
HanJ.BackS. H.HurJ.LinY. H.GildersleeveR.ShanJ.et al (2013). ER-stress-induced transcriptional regulation increases protein synthesis leading to cell death.Nat. Cell Biol.15481–490. 10.1038/ncb2738
42
HardyB.RaiterA.YakimovM.VilkinA.NivY. (2012). Colon cancer cells expressing cell surface GRP78 as a marker for reduced tumorigenicity.Cell Oncol. (Dordr.)35345–354. 10.1007/s13402-012-0094-94
43
Henao-MejiaJ.ElinavE.JinC.HaoL.MehalW. Z.StrowigT.et al (2012a). Inflammasome-mediated dysbiosis regulates progression of NAFLD and obesity.Nature482179–185. 10.1038/nature10809
44
Henao-MejiaJ.ElinavE.StrowigT.FlavellR. A. (2012b). Inflammasomes: far beyond inflammation.Nat. Immunol.13321–324. 10.1038/ni.2257
45
HetzC. (2012). The unfolded protein response: controlling cell fate decisions under ER stress and beyond.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.1389–102. 10.1038/nrm3270
46
HirotaS. A.NgJ.LuengA.KhajahM.ParharK.LiY.et al (2011). NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in the regulation of intestinal homeostasis.Inflamm. Bowel Dis.171359–1372. 10.1002/ibd.21478
47
HorngT.HotamisligilG. S. (2011). Linking the inflammasome to obesity-related disease.Nat. Med.17164–165. 10.1038/nm0211-164
48
HuB.ElinavE.FlavellR. A. (2011). Inflammasome-mediated suppression of inflammation-induced colorectal cancer progression is mediated by direct regulation of epithelial cell proliferation.Cell Cycle101936–1939. 10.4161/cc.10.12.16008
49
HuP.HanZ.CouvillonA. D.KaufmanR. J.ExtonJ. H. (2006). Autocrine tumor necrosis factor alpha links endoplasmic reticulum stress to the membrane death receptor pathway through IRE1alpha-mediated NF-kappaB activation and down-regulation of TRAF2 expression.Mol. Cell. Biol.263071–3084. 10.1128/MCB.26.8.3071-3084.2006
50
HugotJ. P.ChamaillardM.ZoualiH.LesageS.CezardJ. P.BelaicheJ.et al (2001). Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease.Nature411599–603. 10.1038/3507910735079107
51
IbrahimM. A.KelleniM.GeddawyA. (2013). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: current and potential therapies.Life Sci.92114–118. 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.11.004
52
ImaedaA. B.WatanabeA.SohailM. A.MahmoodS.MohamadnejadM.SutterwalaF. S.et al (2009). Acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in mice is dependent on Tlr9 and the Nalp3 inflammasome.J. Clin. Invest.119305–314. 10.1172/JCI35958
53
JiC.KaplowitzN.LauM. Y.KaoE.PetrovicL. M.LeeA. S. (2011). Liver-specific loss of glucose-regulated protein 78 perturbs the unfolded protein response and exacerbates a spectrum of liver diseases in mice.Hepatology54229–239. 10.1002/hep.24368
54
JostinsL.RipkeS.WeersmaR. K.DuerrR. H.McgovernD. P.HuiK. Y.et al (2012). Host–microbe interactions have shaped the genetic architecture of inflammatory bowel disease.Nature491119–124. 10.1038/nature11582
55
JoyceM. A.WaltersK. A.LambS. E.YehM. M.ZhuL. F.KnetemanN.et al (2009). HCV induces oxidative and ER stress, and sensitizes infected cells to apoptosis in SCID/Alb-uPA mice.PLoS Pathog.5:e1000291. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000291
56
KammounH. L.ChabanonH.HainaultI.LuquetS.MagnanC.KoikeT.et al (2009). GRP78 expression inhibits insulin and ER stress-induced SREBP-1c activation and reduces hepatic steatosis in mice.J. Clin. Invest.1191201–1215. 10.1172/JCI37007
57
KanekoM.NiinumaY.NomuraY. (2003). Activation signal of nuclear factor-kappa B in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress is transduced via IRE1 and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 2.Biol. Pharm. Bull.26931–935. 10.1248/bpb.26.931
58
KaserA.LeeA. H.FrankeA.GlickmanJ. N.ZeissigS.TilgH.et al (2008). XBP1 links ER stress to intestinal inflammation and confers genetic risk for human inflammatory bowel disease.Cell134743–756. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.021
59
KatoH.NakajimaS.SaitoY.TakahashiS.KatohR.KitamuraM. (2012). mTORC1 serves ER stress-triggered apoptosis via selective activation of the IRE1-JNK pathway.Cell Death Differ.19310–320. 10.1038/cdd.2011.98
60
KawaiT.AkiraS. (2011). Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity.Immunity34637–650. 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.05.006
61
KawasakiN.AsadaR.SaitoA.KanemotoS.ImaizumiK. (2012). Obesity-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress causes chronic inflammation in adipose tissue.Sci. Rep.2:799. 10.1038/srep00799
62
Kharabi MasoulehB.GengH.HurtzC.ChanL. N.LoganA. C.ChangM. S.et al (2014). Mechanistic rationale for targeting the unfolded protein response in pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111E2219–E2228. 10.1073/pnas.1400958111
63
KleinerD. E.BruntE. M. (2012). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathologic patterns and biopsy evaluation in clinical research.Semin. Liver Dis.323–13. 10.1055/s-0032-1306421
64
KrausovaM.KorinekV. (2014). Wnt signaling in adult intestinal stem cells and cancer.Cell. Signal.26570–579. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.11.032
65
KubischC. H.LogsdonC. D. (2008). Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the pancreatic acinar cell.Expert Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.2249–260. 10.1586/17474124.2.2.249
66
LakeA. D.NovakP.HardwickR. N.Flores-KeownB.ZhaoF.KlimeckiW. T.et al (2013). The adaptive endoplasmic reticulum stress response to lipotoxicity in progressive human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Toxicol. Sci.13726–35. 10.1093/toxsci/kft230
67
LarrainS.RinellaM. E. (2012). A myriad of pathways to NASH.Clin. Liver Dis.16525–548. 10.1016/j.cld.2012.05.009
68
LeeJ. S.MendezR.HengH. H.YangZ. Q.ZhangK. (2012a). Pharmacological ER stress promotes hepatic lipogenesis and lipid droplet formation.Am. J. Transl. Res.4102–113.
69
LeeJ. S.ZhengZ.MendezR.HaS. W.XieY.ZhangK. (2012b). Pharmacologic ER stress induces non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in an animal model.Toxicol. Lett.21129–38. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.02.017
70
LeeM. S.KimM. H.TeshV. L. (2013). Shiga toxins expressed by human pathogenic bacteria induce immune responses in host cells.J. Microbiol.51724–730. 10.1007/s12275-013-3429-3426
71
LeemansJ. C.CasselS. L.SutterwalaF. S. (2011). Sensing damage by the NLRP3 inflammasome.Immunol. Rev.243152–162. 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01043.x
72
LernerA. G.UptonJ. P.PraveenP. V.GhoshR.NakagawaY.IgbariaA.et al (2012). IRE1alpha induces thioredoxin-interacting protein to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and promote programmed cell death under irremediable ER stress.Cell Metab.16250–264. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.007
73
LiJ.HuangJ.LiJ. S.ChenH.HuangK.ZhengL. (2012). Accumulation of endoplasmic reticulum stress and lipogenesis in the liver through generational effects of high fat diets.J. Hepatol.56900–907. 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.10.018
74
LiJ. Q.YuJ. T.JiangT.TanL. (2014). Endoplasmic reticulum dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease.Mol. Neurobiol.10.1007/s12035-014-8695-8698[Epub ahead of print].
75
LiuB.LiZ. (2008). Endoplasmic reticulum HSP90b1 (gp96, grp94) optimizes B-cell function via chaperoning integrin and TLR but not immunoglobulin.Blood1121223–1230. 10.1182/blood-2008-03-143107
76
LiuB.StaronM.HongF.WuB. X.SunS.MoralesC.et al (2013). Essential roles of grp94 in gut homeostasis via chaperoning canonical Wnt pathway.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1106877–6882. 10.1073/pnas.1302933110
77
LiuM.DudleyS. C.Jr. (2014). Targeting the unfolded protein response in heart diseases.Expert Opin. Ther. Targets18719–723. 10.1517/14728222.2014.918605
78
LogueS. E.ClearyP.SaveljevaS.SamaliA. (2013). New directions in ER stress-induced cell death.Apoptosis18537–546. 10.1007/s10495-013-0818-816
79
MachadoM. V.Cortez-PintoH. (2012). Gut microbiota and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Ann. Hepatol.11440–449.
80
MahadevanN. R.RodvoldJ.SepulvedaH.RossiS.DrewA. F.ZanettiM. (2011). Transmission of endoplasmic reticulum stress and pro-inflammation from tumor cells to myeloid cells.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1086561–6566. 10.1073/pnas.1008942108
81
MahoneyE.MaddocksK.FlynnJ.JonesJ.ColeS. L.ZhangX.et al (2013). Identification of endoplasmic reticulum stress-inducing agents by antagonizing autophagy: a new potential strategy for identification of anti-cancer therapeutics in B-cell malignancies.Leuk. Lymphoma542685–2692. 10.3109/10428194.2013.781168
82
MalhiH.KaufmanR. J. (2011). Endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver disease.J. Hepatol.54795–809. 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.005
83
MartinonF.ChenX.LeeA. H.GlimcherL. H. (2010). TLR activation of the transcription factor XBP1 regulates innate immune responses in macrophages.Nat. Immunol.11411–418. 10.1038/ni.1857
84
Martin-PerezR.PalaciosC.YerbesR.Cano-GonzalezA.Iglesias-SerretD.GilJ.et al (2014). Activated ERBB2/HER2 licenses sensitivity to apoptosis upon endoplasmic reticulum stress through a PERK-dependent pathway.Cancer Res.741766–1777. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1747
85
McAlpineC. S.BowesA. J.WerstuckG. H. (2010). Diabetes, hyperglycemia and accelerated atherosclerosis: evidence supporting a role for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling.Cardiovasc. Hematol. Disord. Drug Targets10151–157. 10.2174/187152910791292529
86
McAlpineC. S.WerstuckG. H. (2013). The development and progression of atherosclerosis: evidence supporting a role for endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress signaling.Cardiovasc. Hematol. Disord. Drug Targets13158–164.
87
McGuckinM. A.EriR. D.DasI.LourieR.FlorinT. H. (2010). ER stress and the unfolded protein response in intestinal inflammation.Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.298G820–G832. 10.1152/ajpgi.00063.2010
88
McMahonJ. M.McquaidS.ReynoldsR.FitzgeraldU. F. (2012). Increased expression of ER stress- and hypoxia-associated molecules in grey matter lesions in multiple sclerosis.Mult. Scler.181437–1447. 10.1177/1352458512438455
89
MenuP.MayorA.ZhouR.TardivelA.IchijoH.MoriK.et al (2012). ER stress activates the NLRP3 inflammasome via an UPR-independent pathway.Cell Death Dis.3:e261. 10.1038/cddis.2011.132
90
MenuP.VinceJ. E. (2011). The NLRP3 inflammasome in health and disease: the good, the bad and the ugly.Clin. Exp. Immunol.1661–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04440.x
91
MercadoG.ValdesP.HetzC. (2013). An ERcentric view of Parkinson’s disease.Trends Mol. Med.19165–175. 10.1016/j.molmed.2012.12.005
92
MerquiolE.UziD.MuellerT.GoldenbergD.NahmiasY.XavierR. J.et al (2011). HCV causes chronic endoplasmic reticulum stress leading to adaptation and interference with the unfolded protein response.PLoS ONE6:e24660. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024660
93
MilicS.StimacD. (2012). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/steatohepatitis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical presentation and treatment.Dig. Dis.30158–162. 10.1159/000336669
94
MoralesC.RachidiS.HongF.SunS.OuyangX.WallaceC.et al (2014). Immune chaperone gp96 drives the contributions of macrophages to inflammatory colon tumorigenesis.Cancer Res.74446–459. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1677
95
MuralidharanS.MandrekarP. (2013). Cellular stress response and innate immune signaling: integrating pathways in host defense and inflammation.J. Leukoc. Biol.941167–1184. 10.1189/jlb.0313153
96
NagarajanP.Mahesh KumarM. J.VenkatesanR.MajundarS. S.JuyalR. C. (2012). Genetically modified mouse models for the study of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.World J. Gastroenterol.181141–1153. 10.3748/wjg.v18.i11.1141
97
NakajimaS.HiramatsuN.HayakawaK.SaitoY.KatoH.HuangT.et al (2011). Selective abrogation of BiP/GRP78 blunts activation of NF-kappaB through the ATF6 branch of the UPR: involvement of C/EBPbeta and mTOR-dependent dephosphorylation of Akt.Mol. Cell. Biol.311710–1718. 10.1128/MCB.00939-910
98
NishitohH. (2012). CHOP is a multifunctional transcription factor in the ER stress response.J. Biochem.151217–219. 10.1093/jb/mvr143
99
OganesyanG.SahaS. K.GuoB.HeJ. Q.ShahangianA.ZarnegarB.et al (2006). Critical role of TRAF3 in the Toll-like receptor-dependent and -independent antiviral response.Nature439208–211. 10.1038/nature04374
100
OikawaD.KitamuraA.KinjoM.IwawakiT. (2012). Direct association of unfolded proteins with mammalian ER stress sensor, IRE1beta.PLoS ONE7:e51290. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051290
101
OkazakiT.WangM. H.RawsthorneP.SargentM.DattaL. W.ShugartY. Y.et al (2008). Contributions of IBD5, IL23R, ATG16L1, and NOD2 to Crohn’s disease risk in a population-based case-control study: evidence of gene-gene interactions.Inflamm. Bowel Dis.141528–1541. 10.1002/ibd.20512
102
OslowskiC. M.HaraT.O’sullivan-MurphyB.KanekuraK.LuS.HaraM.et al (2012). Thioredoxin-interacting protein mediates ER stress-induced beta cell death through initiation of the inflammasome.Cell Metab.16265–273. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.07.005
103
OsorioF.TavernierS. J.HoffmannE.SaeysY.MartensL.VettersJ.et al (2014). The unfolded-protein-response sensor IRE-1alpha regulates the function of CD8alpha+ dendritic cells.Nat. Immunol.15248–257. 10.1038/ni.2808
104
OzcanU.YilmazE.OzcanL.FuruhashiM.VaillancourtE.SmithR. O.et al (2006). Chemical chaperones reduce ER stress and restore glucose homeostasis in a mouse model of type 2 diabetes.Science3131137–1140. 10.1126/science.1128294
105
PagliassottiM. J. (2012). Endoplasmic reticulum stress in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.Annu. Rev. Nutr.3217–33. 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071811-150644
106
PapaF. R. (2012). Endoplasmic reticulum stress, pancreatic beta-cell degeneration, and diabetes.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.2:a007666. 10.1101/cshperspect.a007666
107
PapatriantafyllouM. (2011). Mucosal immunology: inflammasome shapes the microbiota.Nat. Rev. Immunol.11439. 10.1038/nri3012
108
PetrasekJ.BalaS.CsakT.LippaiD.KodysK.MenashyV.et al (2012). IL-1 receptor antagonist ameliorates inflammasome-dependent alcoholic steatohepatitis in mice.J. Clin. Invest.1223476–3489. 10.1172/JCI60777
109
PfaffenbachK. T.LeeA. S. (2011). The critical role of GRP78 in physiologic and pathologic stress.Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.23150–156. 10.1016/j.ceb.2010.09.007
110
PincusD.ChevalierM. W.AragonT.Van AnkenE.VidalS. E.El-SamadH.et al (2010). BiP binding to the ER-stress sensor Ire1 tunes the homeostatic behavior of the unfolded protein response.PLoS Biol.8:e1000415. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000415
111
PinedaG.EaC. K.ChenZ. J. (2007). Ubiquitination and TRAF signaling.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.59780–92. 10.1007/978-0-387-70630-6_7
112
QiuQ.ZhengZ.ChangL.ZhaoY. S.TanC.DandekarA.et al (2013). Toll-like receptor-mediated IRE1alpha activation as a therapeutic target for inflammatory arthritis.EMBO J.322477–2490. 10.1038/emboj.2013.183
113
RathinamV. A.VanajaS. K.FitzgeraldK. A. (2012). Regulation of inflammasome signaling.Nat. Immunol.13333–332. 10.1038/ni.2237
114
RazaniB.ChengG. (2010). NF-kappaB: much learned, much to learn.Sci. Signal.3:pe29. 10.1126/scisignal.3138pe29
115
Romero-RamirezL.CaoH.RegaladoM. P.KambhamN.SiemannD.KimJ. J.et al (2009). X box-binding protein 1 regulates angiogenesis in human pancreatic adenocarcinomas.Transl. Oncol.231–38. 10.1593/tlo.08211
116
SandsB. E. (2007). Inflammatory bowel disease: past, present, and future.J. Gastroenterol.4216–25. 10.1007/s00535-006-1995-1997
117
SarraM.PalloneF.MacdonaldT. T.MonteleoneG. (2010). IL-23/IL-17 axis in IBD.Inflamm. Bowel Dis.161808–1813. 10.1002/ibd.21248
118
SavicS.OuboussadL.DickieL. J.GeilerJ.WongC.DoodyG. M.et al (2014). TLR dependent XBP-1 activation induces an autocrine loop in rheumatoid arthritis synoviocytes.J. Autoimmun.5059–66. 10.1016/j.jaut.2013.11.002
119
SchroderM.SutcliffeL. (2010). Consequences of stress in the secretory pathway: the ER stress response and its role in the metabolic syndrome.Methods Mol. Biol.64843–62. 10.1007/978-1-60761-756-3_3
120
SenftlebenU.KarinM. (2002). The IKK/NF-kappa B pathway.Crit. Care Med.30S18–S26. 10.1097/00003246-200201001-00003
121
ShaH.HeY.YangL.QiL. (2011). Stressed out about obesity: IRE1alpha-XBP1 in metabolic disorders.Trends Endocrinol. Metab.22374–381. 10.1016/j.tem.2011.05.002
122
ShenderovK.RiteauN.YipR.Mayer-BarberK. D.OlandS.HienyS.et al (2014). Cutting edge: endoplasmic reticulum stress licenses macrophages to produce mature IL-1beta in response to TLR4 stimulation through a caspase-8- and TRIF-dependent pathway.J. Immunol.1922029–2033. 10.4049/jimmunol.1302549
123
ShimodairaY.TakahashiS.KinouchiY.EndoK.ShigaH.KakutaY.et al (2014). Modulation of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced autophagy by C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP) and inositol-requiring enzyme 1alpha (IRE1alpha) in human colon cancer cells.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.445524–533. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.054
124
ShudaM.KondohN.ImazekiN.TanakaK.OkadaT.MoriK.et al (2003). Activation of the ATF6, XBP1 and grp78 genes in human hepatocellular carcinoma: a possible involvement of the ER stress pathway in hepatocarcinogenesis.J. Hepatol.38605–614. 10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00029-1
125
SmithJ. A. (2014). A new paradigm: innate immune sensing of viruses via the unfolded protein response.Front. Microbiol.5:222. 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00222
126
StaronM.YangY.LiuB.LiJ.ShenY.Zuniga-PfluckerJ. C.et al (2010). gp96, an endoplasmic reticulum master chaperone for integrins and Toll-like receptors, selectively regulates early T and B lymphopoiesis.Blood1152380–2390. 10.1182/blood-2009-07-233031
127
StienstraR.Van DiepenJ. A.TackC. J.ZakiM. H.Van De VeerdonkF. L.PereraD.et al (2011). Inflammasome is a central player in the induction of obesity and insulin resistance.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10815324–15329. 10.1073/pnas.1100255108
128
StroberW.FussI.MannonP. (2007). The fundamental basis of inflammatory bowel disease.J. Clin. Invest.117514–521. 10.1172/JCI30587
129
SzaboG.CsakT. (2012). Inflammasomes in liver diseases.J. Hepatol.57642–654. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.03.035
130
TakeuchiO.AkiraS. (2010). Pattern recognition receptors and inflammation.Cell140805–820. 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.022
131
TamA. B.MercadoE. L.HoffmannA.NiwaM. (2012). ER stress activates NF-kappaB by integrating functions of basal IKK activity, IRE1 and PERK.PLoS ONE7:e45078. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045078
132
TangJ.GuoY. S.ZhangY.YuX. L.LiL.HuangW.et al (2012). CD147 induces UPR to inhibit apoptosis and chemosensitivity by increasing the transcription of Bip in hepatocellular carcinoma.Cell Death Differ.191779–1790. 10.1038/cdd.2012.60
133
TeshV. L. (2012). Activation of cell stress response pathways by Shiga toxins.Cell Microbiol.141–9. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01684.x
134
TingJ. P.DuncanJ. A.LeiY. (2010). How the noninflammasome NLRs function in the innate immune system.Science327286–290. 10.1126/science.1184004
135
TripathiY. B.PandeyV. (2012). Obesity and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stresses.Front. Immunol.3:240. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00240
136
TuyamaA. C.ChangC. Y. (2012). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.J. Diabetes4266–280. 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2012.00204.x
137
UptonJ. P.WangL.HanD.WangE. S.HuskeyN. E.LimL.et al (2012). IRE1alpha cleaves select microRNAs during ER stress to derepress translation of proapoptotic Caspase-2.Science338818–822. 10.1126/science.1226191
138
UranoF.WangX.BertolottiA.ZhangY.ChungP.HardingH. P.et al (2000). Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1.Science287664–666. 10.1126/science.287.5453.664
139
VandanmagsarB.YoumY. H.RavussinA.GalganiJ. E.StadlerK.MynattR. L.et al (2011). The NLRP3 inflammasome instigates obesity-induced inflammation and insulin resistance.Nat. Med.17179–188. 10.1038/nm.2279
140
Van LimbergenJ.RussellR. K.NimmoE. R.SatsangiJ. (2007). The genetics of inflammatory bowel disease.Am. J. Gastroenterol.1022820–2831. 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01527.x
141
VidalR. L.FigueroaA.CourtF. A.ThielenP.MolinaC.WirthC.et al (2012). Targeting the UPR transcription factor XBP1 protects against Huntington’s disease through the regulation of FoxO1 and autophagy.Hum. Mol. Genet.212245–2262. 10.1093/hmg/dds040
142
WenH.TingJ. P.O’NeillL. A. (2012). A role for the NLRP3 inflammasome in metabolic diseases – did Warburg miss inflammation?Nat. Immunol.13352–357. 10.1038/ni.2228
143
WierzbickiA. S.ObenJ. (2012). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and lipids.Curr. Opin. Lipidol.23345–352. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e3283541cfc
144
WooC. W.CuiD.ArellanoJ.DorweilerB.HardingH.FitzgeraldK. A.et al (2009). Adaptive suppression of the ATF4-CHOP branch of the unfolded protein response by toll-like receptor signalling.Nat. Cell Biol.111473–1480. 10.1038/ncb1996
145
WooC. W.KutzlerL.KimballS. R.TabasI. (2012). Toll-like receptor activation suppresses ER stress factor CHOP and translation inhibition through activation of eIF2B.Nat. Cell Biol.14192–200. 10.1038/ncb2408
146
WoodN. J. (2012). Microbiota: dysbiosis driven by inflammasome deficiency exacerbates hepatic steatosis and governs rate of NAFLD progression.Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.9123. 10.1038/nrgastro.2012.21
147
YamazakiH.HiramatsuN.HayakawaK.TagawaY.OkamuraM.OgataR.et al (2009). Activation of the Akt-NF-kappaB pathway by subtilase cytotoxin through the ATF6 branch of the unfolded protein response.J. Immunol.1831480–1487. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900017
148
YangL.LiP.FuS.CalayE. S.HotamisligilG. S. (2010). Defective hepatic autophagy in obesity promotes ER stress and causes insulin resistance.Cell Metab.11467–478. 10.1016/j.cmet.2010.04.005
149
YangY.LiZ. (2005). Roles of heat shock protein gp96 in the ER quality control: redundant or unique function?Mol. Cells20173–182.
150
YangY.LiuB.DaiJ.SrivastavaP. K.ZammitD. J.LefrancoisL.et al (2007). Heat shock protein gp96 is a master chaperone for toll-like receptors and is important in the innate function of macrophages.Immunity26215–226. 10.1016/j.immuni.2006.12.005
151
YeR.JungD. Y.JunJ. Y.LiJ.LuoS.KoH. J.et al (2010). Grp78 heterozygosity promotes adaptive unfolded protein response and attenuates diet-induced obesity and insulin resistance.Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev.596–16. 10.2337/db09-0755
152
YooS. A.YouS.YoonH. J.KimD. H.KimH. S.LeeK.et al (2012). A novel pathogenic role of the ER chaperone GRP78/BiP in rheumatoid arthritis.J. Exp. Med.209871–886. 10.1084/jem.20111783
153
ZakiM. H.BoydK. L.VogelP.KastanM. B.LamkanfiM.KannegantiT. D. (2010). The NLRP3 inflammasome protects against loss of epithelial integrity and mortality during experimental colitis.Immunity32379–391. 10.1016/j.immuni.2010.03.003
154
ZhaB. S.ZhouH. (2012). ER stress and lipid metabolism in adipocytes.Biochem. Res. Int.2012312943. 10.1155/2012/312943
155
ZhangJ.FuS.SunS.LiZ.GuoB. (2014). Inflammasome activation has an important role in the development of spontaneous colitis.Mucosal. Immunol.10.1038/mi.2014.1[Epub ahead of print].
156
ZhangK.WangS.MalhotraJ.HasslerJ. R.BackS. H.WangG.et al (2011). The unfolded protein response transducer IRE1alpha prevents ER stress-induced hepatic steatosis.EMBO J.301357–1375. 10.1038/emboj.2011.52
157
ZhengY. Z.CaoZ. G.HuX.ShaoZ. M. (2014). The endoplasmic reticulum stress markers GRP78 and CHOP predict disease-free survival and responsiveness to chemotherapy in breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.145349–358. 10.1007/s10549-014-2967-x
158
ZhouA. X.TabasI. (2013). The UPR in atherosclerosis.Semin. Immunopathol.35321–332. 10.1007/s00281-013-0372-x
159
ZhouH.LiuR. (2014). ER stress and hepatic lipid metabolism.Front. Genet.5:112. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00112
160
ZhouL.LiuF. (2010). Autophagy: roles in obesity-induced ER stress and adiponectin downregulation in adipocytes.Autophagy61196–1197. 10.4161/auto.6.8.13478
Summary
Keywords
ER stress, inflammation, hepatic steatosis, colitis, UPR, inflammasome, IRE1
Citation
Guo B and Li Z (2014) Endoplasmic reticulum stress in hepatic steatosis and inflammatory bowel diseases. Front. Genet. 5:242. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00242
Received
19 May 2014
Accepted
07 July 2014
Published
25 July 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited by
Kezhong Zhang, Wayne State University, USA
Reviewed by
Utpal Pal, University of Maryland, USA; Guohui Wang, Houston Methodist Hospital, USA
Copyright
© 2014 Guo and Li.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Zihai Li and Beichu Guo, Department of Microbiology and Immunology and Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, HO-612F, Charleston, SC, USA e-mail: zihai@musc.edu; guobe@musc.edu
This article was submitted to Genomic Endocrinology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.