Abstract
DNA methylation (DNAm) is a key mechanism for regulating gene expression in animals and levels are known to change with age. Recent studies have used DNAm changes as a biomarker to estimate chronological age in humans and these techniques are now also being applied to domestic and wild animals. Animal age is widely used to track ongoing changes in ecosystems, however chronological age information is often unavailable for wild animals. An ability to estimate age would lead to improved monitoring of (i) population trends and status and (ii) demographic properties such as age structure and reproductive performance. Recent studies have revealed new examples of DNAm age association in several new species increasing the potential for developing DNAm age biomarkers for a broad range of wild animals. Emerging technologies for measuring DNAm will also enhance our ability to study age-related DNAm changes and to develop new molecular age biomarkers.
Introduction
Biological ageing involves complex interactions of accumulating organ, cellular, and DNA damage leading to functional decline and increased risk of death (Fontana et al., ). Biological functions including the age of reproductive maturity (Charpentier et al., ; Jones et al., ), reproductive frequency (Froy et al., ), and mortality (Pérez-Barbería et al., 2014) can be better understood in the context of age. Estimates of chronological age are therefore useful for understanding these key ecological characteristics of wild animals. However, chronological age is difficult to estimate in individuals of most animal species (Nussey et al., 2013). Many species lack measurable external features that change with age. Therefore, new methods that allow estimation of chronological age will enhance our understanding of ageing and population biology in wild animals.
DNA methylation (DNAm) at cytosine guanine dinucleotides (CpGs) is the best studied epigenetic modification and can repress gene expression when associated with gene promoters (Jones et al., ). CpG methylation in mammals is regulated by DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs). DNMTs are required for the initial establishment of methylation patterns in early development (Law and Jacobsen, ); and for maintaining established patterns of DNAm over the lifespan of the animal (Jones and Liang, ). There are two types of age-associated DNAm in vertebrates, “epigenetic drift” and “clock-type” DNAm (Jones et al., ). DNMT1 is primarily responsible for maintaining CpG methylation and its decline in activity with age is thought to contribute to a decrease in global methylation or “drift” in ageing cells (Jones et al., ). However, gene-specific DNAm change with age may be regulated by other de-novo DNMTs, such as DNMT3b (Lopatina et al., ). “Clock-type” age-associated DNAm is a change in methylation proportion (either an increase or decrease) at specific CpG sites. Changes at clock-type CpGs may be related to functional changes in gene expression with age (Horvath, ; Steegenga et al., 2014).
In this mini-review, we summarise current knowledge of observed age-related changes of CpG DNAm in mammals, reptiles, birds and fish. Recent technological advances have enabled the relatively quick analysis of large numbers of CpG loci (Parle-Mcdermott and Harrison, 2011). This has greatly increased the number of studies that have observed age-related DNAm in humans and model organisms (Jarman et al., ). We also describe how this new information can be used to develop molecular age biomarkers (MABs) for non-model animals. We explore environmental and behavioural studies of DNAm that are relevant to age estimation. We also discuss emerging technology and their potential for application in wild animals.
DNA methylation ageing signals in humans and mice
Age estimation models based on CpG DNAm combine information from CpG sites that have the highest correlation of DNAm levels with age. These are calibrated using tissue samples from known-age individuals. Early ageing models for humans used single tissues and small numbers of CpG sites (Bocklandt et al., ). Recent more precise models predict age from multiple tissues (Horvath, ). DNAm changes with age can contribute to altered gene expression levels during normal ageing (Zykovich et al., 2014) and disease (Nilsson et al., 2014). Therefore, the effect of CpG DNAm on transcriptional regulation of gene expression has been the focus of intense research (Goyns, ; Figure 1). The first studies to identify human age-related DNAm changes studied monozygotic twins, where epigenetic drift with age was observed when comparing older and younger twins (Fraga et al., ). This observation was supported by further studies of monozygotic twins and healthy controls that led to the first epigenetic age models (Boks et al., ). A detailed summary of age-related DNAm studies is shown in Table S1.
Figure 1
Age-related DNAm changes have been identified in several human and mouse tissues. Analysis of human skin samples for DNAm changes identified a set of CpG sites that were affected by chronological age. Thirty sun-exposed and sun-protected skin biopsy samples were analysed using the Infinium HumanMethylation27 (27 K) BeadChip (Illumina). The study identified 104 CpG sites that had a DNAm relationship with age, but not by sun exposure (Grönniger et al.,
Most clock-type DNAm changes are tissue specific, however several studies have investigated age-associated changes in multiple tissues. Non cell-type dependent DNAm changes were identified in a study that combined several published CpG DNAm data sets to predict age using multiple tissues (Koch and Wagner,
Lifestyle factors can influence DNAm levels in humans and mice and could impact chronological age estimation if not corrected for. A positive difference between estimated DNAm age and known age suggests that an individual is biologically older than their chronological age. Described epigenetic clocks have been used to show decreased age acceleration dependent on diet (Quach et al., 2017) and increased age acceleration associated with smoking (Zaghlool et al., 2015; Gao et al.,
The use of DNAm biomarkers for specialised forensic applications generally involves using fewer CpG sites in simpler assays. A model based on three CpG sites in human blood yielded a MAD from known-age samples of ±5.4 years, which was an improvement over other non-epigenetic molecular ageing techniques (Weidner et al., 2014). In two studies, a small number of CpG sites in one gene region (ELOVL2) allowed simplification of technical analyses while maintaining prediction accuracy (MAD ± 3.9 years) (Zbieć-Piekarska et al., 2015a,b). Single multiplex reactions such as methylation-sensitive single-nucleotide primer extension can be used to make age biomarkers that are cheaper to run than pyrosequencing or microarray assays. For example, one study using this method with eight CpG sites led to age predictions with a MAD of ±6.07 years (Vidal-Bralo et al., 2016). While this approach had lower precision than previous studies it is still a feasible tool for estimating age using adult blood. One study implemented the models published by both Horvath (
Methylation changes in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) associated with age have been identified in humans. An epigenetic model based on two CpGs with a MAD of ±9.3 years was developed from the blood of 82 individuals (18–91 years). Age was correlated with mtDNAm at two sites, M1215 and M1313, in the 12s MT-RNR1 gene (Mawlood et al., 2016). mtDNA overall has a low level of CpG methylation (2–6%), so detection of age-related CpG levels required high assay precision. This is the only study of age-related mtDNA methylation and it is still uncertain whether mtDNAm-based models will match the accuracy of models using genomic biomarkers.
Quantifying DNA methylation, environmental effects and age in model and wild animals
Mammals
DNAm age biomarkers have only been developed for a small number of wild mammal species. In long-lived species, obtaining known-age calibration sample sets that cover the entire lifespan is a significant obstacle. DNAm age estimation is most advanced in species closely related to humans. The age of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus), and gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) were estimated using the 353 CpG clock MAB created for humans (Pai et al., 2011; Hernando-Herraez et al.,
Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) have successfully been used as a test case for applying knowledge of human age-related clock type DNAm change to estimate age in a long-lived wild mammal. Forty-five known-age samples were used to calibrate a DNAm age model. Seven of 37 CpG loci screened by pyrosequencing showed significant age-related DNAm. The three sites with the strongest relationship with age were used to predict whale age from skin with a MAD of 3.75 years. This model also predicted the correct order of ages in samples with known kinship in more than 93% of cases (Polanowski et al., 2014).
Global DNAm levels in dogs change with age as a result of epigenetic drift. Significant differences in relative global DNAm levels have been found amongst pups (43.5%), adolescents (53.6%), adults (61.5%), and old dogs (81.2%) (Gryzinska et al.,
Birds
DNAm patterns in birds are relatively unexplored compared to mammals (Head,
Figure 2

Variable global methylation in vertebrates. *Current genome on NCBI (if available). ∧Average 5 mC for classes (Jabbari et al.,
DNAm studies of behavioural traits in several bird species could yield potential targets for age biomarker development if the identified genes are linked to behavioural change during an animal's life. The DNAm level in the dopamine receptor D4 (DRD4) gene in great tits (Parus major) was shown to be associated with variations in exploratory behaviour (Verhulst et al., 2016). Methylation tiling arrays have linked the promoters of the zinc finger RNA binding protein (ZFR) gene and male hypermethylated region (MHM) with sex dependent gene expression in chicken brain samples (Nätt et al., 2014). Several of the differentially expressed genes were known to affect behaviours including exploration and fearfulness.
Age-associated global DNAm could be affected by environmentally altered DNMT expression in birds. Increases in mRNA for DNMT1, DNMT3A, and methyl binding protein MBD5 were found after a 1°C increase in incubation temperature in several tissues of embryonic Peking ducks (Anas platyrhynchos domestica). These changes in expression levels of methylation-interacting enzymes could lead to overall changes in DNAm of bird genomes with age (Yan et al., 2015). A single CpG in the ERα promoter in wild eastern bluebirds (Sialia sialis) was positively correlated with yolk testosterone concentration and nestling growth rate. While DNAm at this CpG appears to depend on maternal and environmental conditions, it may help to better estimate age in pre-fledgling chicks (Bentz et al.,
The epigenetic effect of adverse environmental conditions has recently been analysed in a wild barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) population. After particulate matter exposure, DNAm levels in two Clock gene loci were significantly increased in chicks (7 to 5 days old) and mothers. This study is a good example of a targeted DNAm approach and is the first study to show that DNAm levels can change in response to anthropogenic pollutants in wild birds (Romano et al., 2017). Exposure to DNAm altering compounds could be used to produce DNAm age biomarkers if exposure is consistent over time and among individuals in a population.
Reptiles
Reptile DNAm has not been well studied in general and there is little data on age-related DNAm. Reptilian CpG island positions relative to promoters are similar to those found in mammals and birds, indicating that DNAm has a similar regulatory function (Varriale and Bernardi, 2006; Head,
Fish
Fish DNAm is better studied compared to birds and reptiles, with the majority of research on the zebrafish model (Danio rerio). Zebrafish embryos show high levels of global CpG methylation (80%), which is similar to mouse (74%), and also have depletion of methylation around transcriptional start sites similar to mammals (Feng et al.,
Future directions
Changes to DNAm patterns have been established as biomarkers of chronological and biological ageing in humans and have great potential for age estimation in wild animals. Global DNAm hypomethylation correlating with age has been found in a range of wild animals, suggesting that epigenetic drift occurs in most vertebrates. Numerous clock-type age-related CpG sites have also been identified, several of which appear to be well conserved in mammals (Table S1). Both epigenetic drift and clock-type DNAm changes could be used for age estimation in vertebrates.
New technologies for measuring changes in DNAm relating to age will improve our ability to generate age biomarkers. Nanopore technology has recently improved so that it is possible to identify cytosine and adenosine methylation variants in E. coli (Rand et al., 2017). An advantage of nanopore technology is that relatively small amounts of non-treated DNA are required to produce long sequence reads compared to bisulphite treated DNA. This may be advantageous for animal studies where DNA yield from the target tissue is low, such as feather quill ends (Simpson et al., 2017). Digital restriction enzyme analysis of methylation (DREAM) allows the precise measurement of CpG sites in a global context (Jelinek et al.,
Measuring wild animal age with DNAm has diverse applications in ecological and environmental research. Populations of known-age wild animals will be particularly important for this type of research. Age estimates generated from a robust DNAm model could be used to understand survival, reproductive potential, and biological ageing (Jarman et al.,
Statements
Author contributions
Conception: RD, JD, SJ; Design: RD, SJ, BD, MH, CM; Drafting original: RD, SJ, BD; Critical revision: JD, MH, CM; Final approval and accountability, all authors.
Funding
This work was funded by Australian Antarctic Science project number: 4014 (BD, SJ), the Australian Government Research Training Program (RD), the Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment (H0024583)—ANZ Trustees Foundation (RD) (http://www.eqt.com.au/charities-and-not-for-profits/grants/animals-and-environmentgrants) and the Joyce W. Vickery Scientific Research Fund (H0024181)—The Linnean Society of New South Wales (RD) (http://linneansocietynsw.org.au/).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fgene.2017.00106/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AndraszekK.GryzińskaM.WójcikE.KnagaS.SmalecE. (2014). Age-dependent change in the morphology of nucleoli and methylation of genes of the nucleolar organizer region in Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica) model (Temminck and Schlegel, 1849)(Galliformes: Aves). Folia Biol.62, 293–300. 10.3409/fb62_4.293
2
BekaertB.KamalanduaA.ZapicoS. C.Van de VoordeW.DecorteR. (2015). Improved age determination of blood and teeth samples using a selected set of DNA methylation markers. Epigenetics10, 922–930. 10.1080/15592294.2015.1080413
3
BentzA. B.SirmanA. E.WadaH.NavaraK. J.HoodW. R. (2016). Relationship between maternal environment and DNA methylation patterns of estrogen receptor alpha in wild Eastern Bluebird (Sialia sialis) nestlings: a pilot study. Ecol. Evol.6, 4741–4752. 10.1002/ece3.2162
4
BocklandtS.LinW.SehlM. E.SánchezF. J.SinsheimerJ. S.HorvathS.et al. (2011). Epigenetic predictor of age. PLoS ONE6:e14821. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014821
5
BoksM. P.DerksE. M.WeisenbergerD. J.StrengmanE.JansonE.SommerI. E.et al. (2009). The relationship of DNA methylation with age, gender and genotype in twins and healthy controls. PLoS ONE4:e6767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0006767
6
CaracappaS.PisciottaA.PersichettiM.CaracappaG.AlduinaR.ArculeoM. (2016). Nonmodal scutes patterns in the Loggerhead Sea turtle (Caretta caretta): a possible epigenetic effect?Can. J. Zool.94, 379–383. 10.1139/cjz-2015-0248
7
CharpentierM. J.TungJ.AltmannJ.AlbertsS. (2008). Age at maturity in wild baboons: genetic, environmental and demographic influences. Mol. Ecol.17, 2026–2040. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03724.x
8
ChristiansenL.LenartA.TanQ.VaupelJ. W.AvivA.McGueM.et al. (2016). DNA methylation age is associated with mortality in a longitudinal Danish twin study. Aging Cell15, 149–154. 10.1111/acel.12421
9
EhrlichM.Gama-SosaM. A.HuangL.-H.MidgettR. M.KuoK. C.McCuneR. A.et al. (1982). Amount and distribution of 5-methylcytosine in human DNA from different types of tissues or cells. Nucleic Acids Res.10, 2709–2721. 10.1093/nar/10.8.2709
10
EipelM.MayerF.ArentT.FerreiraM. R.BirkhoferC.GerstenmaierU.et al. (2016). Epigenetic age predictions based on buccal swabs are more precise in combination with cell type-specific DNA methylation signatures. Aging8, 1034–1048. 10.18632/aging.100972
11
FengS.CokusS. J.ZhangX.ChenP.-Y.BostickM.GollM. G.et al. (2010). Conservation and divergence of methylation patterning in plants and animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.107, 8689–8694. 10.1073/pnas.1002720107
12
FontanaL.PartridgeL.LongoV. D. (2010). Extending healthy life span—from yeast to humans. Science328, 321–326. 10.1126/science.1172539
13
FragaM. F.BallestarE.PazM. F.RoperoS.SetienF.BallestarM. L.et al. (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.102, 10604–10609. 10.1073/pnas.0500398102
14
FroyH.PhillipsR. A.WoodA. G.NusseyD. H.LewisS. (2013). Age-related variation in reproductive traits in the wandering albatross: evidence for terminal improvement following senescence. Ecol. Lett.16, 642–649. 10.1111/ele.12092
15
Gama-SosaM. A.MidgettR. M.SlagelV. A.GithensS.KuoK. C.GehrkeC. W.et al. (1983). Tissue-specific differences in DNA methylation in various mammals. Biochim. Biophys. Acta740, 212–219. 10.1016/0167-4781(83)90079-9
16
GaragnaniP.BacaliniM. G.PirazziniC.GoriD.GiulianiC.MariD.et al. (2012). Methylation of ELOVL2 gene as a new epigenetic marker of age. Aging Cell11, 1132–1134. 10.1111/acel.12005
17
GaoX.ZhangY.BreitlingL. P.BrennerH. (2016). Relationship of tobacco smoking and smoking-related DNA methylation with epigenetic age acceleration. Oncotarget7, 46878–46889. 10.18632/oncotarget.9795
18
GoynsM. H. (2002). Genes, telomeres and mammalian ageing. Mech. Ageing Dev.123, 791–799. 10.1016/S0047-6374(01)00424-9
19
GrönnigerE.WeberB.HeilO.PetersN.StäbF.WenckH.et al. (2010). Aging and chronic sun exposure cause distinct epigenetic changes in human skin. PLoS Genet.6:e1000971. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000971
20
GryzinskaM.BlaszczakE.StracheckaA.Jezewska-WitkowskaG. (2013). Analysis of age-related global DNA methylation in chicken. Biochem. Genet.51, 554–563. 10.1007/s10528-013-9586-9
21
GryzinskaM.JakubczakA.ListosP.DudkoP.AbramowiczK.Jeżewska-witkowskaG.et al. (2016). Association between body weight and age of dogs and global DNA methylation. Med. Weter72, 64–67. Available online at: http://medycynawet.edu.pl/index.php/archives/366/5440-summary-med-weter-72-1-64-67-2016
22
HannumG.GuinneyJ.ZhaoL.ZhangL.HughesG.SaddaS.et al. (2013). Genome-wide methylation profiles reveal quantitative views of human aging rates. Mol. Cell49, 359–367. 10.1016/j.molcel.2012.10.016
23
HeadJ. A. (2014). Patterns of DNA methylation in animals: an ecotoxicological perspective. Integr. Comp. Biol.25, 77–86. 10.1093/icb/icu025
24
Hernando-HerraezI.Prado-MartinezJ.GargP.Fernandez-CallejoM.HeynH.HvilsomC.et al. (2013). Dynamics of DNA methylation in recent human and great ape evolution. PLoS Genet.9:e1003763. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003763
25
HorvathS. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types. Genome Biol.14:R115. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
26
HorvathS.ErhartW.BroschM.AmmerpohlO.von SchönfelsW.AhrensM.et al. (2014). Obesity accelerates epigenetic aging of human liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.111, 15538–15543. 10.1073/pnas.1412759111
27
ItoG.YoshimuraK.MomoiY. (2017). Analysis of DNA methylation of potential age-related methylation sites in canine peripheral blood leukocytes. J. Vet. Med. Sci.79, 745–750. 10.1292/jvms.16-0341
28
JabbariK.CacciòS.de BarrosJ. P.DesgrèsJ.BernardiG. (1997). Evolutionary changes in CpG and methylation levels in the genome of vertebrates. Gene205, 109–118. 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00475-7
29
JarmanS. N.PolanowskiA. M.FauxC. E.RobbinsJ.Paoli-IseppiD. R.BravingtonM.et al. (2015). Molecular biomarkers for chronological age in animal ecology. Mol. Ecol.24, 4826–4847. 10.1111/mec.13357
30
JazwinskiS. M.KimS. (2017). Metabolic and Genetic Markers of Biological Age. Front. Genet.8:64. 10.3389/fgene.2017.00064
31
JelinekJ.LiangS.LuY.HeR.RamagliL. S.ShpallE. J.et al. (2012). Conserved DNA methylation patterns in healthy blood cells and extensive changes in leukemia measured by a new quantitative technique. Epigenetics7, 1368–1378. 10.4161/epi.22552
32
JelinekJ.MadzoJ. (2016). DREAM: a simple method for DNA methylation profiling by high-throughput sequencing. Methods Mol. Biol.1465, 111–127. 10.1007/978-1-4939-4011-0_10
33
JonesM. J.GoodmanS. J.KoborM. S. (2015). DNA methylation and healthy human aging. Aging Cell14, 924–932. 10.1111/acel.12349
34
JonesO. R.ScheuerleinA.Salguero-GómezR.CamardaC. G.SchaibleR.CasperB. B.et al. (2014). Diversity of ageing across the tree of life. Nature505, 169–173. 10.1038/nature12789
35
JonesP. A.LiangG. (2009). Rethinking how DNA methylation patterns are maintained. Nat. Rev. Genet.10, 805–811. 10.1038/nrg2651
36
KochC. M.WagnerW. (2011). Epigenetic-aging-signature to determine age in different tissues. Aging3, 1018–1027. 10.18632/aging.100395
37
LawJ. A.JacobsenS. E. (2010). Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet.11, 204–220. 10.1038/nrg2719
38
LetunicI.BorkP. (2006). Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Bioinformatics23, 127–128. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl529
39
LiQ.LiN.HuX.LiJ.DuZ.ChenL.et al. (2011). Genome-wide mapping of DNA methylation in chicken. PLoS ONE6:e19428. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019428
40
LopatinaN.HaskellJ. F.AndrewsL. G.PooleJ. C.SaldanhaS.TollefsbolT. (2002). Differential maintenance and de novo methylating activity by three DNA methyltransferases in aging and immortalized fibroblasts. J. Cell. Biochem.84, 324–334. 10.1002/jcb.10015
41
LuoJ.YuY.ZhangH.TianF.ChangS.ChengH. H.et al. (2011). Down-regulation of promoter methylation level of CD4 gene after MDV infection in MD-susceptible chicken line. BMC Proc. 5(Suppl 4):S7. 10.1186/1753-6561-5-S4-S7
42
MaegawaS.GoughS. M.Watanabe-OkochiN.LuY.ZhangN.CastoroR. J.et al. (2014). Age-related epigenetic drift in the pathogenesis of MDS and AML. Genome Res.24, 580–591. 10.1101/gr.157529.113
43
MaegawaS.HinkalG.KimH. S.ShenL.ZhangL.ZhangJ.et al. (2010). Widespread and tissue specific age-related DNA methylation changes in mice. Genome Res.20, 332–340. 10.1101/gr.096826.109
44
MatsumotoY.BuemioA.ChuR.VafaeeM.CrewsD. (2013). Epigenetic control of gonadal aromatase (cyp19a1) in temperature-dependent sex determination of red-eared slider turtles. PLoS ONE8:e63599. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063599
45
MatsumotoY.HanniganB.CrewsD. (2016). Temperature shift alters dna methylation and histone modification patterns in gonadal aromatase (cyp19a1) gene in species with temperature-dependent sex determination. PLoS ONE11:e0167362. 10.1371/journal.pone.0167362
46
MawloodS. K.DennanyL.WatsonN.DempsterJ.PickardB. S. (2016). Quantification of global mitochondrial DNA methylation levels and inverse correlation with age at two CpG sites. Aging8, 636–641. 10.18632/aging.100892
47
NättD.AgnvallB.JensenP. (2014). Large sex differences in chicken behavior and brain gene expression coincide with few differences in promoter DNA-methylation. PLoS ONE9:e96376. 10.1371/journal.pone.0096376
48
NilsenF. M.ParrottB. B.BowdenJ. A.KassimB. L.SomervilleS. E.BryanT. A.et al. (2016). Global DNA methylation loss associated with mercury contamination and aging in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Sci. Total Environ.545, 389–397. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.059
49
NilssonE.JanssonP. A.PerfilyevA.VolkovP.PedersenM.SvenssonM. K.et al. (2014). Altered DNA methylation and differential expression of genes influencing metabolism and inflammation in adipose tissue from subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes63, 2962–2976. 10.2337/db13-1459
50
NusseyD. H.FroyH.LemaitreJ.-F.GaillardJ.-M.AustadS. N. (2013). Senescence in natural populations of animals: widespread evidence and its implications for bio-gerontology. Ageing Res. Rev.12, 214–225. 10.1016/j.arr.2012.07.004
51
OkamuraK.MatsumotoK. A.NakaiK. (2010). Gradual transition from mosaic to global DNA methylation patterns during deuterostome evolution. BMC Bioinformatics11(Suppl 7):S2. 10.1186/1471-2105-11-S7-S2
52
PaiA. A.BellJ. T.MarioniJ. C.PritchardJ. K.GiladY. (2011). A genome-wide study of DNA methylation patterns and gene expression levels in multiple human and chimpanzee tissues. PLoS Genet.7:e1001316. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001316
53
ParkJ. K.RyuJ. K.LeeK. H.LeeJ. K.YoonW. J.LeeS. H.et al. (2007). Quantitative analysis of NPTX2 hypermethylation is a promising molecular diagnostic marker for pancreatic cancer. Pancreas35, e9–e15. 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318153fa42
54
Parle-McdermottA.HarrisonA. (2011). DNA methylation: a timeline of methods and applications. Front. Genet.2:74. 10.3389/fgene.2011.00074
55
ParrottB. B.BowdenJ. A.KohnoS.Cloy-McCoyJ. A.HaleM. D.BangmaJ. T.et al. (2014). Influence of tissue, age, and environmental quality on DNA methylation in Alligator mississippiensis. Reproduction147, 503–513. 10.1530/REP-13-0498
56
PennerM.ParrishR.HoangL.RothT.LubinF.BarnesC. (2016). Age-related changes in Egr1 transcription and DNA methylation within the hippocampus. Hippocampus26, 1008–1020. 10.1002/hipo.22583
57
Pérez-BarberíaF.DuffE.BrewerM.GuinnessF. (2014). Evaluation of methods to age Scottish red deer: the balance between accuracy and practicality. J. Zool.294, 180–189. 10.1111/jzo.12166
58
PetkovichD. A.PodolskiyD. I.LobanovA. V.LeeS.-G.MillerR. A.GladyshevV. N. (2017). Using DNA methylation profiling to evaluate biological age and longevity interventions. Cell Metab.25, 954.e6–960.e6. 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.03.016
59
PolanowskiA. M.RobbinsJ.ChandlerD.JarmanS. N. (2014). Epigenetic estimation of age in humpback whales. Mol. Ecol. Resour.14, 976–987. 10.1111/1755-0998.12247
60
PongerL.LiW.-H. (2005). Evolutionary diversification of DNA methyltransferases in eukaryotic genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol.22, 1119–1128. 10.1093/molbev/msi098
61
PotokM. E.NixD. A.ParnellT. J.CairnsB. R. (2013). Reprogramming the maternal zebrafish genome after fertilization to match the paternal methylation pattern. Cell153, 759–772. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.030
62
QuachA.LevineM. E.TanakaT.LuA. T.ChenB. H.FerrucciL.et al. (2017). Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors. Aging9, 419–446. 10.18632/aging.101168
63
RandA. C.JainM.EizengaJ. M.Musselman-BrownA.OlsenH. E.AkesonM.et al. (2017). Mapping DNA methylation with high-throughput nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods14, 411–413. 10.1038/nmeth.4189
64
RomanoA.De GiorgioB.ParoliniM.FaveroC.PossentiC. D.IodiceS.et al. (2017). Methylation of the circadian clock gene in the offspring of a free-living passerine bird increases with maternal and individual exposure to PM 10. Environ. Pollut.220, 29–37. 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.060
65
ShimodaN.IzawaT.YoshizawaA.YokoiH.KikuchiY.HashimotoN. (2014). Decrease in cytosine methylation at CpG island shores and increase in DNA fragmentation during zebrafish aging. Age36, 103–115. 10.1007/s11357-013-9548-5
66
SimpsonJ. T.WorkmanR. E.ZuzarteP. C.DavidM.DursiL. J.TimpW. (2017). Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat. Methods14, 407–410. 10.1038/nmeth.4184
67
SpiersH.HannonE.WellsS.WilliamsB.FernandesC.MillJ. (2016). Age-associated changes in DNA methylation across multiple tissues in an inbred mouse model. Mech. Ageing Dev.154, 20–23. 10.1016/j.mad.2016.02.001
68
SteegengaW. T.BoekschotenM. V.LuteC.HooiveldG. J.De GrootP. J.MorrisT. J.et al. (2014). Genome-wide age-related changes in DNA methylation and gene expression in human PBMCs. Age36:9648. 10.1007/s11357-014-9648-x
69
StubbsT. M.BonderM. J.StarkA.-K.KruegerF.von MeyennF.StegleO.et al. (2017). Multi-tissue DNA methylation age predictor in mouse. Genome Biol.18, 68. 10.1186/s13059-017-1203-5
70
SunY. N.GaoY.QiaoS. P.WangS. Z.DuanK.WangY. X.et al. (2014). Epigenetic DNA methylation in the promoters of in chicken lines divergently selected for fatness. J. Anim. Sci.92, 48–53. 10.2527/jas.2013-6962
71
TeschendorffA. E.MenonU.Gentry-MaharajA.RamusS. J.WeisenbergerD. J.ShenH.et al. (2010). Age-dependent DNA methylation of genes that are suppressed in stem cells is a hallmark of cancer. Genome Res.20, 440–446. 10.1101/gr.103606.109
72
VanyushinB.MazinA.VasilyevV.BelozerskyA. (1973). The content of 5-methylcytosine in animal DNA: the species and tissue specificity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta299, 397–403. 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90264-5
73
VanyushinB. F.TkachevaS. G.BelozerskyA. N. (1970). Rare bases in animal DNA. Nature225, 948–949. 10.1038/225948a0
74
VarrialeA.BernardiG. (2006). DNA methylation in reptiles. Gene385, 122–127. 10.1016/j.gene.2006.05.034
75
VerhulstE. C.MatemanA. C.ZwierM. V.CaroS. P.VerhoevenK. J.Van OersK. (2016). Evidence from pyrosequencing indicates that natural variation in animal personality is associated with DRD4 DNA methylation. Mol. Ecol.25, 1801–11. 10.1111/mec.13519
76
Vidal-BraloL.Lopez-GolanY.GonzalezA. (2016). Simplified assay for epigenetic age estimation in whole blood of adults. Front. Genet.7:126. 10.3389/fgene.2016.00126
77
WagnerW. (2017). Epigenetic aging clocks in mice and men. Genome Biol.18, 107. 10.1186/s13059-017-1245-8
78
WeidnerC. I.LinQ.KochC. M.EiseleL.BeierF.ZieglerP.et al. (2014). Aging of blood can be tracked by DNA methylation changes at just three CpG sites. Genome Biol.15:R24. 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r24
79
YanX.-P.LiuH.-H.LiuJ.-Y.ZhangR.-P.WangG.-S.LiQ.-Q.et al. (2015). Evidence in duck for supporting alteration of incubation temperature may have influence on methylation of genomic DNA. Poult. Sci.94, 2537–2545. 10.3382/ps/pev201
80
YokomineT.HataK.TsudzukiM.SasakiH. (2006). Evolution of the vertebrate DNMT3 gene family: a possible link between existence of DNMT3L and genomic imprinting. Cytogenet. Genome Res.113, 75–80. 10.1159/000090817
81
ZaghloolS. B.Al-ShafaiM.Al MuftahW. A.KumarP.FalchiM.SuhreK. (2015). Association of DNA methylation with age, gender, and smoking in an Arab population. Clin. Epigenet.7:6. 10.1186/s13148-014-0040-6
82
Zbieć-PiekarskaR.SpólnickaM.KupiecT.MakowskaŻ.SpasA.Parys-ProszekA.et al. (2015a). Examination of DNA methylation status of the ELOVL2 marker may be useful for human age prediction in forensic science. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.14, 161–167. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.10.002
83
Zbieć-PiekarskaR.SpólnickaM.KupiecT.Parys-ProszekA.MakowskaŻ.PałeczkaA.et al. (2015b). Development of a forensically useful age prediction method based on DNA methylation analysis. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet.17, 173–9. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.05.001
84
ZhangM.YanF.-B.LiF.JiangK.-R.LiD.-H.HanR.-L.et al. (2017). Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles reveal novel candidate genes associated with meat quality at different age stages in hens. Sci. Rep.7:45564. 10.1038/srep45564
85
ZykovichA.HubbardA.FlynnJ. M.TarnopolskyM.FragaM. F.KerksickC.et al. (2014). Genome-wide DNA methylation changes with age in disease-free human skeletal muscle. Aging Cell13, 360–366. 10.1111/acel.12180
Summary
Keywords
epigenetics, ageing, methylation, wild animals, conservation, ecology
Citation
De Paoli-Iseppi R, Deagle BE, McMahon CR, Hindell MA, Dickinson JL and Jarman SN (2017) Measuring Animal Age with DNA Methylation: From Humans to Wild Animals. Front. Genet. 8:106. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00106
Received
28 June 2017
Accepted
02 August 2017
Published
17 August 2017
Volume
8 - 2017
Edited by
Alexey Moskalev, Institute of Biology of Komi Science Center of Ural Division of RAS, Russia
Reviewed by
Polina Mamoshina, Insilico Medicine, Inc., United States; George A. Garinis, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology (FORTH) and University of Crete, Greece
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2017 De Paoli-Iseppi, Deagle, McMahon, Hindell, Dickinson and Jarman.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi ricardo.depaoliiseppi@utas.edu.au
This article was submitted to Genetics of Aging, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.