Abstract
Research in the field of gerontology has traditionally focused on later life stages. There is increasing evidence, however, that both the rate of age-related functional decline and the later-life health status can be programmed during early development. The central role of epigenetic mechanisms (methylation of DNA, histone modifications and regulation by non-coding RNAs) in mediating these long-term effects has been elucidated. Both rate and direction of age-associated change of epigenetic patterns (“epigenetic drift”) were shown to be largely dependent on early-life environmental conditions. Inter-individual divergences in epigenetic profiles may arise following the stochastic errors in maintaining epigenetic marks, but they may also be adaptively mediated by specific environmental cues. Recent cohort studies indicate that ticking rate of epigenetic clock, estimated by a DNA methylation-based methods, may be developmentally adjusted, and that individual’s discrepancies among epigenetic and chronological age would be likely programmed early in development. In this Perspective article, recent findings suggesting the importance of early-life determinants for life-course dynamics of epigenetic drift are summarized and discussed.
Introduction
Genetic and lifestyle factors have been traditionally considered as main determinants of aging rate and longevity. However, accumulating data indicate that both individual’s aging trajectory and population mortality rate may substantially depend on developmental conditions (; ). The mechanistic pathways underlying such life-long effects are largely unknown, but modulation of epigenetic regulation of gene expression appears to be the most plausible explanation (). Epigenetic modifications refer to heritable changes in gene expression occurring without changes in DNA sequence. Main components of epigenetic control include DNA methylation, histone modifications, and regulation by non-coding RNAs. Initially, it was assumed that stochastic errors in maintaining epigenetic marks (“epimutations”) occur during the life course due to limitations in epigenetic settings of maintenance and repair functions (). Since age-related accumulation of epimutations inevitably leads to impairment of the normal gene responsiveness to environmental stresses and to gradual loss of phenotypic plasticity, this process is commonly believed to be one of the main causes of aging (). In addition, since age-related loss of DNA methylation may result in chromosome instability, and hypermethylation of DNA in promoter regions of tumor suppressor genes can cause their suppression, accumulation of epimutations with age could play an important role in the initiation and progression of different cancers (; ).
An accumulation of mistakes in maintaining normal epigenetic patterns leads to an increase in variability of epigenetic marks throughout the individual’s life course. This process currently referred to as “epigenetic drift” results in a gradual impairment of the body’s homeostatic mechanisms and appears to be a crucial hallmark of aging and an important determinant of longevity (). The earliest evidence for epigenetic drift in humans was provided from studies of monozygotic (MZ) twins. Within-pair comparison of such twins provides a useful model for investigation of factors regulating epigenetic variability by controlling for genetic variation. Despite MZ twins have the same genetic background their epigenetic profiles have been shown to gradually diverge with age (). Remarkably, most apparent divergences in epigenetic profiles have been observed in MZ twins who, according to questionnaire responses, had spent less of their lifetime together and/or had more differing natural health–medical history. Similarly, in recent study by , the correlation in genome-wide average DNA methylation levels between non-twin first-degree relatives was shown to increase with time living together and decrease with time living apart. An interaction between environmental conditions and age-related methylation divergence was also confirmed in a longitudinal, genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in MZ twins from birth to 18 months (). These findings collectively suggest that divergence in epigenetic profiles can occur not only via the stochastic epigenetic drift caused, e.g., by errors in the maintenance of DNA methylation patterns throughout DNA replication cycles, but may also be mediated directly by specific environmental cues (; ). From this, it is assumed that epigenome can respond to environmental challenges in an adaptive manner to maintain homeostasis and performance (, ; ). Thereby, the age-associated epigenome modification is increasingly seen as a process of memorization of environmental exposures experienced by organism over the lifetime. The epigenetic memorization likely affects the epigenetic drift rate. In this Perspective article, recent findings suggesting the importance of early-life determinants for life-course dynamics of epigenetic drift are summarized and discussed.
Early-Life Determinants of Epigenetic Drift
Multiple lines of evidence indicate that both direction and rate of age-associated epigenetic drift largely depend on early-life environmental conditions (). This is not surprising, since it is well known that the epigenome (the whole-genome totality of epigenetic marks) is highly plastic during the early developmental period, especially throughout the establishment of the cell lineage-specific profiles of gene expression (; ). In mammals, including humans, windows of early-life epigenetic plasticity extend from preconception through weaning (). After the establishment throughout early developmental stages, most epigenetic marks are stably propagated in course of numerous cell divisions. Such epigenetic cellular memory allows to maintain stable profiles of gene expression in particular cell lineages throughout lifetime. This process is commonly referred to as “developmental epigenetic programming” (). Importance of this period to future health status underlies the concept of the “first 1000 days,” prioritizing gestation and first 2 years after birth as a critical developmental period (). According to the concept of predictive adaptive response, early-life cues can be used by an organism to rearrangement of the epigenome in a way that provides greatest fitness dividends in future life (). If resulting phenotype is properly matched to predicted environmental conditions, such adaptive strategy results in survival benefits in adult life. If adaptive epigenetic fine-tuning in early life is, however, incorrect and a mismatch exists between the further living conditions and the developmentally programmed phenotype, it may cause increased disease risk in adulthood (). These conceptual considerations seem particularly relevant in the context of the topic discussed. The research findings suggesting the importance of early-life determinants for epigenetic programming of aging phenotypes and dynamics of epigenetic drift are presented in subsequent sections.
Evidence From Animal Models
Since human data are scarce owing to restricted access to suitable biological materials, the most direct evidence for the role of epigenetic regulation in developmental programming of aging and longevity phenotypes came from animal models. In study, perturbation of mitochondria throughout larval development not only delayed aging but also maintained unfolded protein response [UPR(mt)] signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, assuming an epigenetic mechanism contributing to both lifespan and mitochondrial proteostasis across life course. In particular, reducing the function of lysine demethylases, JMJD-1.2/PHF8 and JMJD-3.1/JMJD3, has been shown to be able to potentially suppress longevity and UPR(mt) induction, while gain of function was sufficient to extend lifespan in a UPR(mt)-dependent manner. In the study, the ASH-2 trithorax complex, which trimethylates histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4), was identified as another important player in epigenetic programming of longevity in nematode. Remarkably, developmental activation of a particular longevity-regulating signaling pathways caused by misregulation of H3K4me2, led to a transgenerational lifespan extension in F2-F4 nematode offspring, potentially indicative of epigenetic memory (). The possibility of such epigenetically mediated transgenerational effects on the worm’s longevity has been also confirmed in more recent studies (; ; ).
Transgenerational effects on reproductive activity and longevity of Drosophila melanogaster induced by post-eclosion manipulation with dietary protein content were reported by . In this research, both low- and high-protein diets reduced lifespan, while the intermediate-protein diet significantly extended longevity until F3 generation. In a subsequent study, feeding with a low-protein diet throughout the post-eclosion period resulted in a shortened life expectancy in F0 generation as well as in F2 offspring. These effects were accompanied by upregulating the H3K27-specific methyltransferase, E(z), and enhanced levels of H3K27 trimethylation, H3K27me3 (). Interestingly, both RNAi-mediated knockdown of E(z) and pharmacological inhibiting its enzymatic function with a specific inhibitor of histone methyltransferase, Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438), lowered H3K27me3 levels across generations. In addition, Tazemetostat completely abolished the lifespan-shortening effect of the parental low-protein diet.
In rodent models, confirmatory evidence was also obtained for the role of factors such as xenobiotic exposure, stress, and malnutrition in developmental epigenetic programming of pathways contributed to the control of aging and longevity (for reviews, see ; ; ). For example, in the study by , prenatal malnutrition led to disrupted patterns of DNA methylation and dysregulation of transcriptional activity of genes implicated in aging-related processes and development of metabolic disorders in young (9-week-old) rat offspring. Remarkably, these dysregulated epigenetic patterns have been similar to those revealed in aged (20-month-old) offspring.
Evidence From Twin Models
The evidence that epigenetic drift can be developmentally programmed was mostly obtained from studies in birth-weight discordant MZ twins. Birth weight was used in these studies as a proxy for prenatal conditions. Such research design generally relies on investigating twins raised in shared family environments, which may provide control not only for common genetic background but also for similar postnatal rearing environment. In the study by , strong evidence of gene expression discordance in MZ twins at birth was found in two different cell types. Among genes showing most different expression patterns within pairs, there were genes involved in stress response, metabolism, and cardiovascular function. In several recent studies, evidence was also obtained that early-life-induced epigenetic alterations may persist into adulthood. Although very similar genome-wide profiles of DNA methylation were found in saliva samples from discordant for birth weight adult female MZ twins (), more recent studies revealed persistent differences in DNA methylation profiles. Importantly, most of these differentially methylated genes were known to be implicated in aging-associated processes. Pronounced differences in fetal growth (discordance in birth weight more than 20%) were significantly associated with DNA methylation changes in the IGF1R gene during adulthood (). In an epigenome-wide DNA methylation analysis conducted to examine adult MZ twins discordant for birth weight, a region on chromosome 1 has been identified as being differentially methylated for birth-weight discordance (). This region covered two metabolism-associated genes, CRYZ and TYW3. Genome-wide methylome profiling in blood samples from adult MZ twins discordant for birth weight did not reveal any differences in DNA methylation patterns between twins, although particular sites displayed age-associated intra-pair differential methylation in highly birth weight-discordant twin pairs (). The evidence that life-course dynamics of epigenetic drift is largely dependent from early-life programming events was also obtained from non-MZ twin models. In analyzing results from seven twin and/or family studies, found that correlation in genome-wide average DNA methylation levels is very high at birth and remains high enough throughout life course in both twins and non-twin first-degree relatives. On the basis of these data, the authors concluded that genome-wide DNA methylation levels are determined in utero by prenatal environmental exposures, and these effects persist throughout life.
Quasi-Experimental Evidence
Research findings indicative of contribution of epigenetic mechanisms to developmental programming of adverse later-life health outcomes were also obtained in quasi-experimental studies. Such research design (also referred to as “natural experiment”) is defined as “naturally occurring circumstances in which subsets of the population have different levels of exposure to a supposed causal factor, in a situation resembling an actual experiment where human subjects would be randomly allocated to groups” (). The Dutch famine, that took place in the German-occupied part of Netherlands in 1944–1945, is the most studied in this respect. The signs of accelerated aging were repeatedly reported in the cohort born during this famine, including impaired physical function, lowered cognitive performance, more atherogenic plasma lipid profile, enhanced stress responsivity, increased risk for depression and cardiometabolic disorders (; ; ), and also the enhanced mortality rate () at older ages. These adverse health outcomes were accompanied by persistent epigenetic changes. Whereas no association has been reported between prenatal exposure to the Dutch famine and the overall level of DNA methylation in adult life (), levels of DNA methylation of particular genes have been strongly associated with prenatal exposure to famine in the whole blood samples from adult offspring. Among the genes found to be differentially methylated between the famine-exposed subjects and non-exposed control individuals, there were genes known to be implicated in the development of cardiometabolic phenotypes, such as IGF2 (), and also GNASAS, IL10, LEP, ABCA1, INSIGF, and MEG3 (). More recently, differential methylation of genomic regions extended along pathways associated with growth and metabolism was observed in persons periconceptionally exposed to famine (). Early, but not mid or late gestation, was identified as a critical time window for inducing persistent changes in DNA methylation profiles (). Even though it has not been reported until now whether it is a correlation between the DNA methylation and gene expression levels, the revealed DNA methylation modification was clearly related to impaired metabolic homeostasis in adult individuals who were prenatally exposed to famine (; ). Similar results were obtained in studying long-term consequences of the perinatal exposure to famine in rural Bangladesh. In this study, those offspring who were exposed to famine perinatally were demonstrated to be at higher risk of developing obesity and type 2 diabetes during adulthood in comparison with unexposed control subjects. These health outcomes were associated with significant differences in methylation levels in metastable epialleles such as PRDM-9, VTRNA2-1, PAX8, near BOLA, near ZFP57, and EXD3 ().
Developmental Adjustment of Epigenetic Clock
Recently, DNA methylation has gained significant interest as a powerful biomarker of aging allowing to quantify the individual aging rate and inter-individual variations in functional decline and timing of disease onset during the life course (). In particular, the multi-tissue algorithm developed by allows to produce age estimates which correlate with chronological age well above r = 0.90 for full age range samples. Recent cohort studies indicated that ticking rate of epigenetic clock, estimated by DNA methylation-based methods, may be developmentally adjusted, and that individual’s discrepancies between epigenetic and chronological age may be programmed early in life. The supporting evidence for this came mainly from cohort studies. In most of these studies, the differences between actual chronological age and calculated DNA methylation age have been estimated using Horvath’s method (). For example, dependence of adult rate of epigenetic aging (age acceleration, AgeAccel) from childhood conditions was evaluated in the study by . AgeAccel was defined as residual from regressing epigenetic age on actual age. The association between birth weight and AgeAccel during adolescence was found in two birth cohorts in this study. In analysis of the profiles of DNA methylation across five time-points in mother-child pairs from a United Kingdom birth cohort, adolescent AgeAccel was associated with maternal alcohol consumption during pregnancy. In a subsequent longitudinal study conducted with the same birth cohort, strong associations between AgeAccel and several developmental characteristics including height, weight, fat mass, and body mass index during childhood and adolescence have been demonstrated (). An inverse association between pubertal tempo and AgeAccel in girls was shown in the longitudinal Growth and Obesity Cohort Study (). Similar findings were obtained in two Finnish follow-up cohorts where AgeAccel levels were established in pre-adult life and remained unchanged during the rest of the lifetime, even in oldest-old ages (). On the basis of these findings, the epigenetic clock theory of aging was recently proposed by , which postulated that epigenetic clock links developmental processes to aging.
Hypothetical Considerations
Based on the conceptual frameworks and research findings above, it can be assumed that life-course dynamics of epigenetic aging can depend on early-life events and that the mode of this dependence can be different depending on the stage affected and on the type, duration and intensity of exposure. Most data on this relationship correspond to common intuitive notions. Adverse environmental exposures early in life can result in an elevated rate of accumulation of epimutations without accelerating the rate of epigenetic aging. This may increase intercept parameter without changing the slope parameter in the linear regression model describing this relationship (“premature epigenetic aging,” Figure 1A). Inappropriate developmental programming due to, e.g., mismatched epigenetic adaptation, may cause increase in slope (“accelerated epigenetic aging,” Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1
Some findings on long-term consequences of early-life programming events are, however, counterintuitive and require additional assumptions. For example, in analyzing the deceleration of the old-age mortality rate observed across developed countries over the second part of the XXth century, suggested that some centenarians paradoxically come from an initially frail part of the cohort. The authors hypothesized that more vulnerable (and likely more labile) organism can better improve its stress reactivity than more robust (and rigid) one. This can result in survival advantages to originally more vulnerable organisms at older ages. The evidence for this assumption also comes from studies conducted to test hygiene hypothesis proposed by to explain the link between the lack of microbial exposure due to overhygienic conditions in childhood and high risk of allergic and autoimmune disorders in later life. The overhygienization is becoming increasingly widespread in modern world, and it is believed to cause increased antibiotic resistance and permanently increasing number of persons with weakened immunity in developed societies (). Although lack of microbial exposure may not be the only causal factor, the assumptions of this hypothesis have been repeatedly confirmed through both observational and experimental studies (). Under-using of immune system early in life can likely cause not only atopic conditions, but also autoimmune states (). The latter seems especially important since immunosenescence are regarded now as one of the leading processes underlying aging. Importantly, although inflamm-aging is traditionally regarded as leading cause of most age-related disorders, such strictly negative interpretation of immunosenescence is challenged now by many immune-gerontologists. Age-associated immune changes are increasingly considered as adaptive or remodeling rather than solely detrimental (). Despite the fact that these immune changes can obviously cause various pathological conditions, these alterations may potentially contribute to developing extended longevity phenotypes. It is even suggested by the authors that without the presence of the immunosenescence/inflamm-aging, human longevity would be substantially shortened (). An important point in the context of the topic discussed is that complex interactions between immune and epigenetic pathways likely play an important role in these effects (; ). Given the fact that these processes can have a significant impact on epigenome, they may likely decelerate the epigenetic clock-ticking rate by increasing the intercept parameter and by decreasing slope value (“slowed epigenetic aging,” Figure 1C), even though initial level of accumulation of epimutations could be higher in early-life exposed population than in unexposed one. Interestingly, in the study by , epigenetic age was shown to be increasing at a slower rate than chronological age across life course, especially in the oldest population. The selection bias in which healthier individuals are more likely to reach older ages was proposed to explain these results by the authors. The individual induction due to epigenetic adaptation might, however, be an alternative explanation. For a definitive conclusion, nevertheless, more thorough research is required.
Conclusive Remarks
Research in the field of gerontology has traditionally focused on later stages of the life cycle. There is, however, increasing evidence that the rate of age-related functional decline and risk for aging-associated diseases can largely depend on developmental conditions. Growing awareness of the of developmental programming in the pathogenesis of adult-life chronic pathological conditions and unraveling the mechanisms involved led to rising interest in research in this area. The developmental programming processes would likely be of particular importance in modern developed societies due to significant lifestyle changes (westernized diet, sedentary behavior, etc.), which can often conflict with adaptive epigenetic strategies programmed during development.
Two important points follow from these considerations for future research and practical applications. First, further development of epigenetic methodology will provide an opportunity to identify individuals at risk for developing certain age-related pathological condition due to early-life malprogramming long before the clinical manifestation of the disease. Second, since epimutations, unlike genetic mutations, are potentially reversible, they may be corrected by specific nutritional and/or pharmacological interventions. The implementation of such epigenome-targeted interventions would allow to influence life-course dynamics of epigenetic age and slow down the ticking rate of the epigenetic clock to delay or decelerate the aging-related processes.
Statements
Author contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Oksana Zabuga for the technical assistance in preparing this manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AlvaresS. M.MayberryG. A.JoynerE. Y.LakowskiB.AhmedS. (2014). H3K4 demethylase activities repress proliferative and postmitotic aging.Aging Cell13245–253. 10.1111/acel.12166
2
AmbeskovicM.RoseboomT. J.MetzG. A. S. (2018). Transgenerational effects of early environmental insults on aging and disease incidence.Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev.10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.08.002 [Epub ahead of print].
3
BatesonP.GluckmanP.HansonM. (2014). The biology of developmental plasticity and the predictive adaptive response hypothesis.J. Physiol.5922357–2368. 10.1113/jphysiol.2014.271460
4
Bianco-MiottoT.CraigJ. M.GasserY. P.van DijkS. J.OzanneS. E. (2017). Epigenetics and DOHaD: from basics to birth and beyond.J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis.111–7. 10.1017/S2040174417000733
5
BinderA. M.CorvalanC.MericqV.PereiraA.SantosJ. L.HorvathS.et al (2018). Faster ticking rate of the epigenetic clock is associated with faster pubertal development in girls.Epigenetics1385–94. 10.1080/15592294.2017.1414127
6
BlekerL. S.de RooijS. R.PainterR. C.van der VeldeN.RoseboomT. J. (2016). Prenatal undernutrition and physical function and frailty at the age of 68 years: the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study.J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.711306–1314. 10.1093/gerona/glw081
7
BloomfieldS. F.RookG. A.ScottE. A.ShanahanF.Stanwell-SmithR.TurnerP. (2016). Time to abandon the hygiene hypothesis: new perspectives on allergic disease, the human microbiome, infectious disease prevention and the role of targeted hygiene.Perspect. Public Health136213–224. 10.1177/1757913916650225
8
BurnsS. B.SzyszkowiczJ. K.LuheshiG. N.LutzP. E.TureckiG. (2018). Plasticity of the epigenome during early-life stress.Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol.77115–132. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.09.033
9
ChenM.BaumbachJ.VandinF.RöttgerR.BarbosaE.DongM.et al (2016). Differentially methylated genomic regions in birth-weight discordant twin pairs.Ann. Hum. Genet.8081–87. 10.1111/ahg.12146
10
CortessisV. K.ThomasD. C.LevineA. J.BretonC. V.MackT. M.SiegmundK. D.et al (2012). Environmental epigenetics: prospects for studying epigenetic mediation of exposure-response relationships.Hum. Genet.1311565–1589. 10.1007/s00439-012-1189-8
11
CunliffeV. T. (2015). Experience-sensitive epigenetic mechanisms, developmental plasticity, and the biological embedding of chronic disease risk.Wiley. Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med.753–71. 10.1002/wsbm.1291
12
FeinbergA. P.KoldobskiyM. A.GöndörA. (2016). Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression.Nat. Rev. Genet.17284–299. 10.1038/nrg.2016.13
13
FinerS.IqbalM. S.LoweR.OgunkoladeB. W.PervinS.MathewsC.et al (2016). Is famine exposure during developmental life in rural Bangladesh associated with a metabolic and epigenetic signature in young adulthood? A historical cohort study.BMJ Open6:e011768. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011768
14
FragaM. F.BallestarE.PazM. F.RoperoS.SetienF.BallestarM. L.et al (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10210604–10609. 10.1073/pnas.0500398102
15
FulopT.LarbiA.DupuisG.Le PageA.FrostE. H.CohenA. A.et al (2018). Immunosenescence and inflamm-aging as two sides of the same coin: Friends or foes?Front. Immunol.8:1960. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01960
16
GarmendiaM. L.CorvalanC.UauyR. (2014). Assessing the public health impact of developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) nutrition interventions.Ann. Nutr. Metab.64226–230. 10.1159/000365024
17
GodfreyK. M.LillycropK. A.BurdgeG. C.GluckmanP. D.HansonM. A. (2007). Epigenetic mechanisms and the mismatch concept of the developmental origins of health and disease.Pediatr. Res.615R–10R. 10.1203/pdr.0b013e318045bedb
18
GordonL.JooJ. H.AndronikosR.OllikainenM.WallaceE. M.UmstadM. P.et al (2011). Expression discordance of monozygotic twins at birth: effect of intrauterine environment and a possible mechanism for fetal programming.Epigenetics6579–592. 10.4161/epi.6.5.15072
19
GravinaS.VijgJ. (2010). Epigenetic factors in aging and longevity.Pflugers Arch.459247–258. 10.1007/s00424-009-0730-7
20
GreerE. L.BeckerB.LatzaC.AntebiA.ShiY. (2016). Mutation of C. elegans demethylase spr-5 extends transgenerational longevity.Cell Res.26229–238. 10.1038/cr.2015.148
21
GreerE. L.MauresT. J.HauswirthA. G.GreenE. M.LeemanD. S.MaroG. S.et al (2010). Members of the H3K4 trimethylation complex regulate lifespan in a germline-dependent manner in C. elegans.Nature466383–387. 10.1038/nature09195
22
GreerE. L.MauresT. J.UcarD.HauswirthA. G.ManciniE.LimJ. P.et al (2011). Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nature479365–373. 10.1038/nature10572
23
Grolleau-JuliusA.RayD.YungR. L. (2010). The role of epigenetics in aging and autoimmunity.Clin. Rev. Allergy Immunol.3942–50. 10.1007/s12016-009-8169-3
24
HeijmansB. T.TobiE. W.SteinA. D.PutterH.BlauwG. J.SusserE. S.et al (2008). Persistent epigenetic differences associated with prenatal exposure to famine in humans.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10517046–17049. 10.1073/pnas.0806560105
25
HeoH. J.TozourJ. N.DelahayeF.ZhaoY.CuiL.BarzilaiN.et al (2016). Advanced aging phenotype is revealed by epigenetic modifications in rat liver after in utero malnutrition.Aging Cell15964–972. 10.1111/acel.12505
26
HermanJ. J.SpencerH. G.DonohueK.SultanS. E. (2014). How stable ’should’ epigenetic modifications be? Insights from adaptive plasticity and bet hedging.Evolution68632–643. 10.1111/evo.12324
27
HochbergZ.FeilR.ConstanciaM.FragaM.JunienC.CarelJ. C.et al (2011). Child health, developmental plasticity, and epigenetic programming.Endocr. Rev.32159–224. 10.1210/er.2009-0039
28
HollidayR. (1987). The inheritance of epigenetic defects.Science238163–170. 10.1126/science.3310230
29
HorvathS. (2013). DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.Genome Biol.14:R115. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-10-r115
30
HorvathS.RajK. (2018). DNA methylation-based biomarkers and the epigenetic clock theory of ageing.Nat. Rev. Genet.19371–384. 10.1038/s41576-018-0004-3
31
IurlaroM.von MeyennF.ReikW. (2017). DNA methylation homeostasis in human and mouse development.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.43101–109. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.02.003
32
JasiulionisM. G. (2018). Abnormal epigenetic regulation of immune system during aging.Front. Immunol.9:197. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00197
33
JungM.PfeiferG. P. (2015). Aging and DNA methylation.BMC Biol.13:7. 10.1186/s12915-015-0118-4
34
KananenL.MarttilaS.NevalainenT.KummolaL.JunttilaI.MononenN.et al (2016). The trajectory of the blood DNA methylome ageing rate is largely set before adulthood: evidence from two longitudinal studies.Age38:65. 10.1007/s11357-016-9927-9
35
KishimotoS.UnoM.OkabeE.NonoM.NishidaE. (2017). Environmental stresses induce transgenerationally inheritable survival advantages via germline-to-soma communication in Caenorhabditis elegans.Nat. Commun.8:14031. 10.1038/ncomms14031
36
KramerA.BekeschusS.BrökerB. M.SchleibingerH.RazaviB.AssadianO. (2013). Maintaining health by balancing microbial exposure and prevention of infection: the hygiene hypothesis versus the hypothesis of early immune challenge.J. Hosp. Infect.83S29–S34. 10.1016/S0195-6701(13)60007-9
37
LastJ. M. (ed.). (1995). A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 3rd Edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
38
LevineM. E.LuA. T.QuachA.ChenB. H.AssimesT. L.BandinelliS.et al (2018). An epigenetic biomarker of aging for lifespan and healthspan.Aging10573–591. 10.18632/aging.101414
39
LiS.WongE. M.DuguéP. A.McRaeA. F.KimE.JooJ. E.et al (2018). Genome-wide average DNA methylation is determined in utero.Int. J. Epidemiol.10.1093/ije/dyy028 [Epub ahead of print].
40
LiY.TollefsbolT. O. (2016). Age-related epigenetic drift and phenotypic plasticity loss: implications in prevention of age-related human diseases.Epigenomics81637–1651. 10.2217/epi-2016-0078
41
LumeyL. H.SteinA. D.KahnH. S.van der Pal-de BruinK. M.BlauwG. J.ZybertP. A.et al (2007). Cohort profile: the Dutch Hunger Winter families study.Int. J. Epidemiol.361196–1204. 10.1093/ije/dym126
42
LumeyL. H.SteinA. D.SusserE. (2011). Prenatal famine and adult health.Annu. Rev. Public Health32237–262. 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031210-101230
43
LumeyL. H.TerryM. B.Delgado-CruzataL.LiaoY.WangQ.SusserE.et al (2012). Adult global DNA methylation in relation to pre-natal nutrition.Int. J. Epidemiol.41116–123. 10.1093/ije/dyr137
44
Maia RdaR.Wünsch FilhoV. (2013). Infection and childhood leukemia: review of evidence.Rev. Saude Publica471172–1185. 10.1590/S0034-8910.2013047004753
45
MarioniR. E.SudermanM.ChenB. H.HorvathS.BandinelliS.MorrisT.et al (2018). Tracking the epigenetic clock across the human life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort data.J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.10.1093/gerona/gly060 [Epub ahead of print].
46
MartinoD.LokeY. J.GordonL.OllikainenM.CruickshankM. N.SafferyR.et al (2013). Longitudinal, genome-scale analysis of DNA methylation in twins from birth to 18 months of age reveals rapid epigenetic change in early life and pair-specific effects of discordance.Genome Biol.14:R42. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r42
47
MendelsohnA. R.LarrickJ. W. (2017). Epigenetic drift is a determinant of mammalian lifespan.Rejuvenation Res.20430–436. 10.1089/rej.2017.2024
48
MerkwirthC.JovaisaiteV.DurieuxJ.MatilainenO.JordanS. D.QuirosP. M.et al (2016). Two conserved histone demethylases regulate mitochondrial stress-induced longevity.Cell1651209–1223. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.012
49
RoseboomT. J.PainterR. C.van AbeelenA. F.VeenendaalM. V.de RooijS. R. (2011). Hungry in the womb: What are the consequences? Lessons from the Dutch famine.Maturitas70141–145. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.06.017
50
SimpkinA. J.HemaniG.SudermanM.GauntT. R.LyttletonO.McardleW. L.et al (2016). Prenatal and early life influences on epigenetic age in children: a study of mother-offspring pairs from two cohort studies.Hum. Mol. Genet.25191–201. 10.1093/hmg/ddv456
51
SimpkinA. J.HoweL. D.TillingK.GauntT. R.LyttletonO.McArdleW. L.et al (2017). The epigenetic clock and physical development during childhood and adolescence: longitudinal analysis from a UK birth cohort.Int. J. Epidemiol.46549–558. 10.1093/ije/dyw307
52
SourenN. Y.LutsikP.GasparoniG.TierlingS.GriesJ.RiemenschneiderM.et al (2013). Adult monozygotic twins discordant for intra-uterine growth have indistinguishable genome-wide DNA methylation profiles.Genome Biol.14:R44. 10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r44
53
StrachanD. P. (1989). Hay fever, hygiene, and household size.BMJ2991259–1260. 10.1136/bmj.299.6710.1259
54
TanQ.FrostM.HeijmansB. T.von Bornemann HjelmborgJ.TobiE. W.ChristensenK.et al (2014). Epigenetic signature of birth weight discordance in adult twins.BMC Genomics15:1062. 10.1186/1471-2164-15-1062
55
Tarry-AdkinsJ. L.OzanneS. E. (2014). The impact of early nutrition on the ageing trajectory.Proc. Nutr. Soc.73289–301. 10.1017/S002966511300387X
56
Tarry-AdkinsJ. L.OzanneS. E. (2017). Nutrition in early life and age-associated diseases.Ageing Res. Rev.3996–105. 10.1016/j.arr.2016.08.003
57
TobiE. W.GoemanJ. J.MonajemiR.GuH.PutterH.ZhangY.et al (2014). DNA methylation signatures link prenatal famine exposure to growth and metabolism.Nat. Commun.5:5592. 10.1038/ncomms6592
58
TobiE. W.LumeyL. H.TalensR. P.KremerD.PutterH.SteinA. D.et al (2009). DNA methylation differences after exposure to prenatal famine are common and timing- and sex-specific.Hum. Mol. Genet.184046–4053. 10.1093/hmg/ddp353
59
TobiE. W.SliekerR. C.LuijkR.DekkersK. F.SteinA. D.XuK. M.et al (2018). DNA methylation as a mediator of the association between prenatal adversity and risk factors for metabolic disease in adulthood.Sci. Adv.4:eaao4364. 10.1126/sciadv.aao4364
60
TobiE. W.SliekerR. C.SteinA. D.SuchimanH. E.SlagboomP. E.van ZwetE. W.et al (2015). Early gestation as the critical time-window for changes in the prenatal environment to affect the adult human blood methylome.Int. J. Epidemiol.441211–1223. 10.1093/ije/dyv043
61
TsaiP. C.Van DongenJ.TanQ.WillemsenG.ChristiansenL.BoomsmaD. I.et al (2015). DNA Methylation changes in the IGF1R gene in birth weight discordant adult monozygotic twins.Twin Res. Hum. Genet.18635–646. 10.1017/thg.2015.76
62
VaisermanA. (2015). Epidemiologic evidence for association between adverse environmental exposures in early life and epigenetic variation: a potential link to disease susceptibility?Clin. Epigenetics7:96. 10.1186/s13148-015-0130-0
63
VaisermanA.KoliadaA.LushchakO. (2018). Developmental programming of aging trajectory.Ageing Res. Rev.47105–122. 10.1016/j.arr.2018.07.007
64
VaisermanA. M. (2008). Epigenetic engineering and its possible role in anti-aging intervention.Rejuvenation Res.1139–42. 10.1089/rej.2007.0579
65
VaisermanA. M. (2010). Hormesis, adaptive epigenetic reorganization, and implications for human health and longevity.Dose Response816–21. 10.2203/dose-response.09-014.Vaiserman
66
VaisermanA. M. (2014). Early-life nutritional programming of longevity.J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis.5325–338. 10.1017/S2040174414000294
67
van AbeelenA. F.VeenendaalM. V.PainterR. C.de RooijS. R.DijkgraafM. G.BossuytP. M.et al (2012). Survival effects of prenatal famine exposure.Am. J. Clin. Nutr.95179–183. 10.3945/ajcn.111.022038
68
XiaB.de BelleJ. S. (2016). Transgenerational programming of longevity and reproduction by post-eclosion dietary manipulation in Drosophila.Aging81115–1134. 10.18632/aging.100932
69
XiaB.GerstinE.SchonesD. E.HuangW.Steven de BelleJ. (2016). Transgenerational programming of longevity through E(z)-mediated histone H3K27 trimethylation in Drosophila.Aging82988–3008. 10.18632/aging.101107
70
YashinA. I.UkraintsevaS. V.De BenedictisG.AnisimovV. N.ButovA. A.ArbeevK.et al (2001). Have the oldest old adults ever been frail in the past? A hypothesis that explains modern trends in survival.J. Gerontol. A. Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.56B432–B442. 10.1093/gerona/56.10.B432
Summary
Keywords
DNA methylation, age-related disease, aging rate, developmental programming, epigenetic clock, epigenetic drift
Citation
Vaiserman A (2018) Developmental Tuning of Epigenetic Clock. Front. Genet. 9:584. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00584
Received
01 October 2018
Accepted
09 November 2018
Published
22 November 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Yonghan He, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Reviewed by
Carsten Merkwirth, Ferring Research Institute, Inc., United States; Ionel Sandovici, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; Fu-Hui Xiao, Kunming Institute of Zoology (CAS), China
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Vaiserman.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Alexander Vaiserman, vaiserman@geront.kiev.ua; vaiserman23@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Genetics of Aging, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.