Abstract
CircRNAs (circular RNAs) are a class of RNAs generated from circularization with multiple novel functions. Recent studies have revealed the aberrant expression and aberrant functions of circRNAs in various tumors; thus, circRNAs have been recognized as promising cancer biomarkers. However, the underlying mechanisms behind their aberrant expression and functions remain unclear. In this review, we discuss at length the cancer-specific deregulation of circRNAs and the potential underlying aberrant events in circRNA biogenesis, localization and removal in cancer cells.
Background
CircRNAs are a type of RNA in eukaryotes that are spared from exonucleolytic degradation by RNase R given their circular structures and subsequent lack of accessibility of RNase to 3′ and 5′ ends. In 1976, circRNAs were first discovered in a viroid, and they were considered insignificant byproducts for a long period of time (Sanger et al., 1976). Until the last decade, rapid advances in RNA-sequencing have promoted investigations into circular RNAs. CircRNAs can be generally divided into five categories: exonic circRNAs (ecircRNA), circular RNAs from introns (ciRNAs), exon-intron circRNAs (EIciRNA), intergenic circRNAs, and antisense circRNAs (Memczak et al., 2013; Qian et al., 2018). EcircRNAs containing exclusively exon(s) represent the major class, accounting for approximately 85% of all types of circRNAs (Qian et al., 2018). CiRNAs are generated from intron lariats depending on two specific RNA motifs at specific sites, but so far ciRNAs haven’t been revealed to be involved in cancer (Zhang et al., 2013). EIciRNAs consist of both exons and introns that typically localize and function in the nucleus (Li Z. et al., 2015). Two additional circRNAs, namely intergenic circRNAs and antisense circRNAs are not common and are not fully understood to date (Qian et al., 2018). Different types of circRNAs are generated from pre-mRNAs (precursor mRNAs) via different mechanisms (; Zhang Y. et al., 2016), such as exon skipping, intron pairing and RNA-binding proteins, that combine to drive the head-to-tail junctions to join together as previously reviewed (Dragomir and Calin, 2018).
In this review, we focus on the new advances in the abnormal expression and functions of circRNAs in cancers, which may account for tumorigenesis and progression. An increasing number of studies have emerged to reveal how circRNAs alter the behavior of tumor cells, but there are no reports on the mechanisms responsible for their abnormal expression. Based on recent findings on circRNAs, we discuss possible mechanisms behind the deregulation of circRNA in cancers to provide insights into the etiology, diagnosis and therapy of cancers.
Aberrant Expression and Functions of Circrnas in Cancer
In normal tissues, the expression of circRNA exhibits the following characteristics: (1) Conservation of circRNA expression. A study comparing expression patterns of circRNAs among species suggested ancient and conserved features of circRNA expression. The expression of circRNA isoforms is likely to be derived from orthologous genes, and the functional sequence elements of circRNAs are conserved in subsets (Wang P.L. et al., 2014; ; Dong and Ma, 2017). (2) The complexity of circRNA expression (Li X. et al., 2018). A previous study concluded that during evolution, the circRNA expression pattern becomes increasingly complex as the distribution of orientation-opposite complementary sequences in their flanking introns becomes increasingly diverse (Dong and Ma, 2017). From the perspective of individual genes, various circRNAs can be generated from one sequence (Gao et al., 2016). (3) Cell/tissue-specific expression (Zhang Y. et al., 2016). CircRNAs are extraordinarily abundant and diverse in the brain compared with other tissues, and their expression in brain tissue is increased several fold compared with their linear isoforms (Rybak-Wolf et al., 2015). Host genes coding synaptic proteins may serve as a source of abundant circRNA. Recent work in human hematopoietic cells reveals a circular RNA cell-type specific expression pattern (Nicolet et al., 2018). (4) Stage-specific expression. Dynamic expression of certain circRNAs has been observed in some specific developmental stages, such as human pre-implantation embryos (), human fetal development (Szabo et al., 2015), and aging (Westholm et al., 2014). During the differentiation of cells, such as neural cells and myoblasts, abrupt fluctuation of circRNA expression has been reported (Salzman et al., 2013).
The aberrant expression of circRNAs is prevalent in a large number of diseases, especially tumors (Haque and Harries, 2017; Lei et al., 2018; E et al., 2018). As a result, circRNAs have been proposed as biomarkers of diagnosis, prognosis or therapy in specific cancers (Meng et al., 2017; Qian et al., 2018; Wang D. et al., 2018; Yang and Wang, 2018; Zhou J. et al., 2018) based on the convenience of detecting circRNA in the blood plasma of patients. The abnormal expression of circRNAs in cancer is usually accompanied by abnormal functions (; Patop and Kadener, 2018).
Abnormal circRNA/lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA Loop
A circRNA called Cdr1as was first discovered as a “miRNA sponge” in human and mouse brains in 2013 (Hansen et al., 2013). CircRNAs, as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) with linear mRNAs binding to miRNAs, enhance the expression of target genes (Thomson and Dinger, 2016) and affect the biological behaviors of multiple tumors. For example, the hsa_circ_0007534/miR-761/ZIC5 axis promotes glioma by promoting glial cell proliferation and migration (Li G.F. et al., 2018), and circ-ANAPC7/miR-181 may participate in acute myeloid leukemia pathogenesis (). Other examples of circRNAs functioning as miRNA sponges in cancer processes, such as proliferation, migration, and angiogenesis, are presented in Figure 1 (Mignacca et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017; Zhong Z. et al., 2017; ; Wang H. et al., 2018). In addition, lncRNA (long non-coding RNA), circRNA and mi-RNA interact with each other in a complicated manner, and they combine as RNA networks in cells (Kleaveland et al., 2018). The circRNA/lncRNA/miRNA/mRNA loop is involved in cancer such as bladder cancer (Li M. et al., 2018) due to the complex associations among circRNAs, lncRNAs, miRNA, mRNA and cancer (Nan et al., 2017; Kleaveland et al., 2018).
FIGURE 1
Aberrant Transcriptional Regulation or Aberrant RNA Splicing
The patterns of circRNAs in transcriptional regulation in the nucleus may have similarities with some lncRNAs in cancer (Eidem et al., 2016; Schmitt and Chang, 2017). However, the regulatory roles of lncRNAs in transcription are considerably more varied as they accumulate and act in both cis and trans, whereas circRNAs accumulate and act in cis (). The methods for transcriptional regulation include interaction with Pol II or other associated enzymes (Zhang et al., 2013; Li Z. et al., 2015) and RNA:DNA hybrid formation (). For example, EIcircRNAs such as circEIF3J and circPAIP2 promote the transcription of the host genes through interplay with U1 snRNP, Pol II, and the promoters in HeLa cells and HEK293 cells (Li Z. et al., 2015). However, whether these functions exist in other cancer cells remains unknown. Another study in Arabidopsis found that the SEP3 exon 6 circRNA binds to DNA as a R-loop, inhibiting transcription (). Besides these function, circRNAs are involved in RNA splicing via competition with pre-mRNA splicing or as novel small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) in splicing (Qin et al., 2018). For example, the circularization of circMbl from the second exon of the splicing factor muscleblind competes with canonical pre-mRNA splicing (). As a downregulated biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer, circ-UBR5 binds QKI, NOVA1, and U1 snRNA in the nucleus (Qin et al., 2018).
Aberrant circRNA-Protein Complexes (circRNPs)
CircRNAs exhibit numerous interactions with a large number of proteins as an RBP decoy or a protein scaffold in the cytoplasm (Du et al., 2016; Schneider et al., 2016; ; Fang et al., 2018). In breast cancer, circ-Ccnb1 binds H2AX and wild-type p53 to enable p53 wild-type cell survival. However, the p53 mutant generates circ-Ccnb1 to form a complex with H2AX and Bclaf1, ultimately leading to cell death (Fang et al., 2018). Another well-known circular transcript from forkhead box O3 (circ-Foxo3), which is suppressed in breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, can bind to some transcription factors (Lu, 2017; Pelletier et al., 2017). The Circ-Foxo3-p21-CDK2 ternary complex inhibits cell cycle progression (Du et al., 2016), and the interaction among Circ-Foxo3, anti-senescent protein ID-1, the transcription factor E2F1 increases in cellular senescence (Du et al., 2017). The binding of circRNAs and proteins associated with translation may lead to unexpected stalling in translation. For example, CircPABPN1 inhibits the binding of PABPN1 mRNA and subsequent translation by competitively binding HuR (). Another circRNA derived from the Argonaute (AGO2) gene has the potential to bind HuR as well (). This binding subsequently prevents AGO2 from forming the AGO2-miRNA complex and inhibits gene silencing, which ultimately drives cancer progression ().
Aberrant Translation
In 2017, circRNAs were first found to be translated under certain conditions (Pamudurti et al., 2017). CircRNA translations can be classified as IRES (internal ribosome entry site) dependent and IRES independent (Tatomer and Wilusz, 2017). IRES-dependent translations are generally found in circ-ZNF609 (Legnini et al., 2017), and IRES-independent translations are generally found in artificial circular RNAs in living HeLa cells (). The aberrant translation of circRNAs can alter tumor malignancy. For example, circ-SHPRH driven by IRES elements can be translated into a tumor suppressor protein, which is associated with patient survival time in glioblastoma (). A circRNA named Circ-FBXW7 can be translated into functional proteins and inhibit glioma tumorigenesis (Yang et al., 2018). Additional research in glioblastoma found that the circular form of the long intergenic non-protein-coding RNA p53-induced transcript (LINC-PINT) could be translated into a peptide, which subsequently inhibits the transcriptional elongation of some oncogenes and thus suppresses the growth of glioblastoma (Zhang et al., 2018). Furthermore, a circRNA named circGpr5 encodes a peptide that interacts with Gprc5a and circGpr5 to promote bladder cancer (Gu et al., 2018).
In addition to disruption of these four functions (that is, as miRNA sponges, in transcription regulation, in protein binding and translation into proteins), circRNAs have the potential to be retro-transcribed and then inserted back into the genome to function as competitive RNA (Dong et al., 2016). Deregulation of circ-Foxo3 and the Foxo3 pseudogene have been detected in tumor growth, and their upregulation has been found to suppress cancer by activating Foxo3 protein (Yang et al., 2016).
The Aberrant Regulation of Circrnas in Cancer
As demonstrated above, aberrant expression of circRNA, i.e., upregulation or downregulation, is prevalent in tumors, which can ultimately promote tumorigenesis or progression. However, why do circRNAs exhibit aberrant expression and function exclusively in cancer cells rather than normal cells? What factors may contribute to circRNA deregulation in cancers? We review and explore answers to these questions in the following section, which is presented in Figure 2.
FIGURE 2
Aberrant Events in circRNAs Biogenesis
In normal cells, the accumulation of nascent circRNAs contributes considerably to their detection at steady-state levels (; Zhang Y. et al., 2016), underlining the importance of circRNA biogenesis. This section is mainly focused on the effect of cancer-related genetic alterations, including single nucleotide variants (SNPs), genomic rearrangements, recurrent somatic mutations, and copy number alterations (Manguso et al., 2018), which modulate the expression of circRNAs through circRNA biogenesis. We discuss aberrant events in circRNA biogenesis in chronological order, and this section is divided into five subsections: aberrant cis-elements, aberrant chromosomes and genomes, aberrant transcription, aberrant spliceosomal machinery, and aberrant trans-acting factors.
Aberrant Cis-Elements
Cis-elements typically refer to long complementary flanking introns (repetitive or non-repetitive) in pre-mRNA. Cis-elements play a predominant role in the regulation of circRNA production, especially in humans (). First, as evidence for the intron-driven hypothesis, a species comparative study discovered that short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs), especially Alu elements, are responsible for robust circRNA production in humans (Dong and Ma, 2017). Remarkably, functions of Alu elements may be involved in their roles as splice acceptors, translation inhibitors and genomic instability inducers and their association with some genetic disorders (; Kim et al., 2016). In addition to inverted Alu repeat elements (IAREs), miniature intron vectors could induce back-splicing in human genes (Liang and Wilusz, 2014). Second, the high production of fusion circRNAs, which also supports the intron-driven hypothesis. That is because fusion genes generated from the translocations of chromosomes can breed juxtaposition and intron pairing of pre-mRNAs, then the increased intron pairing promotes the production of circRNAs (Guarnerio et al., 2016; ). Third, the length of flanking introns has been revealed to be positively correlated with circRNA abundance, which means longer flanking introns drive the generation of circRNAs (Westholm et al., 2014). Thus, if some mutations in complementary sequences render them mismatched and fail to circularize, or if the length of the flanking introns are shortened, circRNA deregulation may occur.
On the other hand, mutations in certain intronic repeats are prevalent in cancers such as gastric cancer (Kim et al., 2013). Intron retention in mature mRNAs is associated with a number of human diseases, including cancer, as an orchestrated phenomenon (Wong et al., 2016). Moreover, intron retention contributes to tumor-suppressor inactivation (Jung and Lee, 2015). In addition, intron retention in the conversion from EIciRNA to ecircRNA not only alters the steady-state levels of circRNAs but also changes their localization because the intronic sequences may function as ribonucleic nuclear retention elements ().
Similar to intron mutations, editing enzymes have the potential to diminish the complementarity of flanking introns in cancer. For example, ADAR mainly targets Alu elements, and aberrant ADAR activity has been linked to a variety of cancers (Wang et al., 2017). In addition to cis-elements, alterations of proteins such as the ribonucleoprotein named HNRNPC, which is related to the formation of Alu elements, should be taken into consideration (Wu et al., 2018).
Aberrant Chromosomes and Genomes
Chromosomal and genomic abnormalities such as translocation have been linked to cancers in many studies. First, circRNAs derived from fusion-genes are characteristic of tumors, such as leukemia and non-small cell lung cancer (Guarnerio et al., 2016; Tan et al., 2018). In leukemia, fusion circRNAs promote proliferation and cause therapeutic resistance (Guarnerio et al., 2016). In non-small cell lung cancer, fusion circRNA named F-circEA from the EML4-ALK fusion gene has recently been revealed to promote cell migration and invasion (Tan et al., 2018). The possibility of circularization increases when the chromosomes harbor translocations, which may cause the juxtaposition of intron sequences. In other words, genomic rearrangements generate aberrant cis-elements and promote back-splicing (Guarnerio et al., 2016). Chromosomal translocations have the potential to generate cancer-specific circRNAs, the universality of which was confirmed in the models of artificial NPM1-ALK fusion genes (). Second, some circular DNA tumor viruses, such as Epstein–Barr virus (EBV), robustly generate circRNAs in a manner very similar to aberrant genomes given that the viral genome is present in the nucleus of the host cell in an irregular manner (Toptan et al., 2018).
Aberrant Transcription
Promoter mutations and aberrant expression or enzymatic activity of RNA PolII can result in transcription suspension (Liu et al., 2013). To better understand the regulation of circRNA transcription, further investigations of conflicts over the order of back-splicing and transcription are required. Although early analysis concluded that splicing events mostly occur co-transcriptionally in most cells and tissues (Pandya-Jones and Black, 2009; ), Yang Zhang et al. recently found that the majority of circularizations occur post-transcriptionally (Zhang Y. et al., 2016). The necessity of a functional 3’ end processing signal in back-splicing also supports the post-transcriptional back-splicing (). In contrast, the co-transcriptionality of pre-mRNA processing has been confirmed by the fact that splicing and transcription elongation are mutually dependent (). The head-to-tail junction reads in the chromatin-bound newly synthesized RNA, and the competition between linear splicing and back-splicing support co-transcriptionality as well (); however, we remain skeptical, and in an alternative study, we have been able to potentially determine whether this event occurs post-transcriptionally or co-transcriptionally based on the length of the flanking intronic repeats: long intronic repeats are more likely to promote co-transcriptional back-splicing (Kramer et al., 2015). Co-transcriptional and post-transcriptional splicing facilitates different methods of regulation. If back-splicing occurs co-transcriptionally, the efficiency of back-splicing is strongly influenced by the transcription elongation rate. For example, Pol II mutants in R749H or E1126G have the capacity to slow down or speed up transcription and circularization, respectively (Zhang Y. et al., 2016).
Transcription factors, which are vital players in transcription, are associated with various tumor-specific genes () and circRNAs. For example, the oncogenic transcription factor c-Myc regulates the expression of numerous circRNAs by binding to the promoter regions of parental genes. These Myc-regulated circRNAs are important in cell proliferation via the Ras signaling pathway in cancer (Gou et al., 2017). Moreover, transcription factors were confirmed as regulators of miRNAs in tumorigenesis and progression, and circRNAs and miRNA sponges may also participate in these processes. For example, the impact of Myc on the circRNAs/miRNAs axis has also been reported (Gou et al., 2017).
Aberrant Spliceosomal Machinery
Canonical spliceosomal splicing mechanism and back-splicing mechanism are involved in the biogenesis of circRNA (Quan and Li, 2018). The back-splicing mechanism is affected by canonical splicing signals (Starke et al., 2015). Given that aberrant RNA splicing has been linked to cancer (Scotti and Swanson, 2016), the spliceosomal machinery may contribute to circRNA deregulation in cancer. Mutations in splice sites and spliceosome components, including five small nuclear RNAs (snRNA), affect the steady-state levels of circular RNAs (Liang et al., 2017).
First, recurrent mutations in spliceosomal genes, such as SF3B1, SRSF2 and U2AF1, are responsible for mis-splicing and vulnerabilities in cancer (; Dvinge et al., 2016). Second, splicing factors (hnRNPs, SR proteins) increase Laccase2 circular RNA levels in conjunction with intronic repeats (Kramer et al., 2015). The frequent deregulation of SR/hnRNP proteins induces apoptotic gene dysfunction in cancers (Kedzierska and Piekielko-Witkowska, 2017). Third, dozens of splicing factor genes are differentially expressed in cancer (Sveen et al., 2016). Alternative RNA splicing events, which are diverse in the biogenesis of circRNA, also characterize cancer (Tremblay et al., 2016; Zhang X.O. et al., 2016).
Aberrant Trans-Acting Factors
Trans-acting factors are also important triggers of back-splicing in addition to cis-acting factors. To date, Mbl and QKI are the most typical trans-acting factors as revealed in current studies. Mbl binds to the flanking introns of circMbl in Drosophila and human (). QKI, which is regulated during the human epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), binds to circRNAs in a manner quite similar to Mbl (). Methylation of the QKI promoter, which reduces QKI expression, may be critical in colorectal cancer (; Iwata et al., 2017). In addition, QKI also inhibits aberrant splicing QKI (Zong F.Y. et al., 2014), and these actions may collectively result in aberrant circRNA expression.
Some enzymes, such as RNA helicase, are vital players in regulating circRNA in cancer. The RNA helicase DHX9 is overexpressed in lung cancer (), and its downregulation reduces the number of cancer cells (Lee et al., 2016). DHX9 reduces the expression of circRNAs, such as cSMARCA5, by directly binding to Alu elements and regulating circRNA-producing genes, RNA processing and translation (Yu et al., 2018). In addition, DHX9 interacts with the editing enzyme ADAR given that co-depletion of ADAR and DHX9 increases circular RNA production ().
Other proteins with the potential to function as trans-acting factors in circRNA biogenesis include the immune factors NF90/NF110 (Li et al., 2017). These proteins increase circRNA expression in a manner similar to chromosome translocations (juxtaposing and intron pairing) and serve as components of circRNPs in the antiviral immune response in HeLa cells (Li et al., 2017).
Aberrant Epigenetic Regulation
Advanced sequencing has revealed that greater than 50% of cancers exhibit mutations involved in chromatin organization (Kleppe et al., 2018).
There are two hypothetical mechanisms behind epigenetic aberrations involved in circRNA deregulation. First, chromatin remodeling factors and post-translational modifications of histones impact the transcription rate, which may subsequently affect the production of circRNAs (Zhang Y. et al., 2016). Second, chromatin remodeling is likely to affect diverse alternative splicing events involved in the biogenesis of circRNAs (). For example, promoter CpG island hypermethylation-associated silencing of some genes, such as TUSC3 (tumor suppressor candidate 3) and POMT1 (protein O-mannosyltransferase 1), reduce circRNA production in cancer (Ferreira et al., 2018).
In addition to DNA methylation and histone modifications, post-transcriptional modifications of circRNAs are associated with circRNA deregulation. The three most abundant epitranscriptomic marks of RNA are pseudouridine (Ψ), N6-methyladenosine (m6A) and 5-methylcytosine (m5C). These marks tend to determine the fates of long noncoding RNAs. RNA modifications promote colorectal cancer by upregulating oncogenes or downregulating tumor suppressor genes (Porcellini et al., 2018). Cancer-related long noncoding RNAs, such as MALAT1, exhibit multiple post-transcriptional modifications; however, no aberrant modification in circRNA has been discovered (Jacob et al., 2017). Among these RNA modifications, m6A is the most common modification (). Of note, m6A is rich in circRNA and drives translation initiation (Molinie et al., 2016; Nan et al., 2017; Yang et al., 2017).
Aberrant Regulation in circRNA Export From Nucleus
Upon formation in the nucleus, ecircRNAs tend to be transported to the cytoplasm via a mechanism similar to linear RNA export, and the nuclear pore complex is an important player (Hautbergue, 2017). A methyl-guanosine cap and poly(A) tail are the determinants for RNA exportation from the nucleus (Tuck and Tollervey, 2013). The precise mechanism by which circRNAs without free ends are exported from the nuclear pore complex remains unknown. However, recent studies have found that the length of mature circRNAs plays an important role in determining whether the circRNA is exported or retained, which contradicts the retained intron restriction hypothesis (Huang et al., 2018; Wan and Hopper, 2018). By knocking out the genes associated with RNA exportation, UAP56 and URH49 have been identified to control the location of circRNAs in HeLa cells. In detail, UAP56 is responsible for the export of long circRNAs, whereas URH49 is responsible for the short circRNAs (Huang et al., 2018; Wan and Hopper, 2018). However, this research is based on artificial circular RNAs in HeLa cells, and the mechanism by which natural circRNAs with known functions are exported from the nucleus requires further exploration. Although studies on circRNA export are limited, different cellular localizations of non-coding RNAs have been linked to numerous diseases (Tuck and Tollervey, 2013). It is hypothesized that dysfunctions in the “transporting” or “sorting” mechanisms of circRNAs may contribute to aberrant circRNA expression in tumors (). RNA binding proteins as protein cargos may be involved in circRNA migration. Given that lncRNA subcellular fates are determined by nuclear retention signals and the long non-coding ribonucleoproteins complex (), some disorders in location signals and protein traps might account for circRNA deregulation in cancer. In addition, epigenetic features, such as chromosome structure, could affect the localizations of lncRNAs because high-order chromosomes that form a loop may exhibit increased possibilities for nuclear retention of lncRNAs (Tuck and Tollervey, 2013).
Aberrant circRNA Removal by Cleavage and Exosomes
Degradation of circRNAs in the cytoplasm remains largely uncharacterized, but there is evidence for their existence. For instance, AGO2/miR-671-mediated cleavage of CiRS-7 autoregulates CiRS-7 as confirmed in HEK293 and HeLa cells (Hansen et al., 2011). Thus, the anomalous expression of miR-671 and AGO2, the major components of the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC), influence the amount of CiRS-7.
Packaging and export of circRNAs by extracellular vesicles or microvesicle release seems common in mammalian cells (Lasda and Parker, 2016) given that circRNAs have been noted in exosomes and blood plasma (Li Y. et al., 2015). Accordingly, alterations of proteins associated with the packaging of extracellular vesicles or microvesicles and their protein compositions could cause deregulation. Additionally, extracellular vesicles could influence the tumor microenvironment by communicating with other cells (Wu et al., 2017), and significantly impact the immune response in tumor cells. Aberrant extracellular vesicles have been recognized as emerging therapeutic targets for cancer (Wu et al., 2017).
Conclusion
CircRNAs that are aberrantly expressed in cancers exhibit abnormal roles as miRNA sponges, protein decoys, transcription regulators, or regulators of translation into proteins. The potential mechanisms involved in deregulation were outlined, including in their biogenesis from parental genes, export from the nucleus to the cytoplasm and removal from the cell.
The underlying mechanisms are potentially considerably more complicated than that described above, as they may exhibit multiple interactions. For instance, intron retention that contributes to the aberrant cis-elements may result from the dysfunctions of spliceosomal machinery, such as splice site mutations (Ge and Porse, 2014).
As a cancer cell is viewed as the outcome of alterations in genetics, epigenetics and epitranscriptomics (Porcellini et al., 2018), the deregulation of circRNAs may be associated with these factors as well as other uncharacterized components. The deregulation mechanism of circRNAs is a new field that requires further exploration. In the future, more deregulated circRNAs will be discovered in human diseases, especially cancer, and circRNAs may display more functions. The profound understanding of the deregulation of circRNA mechanisms may provide more possibilities for better diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of cancer. To date, the potential advantages of circRNAs as biomarkers for tumors have been highlighted given their abundance, stability and tissue-specific expression (Qian et al., 2018). Specific circRNAs can be detected in the blood plasma of patients to track the progression of the corresponding cancer. A better understanding of the mechanisms involved will serve as a significant breakthrough in this area.
Availability of Data and Material
The material supporting the conclusion of this review has been included within the article.
Statements
Author contributions
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation of China (81802871).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to members of the Wu laboratories for discussions.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Abbreviations
- circRNA
circular RNA
- Mbl
muscleblind
- m6A
N6-methyladenosine
- QKI
quaking
References
1
AbdelmohsenK.PandaA. C.MunkR.GrammatikakisI.DudekulaD. B.DeS.et al (2017). Identification of HuR target circular RNAs uncovers suppression of PABPN1 translation by CircPABPN1.RNA Biol.14361–369. 10.1080/15476286.2017.1279788
2
AbeN.MatsumotoK.NishiharaM.NakanoY.ShibataA.MaruyamaH.et al (2015). Rolling circle translation of circular RNA in living human cells.Sci. Rep.5:16435. 10.1038/srep16435
3
AktasT.Avsar IlikI.MaticzkaD.BhardwajV.Pessoa RodriguesC.MittlerG.et al (2017). DHX9 suppresses RNA processing defects originating from the Alu invasion of the human genome.Nature544115–119. 10.1038/nature21715
4
Ashwal-FlussR.MeyerM.PamudurtiN. R.IvanovA.BartokO.HananM.et al (2014). circRNA biogenesis competes with pre-mRNA splicing.Mol. Cell5655–66. 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.08.019
5
AtkinsM.PotierD.RomanelliL.JacobsJ.MachJ.HamaratogluF.et al (2016). An ectopic network of transcription factors regulated by hippo signaling drives growth and invasion of a malignant tumor model.Curr. Biol. CB262101–2113. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.06.035
6
BabinL.PiganeauM.RenoufB.LamribetK.ThirantC.DerianoL.et al (2018). Chromosomal translocation formation is sufficient to produce fusion circular RNAs specific to patient tumor cells.iScience519–29. 10.1016/j.isci.2018.06.007
7
Bachmayr-HeydaA.ReinerA. T.AuerK.SukhbaatarN.AustS.Bachleitner-HofmannT.et al (2015). Correlation of circular RNA abundance with proliferation–exemplified with colorectal and ovarian cancer, idiopathic lung fibrosis, and normal human tissues.Sci. Rep.5:8057. 10.1038/srep08057
8
BarrettS. P.SalzmanJ. (2016). Circular RNAs: analysis, expression and potential functions.Development (Cambridge, England)1431838–1847. 10.1242/dev.128074
9
BegumS.YiuA.StebbingJ.CastellanoL. (2018). Novel tumour suppressive protein encoded by circular RNA, circ-SHPRH, in glioblastomas.Oncogene374055–4057. 10.1038/s41388-018-0230-3
10
BrugioloM.HerzelL.NeugebauerK. M. (2013). Counting on co-transcriptional splicing.F1000prime Rep.5:9. 10.12703/P5-9
11
BrzyzekG.SwiezewskiS. (2015). Mutual interdependence of splicing and transcription elongation.Transcription637–39. 10.1080/21541264.2015.1040146
12
CaoS.SunR.WangW.MengX.ZhangY.ZhangN.et al (2017). RNA helicase DHX9 may be a therapeutic target in lung cancer and inhibited by enoxacin.Am. J. Transl. Res.9674–682.
13
ChabotB.ShkretaL. (2016). Defective control of pre-messenger RNA splicing in human disease.J. Cell Biol.21213–27. 10.1083/jcb.201510032
14
ChenH.LiuT.LiuJ.FengY.WangB.WangJ.et al (2018). Circ-ANAPC7 is upregulated in acute myeloid leukemia and appears to target the MiR-181 family.Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Int. J. Exp. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol.471998–2007. 10.1159/000491468
15
ChenL.ShanG. (2015). Circular RNAs remain peculiarly unclear in biogenesis and function.Sci. China. Life Sci.58616–618. 10.1007/s11427-015-4855-y
16
ChenL. L. (2016). Linking long noncoding RNA localization and function.Trends Biochem. Sci.41761–772. 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.07.003
17
ChenL. L.YangL. (2015). Regulation of circRNA biogenesis.RNA Biol.12381–388. 10.1080/15476286.2015.1020271
18
ChenY.YangF.FangE.XiaoW.MeiH.LiH.et al (2018). Circular RNA circAGO2 drives cancer progression through facilitating HuR-repressed functions of AGO2-miRNA complexes.Cell Death Differ. [Epub ahead of print]. 10.1038/s41418-018-0220-6
19
ConnS. J.PillmanK. A.ToubiaJ.ConnV. M.SalmanidisM.PhillipsC. A.et al (2015). The RNA binding protein quaking regulates formation of circRNAs.Cell1601125–1134. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.014
20
ConnV. M.HugouvieuxV.NayakA.ConosS. A.CapovillaG.CildirG.et al (2017). A circRNA from SEPALLATA3 regulates splicing of its cognate mRNA through R-loop formation.Nature Plants3:17053. 10.1038/nplants.2017.53
21
DaiY.LiD.ChenX.TanX.GuJ.ChenM.et al (2018). Circular RNA myosin light chain kinase (MYLK) promotes prostate cancer progression through modulating Mir-29a expression.Med. Sci. Monit.243462–3471. 10.12659/MSM.908009
22
DangY.YanL.HuB.FanX.RenY.LiR.et al (2016). Tracing the expression of circular RNAs in human pre-implantation embryos.Genome Biol.17:130. 10.1186/s13059-016-0991-3
23
DanielC.BehmM.OhmanM. (2015). The role of Alu elements in the cis-regulation of RNA processing.Cell. Mol. Life Sci. CMLS724063–4076. 10.1007/s00018-015-1990-3
24
DarbelliL.RichardS. (2016). Emerging functions of the Quaking RNA-binding proteins and link to human diseases.Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. RNA7399–412. 10.1002/wrna.1344
25
DominissiniD.Moshitch-MoshkovitzS.SchwartzS.Salmon-DivonM.UngarL.OsenbergS.et al (2012). Topology of the human and mouse m6A RNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq.Nature485201–206. 10.1038/nature11112
26
DongR.MaX. K. (2017). Increased complexity of circRNA expression during species evolution.RNA Biol.141064–1074. 10.1080/15476286.2016.1269999
27
DongR.ZhangX. O.ZhangY.MaX. K.ChenL. L.YangL. (2016). CircRNA-derived pseudogenes.Cell Res.26747–750. 10.1038/cr.2016.42
28
DragomirM.CalinG. A. (2018). Circular RNAs in cancer – Lessons learned from microRNAs.Front. Oncol.8:179. 10.3389/fonc.2018.00179
29
DuW. W.YangW.ChenY.WuZ. K.FosterF. S.YangZ.et al (2017). Foxo3 circular RNA promotes cardiac senescence by modulating multiple factors associated with stress and senescence responses.Eur. Heart J.381402–1412.
30
DuW. W.YangW.LiuE.YangZ.DhaliwalP.YangB. B. (2016). Foxo3 circular RNA retards cell cycle progression via forming ternary complexes with p21 and CDK2.Nucleic Acids Res.442846–2858. 10.1093/nar/gkw027
31
DvingeH.KimE.Abdel-WahabO.BradleyR. K. (2016). RNA splicing factors as oncoproteins and tumour suppressors.Nat. Rev. Cancer16413–430. 10.1038/nrc.2016.51
32
ES.CostaM. C.KurcS.DrozdzA.Cortez-DiasN.EnguitaF. J. (2018). The circulating non-coding RNA landscape for biomarker research: lessons and prospects from cardiovascular diseases.J. Cell. Biochem.391085–1099. 10.1038/aps.2018.35
33
EidemT. M.KugelJ. F.GoodrichJ. A. (2016). Noncoding RNAs: regulators of the mammalian transcription machinery.J. Mol. Biol.4282652–2659. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.02.019
34
FangL.DuW. W.LyuJ.DongJ.ZhangC.YangW.et al (2018). Enhanced breast cancer progression by mutant p53 is inhibited by the circular RNA circ-Ccnb1.Cell Death Differ.252195–2208. 10.1038/s41418-018-0115-6
35
FerreiraH. J.DavalosV.de MouraM. C.SolerM.Perez-SalviaM.Bueno-CostaA.et al (2018). Circular RNA CpG island hypermethylation-associated silencing in human cancer.Oncotarget929208–29219. 10.18632/oncotarget.25673
36
GaoY.WangJ.ZhengY.ZhangJ.ChenS.ZhaoF. (2016). Comprehensive identification of internal structure and alternative splicing events in circular RNAs.Nat. Commun.7:12060. 10.1038/ncomms12060
37
GeY.PorseB. T. (2014). The functional consequences of intron retention: alternative splicing coupled to NMD as a regulator of gene expression.BioEssays36236–243. 10.1002/bies.201300156
38
GouQ.WuK.ZhouJ. K.XieY.LiuL.PengY. (2017). Profiling and bioinformatic analysis of circular RNA expression regulated by c-Myc.Oncotarget871587–71596. 10.18632/oncotarget.17788
39
GuC.ZhouN.WangZ.LiG.KouY.YuS.et al (2018). circGprc5a promoted bladder oncogenesis and metastasis through gprc5a-targeting peptide.Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids13633–641. 10.1016/j.omtn.2018.10.008
40
GuarnerioJ.BezziM.JeongJ. C.PaffenholzS. V.BerryK.NaldiniM. M.et al (2016). Oncogenic role of fusion-circRNAs derived from cancer-associated chromosomal translocations.Cell1661055–1056. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.07.035
41
HansenT. B.JensenT. I.ClausenB. H.BramsenJ. B.FinsenB.DamgaardC. K.et al (2013). Natural RNA circles function as efficient microRNA sponges.Nature495384–388. 10.1038/nature11993
42
HansenT. B.WiklundE. D.BramsenJ. B.VilladsenS. B.StathamA. L.ClarkS. J.et al (2011). miRNA-dependent gene silencing involving Ago2-mediated cleavage of a circular antisense RNA.EMBO J.304414–4422. 10.1038/emboj.2011.359
43
HaqueS.HarriesL. W. (2017). Circular RNAs (circRNAs) in health and disease.Genes8:E353. 10.3390/genes8120353
44
HautbergueG. M. (2017). RNA nuclear export: from neurological disorders to cancer.Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.100789–109. 10.1007/978-3-319-60733-7_6
45
HuangC.LiangD.TatomerD. C.WiluszJ. E. (2018). A length-dependent evolutionarily conserved pathway controls nuclear export of circular RNAs.Genes Dev.32639–644. 10.1101/gad.314856.118
46
IwataN.IshikawaT.OkazakiS.MogushiK.BabaH.IshiguroM.et al (2017). Clinical significance of methylation and reduced expression of the quaking gene in colorectal cancer.Anticancer. Res.37489–498. 10.21873/anticanres.11341
47
JacobR.ZanderS.GutschnerT. (2017). The dark side of the epitranscriptome: chemical modifications in long non-coding RNAs.Int. J. Mol. Sci.18:2387. 10.3390/ijms18112387
48
JungH.LeeD. (2015). Intron retention is a widespread mechanism of tumor-suppressor inactivation.Nat. Genet.471242–1248. 10.1038/ng.3414
49
KedzierskaH.Piekielko-WitkowskaA. (2017). Splicing factors of SR and hnRNP families as regulators of apoptosis in cancer.Cancer Lett.39653–65. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.03.013
50
KimH. S.ChoiS. I.MinH. L.KimM. A.KimW. H. (2013). Mutation at intronic repeats of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) gene and ATM protein loss in primary gastric cancer with microsatellite instability.PLoS One8:e82769. 10.1371/journal.pone.0082769
51
KimS.ChoC. S.HanK.LeeJ. (2016). Structural variation of alu element and human disease.Genomics Informat.1470–77. 10.5808/GI.2016.14.3.70
52
KleavelandB.ShiC. Y.StefanoJ.BartelD. P. (2018). A network of noncoding regulatory RNAs acts in the mammalian brain.Cell174350.e17–62.e17. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.022
53
KleppeA.AlbregtsenF.VlatkovicL.PradhanM.NielsenB.HveemT. S.et al (2018). Chromatin organisation and cancer prognosis: a pan-cancer study.Lancet Oncol.19356–369. 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30899-9
54
KramerM. C.LiangD.TatomerD. C.GoldB.MarchZ. M.CherryS.et al (2015). Combinatorial control of Drosophila circular RNA expression by intronic repeats, hnRNPs, and SR proteins.Genes Dev.292168–2182. 10.1101/gad.270421.115
55
LasdaE.ParkerR. (2016). Circular RNAs co-precipitate with extracellular vesicles: a possible mechanism for circRNA clearance.PLoS One11:e0148407. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148407
56
LeeT.PaquetM.LarssonO.PelletierJ. (2016). Tumor cell survival dependence on the DHX9 DExH-box helicase.Oncogene355093–5105. 10.1038/onc.2016.52
57
LegniniI.Di TimoteoG.RossiF.MorlandoM.BrigantiF.SthandierO.FaticaA.et al (2017). Circ-ZNF609 is a circular RNA that can be translated and functions in myogenesis.Mol. Cell.6622.e9–37.e9. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.017
58
LeiK.BaiH.WeiZ.XieC.WangJ.LiJ.et al (2018). The mechanism and function of circular RNAs in human diseases.Exp. Cell Res.368147–158. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.05.002
59
LiG. F.LiL.YaoZ. Q.ZhuangS. J. (2018). Hsa_circ_0007534/miR-761/ZIC5 regulatory loop modulates the proliferation and migration of glioma cells.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.499765–771. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.03.219
60
LiM.LiuY.ZhangX.LiuJ.WangP. (2018). Transcriptomic analysis of high-throughput sequencing about circRNA, lncRNA and mRNA in bladder cancer.Gene677189–197. 10.1016/j.gene.2018.07.041
61
LiX.LiuC. X.XueW.ZhangY.JiangS.YinQ. F.et al (2017). Coordinated circRNA biogenesis and function with NF90/NF110 in viral infection.Mol. Cell67214.e7–227.e7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.05.023
62
LiX.YangL.ChenL. L. (2018). The biogenesis, functions, and challenges of circular RNAs.Mol. Cell71428–442. 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.06.034
63
LiY.ZhengQ.BaoC.LiS.GuoW.ZhaoJ.et al (2015). Circular RNA is enriched and stable in exosomes: a promising biomarker for cancer diagnosis.Cell Res.25981–984. 10.1038/cr.2015.82
64
LiZ.HuangC.BaoC.ChenL.LinM.WangX.et al (2015). Exon-intron circular RNAs regulate transcription in the nucleus.Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.22256–264. 10.1038/nsmb.2959
65
LiangD.TatomerD. C.LuoZ.WuH.YangL.ChenL. L.et al (2017). The output of protein-coding genes shifts to circular RNAs when the Pre-mRNA processing machinery is limiting.Mol. Cell.68940.e3–954.e3. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.034
66
LiangD.WiluszJ. E. (2014). Short intronic repeat sequences facilitate circular RNA production.Genes Dev.282233–2247. 10.1101/gad.251926.114
67
LiuW.ZhangJ.ZouC.XieX.WangY.WangB.et al (2017). Microarray expression profile and functional analysis of circular RNAs in osteosarcoma.Cell. Physiol. Biochem.43969–985. 10.1159/000481650
68
LiuX.BushnellD. A.KornbergR. D. (2013). RNA polymerase II transcription: structure and mechanism.Biochim. Biophys. Acta18292–8. 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.09.003
69
LuW. Y. (2017). Roles of the circular RNA circ-Foxo3 in breast cancer progression.Cell Cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)16589–590. 10.1080/15384101.2017.1278935
70
MangusoN.GiulianoA. E.TanakaH. (2018). circRNA meets gene amplification.Noncod. RNA Investig.2:38. 10.21037/ncri.2018.06.04
71
MemczakS.JensM.ElefsiniotiA.TortiF.KruegerJ.RybakA.et al (2013). Circular RNAs are a large class of animal RNAs with regulatory potency.Nature495333–338. 10.1038/nature11928
72
MengX.ChenQ.ZhangP.ChenM. (2017). CircPro: an integrated tool for the identification of circRNAs with protein-coding potential.Bioinformatics (Oxford, Engl.)333314–3316. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx446
73
MignaccaL.Saint-GermainE.BenoitA.BourdeauV.MoroA.FerbeyreG. (2016). Sponges against miR-19 and miR-155 reactivate the p53-Socs1 axis in hematopoietic cancers.Cytokine8280–86. 10.1016/j.cyto.2016.01.015
74
MolinieB.WangJ.LimK. S.HillebrandR.LuZ. X. (2016). m(6)A-LAIC-seq reveals the census and complexity of the m(6)A epitranscriptome.Nat. Methods13692–698. 10.1038/nmeth.3898
75
NanA.ChenL.ZhangN.LiuZ.YangT.WangZ.et al (2017). A novel regulatory network among LncRpa, CircRar1, MiR-671 and apoptotic genes promotes lead-induced neuronal cell apoptosis.Arch. Toxicol.911671–1684. 10.1007/s00204-016-1837-1
76
NicoletB. P.EngelsS.AglialoroF.van den AkkerE.von LindernM.WolkersM. C. (2018). Circular RNA expression in human hematopoietic cells is widespread and cell-type specific.Nucleic Acids Res.468168–8180. 10.1093/nar/gky721
77
PamudurtiN. R.BartokO.JensM.Ashwal-FlussR.StottmeisterC.RuheL.et al (2017). Translation of CircRNAs.Mol. Cell.669.e7–21.e7. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.02.021
78
Pandya-JonesA.BlackD. L. (2009). Co-transcriptional splicing of constitutive and alternative exons.RNA (New York, N.Y.)151896–1908. 10.1261/rna.1714509
79
PatopI. L.KadenerS. (2018). circRNAs in cancer.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.48121–127. 10.1016/j.gde.2017.11.007
80
PelletierJ.DuW. W.YangW.ChenY.WuZ. K.FosterF. S.et al (2017). Foxo3 circular RNA promotes cardiac senescence by modulating multiple factors associated with stress and senescence responses.Oncogene381402–1412.
81
PorcelliniE.LaproviteraN.RiefoloM.RavaioliM.GarajovaI.FerracinM. (2018). Epigenetic and epitranscriptomic changes in colorectal cancer: diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment implications.Cancer Lett.41984–95. 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.01.049
82
QianL.YuS.ChenZ.MengZ.HuangS.WangP. (2018). The emerging role of circRNAs and their clinical significance in human cancers.Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer1870247–260. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.06.002
83
QinM.WeiG.SunX. (2018). Circ-UBR5: an exonic circular RNA and novel small nuclear RNA involved in RNA splicing.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.5031027–1034. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.112
84
QuanG.LiJ. (2018). Circular RNAs: biogenesis, expression and their potential roles in reproduction.J. Ovar. Res.11:9. 10.1186/s13048-018-0381-4
85
Rybak-WolfA.StottmeisterC.GlazarP.JensM.PinoN.GiustiS.et al (2015). Circular RNAs in the mammalian brain are highly abundant, conserved, and dynamically expressed.Mol. Cell58870–885. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.027
86
SalzmanJ.ChenR. E.OlsenM. N.WangP. L.BrownP. O. (2013). Cell-type specific features of circular RNA expression.PLoS Genet.9:e1003777. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003777
87
SangerH. L.KlotzG.RiesnerD.GrossH. J.KleinschmidtA. K. (1976). Viroids are single-stranded covalently closed circular RNA molecules existing as highly base-paired rod-like structures.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.733852–3856. 10.1073/pnas.73.11.3852
88
SchmittA. M.ChangH. Y. (2017). Long noncoding RNAs: at the intersection of cancer and chromatin biology.Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.7:a026492. 10.1101/cshperspect.a026492
89
SchneiderT.HungL. H.SchreinerS.StarkeS.EckhofH.RossbachO.et al (2016). CircRNA-protein complexes: IMP3 protein component defines subfamily of circRNPs.Sci. Rep.6:31313. 10.1038/srep31313
90
ScottiM. M.SwansonM. S. (2016). RNA mis-splicing in disease.Nat. Rev. Genet.1719–32. 10.1038/nrg.2015.3
91
StarkeS.JostI.RossbachO.SchneiderT.SchreinerS.HungL. H.et al (2015). Exon circularization requires canonical splice signals.Cell Rep.10103–111. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.12.002
92
SveenA.KilpinenS.RuusulehtoA.LotheR. A.SkotheimR. I. (2016). Aberrant RNA splicing in cancer; expression changes and driver mutations of splicing factor genes.Oncogene352413–2427. 10.1038/onc.2015.318
93
SzaboL.MoreyR.PalpantN. J.WangP. L.AfariN.JiangC.et al (2015). Statistically based splicing detection reveals neural enrichment and tissue-specific induction of circular RNA during human fetal development.Genome Biol.16:126. 10.1186/s13059-015-0690-5
94
TanS.SunD.PuW.GouQ.GuoC.GongY.et al (2018). Circular RNA F-circEA-2a derived from EML4-ALK fusion gene promotes cell migration and invasion in non-small cell lung cancer.Mol. Cancer17:138. 10.1186/s12943-018-0887-9
95
TatomerD. C.WiluszJ. E. (2017). An unchartered journey for ribosomes: circumnavigating circular RNAs to produce proteins.Mol. Cel.661–2. 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.03.011
96
ThomsonD. W.DingerM. E. (2016). Endogenous microRNA sponges: evidence and controversy.Nat. Rev. Genet.17272–283. 10.1038/nrg.2016.20
97
ToptanT.AbereB.NalesnikM. A.SwerdlowS. H.RanganathanS.LeeN.et al (2018). Circular DNA tumor viruses make circular RNAs.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.115E8737–E8745. 10.1073/pnas.1811728115
98
TremblayM. P.ArmeroV. E.AllaireA.BoudreaultS.Martenon-BrodeurC.DurandM.et al (2016). Global profiling of alternative RNA splicing events provides insights into molecular differences between various types of hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC Genomics17:683. 10.1186/s12864-016-3029-z
99
TuckA. C.TollerveyD. (2013). A transcriptome-wide atlas of RNP composition reveals diverse classes of mRNAs and lncRNAs.Cell154996–1009. 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.047
100
WanY.HopperA. K. (2018). Size matters: conserved proteins function in length-dependent nuclear export of circular RNAs.Genes Dev.32600–601. 10.1101/gad.316216.118
101
WangC.ZouJ.MaX.WangE.PengG. (2017). Mechanisms and implications of ADAR-mediated RNA editing in cancer.Cancer Lett.41127–34. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.09.036
102
WangD.YangS.WangH.WangJ.ZhangQ.ZhouS.et al (2018). The progress of circular RNAs in various tumors.Am. J. Transl. Res.101571–1582.
103
WangH.XiaoY.WuL.MaD. (2018). Comprehensive circular RNA profiling reveals the regulatory role of the circRNA-000911/miR-449a pathway in breast carcinogenesis.Int. J. Oncol.52743–754. 10.3892/ijo.2018.4265
104
WangP. L.BaoY.YeeM. C.BarrettS. P.HoganG. J.OlsenM. N.et al (2014). Circular RNA is expressed across the eukaryotic tree of life.PLoS One9:e90859. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090859
105
WestholmJ. O.MiuraP.OlsonS.ShenkerS.JosephB.SanfilippoP.et al (2014). Genome-wide analysis of drosophila circular RNAs reveals their structural and sequence properties and age-dependent neural accumulation.Cell Rep.91966–1980. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.10.062
106
WongJ. J.AuA. Y.RitchieW.RaskoJ. E. (2016). Intron retention in mRNA: no longer nonsense: known and putative roles of intron retention in normal and disease biology.BioEssays3841–49. 10.1002/bies.201500117
107
WuK.XingF.WuS. Y.WatabeK. (2017). Extracellular vesicles as emerging targets in cancer: recent development from bench to bedside.Biochim. Biophys. Acta1868538–563.10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.10.001
108
WuY.ZhaoW.LiuY.TanX.LiX.ZouQ.et al (2018). Function of HNRNPC in breast cancer cells by controlling the dsRNA-induced interferon response.EMBO J.37:e99017. 10.15252/embj.201899017
109
YangW.DuW. W.LiX.YeeA. J.YangB. B. (2016). Foxo3 activity promoted by non-coding effects of circular RNA and Foxo3 pseudogene in the inhibition of tumor growth and angiogenesis.Oncogene353919–3931. 10.1038/onc.2015.460
110
YangY.FanX.MaoM.SongX.WuP.ZhangY.et al (2017). Extensive translation of circular RNAs driven by N(6)-methyladenosine.Cell Res.27626–641. 10.1038/cr.2017.31
111
YangY.GaoX.ZhangM.YanS.SunC.XiaoF.et al (2018). Novel role of FBXW7 circular RNA in repressing glioma tumorigenesis.J. Natl. Cancer Inst.110304–315. 10.1093/jnci/djx166
112
YangY.WangZ. (2018). Constructing GFP-based reporter to study back splicing and translation of circular RNA.Methods Mol. Biol. (Clifton, N.J.)1724107–118. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7562-4_9
113
YuJ.XuQ. G.WangZ. G.YangY.ZhangL.MaJ. Z.et al (2018). Circular RNA cSMARCA5 inhibits growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma.J. Hepatol.681214–1227. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.01.012
114
ZhangM.ZhaoK.XuX.YangY.YanS.WeiP.et al (2018). A peptide encoded by circular form of LINC-PINT suppresses oncogenic transcriptional elongation in glioblastoma.Nat. Commun.9:4475. 10.1038/s41467-018-06862-2
115
ZhangX. O.DongR.ZhangY.ZhangJ. L.LuoZ.ZhangJ.et al (2016). Diverse alternative back-splicing and alternative splicing landscape of circular RNAs.Genome Res.261277–1287. 10.1101/gr.202895.115
116
ZhangY.XueW.LiX.ZhangJ.ChenS.ZhangJ. L.et al (2016). The biogenesis of nascent circular RNAs.Cell Rep.15611–624. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.058
117
ZhangY.ZhangX. O.ChenT.XiangJ. F.YinQ. F.XingY. H.et al (2013). Circular intronic long noncoding RNAs.Mol. Cell51792–806. 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.017
118
ZhongZ.HuangM.LvM.HeY.DuanC.ZhangL.et al (2017). Circular RNA MYLK as a competing endogenous RNA promotes bladder cancer progression through modulating VEGFA/VEGFR2 signaling pathway.Cancer Lett.403305–317. 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.06.027
119
ZhouJ.GeY.HuY.RongD.FuK.WangH.et al (2018). Circular RNAs as novel rising stars with huge potentials in development and disease.Cancer Biomark.22597–610. 10.3233/CBM-181296
120
ZongF. Y.FuX.WeiW. J.LuoY. G.HeinerM.CaoL. J.et al (2014). The RNA-binding protein QKI suppresses cancer-associated aberrant splicing.PLoS Genet.10:e1004289. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004289
Summary
Keywords
circRNA, deregulation, cancer, non-coding RNA, genetic
Citation
Wu Q, Li P, Wu M and Liu Q (2019) Deregulation of Circular RNAs in Cancer From the Perspectives of Aberrant Biogenesis, Transport and Removal. Front. Genet. 10:16. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00016
Received
26 September 2018
Accepted
14 January 2019
Published
01 February 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Michael Eccles, University of Otago, New Zealand
Reviewed by
Marjan Askarian-Amiri, The University of Auckland, New Zealand; Jyotsna Batra, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Wu, Li, Wu and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Qiang Liu, aoyebuhuijia@163.com
This article was submitted to Cancer Genetics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.