MINI REVIEW article

Front. Genet., 12 February 2019

Sec. RNA

Volume 10 - 2019 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00103

Recent Insights Into the Structure, Function, and Evolution of the RNA-Splicing Endonucleases

  • Department of Materials Science and Biotechnology, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ehime University, Matsuyama, Japan

Abstract

RNA-splicing endonuclease (EndA) cleaves out introns from archaeal and eukaryotic precursor (pre)-tRNA and is essential for tRNA maturation. In archaeal EndA, the molecular mechanisms underlying complex assembly, substrate recognition, and catalysis have been well understood. Recently, certain studies have reported novel findings including the identification of new subunit types in archaeal EndA structures, providing insights into the mechanism underlying broad substrate specificity. Further, metagenomics analyses have enabled the acquisition of numerous DNA sequences of EndAs and intron-containing pre-tRNAs from various species, providing information regarding the co-evolution of substrate specificity of archaeal EndAs and tRNA genetic diversity, and the evolutionary pathway of archaeal and eukaryotic EndAs. Although the complex structure of the heterothermic form of eukaryotic EndAs is unknown, previous reports regarding their functions indicated that mutations in human EndA cause neurological disorders including pontocerebellar hypoplasia and progressive microcephaly, and yeast EndA significantly cleaves mitochondria-localized mRNA encoding cytochrome b mRNA processing 1 (Cpb1) for mRNA maturation. This mini-review summarizes the aforementioned results, discusses their implications, and offers my personal opinion regarding future directions for the analysis of the structure and function of EndAs.

Introduction

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) play a fundamental role as adapter molecules for mRNA translation. Maturation events in tRNAs, including removals of the 5′-leader, 3′-trailer, and intron sequences, modification, and addition of 3′-CCA sequences and amino acids are essential for protein synthesis. During tRNA maturation, tRNA splicing is one of the most significant processes in intron splicing and ligation of the two halves of exons in the precursor (pre)-tRNA. Pre-tRNA introns are either auto-catalytically or enzymatically cleaved out in the three domains of life. Group I introns found in pre-tRNA in some bacteria and higher eukaryotic plastids are auto-catalytically cleaved out with an external guanosine-5′-triphosphate (GTP) (; ). By contrast, the introns in cytoplasmic eukaryotic and archaeal pre-tRNAs are enzymatically cleaved out by an RNA-splicing endonuclease (EndA) () and the two halves of the exon are subsequently ligated by a tRNA ligase (; ; ; ; ). Eukaryotic EndA has been extensively identified and characterized in yeast, xenopus, and human. The yeast and human isoform comprise four distinct subunits, referred to as either Sen2, Sen15, Sen34, and Sen54 or αβγσ (; , ; ), although the complete structure of the heterothermic form of eukaryotic EndAs remains unknown. The intron cleavage mechanism of eukaryotic EndAs has been demonstrated owing to early advancements by Dr. John Abelson’s and Dr. Glauco Tocchini-Valentini’s groups (; ; ). Furthermore, archaeal EndAs are classified into three types [α4, α′2, (αβ)2] in accordance with the subunit components () until the 𝜀2 type of archaeal End is newly identified and characterized (; ). Currently, four types of EndAs are found in archaea. The general mechanism underlying the recognition and cleavage of pre-tRNA by archaeal EndA was previously reported by Dr. John Abelson’s and Dr. Hong Li’s groups (; ; ). Eukaryotic EndA follows a similar mechanism, implicating an evolutionary association between archaeal and eukaryotic EndAs. Furthermore, reported the molecular mechanisms underlying complex assembly, substrate recognition, and catalysis in archaeal EndA. Their review article still provides robust evidence regarding the mechanisms underlying substrate recognition and intron-cleavage by archaeal EndAs. This mini-review is focused on recent advancements regarding the structure, function, and evolution of archaeal and eukaryotic EndAs and additionally provides a perspective for future studies on the structure and function of EndAs.

Structure

Information regarding the four types of archaeal EndA structures, i.e., α4, α′2, (αβ)2, and 𝜀2, has been obtained from extensive crystallographic studies (Table 1), whereas only the structure of one subunit (Sen15) of eukaryotic EndA has been determined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy (). Initially, Dr. John Abelson’s group determined the X-ray structure of the homotetrameric form (α4) of archaeal EndA in Methanocaldococcus jannaschii () and of the homodimeric form (α′2) in Archaeoglobus fulgidus (). The α′2 type of EndA has also been determined in Thermoplasma acidophilum by another group (). The overall structures of two types are suggestive of a rectangular parallelepiped conformation (Figure 1A,B). Briefly, the N-terminal domain of one α subunit in α4 type of archaeal EndA consists of three α helices and a mixed antiparallel/parallel β sheet, and the C-terminal domain comprises two α helices and a central four-stranded mixed β sheet. Homotetramer formation is achieved by two significant interactions: interaction between two β–β strands at the domain interface between two α subunits and interaction between a negatively charged L10 loop of the α subunit with a positively charged pocket of the opposing α subunit. The interactions are conserved in the four types of archaeal EndAs. The α subunit of α′2 type of EndA is considered the fusion protein of two α subunits of α4 type of EndA because of the evolutionary association between the α4 and α′2 types, based on their sequence similarity, and the two α subunits are connected by a linker from the C-terminal domain of α subunit to the N-terminal domain of another subunit. X-ray structures of (αβ)2 type of archaeal EndAs have been reported in Nanoarchaeum equitans (), Pyrobaculum aerophilum (Yoshinari et al., 2009), Aeropyrum pernix (; ), and Methanopyrus kandleri (). The (αβ)2 type EndA comprises two α catalytic subunits and two β structural subunits, and the four subunits are assembled into a heterotetramer (αβ)2 through the aforementioned interactions. The overall structures are very similar to those of the α4 and α′2 types of EndAs, although the structure of P. aerophilum EndA is more compact than that of other EndAs because of the absence of the N-terminal domain of structural β subunit. Furthermore, a new type of 𝜀2 EndA was identified and characterized in Candidatus Micrarchaeum acidiphilum (ARMAN-2) (; ), which is deeply branched within Euryarchaeota. ARMAN-2 EndA forms an 𝜀2 homodimer through evolutionarily conserved interactions in the other three types of archaeal EndAs. The 𝜀 protomer is very unique and is separated into three units (αN, α, and βC) fused by two distinct linkers, although the overall shape of ARMAN-2 𝜀2 EndA is similar to that of the other three types of archaeal EndAs. Structure-based sequence analysis suggests that all four types of archaeal EndAs evolved from a common ancestor.

Table 1

SpeciesFunctional subunitsAmino acid length (aa)SpecificityPDB_IDReference
Methanocaldococcus jannaschiiα4α = 179Narrow1A79
Archaeoglobus fulgidusα′2α = 305Narrow1RLV 2GJW (RNA complex);
Thermoplasma acidophilumα′2α = 289Narrow2OHC
Aeropyrum pernix(αβ)2α = 186, β = 170Broad3P1Z 3AJV (H133A);
Nanoarchaeum equitans(αβ)2α = 154, β = 153Broad3IEY
Pyrobaculum aerophilum(αβ)2α = 183, β = 96Broad2ZYZYoshinari et al., 2009
Methanopyrus kandleri(αβ)2α = 179, β = 166Constrained broad5X89
Candidatus Micrarchaeum acidiphilum (ARMAN-2)𝜀2𝜀 = 390Broad4FZ2
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeα (Sen2), β (Sen34), γ (Sen15), δ (Sen54)α = 377, β = 275 γ = 128, δ = 467Broad?
Homo sapienceα (TSen2), β (TSen34), γ (TSen15), δ (TSen54)α = 465, β = 310 γ = 171, δ = 526Broad?2GW6 (TSen15)

Structural and functional characterization of archaeal and eukaryotic EndAs.

FIGURE 1

) and reproduced with permission based on the copyright policy from Oxford University Press.

Three catalytic residues (tyrosine, histidine, and lysine) are conserved in the four types of EndAs, and each subunit assembly of the archaeal EndAs leads to the formation of two intron cleavage sites at the active site (Figure 1AD, green circle). Similarly, two sets of the two substrate recognition residues [two arginines in α subunit of α4 and α′2 types or arginine and tryptophan residues in α subunit of (αβ)2 and 𝜀2 types] are positioned at a similar location adjacent to the three catalytic residues. Thus, each multimeric conformation of archaeal EndAs is essential for catalysis and substrate tRNA recognition. In eukaryotes, yeast EndA is a heterotetramer (αβγσ) comprising two catalytic (Sen2 and Sen34) and two accessory (Sen15 and Sen54) subunits identified on the basis of homology with their human counterparts (). The Sen2 and Sen34 share homology with the α subunit of archaeal EndAs and employ the catalytic residues (histidine, tyrosine, and lysine) identical to their archaeal counterparts. Therefore, eukaryotic and archaeal EndAs are presumed to employ a molecular mechanism of cleavage similar to that of ribonuclease A, using the three catalytic residues (; ). The complex structure of the heterodimer in eukaryotic EndA is unknown, although the NMR structure of human Sen15 is known (Table 1). The structural arrangement of human Sen15 is similar to that of the C-terminal domain of the α subunit in M. jannaschii α4 EndA. Together, these findings implicate an evolutionary relationship between the eukaryotic and archaeal isoforms of EndA.

Substrate Specificity

Initial studies on the substrate specificity of archaeal EndAs were conducted by Dr. Charles Daniels’ and Roger Garrett’s groups (; ; ; ; ; ,). Archaeal EndAs are known to recognize a bulge-helix-bulge (BHB) motif (Figure 1E), which comprises two bulges (3 nt) separated by one helix (4 nt) located at the exon–intron boundary of pre-tRNAs (). The canonical BHB motif is frequently present in the anticodon loop between position 37 and 38 (37/38) of archaeal pre-tRNA; however, in some cases, this motif is present in pre-mRNA and pre-rRNA for their maturation (; Yoshinari et al., 2006). In contrast with this canonical BHB motif, two types of relaxed BHB motifs, non-canonical introns (hBH and HBh′), are present in pre-tRNAs (Figure 1E). The relaxed BHB motifs of hBH and HBh′ disrupt either 5′ or 3′ bulges in the canonical BHB motif. One of the bulges is often absent to form a relaxed bulge-helix-loop (BHL). Furthermore, the unique features of disrupted tRNA genes include multiple (two or three) intron-containing tRNAs (; ), split and tri-split tRNAs, wherein tRNA fragments are encoded by two or three genes (; ), and permuted tRNAs, wherein the sequences of 5′ and 3′ halves of tRNA genes are inverted (). Remarkably, the canonical and relaxed BHB motifs are located not only at the anticodon loop position 37/38 but also at the D-loop, T-loop, and acceptor-stem of archaeal pre-tRNAs (; ). Although introns with canonical and relaxed BHB motifs are distributed at the various positions in pre-tRNA, archaeal EndAs actually recognize and cleave introns. However, only two types, i.e., (αβ)2 and 𝜀2 EndAs, can efficiently eliminate introns with relaxed BHB motifs, thereby displaying broad substrate specificity in the EndAs. Eukaryotic EndA recognizes and eliminates introns with a canonical BHB motif from archaeal pre-tRNA, although in most eukaryotic pre-tRNAs, the introns are located at the anticodon loop 37/38 and includes the BHL motif. To eliminate introns with a BHL motif, eukaryotic EndA requires a mature domain of pre-tRNA, wherein the interaction between the D- and T-loops yields a unique structure, the so-called “elbow” (; ). The α′2 type of archaeal EndA from Archaeoglobus fulgidus can eliminate introns with the BHL motif at position 37/38 in the case of full-length pre-tRNA ().

Broad Substrate Specificity of the Archaeal EndAs

The (αβ)2 and 𝜀2 EndAs have broad substrate specificity, which can efficiently cleave not only the introns with canonical BHB motif but also those with a relaxed BHB motif. The molecular mechanism underlying the broad substrate specificity of (αβ)2 EndA is unknown. To clarify the mechanism, structural and biochemical analyses of the (αβ)2 type of EndA from hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon Aeropyrum pernix was performed (). At the time, (αβ)2-type EndAs were reported exclusively in crenarchaea and nanoarchaea, except for euryarchaeon Methanopyrus kandleri (). Our studies on A. pernix EndA reported a Crenarchaea-specific loop (CSL), which was conserved in crenarchaeal EndAs and located adjacent to the active site (Figure 1F). Furthermore, insertion of CSL in A. fulgidus α′2 EndA conferred A. pernix EndA with broad substrate specificity, which originally had narrow substrate specificity. In the A. pernix EndA with a CSL insert, an alanine-substituted mutant of the conserved Lys residue of CSL disrupted the broad substrate specificity. Together, these findings suggest that the Lys residue of CSL plays a significant role as an RNA binding site and is responsible for the broad substrate specificity in the (αβ)2 of crenarchaeal EndAs. Similarly, the 𝜀2 type of ARMAN-2 EndA possesses an ARMAN-2 specific loop (ASL), which confers broad substrate specificity, and the Lys residue of ASL functions as the RNA recognition site. Although the ASL conformation in ARMAN-2 EndA is markedly similar to that of CSL in A. pernix EndA, there are no obvious sequence similarities between the ASL and CSL, except for the conserved Lys residue, which functions as the substrate recognition site. Together, these findings indicate that the ASL was acquired by a distinctly independent evolutionary pathway toward the CSL (i.e., “convergent evolution”). However, it is still unknown why each Lys residue conserved in the CSL and ASL is required for intron cleavage, despite the presence of three catalytic residues in the EndAs. However, M. kandleri EndA was identified as the (αβ)2 type lacking specific loops such as the ASL and CSL (). While M. kandleri EndA slightly cleaves introns with a relaxed BHB motif in M. kandleri pre-tRNAGlu (UUC), it could not eliminate introns from a mini-helix RNA with a BHL motif. Therefore, the M. kandleri EndA is considered to be of the (αβ)2 type with constrained substrate specificity.

Evolution

The α4 type of archaeal EndA, which encodes a single catalytic α subunit, is proposed to be the prototype of the EndAs (), and the subsequent subfunctionalization of gene duplication and fusion has yielded the other three types [α′2, (αβ)2 and 𝜀2]. Intriguingly, 𝜀2-type ARMAN-2 EndA appears to have undergone a genetic recombination of the three subunits, euryarchaeal α subunit, crenarchaeal α subunit, and crenarchaeal β subunit (), comprising three units (αN-α-βC) of the 𝜀 protomer (Figure 1G). Each unit is clearly divided into a domain structure, thus providing a good example of the so-called “domain shuffling” occurring naturally. Moreover, the C-terminal subdomain of the crenarchaeal β subunit may have been incorporated into the terminus of the crenarchaeal α subunit, which may have primarily led to changes in the structural location of β–β interaction responsible for subunit assembly.

The sequence of archaeal α subunit is locally conserved in the two catalytic subunits (Sen2 and Sen34) of the heterotetrameric form (αβγδ) of eukaryotic EndA with approximately 50 amino acid residues. Therefore, eukaryotic EndA is considered to have evolved from the archaeal (αβ)2 EndA with the acquisition of new subunits (γ and δ). Remarkably, the primitive eukaryotic red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae harbors many disrupted tRNA genes with a relaxed BHB motif as employed in Archaea (, ; ). The C. merolae EndA is expected to comprise three subunits [cmSen2p, cmSen34p, and cmSen54p (αβγ)] for processing these pre-tRNAs; however, it does not contain the ASL and CSL. Thus, heterotrimer form of C. merolae EndA might be an intermediate in the evolutionary transition between the heterotetramer of archaeal EndA to heterotetramer of eukaryotic EndA. Furthermore, recent bioinformatics analysis has reported that archaeal species with specific loops such as the ASL and CSL in EndAs clearly represent a trend of increased intron-containing tRNA genes with BHB and relaxed BHB motifs, suggesting coevolution of tRNA gene diversity and broad substrate specificity (). These findings further update the previous concept of co-evolution (; ).

New Aspects of Eukaryotic EndA

Vertebrate and Saccharomyces cerevisiae EndAs are localized in the nucleus () and on the mitochondrial outer membrane (Yoshihisa et al., 2003, 2007), respectively. A recent study reported that S. cerevisiae EndA cleaves the mitochondria-localized mRNA encoding Cbp1 (cytochrome b mrNA processing 1) and this cleavage requires a predicted stem-loop structure of the endonucleolytic cleavage-inducible sequence of Cpb1 with synergistic effects of other factors (). These significant findings provide evidence regarding the biological role of mitochondrial-localized S. cerevisiae EndA and suggest that the EndA has broad substrate specificity owing to specific recognition of the predicted stem-loop structure without the BHB motif. Furthermore, the human EndA complex (TSen2, TSen15, TSen34, and TSen54) reportedly cleaves introns from pre-tRNAs, and the TSen2 subunit is involved in pre-mRNA′3 end formation (). These reports further expand the possibility that the substrates of EndA are non-coding RNAs involved in the regulation of gene expression. To confirm the possibility, crosslinking RNA-EndA complex using UV irradiation combined with immunoprecipitation and RNA sequencing could be a useful method to identify the non-coding RNAs as the substrate of EndA. More importantly, recessive mutations in the genes of three subunits (TSen2, TSen34, and TSen54) cause pontocerebellar hypoplasia (PCH) types 2A-C, 4, and 5 (; ,; ; ). PCH2 is reportedly involved in progressive cerebral atrophy and microcephaly, dyskinesia, seizures and early childhood mortality. Furthermore, a recent study reported that three homozygous TSEN15 cause a milder version of the PCH2-related pathology (). Hence, appropriate EndA function is required for brain development in humans. However, the mechanism underlying the pathogenesis of PCH which is caused by human EndA mutations remains unclear because its complex structure is yet unknown.

Conclusion and Future Perspectives

The mechanism underlying the recognition and cleavage of RNA introns by EndAs is known; however, they have gained increasing interest, since the evolutionary pathway from archaeal to eukaryotic EndA and the mechanism underlying the broad substrate specificity of archaeal and eukaryotic EndA warrant further investigation. The conserved Lys residue in CSL and ASL of the (αβ)2 and 𝜀2 types of archaeal EndAs might function as the catalytic and RNA recognition residue. Eukaryotic EndAs probably possess broad substrate specificity, similar to the archaeal (αβ)2- and 𝜀2- type EndAs, whereas the mechanism underlying the broad substrate specificity may vary between the eukaryotic and archaeal EndAs. Further structural analysis is required to elucidate the detailed mechanism underlying broad substrate specificity by archaeal and eukaryotic EndAs. In particular, the structural information of human EndA may be useful for drug design that improves the inadequate EndA function, which causes the developmental retardation of human brain described above.

Statements

Author contributions

The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI grant number JP18K06088 (to AH).

Conflict of interest

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Summary

Keywords

RNA-splicing endonuclease, intron-containing tRNA, broad substrate specificity, co-evolution of protein and RNA, archaea and eukaryote

Citation

Hirata A (2019) Recent Insights Into the Structure, Function, and Evolution of the RNA-Splicing Endonucleases. Front. Genet. 10:103. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00103

Received

19 November 2018

Accepted

30 January 2019

Published

12 February 2019

Volume

10 - 2019

Edited by

Tohru Yoshihisa, University of Hyogo, Japan

Reviewed by

Naoki Shigi, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan; Yohei Kirino, Thomas Jefferson University, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Akira Hirata,

This article was submitted to RNA, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics