Abstract
Most single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are located in non-coding regions, but the fraction usually studied is harbored in protein-coding regions because potential impacts on proteins are relatively easy to predict by popular tools such as the Variant Effect Predictor. These tools annotate variants independently without considering the potential effect of grouped or haplotypic variations, often called “multi-nucleotide variants” (MNVs). Here, we used a large RNA-seq dataset to survey MNVs, comprising 382 chicken samples originating from 11 populations analyzed in the companion paper in which 9.5M SNPs— including 3.3M SNPs with reliable genotypes—were detected. We focused our study on in-codon MNVs and evaluate their potential mis-annotation. Using GATK HaplotypeCaller read-based phasing results, we identified 2,965 MNVs observed in at least five individuals located in 1,792 genes. We found 41.1% of them showing a novel impact when compared to the effect of their constituent SNPs analyzed separately. The biggest impact variation flux concerns the originally annotated stop-gained consequences, for which around 95% were rescued; this flux is followed by the missense consequences for which 37% were reannotated with a different amino acid. We then present in more depth the rescued stop-gained MNVs and give an illustration in the SLC27A4 gene. As previously shown in human datasets, our results in chicken demonstrate the value of haplotype-aware variant annotation, and the interest to consider MNVs in the coding region, particularly when searching for severe functional consequence such as stop-gained variants.
Introduction
Next-generation sequencing has given access to genomes at the nucleotide level through DNA-seq but also specifically to expressed regions by whole-exome sequencing (WES, originally focusing on exonic parts of the genome) or RNA-seq. These data enable us to call genetic variations by spotting differences between aligned reads and the species reference genome or among aligned reads. Among these genetic variations, single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are the most frequent and most studied variations. Although most variations are located in non-coding regions, the most analyzed lie in protein-coding regions where their potential impact(s) on the protein are relatively easy to predict. For example, in a study using 60,706 human exomes, the Exome Aggregation Consortium (ExAC) identified 3,230 genes with near-complete depletion of predicted protein-truncating variants. Of these genes, 72% have not been related to any known human disease phenotype (). Different popular tools have been developed this last decade to predict SNPs’ effects on proteins such as Variant Effect Predictor (VEP) (), SnpEff (), or ANNOtate VARiation (ANNOVAR) (Wang et al., 2010). But these tools consider each variation location individually, as if it they were specific to “reference” nucleotides. However, SNPs can be grouped by two or more coexisting variants present in the same haplotype (in the same individual), in which case they are called “multi-nucleotide variants” (MNVs). An example of MNV in one individual (with two nearby SNPs) is given in Figure 1. When such MNVs occur within a codon, the amino acid modification caused by this MNV may be different from protein change resulting from each constituent SNPs taken individually, leading to a risk of erroneous functional consequence prediction, as depicted in Figure 1. MNV identification tools have been developed using different methods for phasing SNPs [MAC (Wei et al., 2015), varDic (), COPE (), BCFtools (), and MACARON ()] and have been applied to different human genetic variant datasets [1,000 Genomes Project dataset (; ; ; Wang et al., 2020), ExAC (), The Cancer Genome Atlas (), or gnomAD consortium (Wang et al., 2020)], mainly based on exomes.
FIGURE 1
To our knowledge, no study has been conducted on MNVs in livestock species. The aim of this paper is to focus on MNVs occurring in protein-coding regions to provide examples and evaluate the functional consequences of resulting mis-annotations. Considering this aim, we used 9.5M SNPs recently detected in 382 chickens from 767 multi-tissue RNA-seq, enriched by construction in expressed regions and therefore in protein-coding regions. From this 9.5M SNPs, we focused on the 3.3M SNPs with reliable genotypes [see the companion paper (
Materials and Methods
SNP Dataset
The 3,276,615 SNPs analyzed in this study have been detected following the method presented in the companion paper (
Analysis of the Functional Impact of Each Individual SNP in the Coding Regions
VEP v92 (
MNV Calling and Recalculation of Consequences
The script to detect the MNV and to calculate the consequences is available in Additional File 2.
Detection of SNPs Located in the Same Codon
With the information produced by VEP, an ID composed of the “transcriptID” and the “position of the SNP in the coding sequence (expressed in codon number)” was created for each consequence. Through this approach, the same codon of the same transcript supporting at least two different SNPs will have the same ID. Thus, only duplicated IDs were kept as they correspond to those containing two or more SNPs.
Detection of Co-located SNPs Carried by the Same Haplotype (MNV)
To test if the SNPs located in the same codon were also present in the same haplotype, the VEP file generated in the previous step and the VCF file were joined by the “SNPid” key, equivalent to “CHR_POS_REF/ALT.” The resulting file (VEP merged to VCF information) contained SNPs on the same codon with additional information about their phase (PID and PGT). Finally, the SNPs which were phased (i.e., same PID) and co-located in a codon were extracted: they correspond to MNVs containing two or three phased SNPs in the same codon.
Recalculation of the Consequences
With the R package Biostrings v2.50.2 (
Analysis of MNV Functional Impacts and Comparison With the Constituent SNP Impacts
To compare MNV and independent SNP consequences, we selected only the most impactful consequence per codon for these constituent SNPs using the following order of priority from severe to weak consequences: (1) stop-gained, (2) stop-lost, (3) start-lost, (4) missense_variant, (5) stop-retained_variant, and (6) synonymous_variant.
For MNVs with a missense annotation corresponding to a missense annotation for both constituent SNPs, we distinguished two cases:
- –
missense MNV with an amino acid different from those predicted by the constituent SNPs (SNP1: Missense A; SNP2: Missense B → MNV: Missense C) and
- –
missense MNV with an amino acid common to one of two amino acids predicted by the constituent SNPs (SNP1: Missense A; SNP2: Missense B → MNV: Missense A or B).
In order to visualize the results, we produced an alluvial plot using the R “alluvial” package v0.1-2 (
GO or KEGG Term Enrichment Analysis
The enrichment analysis of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the gene set of interest was performed using the STRING v11.0. tool (
DNA Sequencing of SLC27A4
Five microliters of DNA samples was mixed with 5 μl of GoTaq Flexi Buffer 5 ×, 2 μl of MgCl2 solution (25 mM), 0.125 μl of GoTaq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl) (Promega, catalog number: M891), 0.5 μl of dNTPs 10 mM, 12.5 μl H2O, and 1.25 μl of specific reverse (CATTCCCGTAGTGCCAGAGG) and forward primers (GCACTTTCTGGTGCAAAGCA) at 10 μM. Reaction mixtures were then incubated in a T100 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Marne la Coquette, France) for 30 cycles with 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C. The amplification products were then deposited on a 2% agarose gel and sent for sequencing (Genoscreen) to verify their location on the chicken genome.
Results and Discussion
Read-Based Phasing for Identification of MNVs
Using 3.3M SNPs previously detected from 767 multi-tissue RNA-seq of 382 animals from 11 chicken populations and therefore enriched in coding regions [see the companion paper (
FIGURE 2

Workflow of MNV detection in coding regions and functional consequence prediction. Left: MNV detection from 3.3M SNPs previously identified using RNA-seq of 382 chickens (companion article;
As shown in Figure 2 (left part—in green), we then defined an MNV in a codon as a group of two or three phased SNPs, i.e., existing on the same haplotype in the same individual. We found 11,183 SNPs (4.3% of the SNPs in codons) as constituent variants of 5,533 MNVs, which corresponded to 4,415 transcripts and 2,916 genes. Most of them (98%: 5,416) contained two SNPs with similar proportions (1/3) by constituent SNP position in the codon (1–3, 1–2, and 2–3, Figure 2, left). In order to ensure the reliability of the MNVs, we selected MNVs observed in at least five individuals. Out of the 5,416 MNVs with two SNPs, 2,965 MNVs were present in at least five individuals, corresponding to 2,636 transcripts and 1,792 genes. No GO terms or KEGG terms were found as significantly enriched for this gene list, suggesting that no specific biological pathway was impacted by MNVs. Table 1 gives the distribution of MNVs and their consequences according to the individual number supporting the MNV (ranging from 2 to 100 individuals). We can note that 31% of the 5,416 MNVs with two SNPs are observed only in a single individual and are here considered as erroneous, likely due to sequencing errors.
TABLE 1
| SNP annotation | → | MNV annotation | Number of individuals carrying the MNV | ||||||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 50 | 100 | |||
| Eased impact | |||||||||||||
| Missense | → | Synonymous | 110 | 91 | 86 | 86 | 83 | 76 | 74 | 74 | 72 | 66 | 54 |
| Stop_gained | → | Missense | 194 | 118 | 102 | 99 | 87 | 63 | 47 | 39 | 33 | 27 | 14 |
| Equal impact | |||||||||||||
| Stop_lost | → | Stop_lost | 8 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Start_lost | → | Start_lost | 19 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 1 |
| Synonymous | → | Synonymous | 95 | 84 | 81 | 78 | 76 | 69 | 63 | 58 | 54 | 45 | 32 |
| Missense | → | Missense | 4,932 | 3,425 | 3,107 | 2,854 | 2,688 | 2,162 | 1,876 | 1,652 | 1,369 | 1,083 | 716 |
| Stop_gained | → | Stop_gained | 12 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Aggravated impact | |||||||||||||
| Stop_retained | → | Stop_lost | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Synonymous | → | Missense | 15 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Missense | → | Stop_gained | 30 | 13 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
| Total MNVs | 5,416 | 3,758 | 3,413 | 3,151 | 2,965 | 2,391 | 2,076 | 1,837 | 1,541 | 1,229 | 819 | ||
Occurrences for each type of re-prediction according to the number of individuals carrying the MNV.
The column in bold corresponds to MNVs observed in at least five individuals (MNV set used in Figure 3).
Functional Impact Comparison of MNVs and Their Component SNPs
Focusing on the 2,965 MNVs present in at least five individuals, we then compared their functional consequences with those of the 5,930 constituent SNPs as illustrated by the right part of the workflow provided in Figure 2. For such a comparison, we retained for each MNVs, the most severe consequence of the constituent SNPs according to the order indicated in Figure 2 (bottom right). The alluvial plot in Figure 3 depicts the consequence variations before (left) and after (right) taking the MNV impacts into account, according to the different consequence categories; the details of impact variation per MNV are given in Additional File 3 for the whole 2,965 MNV set. We can observe in Figure 3 that the biggest change in variant impacts concerns the originally stop-gained consequence categories, for which 95.6% were re-predicted as missense (green flux: 87 out of the 91 stop-gained initially predicted). The second and third biggest fluxes concern missense consequence categories, for which 37.3% had a different predicted amino acid (violet flux: 1,038 MNVs out of the 2,780 initial missenses), and 3.0% became synonymous variants (blue flux: 83 MNVs out of the initial missenses). The distribution of re-prediction fluxes is provided in Table 1 as a function of the individual number supporting the MNV among the 382 individuals analyzed. Among the 87 rescued stop-gained observed in five individuals, half (47) are observed in at least 15 individuals and are present on average in five populations (see Additional File 4). Out of the MNVs, the proportion of rescued stop-gained MNVs (2.9%), defined as at least one of the individual SNPs creating a nonsense mutation but not the resulting MNV, is in the same order of magnitude as the one reported by the gnomAD consortium with 1,821 rescued stop-gained MNVs out of 31,575 human MNVs (5.8%) (Wang et al., 2020). Genes with a stop-gained MNV rescued in the missense variant are available in Additional File 4 with the population affected and the individual number per population carrying these MNVs. To a lesser extent, nine missenses were re-predicted as stop-gained, which would have gone unnoticed without re-prediction. After a deeper investigation with the IGV browser, these re-predicted stop-gained variants seem to be present since they were not located in a potential exon skipping. Finally, this stop-gained category drastically declined by 86% (from 91 to 13) after considering MNVs, whereas the synonymous category was increased by twofold (from 79 to 159). These different category changes after considering MNVs have a major impact on variant interpretation and thus are critical for accurate variant annotation. More broadly, when the MNVs were considered together, the resulting functional impact differed from the independent impacts of the individual variants in 41.1% of the analyzed MNVs. This large percentage of mis-annotations is relatively consistent with ∼60% of reannotations in human MNVs recently reported by the gnomAD consortium in coding regions (Wang et al., 2020). Such results show the importance of paying attention to these MNVs as highlighted by
FIGURE 3

Comparison of the functional impact of MNVs (right) and their component SNPs (left) for each of the 2,965 MNVs. Left: The consequence originally predicted for the component SNPs, the most severe impact being retained by the codon (see Figure 2 or the text for the order). Right: The new prediction associated with the MNVs. For each category of functional predictions of the component SNPs (left), the numbers and percentages are given with new predictions due to the associated MNV. The two slashes indicate that the scale has been adapted (reduction by five times) for better readability.
Example of an Erroneously Predicted Stop-Gained
As an example of erroneously predicted stop-gained, we present the case of the SLC27A4 gene, which is located on the reverse strand of chicken chromosome 17 (ENSGALG00000004965) (Figure 4A). In this gene, two SNPs rs316701182 and rs15031398, already reported in the Ensembl SNP database (
FIGURE 4

SLC27A4 with an MNV composed of two phased SNPs observed in the experimental divergent lean line (LL). (A) Exon structure of the SLC27A4 gene and the MNV location. (B) For the two SNPs (SNP1: rs316701182 and SNP2: rs15031398) related to the MNV of interest, the allele position (on the Galgal5 genome), functional impact on the associated protein, and frequencies in the FLLL population are indicated, and the two FL and LL subpopulations are divergently selected on abdominal fat weight. (C) Effects of the four haplotypes related to SNP1 and SNP2 separately analyzed by VEP and frequencies in LL (n = 12) and FL (n = 12) subpopulations and focus on the percentage of observed haplotypes in the two FL and LL subpopulations. The haplotypes were determined through the IGV browser of mapped RNA-seq reads against the chicken genome. (D) Tissue expression of the gene in a chicken RNA-seq dataset composed of 21 tissues (
Conclusion
We have shown that MNVs represent an important class of genetic variations since they have a significant impact on polymorphism functional interpretation with roughly 40% of MNVs in our dataset inducing reannotation. These reannotations show a decreased impact severity of MNVs when compared to their constituent SNPs, at least for the stop-gained category. As previously demonstrated in human studies, our results in chicken demonstrate the value of haplotype-aware variant annotation and the interest to consider MNVs in coding region particularly when focusing on severe functional consequences such as stop-gained. We illustrated such a case with an erroneous stop-gained annotation found in the chicken SLC27A4 gene.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.
Author contributions
FD, FJ, and SL conceived the study and drafted the manuscript. FD, FJ, FL, CK, and SL participated to in bioinformatics processing of the RNA-seq data and bioinformatic analyses. LL, CD, and KM participated in the IGV analysis, PCR amplification, and Sanger sequencing for SLC27A4 analyses. KM, FP, FL, and CK helped to improve the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version.
Funding
The sample and/or data were collected in the frame of projects that received financial support from the European Union’s H2020 Program under Grant Agreement No. 633531 (Feed-a-Gene project), the French National Agency of Research (FatInteger project ANR-11-SVS7; ChickStress project, ANR-13-ADAP; EpiBird ANR project PCS-09-GENM-010), and the French institutions Institut Agro (AGROCAMPUS OUEST) and INRAE [Fr-AgENCODE project (2015–2017) and ELASTICe project (2012)]. FJ, FD, and KM were Ph.D. fellows supported by the Brittany region (France) and the INRAE Animal Genetics division. These funding bodies had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; or in the writing of the manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Genotoul bioinformatics platform Toulouse Occitanie (Bioinfo Genotoul, doi: 10.15454/1.5572369328961167E1) for providing help and/or computing and/or storage resources. We thank to Morgane Boutin who passed away this year and who did a lot in SLC27A4 analyses.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2021.659287/full#supplementary-material
Additional File 1Detail per population of the number of birds, tissues, and samples. The median number of sequenced fragments (× 1E6) is also indicated for each population.
Additional File 2Script used for recalculating the consequences for MNVs made up of two SNPs. The script is not generalized and therefore requires adaptations from the users. It is written in bash and R; the change of language is clearly indicated.
Additional File 3List of MNVs with two phased SNPs (position on the Galgal5 chicken genome) identified among the 382 chickens from 11 populations with their functional impacts (newConseq) and their constituent SNPs (oldConseq). (A) List of 2,965 MNVs identified in at least five individuals. (B) List of 5,416 MNVs without filtering on the number of individuals supporting the MNV. For the two tables, the population number (popNb), the total number of individuals (indNb_total), and the population name with the individual number per population (popName_indNb), in which the MNVs have been observed, are provided. AA, amino acid.
Additional File 4List of genes presenting a rescued stop-gained according to the number of individuals carrying the MNV. (A) Summary of the number of genes detected as “rescued” according to the number of individuals supporting the MNV. (B) For each gene, the population number (popNb) and the population name(s) with the individual number per population (popName:indNb) where the MNV is observed are indicated. The column in blue corresponds to MNVs observed in at least five individuals, the MNV set used in Figure 3.
References
1
BojanowskiM. (2020). mbojan/alluvial. R. Available online at: https://github.com/mbojan/alluvial. (accessed 8 Jan 2021).
2
ChengS.-J.ShiF.-Y.LiuH.DingY.JiangS.LiangN.et al (2017). Accurately annotate compound effects of genetic variants using a context-sensitive framework.Nucleic Acids Res.45:e82. 10.1093/nar/gkx041
3
CingolaniP.PlattsA.WangL. L.CoonM.NguyenT.WangL.et al (2012). A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3.Fly (Austin)680–92. 10.4161/fly.19695
4
DanecekP.McCarthyS. A. (2017). BCFtools/csq: haplotype-aware variant consequences.Bioinformatics332037–2039. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx100
5
DePristoM. A.BanksE.PoplinR.GarimellaK. V.MaguireJ. R.HartlC.et al (2011). A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data.Nat. Genet.43491–498.
6
Ensembl. (2018). dbSNP - Gallus Gallus 5 - V94.ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-94/variation/vcf/gallus_gallus(accessed December 11, 2020).∗
7
GimenoR. E.HirschD. J.PunreddyS.SunY.OrtegonA. M.WuH.et al (2003). Targeted deletion of fatty acid transport protein-4 results in early embryonic lethality.J. Biol. Chem.27849512–49516. 10.1074/jbc.m309759200
8
HerrmannT.van der HoevenF.GröneH.-J.StewartA. F.LangbeinL.KaiserI.et al (2003). Mice with targeted disruption of the fatty acid transport protein 4 (Fatp 4, Slc27a4) gene show features of lethal restrictive dermopathy.J. Cell Biol.1611105–1115. 10.1083/jcb.200207080
9
HirschD.StahlA.LodishH. F. (1998). A family of fatty acid transporters conserved from mycobacterium to man.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.958625–8629. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8625
10
JehlF.DegalezF.BernardM.LecerfF.LagoutteL.DésertC.et al (2021). RNA-Seq data for reliable SNP detection and genotype calling: Interest for coding variant characterization and cis-regulation analysis by allele-specific expression in livestock species. Front. Genet.12:655707. 10.3389/fgene.2021.655707
11
JehlF.MuretK.BernardM.BoutinM.LagoutteL.DésertC.et al (2020). An integrative atlas of chicken long non-coding genes and their annotations across 25 tissues.Sci. Rep.10:20457.
12
KhanW.Varma SaripellaG.LudwigT.CuppensT.ThibordF.GéninE.et al (2018). MACARON: a python framework to identify and re-annotate multi-base affected codons in whole genome/exome sequence data.Bioinformatics343396–3398. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty382
13
LaiZ.MarkovetsA.AhdesmakiM.ChapmanB.HofmannO.McEwenR.et al (2016). VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research.Nucleic Acids Res.44:e108. 10.1093/nar/gkw227
14
LeclercqB.BlumJ. C.BoyerJ. P. (1980). Selecting broilers for low or high abdominal fat: Initial observations.Br. Poult. Sci.21107–113. 10.1080/00071668008416644
15
LekM.KarczewskiK. J.MinikelE. V.SamochaK. E.BanksE.FennellT.et al (2016). Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.Nature536285–291.
16
LinM.-H.ChangK.-W.LinS.-C.MinerJ. H. (2010). Epidermal hyperproliferation in mice lacking fatty acid transport protein 4 (FATP4) involves ectopic EGF receptor and STAT3 signaling.Dev. Biol.344707–719. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.05.503
17
McKennaA.HannaM.BanksE.SivachenkoA.CibulskisK.KernytskyA.et al (2020). The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A Mapreduce Framework For Analyzing Next-Generation Dna Sequencing Data. Available online at: https://genome.cshlp.org/content/20/9/1297.long. (accessed 18 Sep 2020).
18
McLarenW.GilL.HuntS. E.RiatH. S.RitchieG. R. S.ThormannA.et al (2016). The ensembl variant effect predictor.Genome Biol.17:122.
19
MoulsonC. L.MartinD. R.LugusJ. J.SchafferJ. E.LindA. C.MinerJ. H. (2003). Cloning of wrinkle-free, a previously uncharacterized mouse mutation, reveals crucial roles for fatty acid transport protein 4 in skin and hair development.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1005274–5279. 10.1073/pnas.0431186100
20
NgP. C.HenikoffS. (2003). SIFT: predicting amino acid changes that affect protein function.Nucleic Acids Res.313812–3814. 10.1093/nar/gkg509
21
PagèsH.AboyounP.GentlemanR.DebRoyS. (2021). Biostrings: Efficient Manipulation Of Biological Strings. Bioconductor Version: Release (3.12).10.18129/B9.bioc.Biostrings
22
RobinsonJ. T.ThorvaldsdóttirH.WincklerW.GuttmanM.LanderE. S.GetzG.et al (2011). Integrative genomics viewer.Nat. Biotechnol.2924–26. 10.1038/nbt.1754
23
SchafferJ. E. (2002). Fatty acid transport: the roads taken.Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.282E239–E246.
24
SimN.-L.KumarP.HuJ.HenikoffS.SchneiderG.NgP. C. (2012). SIFT web server: predicting effects of amino acid substitutions on proteins.Nucleic Acids Res.40W452–W457.
25
SzklarczykD.GableA. L.LyonD.JungeA.WyderS.Huerta-CepasJ.et al (2019). STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets.Nucleic Acids Res.47D607–D613.
26
TaoJ.KosterM. I.HarrisonW.MoranJ. L.BeierD. R.RoopD. R.et al (2012). A spontaneous fatp4/scl27a4 splice site mutation in a new murine model for congenital ichthyosis.PLoS One.7:e50634. 10.1371/journal.pone.0050634
27
Van der AuweraG. A.CarneiroM. O.HartlC.PoplinR.Del AngelG.Levy-MoonshineA.et al (2013). From fastq data to high-confidence variant calls: the genome analysis toolkit best practices pipeline.Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma.4311.10.1–11.10.33.
28
WangK.LiM.HakonarsonH. (2010). ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data.Nucleic Acids Res.38:e164. 10.1093/nar/gkq603
29
WangQ.Pierce-HoffmanE.CummingsB. B.AlföldiJ.FrancioliL. C.GauthierL. D.et al (2020). Landscape of multi-nucleotide variants in 125,748 human exomes and 15,708 genomes.Nat. Commun.11:2539.
30
WeiL.LiuL. T.ConroyJ. R.HuQ.ConroyJ. M.MorrisonC. D.et al (2015). MAC: identifying and correcting annotation for multi-nucleotide variations.BMC Genomics.16:569. 10.1186/s12864-015-1779-7
Summary
Keywords
MNV, SNP, variation, rescued stop-gained, SLC27A4, FATP4
Citation
Degalez F, Jehl F, Muret K, Bernard M, Lecerf F, Lagoutte L, Désert C, Pitel F, Klopp C and Lagarrigue S (2021) Watch Out for a Second SNP: Focus on Multi-Nucleotide Variants in Coding Regions and Rescued Stop-Gained. Front. Genet. 12:659287. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.659287
Received
27 January 2021
Accepted
27 May 2021
Published
07 July 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Hans Cheng, Agricultural Research Service (USDA), United States
Reviewed by
John B. Cole, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), United States; Robert D. Schnabel, University of Missouri, United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2021 Degalez, Jehl, Muret, Bernard, Lecerf, Lagoutte, Désert, Pitel, Klopp and Lagarrigue.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sandrine Lagarrigue, sandrine.lagarrigue@agrocampus-ouest.fr
†These authors share first authorship
This article was submitted to Livestock Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.