REVIEW article
Front. Health Serv.
Sec. Implementation Science
This article is part of the Research TopicBeyond the Hype: A Global Perspective on the Real-World Utility of AI in Healthcare Research and Service DeliveryView all 4 articles
Rapid Review on GenAI in Nursing Education
Provisionally accepted- 1Faculty of Healthcare, Ostfalia University of Applied Sciences, Wolfsburg, Germany
- 2Westsachsische Hochschule Zwickau, Zwickau, Germany
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Backround: The use of generative AI, as represented by ChatGPT, holds promising potential for nursing education. This manifests itself in various areas, including personalised learning, simulation training and teaching process support. However, its integration requires careful consideration of ethical implications, adaptation of curricula and a high level of digital competence on the part of teachers. Only in this way can potential risks, such as the distortion of knowledge, bias and educational inequalities, be avoided. Methodes: Relevant publications were identified between 2019 and 2025 as part of a comprehensive literature search in the specialist databases PubMed, Embase, CINAHL and Scopus. The search was conducted using combined search terms that included the terms 'generative AI', "ChatGPT" and 'nursing'. After removing duplicates and screening (PRISMA-guided), 140 full texts were analysed and divided into two publications. This rapid overview focuses on the topic of generative AI in nursing education. Results: As part of the analysis of the included studies, five thematic areas were identified, which were divided into the categories of nursing education, competence development and nursing skills, implementation possibilities, examination quality and ethical considerations, and evaluated. A key theme is the dual potential of this technology: it can enrich learning through features such as virtual tutors and improved exam preparation, but it also requires critical consideration of ethical issues such as plagiarism, data bias and the need for human oversight. Outlook: In this context, the conclusion emphasises the urgent need to adapt curricula and provide targeted further training for teachers so that GenAI can be used responsibly and effectively – rather than, as is often the case at present, by banning it altogether.
Keywords: artificial intelligence, digital competence, Digital Nursing, ethical reflection, Nursing education
Received: 15 Oct 2025; Accepted: 09 Dec 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Hinsche, Hasseler, Tischendorf and Schaal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Laura Hinsche
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.