ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hortic.
Sec. Floriculture and Landscapes
Volume 4 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fhort.2025.1490879
Perceptions, Barriers, and Challenges of Adopting Battery-Powered Landscape Equipment in Professional Maintenance
Provisionally accepted
- 1Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, United States
- 2Alabama Cooperative Extension Service, Auburn, AL, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Legislative measures and societal pressures are reshaping the landscape maintenance industry by imposing restrictions on gas-powered outdoor power equipment. These regulations are driving a significant shift toward the adoption of eco-friendly alternatives in landscape maintenance practices. To gain insights into the perceptions, benefits, and challenges of adopting battery-powered outdoor power equipment, a survey was conducted among landscape maintenance operators in the USA. Professional landscape companies prioritize operation efficiency factors such as "Reliability," (score of 4.6 out of 5), "Work Capacity," (score of 4.5 out of 5), and equipment "Availability" (score of 4.3 out of 5) rather than the environmental factors such as "Air Pollution" (score of 3.1 out of 5) and "Noise Pollution" (score of 3.2 out of 5) emphasized in recent legislative measures. Of the participants surveyed, 52% said they have integrated battery-powered equipment into their landscape maintenance operations in some capacity. "Noise Pollution" (score of 3.9 out of 5) and "Air Pollution" (score of 3.7 out of 5) were identified as the main drivers behind the integration of batterypowered equipment. "Competitive Advantage" (score of 3.0 out of 5) and "Cost" (score of 2.7 out of 5) were the least motivating factors for battery-powered equipment adoption, suggesting that economic concerns pose a significant barrier to adoption. However, for traditional equipment operators, addressing concerns related to the "Work Capacity, "Power," and "Quality" of batterypowered equipment could be pivotal in overcoming skepticism. Of traditional gas-powered equipment users, 70% indicated they would consider adopting battery-powered equipment if their concerns were alleviated. Based on these results, future research should aim to fill the existing knowledge gap regarding the long-term operational costs and benefits of battery-powered equipment and gas-powered equipment.
Keywords: Battery-powered, gas-powered, Zero-emission, sustainability, Environmental impact, Landscape maintenance, Green industry, horticultural services
Received: 03 Sep 2024; Accepted: 12 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Kent, Brodbeck, Hoffman, Chaves-Cordoba and Bartley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Paul Carver Bartley, Auburn University, Auburn, 36849, Alabama, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.