ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Hum. Dyn.
Sec. Social Networks
Quantifying the Digital Cultural Divide: How Platform Algorithms Shape Rural-Urban Identity Politics in China
Yuehua Chen 1
Jiayao Gao 2
1. Southeast University, Nanjing, China
2. Party School of Jiangsu Provincial Committee of the Communist Party of China, Nanjing, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Abstract
Against the backdrop of the deep promotion of digital China and rural revitalization strategy, short video platform algorithms, as a new cultural intermediary force, are associated with the reconstruction of the political ecology of urban and rural cultural identity. This study systematically examines the differential associative mechanism of algorithmic recommendation systems on cultural identity among urban and rural residents through a nationwide stratified sampling survey. Research has found that algorithm exposure is significantly positively associated with users' acceptance of rural modernity narratives, manifested as a significant increase in fusion innovation identification; Urban and rural registered residence, as a key social location variable, regulates the associative path between algorithm exposure and reality cognition. Urban user groups show a positive correlation between algorithm exposure and reality recognition, while rural user groups do not show this association. Active search behavior exhibits a weakening association with algorithm domestication, as users resist single narrative infiltration through autonomous information acquisition. The study proposes the concept framework of "Algorithm Domestication Gap" to reveal new forms of cognitive expression of the digital divide. It is clarified that the core concept of "digital cultural divide" in this study specifically refers to the multi-dimensional cognitive gap composed of differences in algorithmic exposure, differentiation in cultural content interpretive capacity, and divergence in downstream cultural identity outcomes under the framework of the third-generation digital divide, rather than a single-dimensional gap in technology access or usage skills. The "Algorithm Domestication Gap" is clearly defined as the specific manifestation of the digital cultural divide at the cognitive domestication level, whose core lies in the cognitive acceptance differences among groups with different social positions associated with the process of algorithmic content domestication. This concept not only inherits the third-generation digital divide's focus on knowledge acquisition and cognitive differences but also expands the core logic of the knowledge gap theory that "information processing capacity affects cognitive outcomes", focusing on the differentiated associative effect of algorithms as a new type of technical intermediary on the cognitive domestication process, providing a theoretical lens for understanding the cultural and political aspects of urban and rural areas mediated by technology.
Summary
Keywords
digital cultural divide, Platform algorithm, Short videos, Urban and rural identity recognition, Urban-rural cultural identity
Received
04 November 2025
Accepted
17 February 2026
Copyright
© 2026 Chen and Gao. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jiayao Gao
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.