Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Hum. Neurosci.

Sec. Speech and Language

This article is part of the Research TopicAutism Spectrum Disorder: Exploring the speech and language continuumView all 10 articles

Does baseline language ability predict response to early intervention for toddlers with early signs of autism? Evidence from a caregiver-mediated program

Provisionally accepted
Jessica  Ann BrianJessica Ann Brian1*Ian  RothIan Roth1Lonnie  ZwaigenbaumLonnie Zwaigenbaum2Isabel  SmithIsabel Smith3Lori-Ann  Rosalind SacreyLori-Ann Rosalind Sacrey2Kate  BernardiKate Bernardi1Stacey  MacWilliamStacey MacWilliam4Sara  DaoudSara Daoud1Erin  DowdsErin Dowds1Sanne  JilderdaSanne Jilderda2Samara  OstenSamara Osten1Anna  MichelisAnna Michelis1Abbie  SolishAbbie Solish1
  • 1Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Toronto, Canada
  • 2University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
  • 3Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
  • 4IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background. Caregiver-mediated interventions (CMIs) for young autistic children are supported by mounting evidence of efficacy. Attempts to identify child-level factors that predict treatment response have yielded inconsistent findings, with very few such studies focused on the toddler age range. Objective. Secondary analysis of data from a randomized control trial (NCT03215394) was conducted to explore predictive relationships between toddlers’ communication-related abilities and response to treatment in a CMI program. Participants. 67 toddler-caregiver dyads (62 mothers, 4 fathers, 1 grandmother) participated across three Canadian sites. Participating toddlers (52 boys, 15 girls) had a diagnosis of autism or early signs thereof and ranged in age from 18 to 32 months (M = 25.95 months). Methods. All dyads participated in a 12-week CMI (the Social ABCs). Communication-related skills were assessed at baseline using a direct standardized assessment of expressive language, a caregiver interview to capture receptive and expressive communication, and a parent-report inventory to document words used and understood. Analyses. A series of regressions with simple mediation analyses were performed to identify communication-related predictors of intervention change scores for caregiver fidelity and toddler outcomes. In all cases, toddler age was entered as a mediator to explore any influence on these relationships. Results. Toddlers’ functional communication inversely predicted their caregivers’ mastery of program strategies. Specifically, lower toddler functional receptive and expressive communication predicted larger gains in caregivers’ strategy use. Conversely, higher baseline (receptive but not expressive) communication-related skills predicted greater gains in toddlers’ responsivity. Trends emerged for prediction of toddler smiling and social orienting. The clinical measure selected for this study did not predict outcomes. Conclusions. Caregiver-reported information about toddler communication-related skills was informative for predicting the primary program outcomes. Findings may be helpful in informing clinical triage decisions and personalizing intervention approaches.

Keywords: autism, caregiver-mediated, Communication, Early Intervention, naturalistic, Parent-mediated, Toddler

Received: 12 Sep 2025; Accepted: 16 Feb 2026.

Copyright: © 2026 Brian, Roth, Zwaigenbaum, Smith, Sacrey, Bernardi, MacWilliam, Daoud, Dowds, Jilderda, Osten, Michelis and Solish. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Jessica Ann Brian

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.