Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Lang. Sci.

Sec. Psycholinguistics

This article is part of the Research TopicInsights in Psycholinguistics: 2025View all 5 articles

Switching Cost and Cognate Facilitation Between Two Signed Languages

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • 2The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

This study investigated language switching and cognate facilitation in deaf bilinguals fluent in two signed languages - Irish Sign Language (ISL) and British Sign Language (BSL). Ten participants, who were all deaf and were educated in ISL and later exposed to BSL, completed a picture-naming task requiring them to switch between the two languages based on visual cues. The study aimed to establish whether a switching cost—typically observed in unimodal spoken language bilingualism—also exists in unimodal signed language bilingualism, and whether language dominance and cognate status mediated this effect. Results confirmed a general switching cost: participants were slower to respond on switch trials than during a baseline block with no switching. Both language dominance and cognate status affected the switching cost, such that switching costs were greater in the dominant language, and noncognates were significantly slowed by switching but cognates were not. Accuracy rates were high and did not vary significantly by switching condition or language. As the first investigation to provide evidence of a switching cost in deaf bilinguals who use two signed languages, this study provides an important foundation for future work exploring how language modality and language ecology shape the cognitive control systems underlying language switching.

Keywords: bilingualism, cognate facilitation, Deafness, Language mixing, language switching, signed language

Received: 10 Oct 2025; Accepted: 15 Dec 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Adam and Morford. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Robert Edward James Adam

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.