Abstract
Chlorophyll fluorescence, primarily used to derive phytoplankton biomass, has long been an underutilized source of information on phytoplankton physiology. Diel fluctuations in chlorophyll fluorescence are affected by both photosynthetic efficiency and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ), where NPQ is a decrease in fluorescence through the dissipation of excess energy as heat. NPQ variability is linked to iron and light availability, and has the potential to provide important diagnostic information on phytoplankton physiology. Here we establish a relationship between NPQsv (Stern-Volmer NPQ) and indices of iron limitation from nutrient addition experiments in the sub-Antarctic zone (SAZ) of the Atlantic Southern Ocean, through the derivation of NPQmax (the maximum NPQsv value) and αNPQ (the light limited slope of NPQsv). Significant differences were found for both Fv/Fm and αNPQ for iron versus control treatments, with no significant differences for NPQmax. Similar results from CTDs indicated that changes in NPQ were driven by increasing light availability from late July to December, but by both iron and light from January to February. We propose here that variability in αNPQ, which has removed the effect of light availability, can potentially be used as a proxy for iron limitation (as shown here for the Atlantic SAZ), with higher values being associated with greater iron stress. This approach was transferred to data from a buoyancy glider deployment at the same location by utilizing the degree of fluorescence quenching as a proxy for NPQGlider, which was plotted against in situ light to determine αNPQ. Seasonal increases in αNPQ are consistent with increased light availability, shoaling of the mixed layer depth (MLD) and anticipated seasonal iron limitation. The transition from winter to summer, when positive net heat flux dominates stratification, was coincident with a 24% increase in αNPQ variability and a switch in the dominant driver from incident PAR to MLD. The dominant scales of αNPQ variability are consistent with fine scale variability in MLD and a significant positive relationship was observed between these two at a ∼10 day window. The results emphasize the important role of fine scale dynamics in driving iron supply, particularly in summer when this micronutrient is limiting.
Introduction
Chlorophyll fluorescence has previously been adopted as a proxy for chlorophyll concentration (), however accurately measuring and interpreting these data is not trivial, in particular during daytime periods of high irradiance when fluorescence is depressed and no longer correlated with chlorophyll (Yentsch and Ryther, 1957; ; ; ; ). These diel fluctuations in chlorophyll fluorescence are caused by a decrease in the fluorescence quantum yield when light energy absorption exceeds the photosynthetic capacity for light utilization (; ). The resultant decrease in the ratio of photons emitted as fluorescence to those absorbed by photosynthetic pigments is a process termed non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) (; ; ; ), whereby excess energy is dissipated as heat at the cost of fluorescence () as a mechanism to protect the photosynthetic apparatus (). If fluorescence quenching is not corrected, daytime fluorescence will generate under-representative approximations of chlorophyll concentrations (), which is a major concern for generating long-term, high quality datasets from which trends of climatic relevance can be ascertained (Xing et al., 2012). Despite the hindrance to accurate chlorophyll estimates, this physiological variability within NPQ has the potential to provide important information on phytoplankton photosynthetic efficiency.
Non-photochemical quenching, which can originate in either the light-harvesting antenna or the photosynthetic reaction center (), is known to vary in response to light under saturating conditions (; ; ), to changes in community structure (), and to iron limiting conditions (, ; ; ). An empirical relationship with SST has also been described (), however the underlying controls of this relationship are still not entirely understood. Derivation of NPQ in situ has typically consisted of measurements of active chlorophyll fluorescence alongside the derivation of the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II, Fv/Fm, which has long been established as a key physiological indicator of phytoplankton, and in particular the significant decreases that occur under conditions of iron limitation (; ). Measurements of both NPQ and Fv/Fm are routinely performed using active fluorometers, however these are currently not readily available to be deployed on autonomous platforms. Instead, autonomous platforms, ships’ underway systems, and CTD rosette systems typically employ standard fluorometers in a capacity to estimate phytoplankton biomass and distribution. This fluorescence is then corrected for quenching to derive chlorophyll, a key ecosystem Essential Ocean Variable (). Whilst Fv/Fm cannot yet be routinely measured on autonomous platforms, if quenching is corrected then the degree of quenching can provide useful information on NPQ.
There are various quenching correction methods that exist in the literature (; Xing et al., 2012; ; ; ), however, the optimized method proposed by reduces the reliance on various assumptions and was shown to perform best across multiple oceanic scenarios in the Southern Ocean, including regions dominated by a deep chlorophyll maxima.
Utilization of data from autonomous platforms is at the forefront of oceanographic exploration as these platforms are able to address the space-time gaps of a hitherto radically undersampled ocean. Such measurements are required to improve estimates of phytoplankton biomass and distribution, however an assessment of photosynthetic efficiency on similar scales is also necessary for improved validation of biogeochemical models of oceanic productivity. This is of particular importance in the Southern Ocean where iron limitation is prevalent (; ; ), and the effects of iron limitation on primary production models is poorly constrained (; ). Here, we utilize iron addition incubation experiments to estimate the effect of iron limitation upon NPQ capacity, along with in situ measurements at a single location in the sub-Antarctic Zone (SAZ). We then use the degree of quenching as a proxy for realized in situ NPQ from standard fluorometers on autonomous platforms to infer iron limitation in the Southern Ocean.
Materials and Methods
Experimental data were obtained as part of the third Southern Ocean Seasonal Cycle Experiment (SOSCEx III) () on two cruises to the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean during winter (July 2015) and summer (December 2015–February 2016). The cruises were onboard the SA Agulhas II, and were spanned by continuous high resolution robotics-based observations in the SAZ. Iron addition incubation experiments were performed as described in . Briefly, water for incubation experiments was collected from the mixed layer using a trace metal clean CTD rosette system with GoFlo bottles, whereas water for CTD profiles was collected from a CTD rosette system with Niskin bottles at the same location. Experiments were run for 144–168 h in light and temperature-controlled fridge incubators, with two treatments per experiment, an iron addition (+2.0 nM Fe) and a control. Results from experiment 1 from where there was no evidence of iron limitation, were excluded from further analysis, as were measurements beyond 120 h from experiments 2 and 3 (where bottle effects and community structure changes were prominent). Samples for active chlorophyll fluorescence light curves (FLCs) were collected at various time points of the experiments from 1 bottle per treatment. Profiles of dissolved iron (DFe) concentrations were collected at the same locations as the incubation experiments. For the detailed methodology of collection and analysis see .
Fluorescence light curves were performed using a Chelsea Scientific Instruments FastOceanTM fast repetition rate fluorometer (FRRf) integrated with a FastActTM laboratory system. Samples were dark acclimated for 30 min at incubation temperatures, and measurements were blank corrected using carefully prepared 0.2 μm filtrates (). Active chlorophyll fluorescence measurements consisted of a single turnover protocol with a saturation sequence (100 × 1 μs flashlets with a 2 μs interval) and a relaxation sequence (25 × 1 μs flashlets with an interval of 84 μs), with a sequence interval of 100 ms which was repeated 32 times resulting in a total acquisition time of 3.2 s. The power of the excitation LED (λ450 nm) was adjusted between samples to saturate the observed fluorescence transients following manufacturer specifications but was kept constant during a FLC. The FLCs were determined by sample measurements at 20 actinic irradiances from 0 μmol photons m–2 s–1 to 1865 μmol photons m–2 s–1, with an optimized duration per light level consisting of 12 acquisitions per light level (10 s per light level), except for the first light level (10 μmol photons m–2 s–1) which consisted of 24 acquisitions, resulting in a total measurement time of 42 min.
Data from the FLCs were analyzed to derive fluorescence parameters, as defined in , by fitting transients to the model of , using custom processing software in Python 3.7 (Ryan-Keogh and Robinson, Submitted; gitlab.com/tjryankeogh/phytophotoutils). The derived parameters were quality controlled (mean ± σ × 3) to create a mean per light level, with levels excluded if there were less than three successful acquisitions. The parameters Fm and Fm’ were used to derive the Stern–Volmer NPQ parameter ():
where Fm is the maximum fluorescence level after a period of dark adaptation (i.e., the maximum potential for fluorescence with no effects of quenching), and Fm’ is the maximum fluorescence level after a period of acclimation under actinic light saturation (i.e., under quenching conditions). However, if Fm’ values are higher than Fm, due to not completely removing the effects of in situ quenching from the sample before measurement, NPQsv can also be calculated as described in :
where Fm’,m is the maximum Fm’ value measured during the FLC. NPQ was calculated this way to avoid overestimating values of NPQsv, which can occur when dark acclimating samples. Dark acclimation has long been considered the best practice for performing active chlorophyll fluorescence measurements, however these best practices are currently under review by the fluorescence community who now suggest that low light acclimation is more appropriate for field samples. Under these scenarios the minimum NPQsv value was used to determine ENPQmin, the light value at which the maximum Fm’m is measured, and the model was iteratively fitted to the NPQsv versus E for all E > ENPQmin (FastAct LEDs, μmol photons m–2 s–1), following spectral correction (see below). The data were fit using a least-squares trust-reflective region algorithm (Eq. 3) (, ). The algorithm was used to derive NPQmax (the maximum value of NPQsv – equivalent to PBm from ) and αNPQ (the light limited slope of NPQsv – equivalent to α from ).
A spectral correction factor for the FLC data was determined as the light emitting diodes of the actinic light source for the FastAct chamber do not directly represent the in situ light field of the water column. Failure to account for these differences can lead to over/underestimations in key fluorescence parameters and is therefore considered best practice to account for them where possible (). The spectral correction factor for the FLC curves was calculated as follows:
Where Ein situ is the in situ light spectra determined using a typical incident solar spectrum from ) and the spectrally dependent light attenuation coefficient following . ELED is the spectral light distribution of the actinic light sources in the FastAct chamber as supplied by the manufacturer. a is the chlorophyll-a specific phytoplankton pigment absorption determined by the quantitative filter pad technique () following the IOCCG best practice protocols (). Between 0.5 and 2.0 L of seawater were filtered onto 25 mm GF/F filters before analysis at sea on a Shimadzu UV-2501 spectrophotometer. Optical density was measured from 350 to 750 nm (1 nm resolution) before detrital corrections following the method of . The wavelength specific phytoplankton pigment absorption spectrum was calculated following corrections for particulate retention area of the filter, volume filtered and the path-length amplification coefficients (). a was determined following normalization to the corresponding chlorophyll a concentration. The spectral correction factor averaged 0.94 ± 0.02, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96, which was then multiplied by the actinic light levels (E > ENPQmin) before fitting with the modified equation.
Two autonomous profiling buoyancy Seagliders were deployed consecutively in mooring mode in the SAZ at −43°S, 8.52°E, covering a horizontal distance of 1.4 km per dive (SD: 1.1 km) (). Seaglider (SG543) was deployed in winter on 28 July 2015 and was replaced with SG542 in early summer (08 December 2015) and retrieved in late summer (08 February 2016). The combined continuous sampling resulted in a high-resolution time series of 196 days spanning winter through spring to late summer with measurements of conductivity, temperature, pressure, fluorescence, PAR and optical backscattering at two wavelengths (λ470 and λ700 nm). Glider fluorescence from the WETLabs ECO puckTM was processed using GliderTools, custom code developed in Python 3.7 () and corrected for quenching according to the protocols outlined in . This method corrects daytime quenched fluorescence using a mean night time profile of the fluorescence to backscattering ratio multiplied by daytime profiles of backscattering from the surface to the depth of quenching (determined as the depth at which the day fluorescence profile diverges from the mean night profile). Daily means of fluorescence data collected between local sunrise and sunset (i.e., during periods when quenching was in effect) were used to generate a proxy for NPQ as follows:
where FQ is the quenched fluorescence and FQC is the quenching corrected fluorescence. Assumptions were made that FQ is representative of Fm’ (i.e., maximum fluorescence yield under daytime quenching conditions) and FQC is representative of Fm (maximum fluorescence yield with no effects of quenching, i.e., quenching corrected). The model was similarly applied to the NPQGlider versus E (in situ PAR, μmol photons m–2 s–1) curves to derive NPQmax and αNPQ. Curve parameters from both fitting routines were excluded from further analysis if the r2 of the individual fit was less than the total deployment mean r2 of 0.90. The mixed layer depth (MLD) was calculated from the Seaglider density profiles following , where the density differs from the density at 10 m by more than 0.03 kg m–3. The euphotic depth was defined as the depth at which the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is 1% of surface PAR.
Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) analysis was performed on glider data according to the methods outlined in . Briefly, primary signals from glider sea surface temperature (SST), MLD, surface chlorophyll concentration and αNPQ were decomposed into Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs) (). The mean temporal scales for each IMF were calculated by averaging the times between peaks and troughs of each IMF. The EMD analysis was performed for the individual seasons split into winter and summer at the 26 of November, and the seasonal signal removed by subtracting the EMD residual from the time series. Linear correlations were performed between each IMF and the original dataset to determine the percentage of variance explained by each IMF. In cases of missing αNPQ, data gaps were filled using a linear interpolation and a linear regression with MLD.
Results
To estimate whether changes in NPQ variability can be directly linked to nutrient availability, specifically iron limitation, a series of FLC measurements were performed on nutrient addition incubation experiments. Results from these experiments displayed a seasonal development of iron limitation in the Atlantic sector of the SAZ (), with the addition of iron in December showing no significant differences in Fv/Fm, the photochemical efficiency of phytoplankton, [where Fv is the dark adapted variable fluorescence level, calculated as (Fm – Fo) and Fo is the minimum dark adapted fluorescence level], whereas in January and February the addition of iron resulted in significant increases in Fv/Fm. Concurrent with the results of these experiments were changes in the profiles of DFe (Supplementary Figure S1), where euphotic zone integrated inventories of iron decreased from 11.02 μmol m–2 in December to 4.55 μmol m–2 in February (). The decrease in DFe combined with the physiological responses of Fv/Fm to iron addition implies that December was iron replete followed by the development of iron limitation in January and February. We are thus able to compare changes in NPQsv from the incubation experiments to changes in Fv/Fm, photosynthetic efficiency, and relief from iron stress as the season progressed. Figure 1 displays example data from experiment 2 at 120 h for both the iron addition and control treatments. In all cases Fm’ was higher than Fm (Figure 1A), with ENPQmin ranging from 30 to 216 μmol photons m–2 s–1, requiring Eq. 2 to be applied (Figure 1B) before fitting NPQsv to the model (Figure 1B). Significant differences were found for both Fv/Fm and αNPQ (p < 0.05, n = 4) between iron and control treatments, with significantly higher Fv/Fm (Figure 2A) and significantly lower αNPQ (Figure 2B) values in the iron addition treatment. However, no significant differences (p > 0.05, n = 4) were found for NPQmax (Figure 2C). Results from experiment 1 were excluded as there were no signs of iron limitation from , example data from experiment 1 at 120 h (Supplementary Figure S2) did not display any difference between the iron and control treatments, displaying αNPQ values that were similar to the mean αNPQ values of the iron addition treatments (Figure 2B). Similar results were found in samples from CTD profiles across the growing season, where Fv/Fm decreases from late July to February (Figure 3A), but there are similar values for late July and December (∼0.40) compared to January (∼0.30) and February (∼0.20). This same pattern was also evident for αNPQ (Figure 3B), with similar values for late July to December (6.34–6.64 × 10–4) before increasing to (8.79–8.8710–4) for January and February. However, NPQmax (Figure 3C) displayed an increase between late July and December before increasing again and remaining similar for January and February.
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2

The mean and standard errors of (A) Fv/Fm, (B) αNPQ, and (C) the maximum NPQ value (NPQmax) derived from
FIGURE 3

(A) CTD depth profile of Fv/Fm for July, December, January, and February in the Sub-Antarctic Zone. Bar plots of (B) FRRf derived αNPQ, (C) FRRf derived NPQmax, (D) Glider derived αNPQ and (E) Glider derived NPQmax values from surface CTD FLC samples and coincident Glider profiles in July, December, January, and February.
A seasonal signal was evident within NPQGlider, increasing from low values in late July to high values in February (Figure 4). This NPQGlider variability appears to be linked to changes in the MLD (Figure 4A) and increases in surface PAR (Figure 4B). The initial ramp in NPQGlider (e.g., increase in surface NPQGlider from ∼0.3 to ∼3) is coincident with an increase in surface PAR from ∼400 μmol photons m–2 s–1 in late July to ∼800 μmol photons m–2 s–1 in November. PAR beyond November levels out for the remainder of the time series (oscillating around ∼700 μmol photons m–2 s–1) while NPQGlider (surface and mean in MLD) displays large excursions that appear to be linked to variability in the MLD, suggesting a possible switch in the dominant control. Indeed, mean NPQGlider in the MLD remains similar to the mean NPQGlider in the euphotic zone from late July to October (Figure 4B), following which it begins to deviate with increases that are linked to shoaling events in December and January. This same pattern is evident in surface NPQGlider, where a significant positive relationship was observed with surface PAR (Supplementary Figure S3a: r = 0.65, p < 0.05) and a significant negative relationship with MLD (Supplementary Figure S3b: r = −0.82, p < 0.05). These results suggest that both drivers (PAR and MLD) act to increase NPQ, where increased PAR increases phytoplankton light stress, and shoaling events of the MLD increase both light and nutrient stress. By accounting for the effects of light on NPQGlider the remaining variability in NPQGlider across the season can be assumed to be driven primarily by nutrient stress, and secondarily by changes in community structure. However, previous studies have shown that the community structure remained dominated by Haptophytes (>40% of total chlorophyll) throughout winter and summer (
FIGURE 4

(A) Section of glider derived NPQ (NPQGlider), with the daily mean mixed layer depth (MLD) and euphotic depth (n = 195). (B) A 7-day rolling mean of Surface NPQGlider, mean NPQGlider in MLD, mean NPQGlider in the euphotic zone and surface PAR (μmol photons m– 2 s– 1) for the glider time series.
The depth profile of NPQGlider (Figure 5A) reveals high values in the surface that decrease with depth, similar in shape to the PAR profile (Figure 5B). Moreover, the extent and shape of these profiles is markedly different between winter and summer. By plotting NPQGlider against its relative in situ PAR (Figure 5C) we were able derive the light limited slope of NPQ (αNPQ). This was however not always possible and on six occasions a curve could not be fitted as the daily mean in NPQGlider was zero, in which case the curves were excluded from the analysis. Further quality control (QC) was applied to the data utilizing r2, which ranged from 0.11 to 0.99, with mean and median values of 0.91 and 0.95 respectively. If the r2 value of a fit was less than the total deployment mean r2, the curve was excluded. This QC step resulted in the exclusion of an additional 17 curves, while a total of 172 curves met all QC procedures and were retained. A time series of αNPQ for the glider deployment is plotted in Figure 6A. Between late July and November, before we see the first major deviation between the mean NPQGlider in the MLD and mean NPQGlider in the euphotic zone (Figure 4B), αNPQ increased from a minimum value of 1.65 × 10–3 to a maximum value of 1.54 × 10–2 (Figure 6A and Supplementary Figure S4a), with an interquartile range (IQR) of 3.02 × 10–3. After November there is a ∼24% increase in the mean and standard deviation of αNPQ, and this increase in variability can also be seen with a greater standard deviation and range in NPQmax, the maximum NPQGlider value (Supplementary Figure S4b).
FIGURE 5

Example depth profiles from glider dives on 13/08/2015 (winter) and 05/01/2016 (summer) of (A) NPQGlider and (B) PAR (μmol photons m– 2 s– 1). (C) Example NPQGlider versus PAR curves for both winter and summer.
FIGURE 6

(A) A time-series of a 5-day rolling mean of αNPQ and MLD (m). (B) Correlation coefficients of rolling averages of αNPQ and MLD using different time windows (days).
To estimate the degree to which variability in αNPQ could be linked to nutrient limitation, its relationship to the MLD was examined, where the MLD was used as a proxy for mixing (
Discussion
Autonomous platforms, such as buoyancy gliders, can provide unprecedented spatial and temporal coverage of oceanic systems addressing the space-time gaps in observations needed to validate Earth system models. Buoyancy gliders have been successfully deployed in the Atlantic Southern Ocean SAZ under SOSCEx (
Here, we develop a method that uses the degree of quenching as a proxy for NPQ similar to that proposed by
The lack of a significant change in Fv/Fm between late July (0.36 ± 0.04) and December (0.35 ± 0.03) combined with the lack of response to iron addition in experiment 1 from
Determining this proxy from gliders however requires measurements of NPQ in the absence of active chlorophyll fluorescence from a FRRf (or similar). Instead, the ratio of quenched fluorescence to quenching corrected fluorescence (
A closer look at the time series of glider derived αNPQ showed the greatest increase in variability after November, with a 24% increase in the mean and standard deviation. A similar increase in variability is also evident within NPQmax (Supplementary Figure S4b). The transition period for the different modes of variability appears to coincide with the date of mixed layer restratification (26th November) determined for the same glider time series by
Whilst the MLD does not exhibit particularly large excursions after November (Supplementary Figure S5), this is the period when phytoplankton begin to exhibit signs of nutrient stress (
Given a better understanding of the dominant scales of variability, a series of correlations were performed between αNPQ and MLD using rolling means of time scales ranging from 2 to 12 days and indeed, correlation coefficients increased from 0.39 to 0.64 (Figure 6B). EMD analysis (as per
Conclusion
Whilst gliders have provided extensive in depth understanding of fine scale physical dynamics and phytoplankton production in the SAZ (
Statements
Data availability statement
Glider data is available at ftp://socco.chpc.ac.za/GliderTools/SOSCEx3. Experimental and CTD data are at ftp://socco.chpc.ac.za/RyanKeogh_Thomalla_Glider_2020/.
Author contributions
TR-K and ST designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This work was undertaken through the CSIR’s Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observatory (SOCCO) Programme (http://socco.org.za) and supported by CSIR’s Parliamentary Grant funding (SNA2011112600001) and NRF SANAP grants (SNA2011120800004 and SNA14071475720).
Acknowledgments
We thank the South African National Antarctic Programme (SANAP) and the captain, officers, and crew of the SA Agulhas II for their professional support throughout the cruise. We are thankful for the professional service delivered by the engineers and glider pilots from Sea Technology Services.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The reviewer WS declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors TR-K to the handling Editor.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2020.00275/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AbbottM. R.RichersonP. J.PowellT. M. (1982). In situ response of phytoplankton fluorescence to rapid variations in light.Limnol. Oceanogr.27218–225. 10.4319/lo.1982.27.2.0218
2
AlderkampA. C.KulkG.BumaA. G. J.VisserR. J. W.Van DijkenG. L.MillsM. M.et al (2012). The effect of iron limitation on the photophysiology of phaeocystis antarctica (prymnesiophyceae) and fragilariopsis cylindrus (bacillariophyceae) under dynamic irradiance.J. Phycol.4845–59. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.01098.x
3
AlkireM. B.LeeC.D’AsaroE.PerryM. J.BriggsN.CetiniæI.et al (2014). Net community production and export from Seaglider measurements in the North Atlantic after the spring bloom.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans1196121–6139. 10.1002/2014jc010105
4
BehrenfeldM. J.WestberryT. K.BossE. S.O’MalleyR. T.SiegelD. A.WiggertJ. D.et al (2009). Satellite-detected fluorescence reveals global physiology of ocean phytoplankton.Biogeosciences6779–794. 10.5194/bg-6-779-2009
5
BiddleL. C.KaiserJ.HeywoodK. J.ThompsonA. F.JenkinsA. (2015). Ocean glider observations of iceberg-enhanced biological production in the northwestern Weddell Sea.Geophys. Res. Lett.42459–465. 10.1002/2014gl062850
6
BiermannL.GuinetC.BesterM.BrierleyA.BoehmeL. (2015). An alternative method for correcting fluorescence quenching.Ocean Sci.1183–91. 10.5194/os-11-83-2015
7
BilgerW.BjörkmanO. (1990). Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis.Photosynth. Res.25173–186. 10.1007/BF00033159
8
BolR.HensonS. A.RumyantsevaA.BriggsN. (2018). High-frequency variability of small-particle carbon export flux in the northeast Atlantic.Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles321803–1814. 10.1029/2018gb005963
9
BoydP. W.JickellsT.LawC. S.BlainS.BoyleE. A.BuesselerK. O.et al (2007). Mesoscale iron enrichment experiments 1993-2005: synthesis and future directions.Science315612–617. 10.1126/science.1131669
10
BricaudA.StramskiD. (1990). Spectral absorption coefficients of living phytoplankton and nonalgal biogenous matter: a comparison between the Peru upwelling area and the Sargasso Sea.Limnol. Oceanogr.35562–582. 10.4319/lo.1990.35.3.0562
11
BriggsN.PerryM. J.CetiniæI.LeeC.D’AsaroE.GrayA. M.et al (2011). High-resolution observations of aggregate flux during a sub-polar North Atlantic spring bloom.Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap.581031–1039. 10.1016/j.dsr.2011.07.007
12
BrowningT. J.BoumanH. A.MooreC. M. (2014). Satellite detected fluorescence: decoupling nonphotochemical quenching form iron stress signals in the South Atlantic and Southern Ocean.Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles28510–524. 10.1002/2013gb004773
13
CarranzaM. M.GilleS. T. (2015). Southern Ocean wind-driven entrainment enhances satellite chlorophyll-a through the summer.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans120304–323. 10.1002/2014jc010203
14
ColemanT.LiY. (1996). An interior trust region approach for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds.SIAM J. Optim.6418–445. 10.1137/0806023
15
ColemanT. F.LiY. (1994). On the convergence of interior-reflective Newton methods for nonlinear minimization subject to bounds.Math. Program.67189–224. 10.1007/bf01582221
16
ConstableA. J.CostaD. P.SchofieldO.NewmanL.UrbanE. R.FultonE. A.et al (2016). Developing priority variables (“ecosystem Essential Ocean Variables” — eEOVs) for observing dynamics and change in Southern Ocean ecosystems.J. Mar. Syst.16126–41. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.05.003
17
CullenJ. J. (1982). The deep chlorophyll maximum: comparing vertical profiles of chlorophyll a.Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.39791–803. 10.1139/f82-108
18
CullenJ. J.DavisR. F. (2003). The blank can make a big difference in oceanographic measurements.Limnol. Oceanogr. Bull.1229–35. 10.1002/lob.200312229
19
de Boyer MontégutC.MadecG.FischerA. S.LazarA.IudiconeD. (2004). Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: an examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans109:C12003. 10.1029/2004JC002378
20
Demmig-AdamsB.AdamsW. W. (1996). Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species.Planta198460–470. 10.1007/bf00620064
21
du PlessisM.SwartS.AnsorgeI. J.MahadevanA. (2017). Submesoscale processes promote seasonal restratification in the Subantarctic Ocean.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans1222960–2975. 10.1002/2016jc012494
22
du PlessisM.SwartS.AnsorgeI. J.MahadevanA.ThompsonA. F. (2019). Southern ocean seasonal restratification delayed by Submesoscale wind–front interactions.J. Phys. Oceanogr.491035–1053. 10.1175/jpo-d-18-0136.1
23
EricksonZ. K.ThompsonA. F.CassarN.SprintallJ.MazloffM. R. (2016). An advective mechanism for deep chlorophyll maxima formation in southern Drake Passage.Geophys. Res. Lett.4310,846–10,855. 10.1002/2016GL070565
24
FalkowskiP. G.KolberZ. (1995). Variations in chlorophyll fluorescence yields in phytoplankton in the world oceans.Aust. J. Plant Physiol.22341–355. 10.1071/PP9950341
25
FalkowskiP. G.RavenJ. A. (2007). Aquatic Photosynthesis, 2nd Edn. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
26
FauchereauN.TagliabueA.BoppL.MonteiroP. M. S. (2011). The response of phytoplankton biomass to transient mixing events in the Southern Ocean.Geophys. Res. Lett.38:L17601. 10.1029/2011GL048498
27
FrölicherT. L.SarmientoJ. L.PaynterD. J.DunneJ. P.KrastingJ. P.WintonM. (2014). Dominance of the Southern ocean in anthropogenic carbon and heat uptake in CMIP5 models.J. Clim.28862–886. 10.1175/jcli-d-14-00117.1
28
GeiderR. J. (1993). Quantitative phytoplankton physiology: implications for primary production and phytoplankton growth.ICES Mar. Sci. Symp.19752–62.
29
GregorL.Ryan-KeoghT. J.NicholsonS.-A.du PlessisM. D.GiddyI.SwartS. (2019). GliderTools: a python toolbox for processing underwater glider data.Front. Mar. Sci.6:738. 10.3389/fmars.2019.00738
30
HemsleyV. S.SmythT. J.MartinA. P.Frajka-WilliamsE.ThompsonA. F.DamerellG.et al (2015). Estimating oceanic primary production using vertical irradiance and chlorophyll profiles from ocean gliders in the north Atlantic.Environ. Sci. Technol.4911612–11621. 10.1021/acs.est.5b00608
31
HiscockM. R.LanceV. P.ApprillA. M.BidigareR. R.JohnsonZ. I.MitchellB. G.et al (2008). Photosynthetic maximum quantum yield increases are an essential component of the Southern Ocean phytoplankton response to iron.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.1054775–4780. 10.1073/pnas.0705006105
32
HughesD. J.CampbellD. A.DoblinM. A.KromkampJ. C.LawrenzE.MooreC. M.et al (2018). Roadmaps and detours: active chlorophyll- a assessments of primary productivity across marine and freshwater systems.Environ. Sci. Technol.5212039–12054. 10.1021/acs.est.8b03488
33
IOCCG Protocol Series (2018). Inherent Optical Property Measurements and Protocols: Absorption Coefficient, edsNeelyA. R.ManninoA. (Dartmouth: IOCCG).
34
KieferD. A. (1973). Fluorescence properties of natural phytoplankton populations.Mar. Biol.22263–269. 10.1007/bf00389180
35
KolberZ. S.PrášilO.FalkowskiP. G. (1998). Measurements of variable chlorophyll fluorescence using fast repetition rate techniques: defining methodology and experimental protocols.Biochim. Biophys. Acta136788–106. 10.1016/s0005-2728(98)00135-2
36
KropuenskeL. R.MillsM. M.van DijkenG. L.BaileyS.RobinsonD. H.WelschmeyerN. A.et al (2009). Photophysiology in two major Southern Ocean phytoplankton taxa: photoprotection in phaeocystis antarctica and fragilariopsis cylindrus.Limnol. Oceanogr.541176–1196. 10.4319/lo.2009.54.4.1176
37
Le QuéréC.AndresR. J.BodenT.ConwayT.HoughtonR. A.HouseJ. I.et al (2013). The global carbon budget 1959–2011.Earth Syst. Sci. Data5165–185.
38
LittleH. J.VichiM.ThomallaS. J.SwartS. (2018). Spatial and temporal scales of chlorophyll variability using high-resolution glider data.J. Mar. Syst.1871–12. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2018.06.011
39
LorenzenC. J. (1966). A method for the continuous measurement of in vivo chlorophyll concentrations.Deep Sea Res. Oceanogr. Abstr.13223–277.
40
MilliganA. J.AparicioU. A.BehrenfeldM. J. (2012). Fluorescence and nonphotochemical quenching responses to simulated vertical mixing in the marine diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii.Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.44867–78. 10.3354/meps09544
41
MitchellB.KahruM.WielandJ.StramskaM. (2002). “Determination of spectral absorption coefficients of particles, dissolved material and phytoplankton for discrete water samples,” in Ocean Optics Protocols for Satellite Ocean Color Sensor Validation, edsMuellerJ. L.FargionG. S. (Greenbelt, MD: NASA Goddard Space Flight Centre), 231–257.
42
MonteiroP. M. S.BoydP.BellerbyR. (2011). Role of the seasonal cycle in coupling climate and carbon cycling in the subantarctic zone.Eos Trans. Am. Geophys. Union92235–236. 10.1029/2011eo280007
43
MooreC. M.MillsM. M.ArrigoK. R.Berman-FrankI.BoppL.BoydP. W.et al (2013). Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation.Nat. Geosci.6701–710. 10.1038/ngeo1765
44
MooreC. M.SeeyaveS.HickmanA. E.AllenJ. T.LucasM. I.PlanquetteH.et al (2007). Iron-light interactions during the CROZet natural iron bloom and EXport experiment (CROZEX) I: phytoplankton growth and photophysiology.Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr.542045–2065. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2007.06.011
45
MorelA.ClaustreH.AntoineD.GentiliB. (2007). Natural variability of bio-optical properties in Case 1 waters: attenuation and reflectance within the visible and near-UV spectral domains, as observed in South Pacific and Mediterranean waters.Biogeosciences4913–925. 10.5194/bg-4-913-2007
46
MtshaliT. N.van HorstenN. R.ThomallaS. J.Ryan-KeoghT. J.NicholsonS.-A.RoychoudhuryA. N.et al (2019). Seasonal depletion of the dissolved iron reservoirs in the sub-Antarctic zone of the southern Atlantic ocean.Geophys. Res. Lett.464386–4395. 10.1029/2018gl081355
47
MüllerP.LiX.-P.NiyogiK. K. (2001). Non-photochemical quenching. A response to excess light energy.Plant Physiol.1251558–1566. 10.1104/pp.125.4.1558
48
NicholsonS.-A.LévyM.JouannoJ.CapetX.SwartS.MonteiroP. M. S. (2019). Iron supply pathways between the surface and subsurface waters of the Southern Ocean: from winter entrainment to summer storms.Geophys. Res. Lett.4614567–14575. 10.1029/2019GL084657
49
NicholsonS.-A.LévyM.LlortJ.SwartS.MonteiroP. M. S. (2016). Investigation into the impact of storms on sustaining summer primary productivity in the Sub-Antarctic Ocean.Geophys. Res. Lett.439192–9199. 10.1002/2016gl069973
50
O’MalleyR. T.BehrenfeldM. J.WestberryT. K.MilliganA. J.ShangS.YanJ. (2014). Geostationary satellite observations of dynamic phytoplankton photophysiology.Geophys. Res. Lett.415052–5059. 10.1002/2014gl060246
51
OwensT. G.FalkowskiP. G.WhitledgeT. E. (1980). Diel periodicity in cellular chlorophyll content in marine diatoms.Mar. Biol.5971–77. 10.1007/bf00405456
52
PlattT.GallegosC. L.HarrisonW. G. (1980). Photoinhibition of photosynthesis in natural assemblages of marine phytoplankton.J. Mar. Res.38687–701.
53
QuesteB. Y.VicC.HeywoodK. J.PiontkovskiS. A. (2018). Physical controls on oxygen distribution and denitrification potential in the North West Arabian sea.Geophys. Res. Lett.454143–4152. 10.1029/2017gl076666
54
RatoR. T.OrtigueiraM. D.BatistaA. G. (2008). On the HHT, its problems, and some solutions.Mech. Syst. Signal Process.221374–1394. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.11.028
55
RoháčekK. (2002). Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters: the definitions, photosynthetic meaning, and mutual relationships.Photosynthetica4013–29. 10.1023/A:1020125719386
56
Ryan-KeoghT. J.RobinsonC. M. (0000). Phytoplankton photophysiology utilities: tools for the standardisation of processing active chlorophyll fluorescence data.Front. Mar. Sci.
57
Ryan-KeoghT. J.ThomallaS. J.LittleH. J.MelansonJ. R. (2018a). Seasonal regulation of the coupling between photosynthetic electron transport and carbon fixation in the Southern Ocean.Limnol. Oceanogr.631856–1876. 10.1002/lno.10812
58
Ryan-KeoghT. J.ThomallaS. J.MtshaliT. N.van HorstenN. R.LittleH. J. (2018b). Seasonal development of iron limitation in the sub-Antarctic zone.Biogeosciences154647–4660. 10.5194/bg-15-4647-2018
59
Ryan-KeoghT. J.ThomallaS. J.MtshaliT. N.LittleH. (2017). Modelled estimates of spatial variability of iron stress in the Atlantic sector of the Southern Ocean.Biogeosciences143883–3897. 10.5194/bg-14-3883-2017
60
SackmannB. S.PerryM. J.EriksenC. C. (2008). Fluorescene quenching from Seaglider observations of variability in daytime fluorescence quenching of chlorophyll-a in Northeastern Pacific coastal waters Fluorescence quenching from Seaglider.Biogeosci. Discuss.52839–2865. 10.5194/bgd-5-2839-2008
61
SchallenbergC.LewisM. R.KelleyD. E.CullenJ. J. (2008). Inferred influence of nutrient availability on the relationship between Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and incident irradiance in the Bering Sea.J. Geophys. Res. Oceans1131–21. 10.1029/2007JC004355
62
SchallenbergC.StrzepekR. F.SchubackN.ClementsonL. A.BoydP. W.TrullT. W. (2020). Diel quenching of Southern Ocean phytoplankton fluorescence is related to iron limitation.Biogeosciences17793–812. 10.5194/bg-17-793-2020
63
SchubackN.FleckenM.MaldonadoM. T.TortellP. D. (2016). Diurnal variation in the coupling of photosynthetic electron transport and carbon fixation in iron-limited phytoplankton in the NE subarctic Pacific.Biogeosciences131019–1035. 10.5194/bg-13-1019-2016
64
SchubackN.SchallenbergC.DuckhamC.MaldonadoM. T.TortellP. D. (2015). Interacting effects of light and iron availability on the coupling of photosynthetic electron transport and CO2-assimilation in marine phytoplankton.PLoS One10:e0133235. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133235
65
SchubackN.TortellP. D. (2019). Diurnal regulation of photosynthetic light absorption, electron transport and carbon fixation in two contrasting oceanic environments.Biogeosciences161381–1399. 10.5194/bg-16-1381-2019
66
SerôdioJ.CruzS.VieiraS.BrotasV. (2005). Non-photochemical quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and operation of the xanthophyll cycle in estuarine microphytobenthos.J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol.326157–169. 10.1016/j.jembe.2005.05.011
67
SlovacekR. E.HannanP. J. (1977). In vivo fluorescence determinations of phytoplankton chlorophyll a.Limnol. Oceanogr.22919–925. 10.4319/lo.1977.22.5.0919
68
SmithW. O.AsperV.TozziS.LiuX.StammerjohnS. E. (2011). Surface layer variability in the Ross Sea, Antarctica as assessed by in situ fluorescence measurements.Prog. Oceanogr.8828–45. 10.1016/j.pocean.2010.08.002
69
StompM.HuismanJ.StalL. J.MatthijsH. C. P. (2007a). Colorful niches of phototrophic microorganisms shaped by vibrations of the water molecule.ISME J.1271–282. 10.1038/ismej.2007.59
70
StompM.HuismanJ.VörösL.PickF. R.LaamanenM.HaverkampT.et al (2007b). Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas.Ecol. Lett.10290–298. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01026.x
71
StramskiD.ReynoldsR. A.KaczmarekS.UitzJ.ZhengG. (2015). Correction of pathlength amplification in the filter-pad technique for measurements of particulate absorption coefficient in the visible spectral region.Appl. Opt.546763–6782. 10.1364/AO.54.006763
72
SwartS.ChangN.FauchereauN.JoubertW.LucasM.MtshaliT.et al (2012). Southern Ocean Seasonal Cycle Experiment 2012: seasonal scale climate and carbon cycle links.S. Afr. J. Sci.10811–13. 10.4102/sajs.v108i3/4.1089
73
SwartS.ThomallaS. J.MonteiroP. M. S. (2015). The seasonal cycle of mixed layer dynamics and phytoplankton biomass in the Sub-Antarctic Zone: a high-resolution glider experiment.J. Mar. Syst.147103–115. 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2014.06.002
74
TagliabueA.SalléeJ. B.BowieA. R.LévyM.SwartS.BoydP. W. (2014). Surface-water iron supplies in the Southern Ocean sustained by deep winter mixing.Nat. Geosci.7314–320. 10.1038/ngeo2101
75
TakahashiT.SutherlandS. C.WanninkhofR.SweeneyC.FeelyR. A.ChipmanD. W.et al (2009). Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans.Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr.56554–577. 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.12.009
76
ThomallaS. J.MoutierW.Ryan-KeoghT. J.GregorL.SchüttJ. (2018). An optimized method for correcting fluorescence quenching using optical backscattering on autonomous platforms.Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods16132–144. 10.1002/lom3.10234
77
ThomallaS. J.RacaultM.SwartS.MonteiroP. M. S. (2015). High-resolution view of the spring bloom initiation and net community production in the Subantarctic Southern Ocean using glider data.ICES J. Mar. Sci.721999–2020. 10.1093/icesjms/fsv105
78
ViglioneG. A.ThompsonA. F.FlexasM. M.SprintallJ.SwartS. (2018). Abrupt transitions in Submesoscale structure in southern drake passage: glider observations and model results.J. Phys. Oceanogr.482011–2027. 10.1175/jpo-d-17-0192.1
79
XingX.ClaustreH.BlainS.D’OrtenzioF.AntoineD.RasJ.et al (2012). Quenching correction for in vivo chlorophyll fluorescence acquired by autonomous platforms: a case study with instrumented elephant seals in the Kerguelen region (Southern Ocean).Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods10483–495. 10.4319/lom.2012.10.483
80
YentschC. S.RytherJ. H. (1957). Short-term variation in phytoplankton chlorophyll and their significance.Limnol. Oceanogr.2140–142. 10.4319/lo.1957.2.2.0140
Summary
Keywords
iron, fluorescence, gliders, chlorophyll, non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching
Citation
Ryan-Keogh TJ and Thomalla SJ (2020) Deriving a Proxy for Iron Limitation From Chlorophyll Fluorescence on Buoyancy Gliders. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:275. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00275
Received
10 September 2019
Accepted
06 April 2020
Published
05 May 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited by
Carol Robinson, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom
Reviewed by
Walker Smith, Virginia Institute of Marine Science, United States; Zachary K. Erickson, Universities Space Research Association (USRA), United States
Updates

Check for updates
Copyright
© 2020 Ryan-Keogh and Thomalla.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Thomas J. Ryan-Keogh, tryankeogh@csir.co.za; tjryankeogh@googlemail.com
This article was submitted to Ocean Observation, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.