Contribution of coastal seiches to sediment transport in a microtidal semi-enclosed bay

Abstract

Moorings and axial surveys using acoustic Doppler current profilers in microtidal Masan Bay were conducted to reveal impacts of coastal seiches on sediment behaviors. The hydrodynamic circulation in the bay was dominated by sluggish tidal and residual currents, with which the coastal seiches with a 1-h period were detected. The coastal seiches velocity (u_seiche) accounted for approximately 30% of the total velocities, causing back-and-forth water motions along the channel. This was insufficient to resuspend bed sediments without external forcings. Nevertheless, it influenced the suspended sediment concentration (SSC) of turbidity maximum (~40 mg l⁻¹) at the central part of bay, showing SSC anomaly of 8 mg l⁻¹. Although the seiche-induced sediment fluxes were only 1% of the total fluxes due to offsetting effect of bidirectional flows, they reached up to 0.040×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ at each pulse of coastal seiches. Repetitive coastal seiches lifted the sediment particles to the upper layer where they would not have risen if not for seiche vertical motion. However, the distance that the coastal seiches can transport the suspended sediments was too short compared to their transportable amounts. Even if sediment particles within turbidity maximum were advected by coastal seiches, they could not leave the region. This process was intensified toward the land because the u_seiche slowed down the further as it moved away from the node. As long as the bed sediments were resuspended, the coastal seiches were expected to enhance the potential for water pollution by causing repetitive sediment redistribution.

Introduction

Sediment transport processes, including sedimentation, resuspension, and advection, occur iteratively in coastal regions. Sediment resuspension is a natural process occurring when the bed shear stress exceeds an erosion threshold (Choi et al., 2023). The resuspension has been recognized as an important sediment transport process because it plays a role in the functionality and health of coastal ecosystems. For example, a high concentration of suspended sediments produced by resuspension strongly hinders light penetration through the surface layer and reduces the pre-existing subsurface biological habitats (Mehta, 1989; Schallenberg and Burns, 2004). The sediments resuspended from the bed can also release contaminants and toxic materials into the water column, deteriorating the water quality (Eggleton and Thomas, 2004). These problems are particularly intensified in semi-enclosed or enclosed systems (e.g., bays, estuaries, and harbors) where the water circulation is somewhat restricted (Jordi et al., 2008).

In coastal regions, sediment transport is subjected to various hydrodynamic forcings. Tidal currents and estuarine circulation are the predominant forcings for sedimentation in tide- and river-dominant regions, respectively (Ribbe and Holloway, 2001). They horizontally advect the suspended sediments from input sources such as a river (Wang and Pinardi, 2002). The waves generated by high-energy events, such as storms, are also a major forcing for initiation of sediment motion in shallow coastal regions (Ogston et al., 2000; Jordi et al., 2008). The wave-orbital motions are able to penetrate down to the bed and resuspend the sediment particles from the bed into the water column (Green and Coco, 2014). In the case of a semi-enclosed bay, oscillatory motions with periods longer than those of wind waves and shorter than those of tidal variations have been proposed as an additional forcing for sediment transport (Gomis et al., 1993; Prichard and Hogg, 2003; Anglès et al., 2010).

The oscillatory motions, also known as coastal seiches or harbor oscillation, usually occur in semi-enclosed bays (Rabinovich, 2009). In contrast to seiches generated by direct external forcings, such as atmospheric pressure (De Jong and Battjes, 2004), wind (Niedda and Greppi, 2007), and tsunamis (Van Dorn, 1984), coastal seiches are common phenomenon generated mainly by long-period waves entering through the open boundary from the sea (Rabinovich, 2009; Magdalena et al., 2020). These long-period waves can coincide with the period of other natural wave oscillations (e.g., tides and wind waves) in bays or harbors and eventually produce standing waves (coastal seiches) that can be intensified by resonance (Giese and Chapman, 1993; André et al., 2021). The typical characteristics of coastal seiches are that even a small vertical motions of water column can be accompanied by large horizontal water motions (Rabinovich, 2009; Magdalena et al., 2020). In stormy conditions, further resonance occur, which can make considerable motions reaching a few meters (De Jong and Battjes, 2004; Rabinovich, 2009; Kumar et al., 2016).

The coastal seiches can affect the sediment transport processes by generating currents at intervals of several ten minutes. In previous studies, Prichard and Hogg (2003) demonstrated that the seiches might be an important mechanism for fine-sand sediments, for which bed level changes can reach several centimeters per hour. Jordi et al. (2008) reported that the seiches in semi-enclosed harbors play a role in the driving process to control sediment resuspension from the bed. Yuan et al. (2008) emphasized that the interactions between seiches and tidal currents provide a source of turbulence production, which stripped up the benthic sediment fluff layers. As such, it is known that the coastal seiches can be a driving factor affecting sediment transport. On the other hand, as the period and intensity of the coastal seiches depend on site-specific conditions (e.g., local external forcing, water depth, topography, and area), they are variable, inducing complexity in the sediment transport processes. Thus, the principal mechanisms of coastal seiches controlling the behavior of suspended sediments and the degree to which their impact on sediment resuspension are largely unknown. Therefore, it is essential to understand the interactions between coastal seiches and suspended sediments in a water column. The principal aims of this study are twofold: (1) to understand the contribution of coastal seiches to the sediment resuspension in the microtidal semi-enclosed bay and (2) to quantitatively reveal the impact of coastal seiches on sediment advection.

Study area

Masan Bay, on the south coast of Korea, is a typical semi-enclosed bay system with a vertically well-mixed water column (Jeong et al., 2013; Seo et al., 2022). The Bay has a funnel-shaped morphology, 2.5 km in width and 8 km in length (Figure 1). The mean water depth in the inner part is less than 5 m, which increases gradually up to approximately 20 m at the entrance of the Bay (Yim et al., 2005). It has a mesotidal regime with tidal level reaching up to 2.4 m (spring tide) (Jeong et al., 2006; Jang et al., 2015). Tide is composed of 84%, 11%, and 4% of semi-diurnal (12.4 hours), diurnal, and shallow water tide, respectively (Choo, 2021). The M₂ (12.42 hours) in the bay is the most dominant tidal constituent. The Bay receives the freshwater of 2.4×10⁸ m³ yr⁻¹ from three adjacent streams (Changwon, Samho, and Nam Streams) (Lee et al., 2009). The freshwater freely exchanges with seawater through Jinhae Bay, which opens toward the Korea Strait (Kim et al., 2013; Seo et al., 2022) (Figure 1). From the entrance of Jinhae Bay to Masan Bay, the length of a channel passing through them is approximately 40 km (Lee et al., 2000, 2021). This channel is characterized by a narrower width and shallower depth toward the inner part of Masan Bay (Park et al., 2020). The waves propagating from Korea Strait to Masan Bay due to atmospheric pressure disturbance are intensified by shoaling and harbor resonance as they pass through the long narrow channel (Kwon et al., 2021). The theoretical resonance periods for sea level oscillations in Jinhae-Masan Bay are within the observed periods of 35−90 min at Masan tide station (Kwon et al., 2021).

Figure 1

The bay has a microtidal regime with a mean tidal range of 1.2 m (neap tide) to 2.4 m (spring tide) and has a slight ebb dominance (Kang and Jun, 2003; Jang et al., 2015; Seo et al., 2022). The water circulation is sluggish (current velocity < 0.1 m s^-1) even under tidal forcing (Seo et al., 2022). With the tidal cycle, the relative dominance between the tidal and residual currents varies: tidal currents are prevailing during the spring tide while residual currents are stronger during the neap tide. Under competition between them, the suspended sediments are trapped in the central part of Masan Bay, forming a mobile sediment pool composed mainly of very fine silt and clay (6.2 to 9.5 ϕ) (> 95%) with a small portion of sand (< 5%) (Park and Lee, 1996; Woo et al., 2003; Hyun et al., 2007). The mobile sediment pool responds to the northerly winds and readily resuspends into the water column. The suspended sediments supplied from that pool generate extremely high concentrations, such as primary and secondary estuarine turbidity maxima (ETM and STM, respectively) along the main channel (Seo et al., 2022).

Materials and methods

Mooring and hydrographic data collection

Two acoustic Doppler current profilers (ADCPs) were moored in the inner (M1: 35.1881°N, 128.5861°E) and outer (M2: 35.1657°N, 128.5947°E) parts of the main channel of Masan Bay (Figure 1A). The mean water depths at M1 and M2 were 13.7 and 17.1 m, respectively, and the distance between them was 2.9 km. Up-looking broadband ADCPs at M1 (1200 kHz RDI Workhorse Sentinel) and M2 (1000 kHz RDI Sentinel V20) installed in a trawl-resistant bottom mount were configured to measure the profiles of the three-dimensional current velocities, water level, temperature, and echo intensity every minute and 10 minutes, respectively, from September 22 to October 13, 2017. The data for M1 was adjusted to the same time resolution as M2 in post processing. The ADCP transducers were positioned 0.4 m above the bed (mab), and the vertical bin size was set to 0.2 m (M1) and 0.25 m (M2). In post-processing, the coordinates of the current velocity at M1 and M2 were rotated +1°C and −31°C, respectively, to obtain the along- and across-channel components (u and v in Figure 1).

An along-channel axial survey was conducted with a research vessel on October 12, 2017. The castings of a CTD (SBE-19plus V2, SeaBird) equipped with an optical backscatter sensor (OBS, Campbell) were conducted to measure the turbidity profile (in NTU). Water samples were taken using a Niskin water sampler at each CTD station to convert the turbidity to the suspended sediment concentration (SSC, mg l⁻¹). All water samples were vacuum filtered through pre-weighed glass fiber filters (GF/F, pore size: 0.7 μm; Whatman). The residues on filters were oven-dried at 105°CC for 24 h. The masses of the filtered sediments were determined by the difference in the re-weight of the filters divided by the filtered water volume. The OBS calibration showed good linear regression between turbidity and SSC (r² = 0.80).

The echo intensities (E, counts) recorded from the ADCPs were calibrated to the SSC_ADCP (mg l⁻¹) through a comparison with simultaneous field-collected SSC. Calibration was performed using the following sonar Equations 1, 2, and 3 suggested by Deines (1999):

where S_v is the volume scattering strength (dB), SSC_ADCP (hereafter referred to as SSC) and SSC_OBS are ADCP- and OBS-derived SSC (mg l⁻¹), respectively. R is the range to scatterers along the beam (m), α is the sound attenuation coefficient by the water parcel. L_DBM is the 10·log₁₀ of the transmit pulse length (0.02), and P_DBW is the 10·log₁₀ of the transmit power (23.8). E_r is the reference echo intensity (40 counts). K_c (0.55) and C (−64.78), the signal calibration coefficient, were determined by linear regression between the echo intensity (E−E_r) and SSC_OBS (Deines, 1999; Kim et al., 2004; Ha et al., 2011; Seo et al., 2022).

Wind data were obtained at the Masan Tide Station (35.2100°N, 128.5889°E) maintained by the Korea Hydrographic and Oceanographic Agency (Figure 1).

Sediment flux and characteristics of coastal seiches

The instantaneous flux (F, kg m⁻² s⁻¹) of suspended sediments at the ADCP mooring stations were calculated as follows (Equation 4):

where u is the along-channel current velocity, and z is the vertical coordinate for each bin measured by ADCPs. F was decomposed into = u_res + u_tide and SSC = SSC_res+ SSC_tide. A subscripts res and tide denote a tidal average and fluctuation of a variable, respectively, resulting from the application of 36-h low- and high-pass Butter-worth filters (Geyer et al., 2001; Sommerfield and Wong, 2011; Morgan-King and Schoellhamer, 2013; Gong et al., 2023; Seo et al., 2023). The coastal seiches velocity (u_seiche) and seiche-induced SSC (SSC_seiche) were calculated by band-pass filtering the u and SSC with a frequency of 1 h (±30 min).

The tidal and residual mechanisms of sediment flux were identified by decomposing the tidally averaged F () as follows (Equation 5):

where is the component of mean-flow flux (F_mean) that is longer than the tidal cycle, and is the component of correlation flux (F_corr) that is shorter than the tidal cycle (Geyer et al., 2001; Scully and Friedrichs, 2007; Sommerfield and Wong, 2011; Kim et al., 2024). The F_mean is composed of several processes, such as river discharge, gravitational circulation, tidal straining, and Stokes drift, while F_corr comprises tidal pumping, tidal straining, and coastal seiches (F_seiche = ) processes (Schulz et al., 2018; Figueroa et al., 2020).

The total along-channel sediment flux was calculated by depth-integrated , as follows (Equation 6):

where q_total is the depth-integrated sediment flux (kg m⁻¹ s⁻¹) from the bottom to the water surface of the water column, indicating total sediment transport per unit width. The depth-integrated F_mean and F_corr are referred to as q_mean and q_corr, respectively. Here, q_corr includes q_seiche (depth-integrated F_seiche).

The periods of natural harbor resonance within a semi-enclosed bay were calculated using Equation 7 to understand the fluctuation of coastal seiches (Park et al., 2020; Kwon et al., 2021):

where T_n is the resonant harbor oscillation period of the n^th mode for a semi-enclosed bay, h is the averaged depth (ca. 15 m) from head to mouth, l is the length (17 km) of the bay, and g is the gravitational acceleration.

The SSC anomalies caused by coastal seiches were calculated by subtracting 30 min (three samples) moving-averaged SSC from the SSC over the entire measurement period.

Results

Power spectral density of current velocity

The PSD of depth-averaged current velocity for each mooring station was calculated through a Hamming window of four-day segments with half the window overlapping (Figure 2). The estimated PSDs were classified into two main frequency bands: (1) the low frequencies (residual current) in the range of 0−0.027 cph (period T > 36 h) and (2) the tidal frequencies (tidal current) in the range of 0.027−3 cph (T< 36 h). Generally, the PSD at M2 was higher than that at M1 over the entire frequencies. In the tidal frequency band, the semi-diurnal (12 h and 25 min) frequency dominated the diurnal (24 h and 50 min) frequency (Figure 2A). In particular, the power spectra were unstable in the range of 0.5−1.5 cph and had selective enhancement. Such broad-banded spectra, presumably defined by the topographic characteristics (i.e., width, depth, and curvature) of the whole area and free long waves propagating, were indicative of the form of coastal seiches. The signal of coastal seiches with a high correlation (~0.8) continued to be detected at M1 and M2 throughout the measurement period (Figure 2B). For the total time span, the coastal seiches were dependent on each other in terms of the major oscillation frequencies. Their energies at M1 and M2 were 19.32% and 19.99% of the total (0.01−3 cph), which is not negligible in the microtidal bay. A comparison of the coastal seiches between two mooring stations showed that the PSD at M2 (3.71×10⁻⁴ cm² s⁻² cph⁻¹) was three times higher than that at M1 (1.14×10⁻⁴ cm² s⁻² cph⁻¹) on average (Figure 2A).

Figure 2

The longitudinal wave speed where the phase of a wave propagated could be estimated using the 1-h (±30 min) band-pass filtered current data at M1 and M2 (Figure 3). The time lag of the waves propagating between the two stations, approximately 2.9 km apart, was 304.7 s on average. At a given separation distance and time lag, the wave propagated toward the land at a speed of 9.52 m s⁻¹. This is slower than the theoretical shallow water wave speed, 11.59–12.95 m s⁻¹, in this region. It was reasonable to believe that the wavelength of the coastal seiches was 34.27 km (half-wavelength: 17.14 km) (Figure 1). These properties of coastal seiches were also similar to those calculated using Equation 7. The resonance periods for open-end bay in this geometric condition were 94, 31, and 19 min for the first three modes. The resonance period of the first mode (n = 1) was close to the wave periods of the incoming long waves from the open sea. This suggests that the wave oscillations (0.5−1.5 cph) measured at the two mooring stations originated from amplitude perturbations of waves with a node near the mouth of Jinhae Bay.

Figure 3

Characteristics of coastal seiches

The current patterns in the total velocity fields had two different vertical structures depending on the relative importance between the tidal (u_tide) and residual (u_res) currents (Figure 4). The u in the spring tides (S_I and S_II) with a tidal range of 1.5–2 m were vertically uniform as a barotropic structure, showing landward or seaward flow with the tidal phase (Figures 4A, D). The u_tide fluctuated in the range of −0.025–0.022 m s⁻¹ (−0.053–0.047 m s⁻¹) at M1 (M2) on average and dominated the u_res of 0.012 m s⁻¹ (0.018 m s⁻¹) in the bottom layer. In neap tides (N_I and N_II) with a tidal range of 0.4–1 m, u had two-layered current flows as a baroclinic structure, showing seaward flow in the surface layer and landward flow in the bottom layer (Figures 4A, D). The u_tide at M1 and M2 stagnated in the range of −0.012–0.012 m s⁻¹ and −0.026–0.023 m s⁻¹, respectively, while their u_res reached 0.022 m s⁻¹ and 0.044 m s⁻¹ in the bottom layer, on average. As the tidal forcing weakened, two-layered residual circulations (also known as exchange flow) were developed (Figures 4C, F), intensifying the vertical shear (s², du/dz) at approximately 8 mab of M1 and 5 mab of M2 (Figures 5C, E).

Figure 4

Figure 5

Unlike u_tide, the signal of coastal seiches with 1-h period appeared persistently over the entire measurement periods (Figures 3, 4A, D). Coastal seiches affected the water column through repetitive back-and-forth horizontal motions along the main channel but had different characteristics depending on the distance from the node. Coastal seiches measured at M1 and M2 had a motion close to the standing wave with phase lags of 66.44°C and 68.56°C between current velocity and water elevation, respectively (Figures 3B, D). As they propagated toward shallow onshore from M2 to M1, their velocity weakened while the amplitude of the sea level variation was amplified (Figures 3A, C). In practice, the coastal seiches at M2 close to the entrance of the bay had a high velocity (u_seiche) fluctuations in the range of −0.08–0.08 m s⁻¹ with relatively small fluctuations of sea level (−0.06–0.06 m) (Figure 6). At M1 near the head of the estuary, the u_seiche decreased by 38% compared to M2 and was only in the range of −0.05–0.05 m s⁻¹, while the range of sea level variation increased by 160% to −0.1–0.1 m. Over the entire measurement period, the mean magnitudes of u_seiche were 0.010 m s⁻¹ at M1 and 0.017 m s⁻¹ at M2. The u_seiche were relatively small in magnitude but contributed 20.75% and 31.62% to the total u at M1 and M2, respectively, and 40.72% and 39.42% to the u′ on average (Supplementary Figure S1).

Figure 6

Sediment resuspension and flux

The mobile sediment pool distributed along the main channel was disturbed by near-bed currents, forming the turbidity maxima (Figure 5F). In view of variability in SSC, the sediment behaviors at M2 were more dynamic than at M1. For the M1 between ETM and STM, the sediment resuspension occurred mainly in S_I and N_I, with near-bed SSC of 7–51 mg l⁻¹ (Figure 5B). However, these resuspension events occurred episodically, and a high SSC (> 51 mg l⁻¹) was frequently detected in the surface rather than the bottom because of the surface dispersion of the turbid plume. The near-bed SSC at M2 was influenced by the STM that developed approximately 1.5 km wide in the central part of the main channel, which was 7–80 mg l⁻¹ with the instantaneous SSC > 100 mg l⁻¹ (Figures 5D, F). The SSC had a diurnal pattern in S_I and N_I depending on the sea breeze (Figures 5A, D). The bed sediments resuspended during northerly winds generated the STM, and the suspended sediments then temporarily settled down during southerly winds. The near-bed SSC increased gradually to 80 mg l⁻¹ as the sea breeze was repeated in S_I (September 20–24, 2017). The height, where sediments were resuspended in the water column, also increased to reach the water surface. This height was suppressed to < 5 mab by increased s² when two-layered residual circulation was intensified in N_I (Figures 5D, E). The position of STM was moved gradually toward the land because the residual circulation strengthened in N_I and S_II. Sediment resuspension barely occurred, even though the current velocity applied to the bed in S_II was similar to that in S_I. Thus, the SSC in the water column returned to the background SSC (~7 mg l⁻¹) (Figure 5D).

A series of resuspension at both M1 and M2 had a marked effect on an increase in the instantaneous flux F (Figures 7A, D). During the spring tides (S_I and S_II), F at both stations exhibited landward and seaward periodicity during the flood and ebb tides, respectively. Compared to F (flood: 1.12×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹; ebb: −0.59×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹) at M1 with low sediment supply, the F at M2 influenced by STM reached up to 6.74×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ in the bottom layer during the flood tide and −2.52×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ during the ebb tide. When the STM moved toward the land in S_II, the F at M2 decreased sharply regardless of the tidal cycle and had a low F of 0.30×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ for the wash load. In addition, during the neap tides (N_I and N_II), regardless of the tidal cycle, the F at M1 and M2 were 0.41×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ and 1.23×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ in the bottom layer, respectively, on average. Over the measurement period, the suspended sediments at M1 and M2 were generally transported toward the land with positive q_total under the balance between tidal and residual currents (Figures 7B, E). The suspended sediments were controlled mainly by the residual currents owing to the high buoyancy of STM (or ETM), resulting in a q_mean at M1 and M2 of 92% and 94% of q_total, respectively. The cumulative q_corr at M1 and M2 reached up to 150 kg m⁻¹ and 429 kg m⁻¹, respectively, and tended to be slightly transported toward the land when the events of sediment resuspension occurred (Figures 7C, F).

Figure 7

Relationship between coastal seiches and suspended sediments

The coastal seiches occurred consistently with 1-h (±30 min) interval as a barotropic structure (Figures 8A, B, G, H). In accordance with the period of coastal seiches, the sediments concentrated near the bed, and turbid plumes in the bay fluctuated (Figures 8E, F, K, L). As shown in Figure 9, the SSC anomalies were symmetrical in the range of −35–50 mg l⁻¹ (skewness: 7.37) at M1 and −43–46 mg l⁻¹ (skewness: 10.72) at M2, along with a symmetrical coastal seiches velocity. The results suggest a strong correlation between u_seiche and SSC anomaly because of similar histogram features (Supplementary Figure S2), but this did not mean that a larger u_seiche indicated a larger SSC anomaly. For example, when the sediment resuspension (SSC > 40 mg l⁻¹) occurred at M2 on September 22, 2017, the SSC anomaly fluctuated consistently in the range of −30–37 mg l⁻¹ from 04:00 AM to 7:00 PM along with two peaks of resuspension on 06:00 AM and 6:00 PM (Figure 8F). In contrast, u_seiche, which was minimal (< 0.01 m s⁻¹) at 07:00 AM, increased rapidly to 0.07 m s⁻¹ at 12:00 AM and remained almost constant without an apparent decrease for 10 h. This result shows that the magnitudes between u_seiche and SSC anomaly were not highly correlated despite varying the same frequency. To clarify the relationship between them, the SSC anomaly did not increase proportionally to the u_seiche when u_seiche over the entire period was rearranged in ascending order (Figures 9E, F). At M1 and M2, even weak u_seiche of less than 0.01 m s⁻¹ caused the SSC anomaly of up to 50 mg l⁻¹, whereas even strong u_seiche of 0.08 m s⁻¹ caused an SSC anomaly of only 5 mg l⁻¹. Although the coastal seiches influenced the fluctuations of suspended sediments, they did not contribute predominantly to enhancing the SSC anomaly. The SSC anomaly in the water column depended on whether the bed sediments are eroded or the turbid plumes is spread, by other forcings such as winds and tides.

Figure 8

Figure 9

The sediments resuspended from the bed were influenced repeatedly by the horizontal motions of coastal seiches. At each pulse of coastal seiches at M2 (M1), they were transported toward the land or sea, with F_seiche of 0.040×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ (0.027×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹) near the bed, on average. When the STM was developed, F_seiche increased to > 0.3×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ at M1 and to > 0.4×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ at M2. However, the bidirectional F_seiche canceled each other out owing to the characteristics of back-and-forth horizontal motions of coastal seiches, so thus the q_seiche was not heavily biased to either side. Although the cumulative q_seiche at M2 (M1) remained only −36.21 kg m⁻¹ (−17.04 kg m⁻¹), the q_seiche was equivalent to q_mean and q_corr when the resuspension rarely occurred (i.e., S_II). Over the entire period, these q_seiche at both stations accounted for 10% and 1% of the cumulative q_corr and q_total (Figures 7C, F).

Discussion

The coastal seiches with 1-h period could not be negligible for the total current fields in Masan Bay. The suspended sediments responded consistently to the coastal seiches, showing high SSC fluctuations with STM developed under tidal and residual currents. Owing to the bidirectional characteristics of coastal seiches, the q_seiche accounted for only 1% of the q_total. Tidal and residual currents often masked the impacts of coastal seiches on the suspended sediments. Hence, three perspectives on their role in sediment behaviors were discussed as follows.

Resuspension of bed sediments by coastal seiches

The coastal seiches in shallow regions are usually accompanied by horizontal currents in the bottom layer and enhance near-bed current velocity (Rabinovich, 2009). The bed sediment particles can be resuspended if the seiche-enhanced current velocity exceeds an erosion threshold (Gloor et al., 1994; Basterretxea et al., 2011). Depending on the local properties, coastal seiches may be one of the causes of sediment resuspension when they are enhanced comparable to tidal and residual currents. As listed in Table 1, the characteristics of coastal seiches in Jiaozhou Bay (China), Port Kembla Harbor (Australia), and Mediterranean Harbor (Italy), which have a period of several tens of minutes and current velocity of around 0.1 m s⁻¹, were similar to those in Masan Bay except for the energy source (Jordi et al., 2008; Luick and Hinwood, 2008; Yuan et al., 2008). Most played as much of a significant role in sediment resuspension as tide and wind forcing. They kept the bed sediment unconsolidated and made it readily resuspendable in subsequent events, forming a high SSC of several tens of mg l⁻¹ despite the coarser silt and sand composition (Table 1) (Yuan et al., 2008; Grifoll et al., 2019). The coastal seiches in Masan Bay also contributed to enhancing the near-bed current velocity through back-and-forth horizontal motions (M1: −0.05−0.05 m s⁻¹; M2: −0.08−0.08 m s⁻¹), but it was considered not to cause sufficient bed disturbances to resuspend the bed sediments.

The mobile sediment pool with a thick layer of loosely aggregated cohesive sediments was distributed along the main channel of Masan Bay (Geyer, 1993; Lin and Kuo, 2001; Seo et al., 2022). In S_I, it was easily disturbed and resuspended, even under the slow currents (< 0.1 m s⁻¹). Fine-grained sediments on the mobile sediment pool could be supplied to the upper water column by even northerly winds of < 2.8 m s⁻¹ during slack tides, resulting in STM with > 40 mg l⁻¹. In S_II, the consolidated bed exposed by the STM being moved toward the land required a current velocity of at least > 0.18 m s⁻¹ to be resuspended (Seo et al., 2022). Therefore, the sediment bed with different erosion thresholds was distributed depending on the STM position, even though the coastal seiches consistently caused a disturbance of the sediment bed over the entire period. If the coastal seiches caused a sufficient disturbance of the bed, the erodible sediments with erosion threshold less than 0.1 m s⁻¹, such as the mobile sediment pool (Seo et al., 2022), would have been thickly distributed regardless of the STM position. Even if the coastal seiches could not cause sediment resuspension directly, the SSC anomaly by coastal seiches would also have been detected without significant differences between spring tides (S_I and S_II). Considering these conditions, the contribution of coastal seiches to the sediment behavior depended on the position of the STM and was premised on resuspension by external forcings.

Uplift of suspended sediments by coastal seiches

The effects of coastal seiches on the resuspension of bed sediments were insignificant in Masan Bay without external forcings, such as tides and winds. As long as the bed sediments were resuspended by them, however, the coastal seiches had a marked effects on SSC anomaly. Once the bed sediments were entrained by the external forcings, they could be immediately diffused toward the direction of decreasing concentrations and maintained in suspension (Yuan et al., 2008) (Supplementary Figure S3). As the diffusion occurred, the spatial distributions of SSCs were expanded from the bed to the surface layers (Figure 10B). Consequently, in Masan Bay, the vertical motion of coastal seiches helped enhance the sediment horizontal flux in the surface layer. A weak vertical motion in the range of −0.01–0.01 m s⁻¹ coincided with the back-and-forth horizontal motions at the anti-node at each pulse of coastal seiches. They would have reacted with the tidal currents to partially produce a flow reversal and provide a vertical mixing (Talke and Stacey, 2008; Yuan et al., 2008). Despite relatively low contribution of u_seiche on the vertical mixing compared to u_tide (Supplementary Figure S4), the suspended sediments were lifted to the upper layer where they would not have risen if not for the vertical motion of coastal seiches. As shown in Figures 8 and 10, in practice, the suspended particles within the STM at M2 fluctuated in accordance with the period of coastal seiches. Repetitive coastal seiches vertically pumped the position of diffusing suspended sediment particles, generating the SSC fluctuations in the sawtooth form at 1-h period. At high SSC of 40 mg l^-1, the amplitudes of its isoline were only within a few tens of centimeter (Figure 8B). The lower the SSC, the higher amplitudes of its isoline due to vertical mixing, which had a sufficient diffusion range to cover the entire water column (Figure 10B). This lifting effect applied equally to the turbid plume (M1) and near-bed load regardless of the behavior types of suspended sediments (Figure 10A). For all behaviors of the suspended sediments over the entire period, the horizontal fluxes for those uplifted above the position of suspended sediments assumed to be free of fluctuations by coastal seiches reached 51×10⁻³ kg m⁻¹ s⁻¹ (standard SSC: 20 mg l⁻¹) at M1 and 83×10⁻³ kg m⁻¹ s⁻¹ (standard SSC: 20 mg l⁻¹) at M2 (Figure 10). Although the sediment diffusion was suppressed by enhanced s² in the neap tides (N_I and N_II) (Teng et al., 2022; Zhang et al., 2022), the cumulative uplifted fluxes at M1 and M2 over the entire periods were up to 3.05 kg m⁻¹ and 2.77 kg m⁻¹, respectively, regardless of the direction. The upper layer of the water column could be supplied continuously with other sediment particles from the lower layer by the coastal seiches, equivalent to approximately 1% of the cumulative q_seiche at both M1 and M2.

Figure 10

Redistribution of suspended sediments by coastal seiches

As a feature of the back-and-forth coastal seiches, the cumulative q_seiche accounted for only 1% of the total, which does not appear to contribute much to sediment transport. On the other hand, the tendency, in which suspended sediments were lifted and advected as much as 0.4×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ by a pulse of coastal seiches, suggested that they significantly affected the sediment behaviors. The contribution of coastal seiches to sediment transports in the bay can be evaluated differently for each sedimentary condition because this effect could be enhanced or reduced drastically depending on whether the STM was developed or not. To determine the distance traveled by a water parcel (or sediment particle) during a half period of coastal seiches, regardless of the STM, the excursion length (El_seiche in m) was calculated using following Equation 8:

where and T are the velocity amplitude (m s⁻¹) and periods (s) of coastal seiches, respectively (Johansson, 2010; Cerralbo et al., 2015; Björk et al., 2017; Lafta, 2021). The sediment particles at M2 could travel toward the land or sea as much as El_seiche (< 57 m) for every pulse of coastal seiches unless the u_seiche does not strengthen (Figure 11). In particular, the El_seiche at M1 decreased to < 32 m because the u_seiche gradually slowed down as it moved away from the node, further shortening the sediment transport trajectory. Unlike the tidal (El_tide ~420 m) or residual current that caused even STM movements (Seo et al., 2022), the El_seiche was too short compared to their transportable amounts of suspended sediments, indicating a redistribution process at the immediate vicinity (Figure 11). Given the long wavelength (~35 km) of coastal seiches and the shallow water depth (~15 m), this process was driven primarily by the seiche-induced lifting effects on the suspended sediments than the advection. As more coastal seiches were repeated, the bidirectional coastal seiches could partially offset more current flows, which induced sediment stagnation rather than circulation in the bay. Applying the redistribution processes to the STM, the El_seiche was only approximately 3% of the width (1.5 km) of the STM located in the central part of Masan Bay. Even if the sediment particles within the STM were advected (0.4×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ at M2) by coastal seiches, they could not leave its region. Under the dominant tidal and residual currents, the coastal seiches continued to trap the suspended sediments partially and pump vertically. Considering the sluggish water circulation in Masan Bay (Park et al., 2011; Seo et al., 2022) and the short El_seiche at M1, coastal seiches would cause a redistribution in a narrower range as the STM moves toward the land in N_I and S_II. Unless the coastal seiches lift the suspended sediments to sea level and discharge them out to sea by estuarine circulation, more sediment stagnation will occur in the inner part of the bay.

Figure 11

The effect of persistent coastal seiches on the vertical redistribution of sediments can be maximized when sediment resuspension events occur or turbidity maxima develop. Eventually, this can promote the potential to cause secondary problems, such as pollutant release, an increase in residence time, and a change in inorganic nutrients (Heyes et al., 2004; Basterretxea et al., 2011; Spieckermann et al., 2022). The water exchange with the open sea by the coastal seiches that can induce circulation in the bay must be accompanied to prevent these problems. However, as above, the short El_seiche was only approximately 3% of an almost 2 km long entrance. This allowed a part of the water only to be pumped back and forth within the channel instead of renewing the bay water volume. In other words, the impact of coastal seiches on the water column is limited only within the bay. They would not be sufficient to address the possible problems caused by redistribution despite repetitive fluctuation and be dependent on the tidal and residual currents.

Conclusions

In situ moorings and axial surveys using ADCPs were conducted to reveal the effects of coastal seiches on sediment transport behaviors in a microtidal Masan Bay. The following conclusions were drawn:

• (1) Coastal seiches, close to standing waves originating from the mouth of Jinhae Bay, fluctuated with a 1-h period within the bay. With velocities up to 0.05 m s⁻¹ at M1 and 0.08 m s⁻¹ at M2, they accounted for approximately 30% of the total current fields. At each pulse, the coastal seiches caused the back-and-forth motions of current flows along the main channel as a barotropic structure.

• (2) Even if the coastal seiches enhanced the near-bed current velocity, they could not resuspend the sediments from the bed (i.e., consolidated bed and mobile sediment pool). On the other hand, the suspended sediments fluctuated with an SSC anomaly of 8 mg l⁻¹ in response to the coastal seiches without appreciable bias toward the land or sea. The SSC anomaly depended on the sediment resuspension by external forcings (e.g., tides and winds) rather than coastal seiches.

• (3) As long as the bed sediments were resuspended, the coastal seiches lifted the sediment particles by > 4 m to the upper layer where they would not have risen if not for the vertical motion of coastal seiches. The cumulative uplifted fluxes (standard SSC: 20 mg l⁻¹), regardless of the direction at M1 and M2, were up to 5.09×10⁻³ kg m⁻¹ s⁻¹ and 4.62×10⁻³ kg m⁻¹ s⁻¹, respectively. They were equivalent to approximately 1% of the cumulative q_seiche.

• (4) A pulse of coastal seiches could advect the suspended sediments as much as 0.4×10⁻³ kg m⁻² s⁻¹ depending on the position of STM. However, the El_seiche was too short (< 57 m at M2), which was only 3% of STM width (1.5 km). Even if the coastal seiches repetitively fluctuated water column, the suspended sediments could not leave the STM, showing a redistribution process within the immediate vicinity. This process intensified in a narrower range as the El_seiche (< 32 m at M1) decreased further in the inner parts of the bay, causing stagnation.

• (5) The coastal seiches were expected to enhance the potential for water pollution by causing repetitive sediment redistribution. However, this study has been mainly focused on fluctuations of suspended sediment by coastal seiches at only two mooring stations. In future work, to broadly understand the impact of coastal seiches on the water pollution, the numerical model considering the shape of bay, occurrence of long-period waves, and plume dispersion should be performed.

References

• 1

  AndréG.BellafontF.LecklerF.MorichonD. (2021). Predicting seiche hazard for coastal harbours along the northern and western coasts of France. Natural Hazards106, 10651086. doi: 10.1007/s11069-021-04509-y

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 2

  AnglèsS.JordiA.GarcésE.BasterretxeaG.PalanquesA. (2010). Alexandrium minutum resting cyst distribution dynamics in a confined site. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr.57, 210221. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2009.09.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 3

  BasterretxeaG.JordiA.GarcésE.AnglèS.ReñéA. (2011). Seiches stimulate transient biogeochemical changes in a microtidal coastal ecosystem. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.423, 1528. doi: 10.3354/meps08949

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 4

  BjörkG.NordbergK.ArneborgL.BornmalmL.HarlandR.RobijnA.et al. (2017). Seasonal oxygen depletion in a shallow sill fjord on the Swedish west coast. J. Mar. Syst.175, 114. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2017.06.004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 5

  CerralboP.GrifollM.EspinoM. (2015). Hydrodynamic response in a microtidal and shallow bay under energetic wind and seiche episodes. J. Mar. Syst.149, 113. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2015.04.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 6

  ChoiS. M.SeoJ. Y.HaH. K. (2023). Contribution of local erosion enhanced by winds to sediment transport in intertidal flat. Mar. Geol.465, 107171. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2023.107171

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 7

  ChooH. S. (2021). Tide and tidal current around the sea route of Jinhae and Masan passages. J. Korean Soc. Fish. Ocean Technol. 57 (1), 45-56.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 8

  DeinesK. L. (1999). “Backscatter estimation using broadband acoustic Doppler current profilers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Sixth Working Conference on Current Measurement (Cat. No.99CH36331), San Diego, CA, IEEE. 249253. doi: 10.1109/CCM.1999.755249

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 9

  De JongM. P. C.BattjesJ. A. (2004). Seiche characteristics of Rotterdam harbour. Coast. Eng.51, 373386. doi: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2004.04.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  EggletonJ.ThomasK. V. (2004). A review of factors affecting the release and bioavailability of contaminants during sediment disturbance events. Environ. Int.30, 973980. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.03.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 11

  FigueroaS. M.LeeG. H.ChangJ.SchiederN. W.KimK.KimS. Y. (2020). Evaluation of along-channel sediment flux gradients in an Anthropocene estuary with an estuarine dam. Mar. Geol.429, 106318. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2020.106318

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 12

  GeyerW. R. (1993). The importance of suppression of turbulence by stratification on the estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries16, 113125. doi: 10.2307/1352769

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 13

  GeyerW. R.WoodruffJ. D.TraykovskiP. (2001). Sediment transport and trapping in the Hudson River estuary. Estuaries24, 670679. doi: 10.2307/1352875

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 14

  GieseG. S.ChapmanD. C. (1993). Coastal seiches. Oceanus36, 3846.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 15

  GloorM.WüestA.MünnichM. (1994). Benthic boundary mixing and resuspension induced by internal seiches. Hydrobiologia284, 5968. doi: 10.1007/BF00005731

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 16

  GomisD.MonserratS.TintoréJ. (1993). Pressure-forced seiches of large amplitude in inlets of the Balearic Islands. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans98, 1443714445. doi: 10.1029/93JC00623

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 17

  GongW.WangJ.ZhaoJ.ChenL.ZhangH. (2023). Contrast of fine sediment dynamics between shoals and channels in a microtidal estuary with mixed semi-diurnal tides. Anthropocene Coasts6, 4. doi: 10.1007/s44218-023-00018-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 18

  GreenM. O.CocoG. (2014). Review of wave-driven sediment resuspension and transport in estuaries. Rev. Geophys.53, 77117. doi: 10.1002/rog.v52.1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 19

  GrifollC. M.Cerralbo PeñarroyaP.Guillén ArandaJ.Espino lnfantesM.Boye HansenL.Sánchez-Arcilla ConejoA. (2019). Characterization of bottom sediment resuspension events observed in a micro-tidal bay. Ocean Sci.15, 307319. doi: 10.5194/os-15-307-2019

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 20

  HaH. K.MaaJ. Y.ParkK.KimY. H. (2011). Estimation of high-resolution sediment concentration profiles in bottom boundary layer using pulse-coherent acoustic Doppler current profilers. Mar. Geol.279, 199209. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2010.11.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 21

  HeyesA.MillerC.MasonR. P. (2004). Mercury and methylmercury in Hudson River sediment: impact of tidal resuspension on partitioning and methylation. Mar. Chem.90, 7589. doi: 10.1016/j.marchem.2004.03.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 22

  HyunS.LeeC. H.LeeT.ChoiJ. W. (2007). Anthropogenic contributions to heavy metal distributions in the surface sediments of Masan Bay, Korea. Mar. pollut. Bull.54, 1059. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2007.02.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 23

  JangM. C.ShinK.JangP. G.LeeW. J.ChoiK. H. (2015). Mesozooplankton community in a seasonally hypoxic and highly eutrophic bay. Mar. Freshw. Res.66, 719729. doi: 10.1071/MF14036

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 24

  JeongK. S.ChoJ. H.LeeJ. H.KimK. H. (2006). Accumulation history of anthropogenic heavy metals (Cu, Zn, and Pb) in Masan Bay sediments, southeastern Korea: A role of chemical front in the water column. Geosci. J.10, 445455. doi: 10.1007/BF02910438

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 25

  JeongH. J.Du YooY.LeeK. H.KimT. H.SeongK. A.KangN. S.et al. (2013). Red tides in Masan Bay, Korea in 2004−2005: I. Daily variations in the abundance of red-tide organisms and environmental factors. Harmful Algae30, S75S88. doi: 10.1016/j.hal.2013.10.008

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 26

  JohanssonP. (2010). Water exchange above sill level in the Sannäsfjord, west coast of Sweden Vol. 591 (Sweden: Department of Earth Science, Göteborg, University of Gothenburg B), 37.

  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 27

  JordiA.BasterretxeaG.CasasB.AnglèsS.GarcésE. (2008). Seiche-forced resuspension events in a Mediterranean harbor. Continental Shelf Res.28, 505515. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2007.10.009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 28

  KangJ. W.JunK. S. (2003). Flood and ebb dominance in estuaries in Korea. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.56, 187196. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7714(02)00156-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 29

  KimD.ChoiH. W.ChoiS. H.BaekS. H.KimK. H.JeongJ. H.et al. (2013). Spatial and seasonal variations in the water quality of Jinhae Bay, Korea. New Z. J. Mar. Freshw. Res.47, 192207. doi: 10.1080/00288330.2013.772066

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 30

  KimY. H.GutierrezB.NelsonT.DumarsA.MazaM.PeralesH.et al. (2004). Using the acoustic Doppler current profiler (ADCP) to estimate suspended sediment concentration. Technical Report, CPSD (South Carolina, Columbia: Coastal Processes and Sediment Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Geological Sciences, University of South Carolina), Vol. 4. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1419625

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 31

  KimS. I.SeoJ. Y.ParkJ. H.KimP. J.KimI. G.KimK. M. (2024). Imbalance of sediment transport in a meso-tidal bay: effect of tidal pumping and residual circulation. Front. Mar. Sci.11. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2024.1362583

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 32

  KumarP.ZhangH.KimK. I.YuenD. A. (2016). Modeling wave and spectral characteristics of moored ship motion in Pohang New Harbor under the resonance conditions. Ocean Eng.119, 101113. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.027

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar
  • View reference in article

• 33

  KwonK.ChoiB. J.MyoungS. G.SimH. S. (2021). Propagation of a meteotsunami from the yellow sea to the korea strait in april 2019. Atmosphere12, 1083. doi: 10.3390/atmos12081083

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  LaftaA. A. (2021). Estimation of tidal excursion length along the Shatt Al-Arab estuary, southern Iraq. Vietnam J. Sci. Technol.59, 7989. doi: 10.15625/2525-2518/59/1/15433

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  LeeJ. L.ChuJ. K.HwangR. G. (2000). Mathematical and numerical modelling of eutrophication process in Masan Bay, Korea. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ.43, 313–322. doi: 10.2495/CENV000291

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  LeeY. W.HwangD. W.KimG.LeeW. C.OhH. T. (2009). Nutrient inputs from submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) in Masan Bay, an embayment surrounded by heavily industrialized cities, Korea. Sci. Total Environ.407, 31813188. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.04.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37

  LeeY. W.ParkM. O.KimS. G.KimS. S.KhangB.ChoiJ.et al. (2021). Major controlling factors affecting spatiotemporal variation in the dissolved oxygen concentration in the eutrophic Masan Bay of Korea. Regional Stud. Mar. Sci.46, 101908. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2021.101908

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  LinJ.KuoA. Y. (2001). Secondary turbidity maximum in a partially mixed microtidal estuary. Estuaries24, 707720. doi: 10.2307/1352879

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  LuickJ. L.HinwoodJ. B. (2008). Water levels in a dual-basin harbour in response to infragravity and edge waves. Prog. Oceanogr.77, 367375. doi: 10.1016/j.pocean.2006.04.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  MagdalenaI.Rif’atinH. Q.ReeveD. E. (2020). Seiches and harbour oscillations in a porous semi-closed basin. Appl. Mathematics Comput.369, 124835. doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2019.124835

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  MehtaA. J. (1989). On estuarine cohesive sediment suspension behavior. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans94, 1430314314. doi: 10.1029/JC094iC10p14303

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  Morgan-KingT. L.SchoellhamerD. H. (2013). Suspended-sediment flux and retention in a backwater tidal slough complex near the landward boundary of an estuary. Estuaries Coasts36, 300318. doi: 10.1007/s12237-012-9574-z

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43

  MurrayR. B. H.HodgsonD. M.ThorneP. D. (2012). Wave groups and sediment resuspension processes over evolving sandy bedforms. Continental Shelf Res.46, 1630. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.02.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  NieddaM.GreppiM. (2007). Tidal, seiche and wind dynamics in a small lagoon in the Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.74, 2130. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2007.03.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  OgstonA. S.CacchioneD. A.SternbergR. W.KinekeG. C. (2000). Observations of storm and river flood-driven sediment transport on the northern California continental shelf. Continental Shelf Res.20, 21412162. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00065-0

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  ParkS. J.ChoiB. J.SimH. S.ByunD. S. (2020). Arrival of long ocean waves and hourly sea level oscillations in Masan Bay, Korea on 19–22 March 2014. J. Coast. Res.95, 1510–1514. doi: 10.2112/SI95-291.1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  ParkS. C.LeeK. W. (1996). Modern sedimentary environment of Jinhae Bay, SE Korea. J. Korean Soc. Oceanogr.32, 43–54.

  • Google Scholar

• 48

  ParkS. E.LeeW. C.HongS. J.KimH. C.KimJ. H. (2011). Variation in residence time and water exchange rate by release time of pollutants over a tidal cycle in Masan Bay. J. Korean Soc. Mar. Environ. Energy14, 249–256. doi: 10.7846/JKOSMEE.2011.14.4.249

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  PrichardD.HoggA. J. (2003). Suspended sediment transport under seiches in circular and elliptical basins. Coast. Eng.49, 4370. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3839(03)00046-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  RabinovichA. B. (2009). “Seiches and harbor oscillation0073,” in Handbook of coastal and ocean engineering. Ed. KimY. (World Scientific Publishing, Singapore), 193236. doi: 10.1142/9789812819307_0009

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  RibbeJ.HollowayP. E. (2001). A model of suspended sediment transport by internal tides. Continental Shelf Res.21, 395422. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00081-9

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  SchallenbergM.BurnsC. W. (2004). Effects of sediment resuspension on phytoplankton production: testing apart the influences of light, nutrients and algal entrainment. Freshw. Biol.49, 143159. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2426.2003.01172.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  SchulzE.GrassoF.Le HirP.VerneyR.ThouveninB. (2018). Suspended sediment dynamics in the macrotidal Seine Estuary (France): 2. Numerical modeling of sediment fluxes and budgets under typical hydrological and meteorological conditions. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans123, 578600. doi: 10.1002/2017JC013185

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  ScullyM. E.FriedrichsC. T. (2007). Sediment pumping by tidal asymmetry in a partially mixed estuary. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans112, C07028. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003784

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  SeoJ. Y.ChoiB. J.RyuJ.HaH. K. (2022). Dynamic evolution of a secondary turbidity maximum under various forcing conditions in a microtidal estuary. Mar. Geol.446, 106760. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2022.106760

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  SeoJ. Y.KimY. H.RyuJ.HaH. K. (2023). Wind-induced switch of estuarine residual circulations and sediment transport in microtidal bay. Estuarine Coast. Shelf Sci.288, 108371. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108371

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  SommerfieldC. K.WongK. C. (2011). Mechanisms of sediment flux and turbidity maintenance in the Delaware Estuary. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans116, C01005. doi: 10.1029/2010JC006462

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  SpieckermannM.GröngröftA.KarraschM.NeumannA.EschenbachA. (2022). Oxygen consumption of resuspended sediments of the upper Elbe estuary: process identification and prognosis. Aquat. Geochem.28, 125. doi: 10.1007/s10498-021-09401-6

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  TalkeS. A.StaceyM. T. (2008). Suspended sediment fluxes at an intertidal flat: the shifting influence of wave, wind, tidal, and freshwater forcing. Continental Shelf Res.28, 710725. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2007.12.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  TengL.ChengH.ZhangE.WangY. (2022). Lateral variation of tidal mixing asymmetry and its impact on the longitudinal sediment transport in turbidity maximum zone of salt wedge estuary. J. Mar. Sci. Eng.10, 907. doi: 10.3390/jmse10070907

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  Van DornW. G. (1984). Some tsunami characteristics deducible from tide records. J. Phys. Oceanogr.14, 353363. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1984)014<0353:STCDFT>2.0.CO;2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  WangX. H.PinardiN. (2002). Modeling the dynamics of sediment transport and resuspension in the northern Adriatic Sea. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans107, 3225. doi: 10.1029/2001JC001303

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63

  WooH. J.ChoJ. H.JeongK. S.ChungC. S.KwonS. J.ParkS. M. (2003). Pollution history of the Masan Bay, southeast Korea, from heavy metals and foraminifera in the subsurface sediments. J. Korean Earth Sci. Soc.24, 635–649.

  • Google Scholar

• 64

  YimU. H.HongS. H.ShimW. J.OhJ. R.ChangM. (2005). Spatio-temporal distribution and characteristics of PAHs in sediments from Masan Bay, Korea. Mar. pollut. Bull.50, 319326. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.11.003

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  YuanY.WeiH.ZhaoL.JiangW. (2008). Observations of sediment resuspension and settling off the mouth of Jiaozhou Bay, Yellow Sea. Continental Shelf Res.28, 26302643. doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2008.08.005

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  ZhangR.HongB.ZhuL.GongW.ZhangH. (2022). Responses of estuarine circulation to the morphological evolution in a convergent, microtidal estuary. Ocean Sci.18, 213231. doi: 10.5194/os-18-213-2022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar