ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1505425
An unmanned surface vehicle for acoustic telemetry surveys of coastal fishes: range testing, real world performance, and comparison with a stationary tracking array
Provisionally accepted- 1Herndon Solutions Group, LLC, Kennedy Space Center, United States
- 2Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), Newport, Rhode Island, United States
- 3Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, United States Department of the Interior, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Ocean gliders equipped with acoustic telemetry receivers are a promising approach for studying the movement of marine fishes, but surveys are often brief and lack comparisons with traditional tracking methods. In this study, a Wave Glider unmanned surface vehicle (USV) was deployed on eight multi-week missions to systematically track acoustically tagged animals over the east Florida continental shelf, and to compare its performance to a contemporaneous stationary tracking array. Over a cumulative 190 days and 9600 km travelled, 331 animal encounters with 20 species were recorded, with blacktip shark (Carcharhinus limbatus), blacknose shark (C. acronotus), and red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) the most frequently detected species. Multiple range test trials with the glider's two acoustic receiver types yielded 50% detection rates at ranges up to 350 m. Boosted regression tree models predicted that the glider's distance from the acoustic tag explained 57-71% of the variability in detection probability, but ocean currents, wave height, and solar irradiance were also influential. When compared to a stationary array comprised of up to 62 acoustic receivers, the Wave Glider detected, on average, 64% of the species and 40% of the tagged animals, but less than 2% of the detections over identical timeframes. Further, animal encounters with the glider lasted only 14 minutes on average, versus 48 minutes for stationary receivers. Nonetheless, the glider performed comparably on a per-receiver basis, yielding similar numbers of encounters, animals, and species. Moreover, it successfully navigated complex bathymetry surrounding offshore sand shoals, relocated several shed tags, and paired encounters with a variety of oceanographic and meteorological measurements. These results confirm that USVs are suitable for systematic coastal fish tracking. While single gliders cannot replace stationary arrays in most situations, they are realistic solutions for relocating animals in remote locations, monitoring dispersal across discrete habitat patches (e.g., reefs, wind turbines), and providing highly localized habitat context.
Keywords: acoustic telemetry, Ocean glider, Wave Glider, Range testing, FACT Network, autonomous animal tracking, Unmanned surface vehicle
Received: 02 Oct 2024; Accepted: 16 Jun 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Reyier, Iafrate, Ahr, Watwood, Scheidt, Levenson and Schumann. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Eric Reyier, Herndon Solutions Group, LLC, Kennedy Space Center, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.