ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1535712
This article is part of the Research TopicChallenges in Fishery Assessment MethodologiesView all 13 articles
Unraveling the environmental drivers of blue whiting recruitment: 20 years of observations
Provisionally accepted- 1Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
- 2Centro Oceanográfico de A Coruña (COAC-IEO), CSIC, Coruña, Spain
- 3Centro Oceanográfico de Santander, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Santander, Cantabria, Spain
- 4Centro Oceanográfico de Cádiz (COCAD-IEO), CSIC, Cádiz, Spain
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Recruitment in marine fish is a complex process influenced by multiple ecological factors that often interact in unpredictable ways, making reliable forecasting challenging. Environmental variability further amplifies this uncertainty. This study analyzed the abundance of 0-year class blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) from the Spanish bottom trawl survey on the Porcupine Bank (Irish shelf) between 2001 and 2020, focusing on the exceptional recruitment event in 2020. We examined the effects of wind, chlorophyll-a concentration, salinity, temperature, and ocean currents during the spawning season, along with the spawning stock biomass (SSB).Results indicate that recruitment was primarily influenced by the wind-mixing index, chlorophyll-a concentration, and retention index, with no significant correlation to SSB.Although interannual variability in both environmental conditions and recruitment was high, the relationship between environmental factors and recruitment was not always predictable. For instance, while warm and saline years are generally associated with higher recruitment, the period 2002-2012 (characterized by warm and saline waters) only showed strong recruitment in 2003, 2004, 2007, 2009, and 2010. Conversely, although cold and low-salinity conditions are typically linked to lower recruitment, 2020 saw very strong recruitment despite the belowaverage SSB. Our findings suggest that the exceptional recruitment in 2020 resulted from a unique combination of favorable conditions. Unusually low wind conditions triggered the formation of a stable Taylor column circulation over the Porcupine Bank, promoting phytoplankton accumulation, as evidenced by the elevated chlorophyll-a concentrations. This likely increased food availability for larvae, while the Taylor column also acted as a retention mechanism for larvae and prey. Lagrangian simulations supported this retention hypothesis.Additionally, temperature and salinity conditions during the 2020 spawning season likely optimized the ascent of early life stages from spawning depths to the food-rich surface waters, improving larval feeding success and contributing to the historical recruitment event.
Keywords: Blue whiting, recruitment, 0-year class, chlorophyll-a, wind mixing index, Porcupine Bank, Taylor column
Received: 27 Nov 2024; Accepted: 29 Jul 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Laiz, Chowdhury, González-Nuevo, Velasco and Baldó. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Irene Laiz, Instituto Universitario de Investigación Marina (INMAR), Universidad de Cádiz, Puerto Real, Spain
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.