ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Conservation and Sustainability

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1549897

Restoration-oriented multi-tiered framework for ecosystem degradation diagnosis: a coastal bay case study

Provisionally accepted
Dian  ZhangDian Zhang1Weiwei  YUWeiwei YU2*Bin  ChenBin Chen2Huamei  HuangHuamei Huang3Jianji  LiaoJianji Liao2Lingyang  FengLingyang Feng2Guangcheng  ChenGuangcheng Chen2Zhiyuan  MaZhiyuan Ma2Qinhua  FangQinhua Fang1*Shunyang  ChenShunyang Chen2Bin  XieBin Xie2Zhiyi  KanZhiyi Kan1Shangke  SuShangke Su2Ge  FeiyangGe Feiyang4Hanmeng  YuanHanmeng Yuan5
  • 1College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian Province, China
  • 2Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen, China
  • 3South China Sea Institute of Planning and Environmental Research, Ministry of Natural Resources,, Guangzhou, China
  • 4South China Sea Ecological Center, Ministry of Natural Resources, Guangzhou, China
  • 5Shenzhen Urban Planning and Land Resource Research Center, Shenzhen, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Understanding ecosystem degradation and estimating its extent are essential to enact decision-making policies in biodiversity conservation, ecosystem restoration, and management. Although many approaches have been proposed to identify the degradation status of an ecosystem, the heavy data burden required lacks targeted degradation information to inform such decision-making restoration policies. This study proposes a multi-tiered decision-making framework to diagnose ecosystem degradation based on the most common restoration models that link degradation to restoration. The degradation diagnosis process can be executed step-by-step (i.e., in a physical to chemical to biological order). This study selected a limited number of coastal bay indicators from each layer, and a conceptual ecosystem response profile was applied to guide their degradation criteria settings: stepped for physical indicators, hump-shaped for chemical indicators, and smooth for biological indicators. Daya Bay in China was selected for this case study. In total, 62% of the bay has degraded by varying degrees, including completely degraded, heavily degraded, moderately degraded, and slightly degraded percentages were 4.64%, 3.78%, 15.16%, and 38.43%, respectively. Moreover, there has been a gradual but continuous spatial change in its degradation degree from north to south and from west to east. Results from this study can be used to identify and prioritize restoration processes.Human-assisted restoration efforts should prioritize its moderately degraded western section and its heavily degraded coastal areas along Yaling Bay and Fanhe Harbour.Our framework provides an efficient, science-based, and novel approach to diagnose the degradation status of the coast, particularly in the absence of long-term observational data, which can be effectively applied to any region or ecosystem.

Keywords: coastal bay, Ecosystem degradation, Ecosystem restoration, threshold, ecological restoration

Received: 22 Dec 2024; Accepted: 11 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Zhang, YU, Chen, Huang, Liao, Feng, Chen, Ma, Fang, Chen, Xie, Kan, Su, Feiyang and Yuan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence:
Weiwei YU, Third Institute of Oceanography, State Oceanic Administration, Xiamen, China
Qinhua Fang, College of the Environment and Ecology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, Fujian Province, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.