Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

METHODS article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1561347

This article is part of the Research TopicEcocentric fisheries management in European Seas (Volume II): e-tools, management scenarios, and capacity building to support decision making in fisheries and ecosystemsView all 4 articles

Extending the human pressures-species response system in the MSP Challenge ecosystem simulation platform

Provisionally accepted
  • 1GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 2Breda University of Applied Sciences, Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Geography, University of Kiel, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
  • 4Institute of Biosciences and Bioresources, National Research Council of Italy, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The MSP Challenge Simulation Platform assists planners and stakeholders in understanding and managing the complexity of Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP). It allows users to view various data layers covering an entire sea region, assess the status of the socio-ecological system, and create future scenarios for marine space usage over several decades. The platform integrates the ecosystem modelling approach Ecopath with Ecosim (EwE) to support the implementation of evidence-based and ecosystem-based MSP principles from the EU Directive 2014/89/EU. Each regional edition of the MSP Challenge includes a tailored ecosystem model of the basin. The ecosystem model simulates the effects of pressures from human activities by applying functional responses to each trophic group. This article explains how the modelling of pressures and functional responses was extended from the original system, using the western Baltic Sea as an example. It focuses on pressures characteristic of offshore wind farms, an infrastructure increasingly important for achieving European carbon neutrality and reducing reliance on fossil fuels amid energy crises. First, the general noise pressure that included all kinds of noise and vibrations was split into impulsive noise, continuous noise and bottom vibrations, with air disturbance added as a separate component. Second, a new semi-quantitative metric inspired by the Leopold matrix used in Environmental Impact Assessment was applied to link each pressure to the trophic group’s response, making the process more objective. These improvements standardize the functional response inputs and provide detailed insights into the impacts of different human activities on specific trophic groups. The novelties presented here improve the MSP Challenge Platform’s ability to deliver realistic predictions on ecosystem functioning in response to the construction, operation and decommissioning of offshore wind farms, and may foster more robust decision-making for sustainable maritime spatial planning.

Keywords: Ecospace, Western Baltic Sea, multiple anthropogenic stressors, marine spatial planning, Offshore wind farms, marine protected areas

Received: 15 Jan 2025; Accepted: 05 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Nascimento, Gonçalves, Lieser, Mayer and Scotti. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Marcela Conceição Nascimento, GEOMAR Helmholtz Center for Ocean Research Kiel, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Kiel, 24148, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.