ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Megafauna

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1568607

Whale shark residency and small-scale movements around oil and gas platforms in Qatar

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Qatar Whale Shark Research, Doha, Qatar
  • 2Sharkwatch Arabia, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  • 3Marine Megafauna Foundation, West Palm Beach, United States
  • 4Ocean Sciences Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Mississippi, United States
  • 5Marine Megafauna Foundation, Truckee, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Whale sharks seasonally aggregate near oil and gas platforms in Qatar to feed on fish spawn, creating one of the world's largest aggregations of the species. We used passive acoustic telemetry to examine their fine-scale movements, residency, and seasonality and investigate whether the platforms influence their space use in this area. Tags had a mean retention of 161 ±186 days (standard deviation, SD) and 32 of the 117 tags were recorded in multiple years in the acoustic array (21 stations). Most detections were recorded from May to September, confirming that this whale shark aggregation is seasonal. Whale sharks stayed up to 77 consecutive days in the array (mean = 16 ± 12.51 days) and had a mean residency index Rmax of 0.31. Although most detections (65%) were made at a single receiver located near a platform, here designated P1, an 'open water' receiver near this location also had a high proportion of total detections (8.5%).Receivers at other platforms, located away from this specific site, had relatively few detections.The distance from P1, identified as the centre of the aggregation, was the main explanatory variable in a GAM. Whale shark aggregations were routinely observed feeding on tuna eggs at the surface at this location, with the eggs (and hence whale sharks) moving with the current through the day, and moving through the array as they did so. Whale sharks then swam against the current in the late afternoon and at night to relocate back to near the presumed tuna spawning site, close to P1, again in the early morning. Rather than being generally associated with platforms, whale sharks were clearly associated with a specific feeding location close to P1.Our results highlight the importance of this small feeding area for whale sharks, which face a high threat level in the region.

Keywords: acoustic telemetry, tracking, Aggregations, spawning, elasmobranch, kernel utilisation distribution, hierarchical GAMs

Received: 30 Jan 2025; Accepted: 06 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Bach, Robinson, Jaidah, Pierce, Thoppil and Rohner. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Christoph A Rohner, Marine Megafauna Foundation, Truckee, United States

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.