- 1Faculty of Science and Marine Environment, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
- 2Microplastic Research Interest Group (MRIG), Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
- 3Research Center for Oceanography, The Indoensian National Research and Innovation Agency, Jakarta, Indonesia
- 4Department of Marine Science, Faculty of Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
Editorial on the Research Topic
Baselines, impacts and mitigation strategies for plastic debris and microplastic pollution in South East Asia
Plastic debris and microplastics are significant environmental issues globally, including Southeast Asia countries that were identified as a critical hotspot. This review synthesizes finding from studies in Penang, Malaysia; the south Java coastline, Indonesia; and the Flores Sea, Indonesia. These publications have established baseline on the contamination levels and assessed ecological and socio-economic impacts, and mitigation strategies. The highlighted finding was included in severe contamination in mangrove estuaries and coastal waters, plastic marine litter on beaches, and microplastic dispersion in ocean currents. Mitigation strategies that require integrated approaches involving policy reform, community engagement, technological innovation and regional cooperation.
Introduction
Microplastics have emerged as a pollution concern over the past two decades (Thompson et al., 2025). Microplastic contamination is pervasive across multiple ecosystem matrices. Microplastics predominantly originate, approximately 70-80%, from the degradation of larger plastics caused by UV exposure, weathering, and mechanical factors (Katare et al., 2022). The remainder originates from plastics manufactured in diminutive sizes, such as those used for personal care items or cleaning solutions (Boucher and Friot, 2017).
Microplastics are newly emerging contaminants anticipated to proliferate in the future. They present a significant hazard to environmental and public health (Makhdoumi et al., 2023). Therefore, understanding the sources, distribution, and impacts of microplastics, as well as developing strategies to mitigate their release into the environment is crucial for the region’s long term environmental and economic stability.
Southeast Asia ‘s rapid urbanization, economic growth, and burgeoning population have firmly established the region as a critical player in the global plastic pollution narrative (Omeyer et al., 2022; Williams and Rangel-Buitrago, 2022; Ali et al., 2024). As one of the most world’s fastest-developing areas, Southeast Asia has emerged as a major contributor to the global plastic waste crisis, including within its own borders (Marks, 2022; Ng et al., 2023). Regrettably, studies investigating plastic waste and microplastics in this region remain scarce compared to other parts of the world (Lyons et al., 2019; Manullang et al., 2022; Omeyer et al., 2022, 2023; Nakano et al., 2025). To reconcile the region’s development and environmental management needs, establishing a baseline is crucial for crafting more targeted policies. This review synthesizes findings from recent studies conducted in Penang, Malaysia; along the south Java coastline, Indonesia and the Flores Sea, Indonesia. The aim was to set baseline conditions, assessing ecological and socioeconomic impacts, and exploring mitigation strategies for the pressing issue of plastic and microplastic pollution in the region.
Baseline conditions
Malaysia
Tan and Mohd Zanuri‘s baseline study in Penang, Malaysia, highlights the vulnerability of tropical estuarine mangrove ecosystems to microplastic pollution, potentially driven by human activities and waste management challenges. Sampling across four sites revealed substantial microplastic contamination, with fragments being the dominant morphology, and indicating the breakdown of larger plastic debris. Their findings reported microplastic concentration ranging between 201 ± 21.214 - 1,407 ± 124.265 items per liter (items/L) in coastal surface water, as well as 255 ± 22.368 - 350 ± 25.892 items per kilogram (items/kg) in coastal sediment, and 430 ± 7.234 - 4,000 ± 29.174 items/kg in estuarine sediments. Polyethylene was identified as the predominant polymer in all matrices. This study emphasizes the importance of mangrove estuaries as critical ecological zones that are susceptible to plastic pollution from urban and industrial sources, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to address this pressing environmental issue.
Indonesia
The studies by Yona et al. and Herawati et al. provide valuable baseline data on marine litter and microplastic pollution in Southeast Asia, highlighting the severity of the issue in coastal and marine environments. Yona et al. investigated beach litter across multiple sites in eastern Java, Indonesia, revealing a strong correlation between litter abundance, composition, tourism activities, and beach management practices. Their findings indicate that plastic waste is the predominant pollutant, with approximately 90% originating from land-based sources, including tourism-related activities. The study area had an abundance of beach litter ranging from 0.4 items/m2 to 6.1 items/m2 with average of 2.0 ± 1.5 items/m2. Furthermore, the Clean Coast Index (CCI) classified the surveyed beaches as “dirty” to “extremely dirty”, suggesting that inadequate waste management and low public awareness contribute significantly to the pollution levels, thus highlight the urgent need for further research on sources, mitigation strategies, and sustainable waste management practices to address marine litter in the region effectively.
The study by Herawati et al. investigates the characterization and distribution of microplastics in the Flores Sea, which is influenced by the Indonesian Throughflow currents. Driven by a critical knowledge gap regarding the specific nature and distribution of microplastics in the Flores Sea, this work is revealing the baseline of microplastic contamination in the critical area. Their findings showed microplastic concentrations ranging from 0.84 to 2.24 items/L in surface waters and 0.84 items/g to 2.75 items/g in seabed sediments. The researchers found that microplastics predominantly consisted of polyethylene terephthalate and polyethylene polymers, with shapes including films, filaments, and fragments, and black and blue being the predominant colors. The study identified ocean currents as a key factor shaping the distribution and dispersal of microplastics in this ecologically significant region. The findings contribute to a better understanding of microplastic distribution and can inform future environmental assessments and policy development efforts.
Impacts
It is well established that microplastics pose significant environmental impacts by compromising marine ecosystem health and water quality, as well as entering food chains. In Penang, Malaysia, microplastics were found to contain hazardous chemicals like dimethylmercury, posing risks to estuarine organisms and their habitats (Tan and Mohd Zanuri). Similarly, a study on the Flores Sea, Indonesia, highlighted the potential of microplastics to disrupt biogeochemical processes and harm marine biodiversity (Herawati et al.). Beyond environmental concern, microplastics also have socio-economic implications. For instance, tourism-dependent regions such as the southern Java coastline suffer economic losses due to degraded beach aesthetics and reduced visitor satisfaction (Yona et al.). Furthermore, the presence of microplastics in fishery zones, as observed in the Flores Sea, raises concerns over seafood safety, potentially impacting both local livelihoods and public health.
Mitigation strategies
The ASEAN Regional Action Plan (2021–2025) was installed to improve plastic waste management capacity (Secretariat, A. S. E. A. N, 2021). Other initiatives, the ASEAN-Norway project focusing on local sustainability and ASEAN+3 Marine Plastic Debris programs, emphasize regional collaboration (UN environment, 2017). In addition, public awareness campaigns targeting local communities and tourists can encourage responsible waste disposal. In Indonesia, a waste-bank program introduced in 2012 encourages households was meant to sort waste into specific categories, which are then deposited in central waste banks that provide monetary returns (Loh, 2020). Such initiatives not only improved recycling rates but also engaged communities in waste management efforts (Ng et al., 2023). Innovative technologies, such as the ocean cleanup project by a non-profit organization, aimed to remove plastics from oceans and rivers using devices like interceptor units deployed in Southeast Asia (Omeyer et al., 2022). The 2021 UNEP report highlighted that the production, usage, and disposal of fossil fuel-derived plastics emitted approximately 1.7 gigatons of CO2 equivalents in 2015, projected to rise to 6.5 gigatons by 2050 (Julius and Trajano, 2022). These estimates align with the concern raised by Karasik et al. (2023), who emphasized that plastic production not only accelerates fossil fuel dependency but also imposes disproportionate health and environmental burdens on communities, thus need to be urgently mitigated.
Future research directions
Future research in Southeast Asia and other locations should emphasize the investigation of microplastic contamination in aquatic habitats, particularly in estuarine systems and their many components, to inform successful conservation efforts, based on three studies (Tan and Mohd Zanuri; Herawati et al.; Yona et al.). Research should examine the nature, sources, and transport processes of marine trash, including buoyancy, to formulate specific mitigation strategies. Moreover, studies must evaluate the efficacy of remediation initiatives and create baseline data for marine debris, especially in underexplored areas such as the eastern region of South Java. The effects of microplastics on marine organisms and human health, particularly via the Indonesian Throughflow channels, necessitate additional research. This entails detecting microplastic particles within the water column and examining the impact of riverine contributions from adjacent regions. Standardized procedures and reporting requirements are crucial for guaranteeing comparability and reproducibility among the investigations.
Conclusion
Plastic and microplastic pollution in Southeast Asia is a complex issue requiring comprehensive solutions. Baseline studies from Malaysia and Indonesia reveal high contamination levels linked to anthropogenic activities, with potentially severe ecological and socio-economic consequences. Effective mitigation demands an integrated approach involving policy reforms, community involvement, technological innovation and international collaboration to safeguard marine ecosystems and human well-being in the region.
Author contributions
SA: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. AM: Writing – original draft. MC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to all countries, state governments, and agencies, including UNESCO IOC-WESTPAC, COBSEA and ERIA for their continuous efforts in addressing marine plastic pollution and their commitment to advancing microplastic research in Southeast Asia. Their dedication and initiatives have been instrumental in fostering scientific progress in this field.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Generative AI was utilized only for grammar checking and proofreading.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Ali A. A. M., Khalid A. A., Abd Razak N. I., Maulana N. S. M., Roslan N. S., Razmi R. S. B., et al. (2024). A review on the presence of microplastics in environmental matrices within Southeast Asia: elucidating risk information through an analysis of microplastic characteristics such as size, shape, and type. Water Emerging Contaminants Nanoplastics 3, N–A. doi: 10.20517/wecn.2023.73
Boucher J., Friot D. (2017). Primary Microplastics in the Oceans: A Global Evaluation of Sources. (Gland, Switzerland: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources). doi: 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.01.en
Julius B., Trajano C. (2022). Plastic pollution in Southeast Asia: Wasted opportunity? (Singapore: RSIS).
Karasik R., Lauer N. E., Baker A. E., Lisi N. E., Somarelli J. A., Eward W. C., et al. (2023). Inequitable distribution of plastic benefits and burdens on economies and public health. Front. Marine Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.1017247
Katare Y., Singh P., Sankhla M. S., Singhal M., Jadhav E. B., Parihar K., et al. (2022). Microplastics in aquatic environments: Sources, ecotoxicity, detection & remediation. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 12, 3407–3428. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC123.34073428
Loh P. Y. (2020). Why is Southeast Asia so bad at managing its waste (Kontinentalist). Available online at: https://kontinentalist.com/stories/southeast-asia-ocean-plastics-pollution-waste-management.
Lyons Y., Linting Su T., Lin Neo M. (2019). A review of research on marine plastics in Southeast Asia: who does what? 1–86. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/a-review-of-research-on-marine-plastics-in-sea-who-does-what.
Makhdoumi P., Hossini H., Pirsaheb M. (2023). A review of microplastic pollution in commercial fish for human consumption. Rev. Environ. Health 38, 97–109. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2021-0103
Manullang C., Patria M., Haryono A., Anuar S., Suyadi S., Opier R. (2022). Status and research gaps of microplastics pollution in Indonesian waters: A Review. Indonesian J. Chem. 23, 251–267. doi: 10.22146/ijc.73485
Marks D. (2022). “Transboundary governance failures and Southeast Asia’s plastic pollution,” in The Routledge Handbook of Global Development (Routledge), 280–289. doi: 10.4324/9781003017653-27
Nakano H., Alfonso M. B., Phinchan N., Jandang S., Manap M. R. A., Chavanich S., et al. (2025). Aquatic microplastics research in the ASEAN region: Analysis of challenges and priorities. Marine Pollution Bull. 210, 117342. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117342
Ng C. H., Mistoh M. A., Teo S. H., Galassi A., Ibrahim A., Sipaut C. S., et al. (2023). Plastic waste and microplastic issues in Southeast Asia. Front. Environ. Sci. 11. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1142071
Omeyer L. C. M., Duncan E. M., Abreo N. A. S., Acebes J. M. V., AngSinco-Jimenez L. A., Anuar S. T., et al. (2023). Interactions between marine megafauna and plastic pollution in Southeast Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 874, 162502. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162502
Omeyer L. C., Duncan E. M., Aiemsomboon K., Beaumont N., Bureekul S., Cao B., et al. (2022). Priorities to inform research on marine plastic pollution in Southeast Asia. Sci. Total Environ. 841, 156704. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156704
Secretariat, A. S. E. A. N (2021). ASEAN Regional Action Plan for Combating Marine Debris in the ASEAN Member States (Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat).
Thompson R. C., Courtene-Jones W., Boucher J., Pahl S., Raubenheimer K., Koelmans A. A. (2025). Twenty years of microplastic pollution research—what have we learned? Science 386, eadl2746. doi: 10.1126/science.adl2746
UN environment (2017). Waste management in ASEAN countries: Summary report (Nairobi, Kenya: UN Environment Programme).
Keywords: microplastic, marine plastic pollution, Southeast (SE) Asia, Indonesia, Malaysia
Citation: Anuar ST, Mohd Ali AA, Cordova MR and Charoenpong C (2025) Editorial: Baselines, impacts and mitigation strategies for plastic debris and microplastic pollution in South East Asia. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1586080. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1586080
Received: 02 March 2025; Accepted: 08 April 2025;
Published: 24 April 2025.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Hans Uwe Dahms, Kaohsiung Medical University, TaiwanCopyright © 2025 Anuar, Mohd Ali, Cordova and Charoenpong. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Sabiqah Tuan Anuar, c2FiaXFhaGFudWFyQHVtdC5lZHUubXk=