Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

METHODS article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Aquatic Microbiology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1597865

Exploring Marine Microbial Diversity: An In-depth Assessment Overview of Representative Sampling Strategies

Provisionally accepted
  • 1University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 2Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Türkiye
  • 3Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Tirana, Tirana, Tirana, Albania
  • 4Institute of Natural Products and Agrobiology, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain
  • 5Institute of Marine Biology, University of Montenegro, Kotor, Montenegro
  • 6Water Research Institute, National Research Council - IRSA-CNR, Rome, Italy
  • 7NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal
  • 8Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia
  • 9Marine Biology Station Piran, National Institute of Biology (Slovenia), Piran, Slovenia
  • 10ScotBio, Livingston, United Kingdom
  • 11Marine Research Institute, Klaipeda University, Klaipeda, Klaipeda, Lithuania
  • 12Department of Nanobiotechnology, Biology Centre, ISB, CAS, Ceske Budejovice, Czechia
  • 13University of Galway, Galway, County Galway, Ireland
  • 14University of Turin, Turin, Piedmont, Italy
  • 15Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Limassol, Cyprus

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Abstract 1. The assessment of marine microbial biodiversity is crucial for determining either the environmental status (ecological or biodiversity research) or as a first step in the biodiscovery process (biotechnological research). Regardless of the research purpose, the first step in a biodiversity assessment is the sampling, which can range from ad hoc sampling expeditions to long-term monitoring campaigns. In spite of its demands for funds, infrastructure, expertise, equipment, and personnel, sampling is often not adequately planned. This results in increased likelihood for biased sampling, which can lead to misinterpretation of results, omission of valuable specimens and an unrepresented collection of stored samples, all particularly important for the assessment of microbial biodiversity. For these reasons, we are proposing a conceptual framework to assist in better preparation of sampling, consisting of pre-sampling, sampling and post sampling steps. The manuscript guides the reader through all the necessary steps, regardless of the sampling habitat (from water column to sediment), the sampling techniques and the preservation and storage approaches including inoculation, culture and biorepositories. Such a harmonized approach can be of benefit for (i) researchers in the field of ecology/biotechnology, (ii) industrial companies requiring information on the providers and availability of data, and (iii) governance structures and funders, in the light of open science principles.

Keywords: Biodiscovery, marine microbial diversity, sampling protocol, sample preservationand storage, Biorepositories, Cultures

Received: 21 Mar 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Ljubešić, Gligora Udovic, AKGÜL, Bacu, Díaz-Marrero, Drakulović, Fazi, Gaudêncio, Grgurević, Kolda, Makovec, Novoveska, Overlinge, Safarik, Sousa, Thomas, Reddy, Varese, Vasquez and Rotter. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Ana Rotter, Marine Biology Station Piran, National Institute of Biology (Slovenia), Piran, 1000, Slovenia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.