Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Pollution

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1624922

Efficacies of cooking and depuration for reducing current-use pesticide residues in wildcaught giant mud crabs (Scylla serrata)

Provisionally accepted
  • 1National Marine Science Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia
  • 2Fisheries Research, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Coffs Harbour, Australia
  • 3School of the Environment, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Pesticides can be transported into estuaries via spray drift, ground water contamination and surface runoff. Increasing climatic variability and global pesticide use are likely to increase the exposure of harvested estuarine species, and therefore seafood consumers, to agrichemicals. Post-harvest processing strategies present opportunities to reduce pesticide residues in seafood and so mitigate consumer health risks. We evaluated the efficacies of thermal processing (cooking) and depuration (holding individuals in clean flow-through seawater) for reducing pesticide residues in wild-caught giant mud crab (Scylla serrata) edible tissues (flesh and brown meat (i.e. hepatopancreas and gonads)). Pesticide residues were detected in 82% of assessed crabs, with five analytes quantified (cyprodinil, diuron, imidacloprid, propargite and triazophos). Correlative analyses revealed cooking at ~82°C for 2 min 100-g -1 body mass reduced all pesticide concentrations (and the total residues) in both tissues by 7-99%-except for cyprodinil (51% increase). Imidacloprid residues in crab flesh were reduced (by 81%) after six days of depuration, with complete elimination after 12 days.While a human health-risk assessment identified that the concentrations of pesticide residues in crab tissues posed no negative health effects to seafood consumers, the data support postharvest processing methods for mitigating consumer exposure. Our study highlights the need for ongoing pesticide surveillance of Australian seafood. Food safety regulation should consider establishing maximum residue limits for seafood, with consideration of consumption preferences.

Keywords: contaminants, Fisheries adaptation, insecticide, herbicide, fungicide, Portunid

Received: 08 May 2025; Accepted: 21 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Gray, Champion, Broadhurst, Coleman and Benkendorff. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Benjamin C T Gray, National Marine Science Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.