Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Affairs and Policy

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1636476

Illegal artisanal longline use in the Galapagos Marine Reserve characterized through monitoring and control data

Provisionally accepted
Andres  Romero-CaicedoAndres Romero-Caicedo1*Paola  Buitron-LopezPaola Buitron-Lopez2Andres  Tapia-JaramilloAndres Tapia-Jaramillo3Simon  McKinleySimon McKinley1Edwin  Castro-BrionesEdwin Castro-Briones1Gonzalo  Sevilla-CedeñoGonzalo Sevilla-Cedeño2John  Ronquillo-GarzonJohn Ronquillo-Garzon2Gabriel  Maciel de Souza ViannaGabriel Maciel de Souza Vianna1
  • 1Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos, Ecuador
  • 2Galapagos National Park Directorate, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador
  • 3Independent consultant, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Illegal longline fishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR) represents a socioecological issue with significant impact on protected marine species. This study characterizes the use of illegal longlines in the GMR by analyzing datasets from monitoring and control operations by the Galapagos National Park Directorate. We explored temporal and spatial patterns of longline detections, identified impacted species, and estimated compliance of vessels associated with longlines. The number of longlines detected varied across years but no clear seasonal pattern was evident. The most frequently captured taxa were sharks and rays, including critically endangered scalloped hammerheads (Sphyrna lewini) and endangered manta rays (Mobula birostris). The critically endangered waved-albatrosses and green turtles (Chelonia mydas) were also captured. Longline fishing occurred frequently in the submarine canyon south of Isabela, the seamount east of Santa Cruz, and waters between Pinzon, Isabela, and Santiago Islands, which are areas of high productivity and popular fishing grounds. Longlines were also recorded near Darwin and Wolf Islands, a hotspot for shark conservation. Offending vessels represented 17% of the artisanal fleet targeting pelagic fish and were responsible for ~30% of landings. Notably, 80% of trips when longlines were recorded had no associated fisheries landing. Offending vessels had their Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) deactivated in 69% of trips with longlines, despite their use being legally required. These findings provide baseline data to help GMR managers improve enforcement allocation and underscore the importance of strengthening surveillance and enforcement to mitigate illegal fishing.

Keywords: bycatch, protected species, IUU fishing, surveillance, enforcement

Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Romero-Caicedo, Buitron-Lopez, Tapia-Jaramillo, McKinley, Castro-Briones, Sevilla-Cedeño, Ronquillo-Garzon and de Souza Vianna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Andres Romero-Caicedo, Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos, Ecuador

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.