BRIEF RESEARCH REPORT article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Affairs and Policy
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1636476
Illegal artisanal longline use in the Galapagos Marine Reserve characterized through monitoring and control data
Provisionally accepted- 1Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos, Ecuador
- 2Galapagos National Park Directorate, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador
- 3Independent consultant, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Illegal longline fishing in the Galapagos Marine Reserve (GMR) represents a socioecological issue with significant impact on protected marine species. This study characterizes the use of illegal longlines in the GMR by analyzing datasets from monitoring and control operations by the Galapagos National Park Directorate. We explored temporal and spatial patterns of longline detections, identified impacted species, and estimated compliance of vessels associated with longlines. The number of longlines detected varied across years but no clear seasonal pattern was evident. The most frequently captured taxa were sharks and rays, including critically endangered scalloped hammerheads (Sphyrna lewini) and endangered manta rays (Mobula birostris). The critically endangered waved-albatrosses and green turtles (Chelonia mydas) were also captured. Longline fishing occurred frequently in the submarine canyon south of Isabela, the seamount east of Santa Cruz, and waters between Pinzon, Isabela, and Santiago Islands, which are areas of high productivity and popular fishing grounds. Longlines were also recorded near Darwin and Wolf Islands, a hotspot for shark conservation. Offending vessels represented 17% of the artisanal fleet targeting pelagic fish and were responsible for ~30% of landings. Notably, 80% of trips when longlines were recorded had no associated fisheries landing. Offending vessels had their Automatic Identification Systems (AIS) deactivated in 69% of trips with longlines, despite their use being legally required. These findings provide baseline data to help GMR managers improve enforcement allocation and underscore the importance of strengthening surveillance and enforcement to mitigate illegal fishing.
Keywords: bycatch, protected species, IUU fishing, surveillance, enforcement
Received: 28 May 2025; Accepted: 05 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Romero-Caicedo, Buitron-Lopez, Tapia-Jaramillo, McKinley, Castro-Briones, Sevilla-Cedeño, Ronquillo-Garzon and de Souza Vianna. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Andres Romero-Caicedo, Charles Darwin Foundation, Puerto Ayora, Galápagos, Ecuador
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.