Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1641055

Diel vertical distribution of copepods during spring in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean

Provisionally accepted
Mª Luz  Fernández de PuellesMª Luz Fernández de Puelles1,2,3*Magdalena  GazaMagdalena Gaza2,3Miguel  Cabanellas-ReboredoMiguel Cabanellas-Reboredo2,3Santiago  Hernández-LeónSantiago Hernández-León4,5
  • 1Spanish Institute of Oceanography (IEO), Madrid, Spain
  • 2Instituto Espanol de Oceanografia Centre Oceanografic de les Balears, Palma, Spain
  • 3IEO, palma, Spain
  • 4Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Instituto de Oceanografia y Cambio Global, Telde, Spain
  • 5Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Vertical migration is a rather complex behavior by which multiple species of different sizes move from the meso- and bathy-pelagic zones, where they reside during day to avoid predators, to the epipelagic zone for feeding. Understanding this behavior of zooplankton organisms is key to assess their role in the active transport of carbon in the oceans. The present study disentangles the diel vertical distribution of zooplankton community (mainly copepods) during spring in the Northeast Atlantic Ocean. To address that, 10 stations down to 1900 m depth were sampled using an opening-closing MOCNESS during day- and nighttime. Additionally, we also sampled the epipelagic strata (0-200 m) for microzooplankton (50-200 µm) as well as the mesozooplankton community (>200 µm). A total of 15 zooplankton groups were found (>85% were copepods), and more than 250 species of copepods were identified. The results showed a latitudinal decreasing gradient northward in the number of genera and species, and an increasing gradient in their abundances. A frontal system was observed in the epipelagic layer between 45 and 47oN promoting sharp differences among the northern and southern communities. In this frontal zone, small copepod nauplii and copepodites were rather abundant, being Paracalanus parvus the dominant copepod. In the most northern region, we found Calanus finmarchicus and a high abundance of Oithona spp, while in the southern region C. helgolandicus, Nannocalanus minor and Mecynocera clausi were dominant. A decreasing trend of copepod abundance was observed with depth, segregating the upper 700 m from below. Using the 50 dominant copepod species, five different groups were distinguished in their vertical distributions: (1) the non-migrant epipelagic copepods, (2) copepod migrating from mid-waters to the epipelagic zone at night, (3) copepods abundant in the epipelagic layer but performing reverse migration, (4) the strong migrants moving from the meso- and bathypelagic zones to the epipelagic zone at night, and (5) those just moving into the twilight zone. Our findings highlight the complexity of the diel vertical migration pattern of copepods during spring and their relevant role in the deep-sea of the North Atlantic Ocean.

Keywords: Zooplankton, Copepod community, diel vertical migration, Latitudinal variability, mesopelagic, bathypelagic, North Atlantic Ocean

Received: 04 Jun 2025; Accepted: 22 Oct 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Fernández de Puelles, Gaza, Cabanellas-Reboredo and Hernández-León. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Mª Luz Fernández de Puelles, mluz.fernandez@ieo.csic.es

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.