Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Pollution

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1654808

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Marine Environmental Protection: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives Volume IIView all 34 articles

Forcible measures for maritime law enforcement by the Coast Guard

Provisionally accepted
  • 1Gansu University of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou, China
  • 2China University of Political Science and Law, Changping District, China
  • 3Beijing Yihe Law Firm, Beijing, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The particularity of the maritime law enforcement environment and the complexity of the content of forcible measures determine the importance of the standardized application of forcible measures for maritime law enforcement by the coast guard. Maritime forcible measures mainly include administrative forcible measures, criminal forcible measures, and the use of force. The timely and reasonable application of forcible measures by the coast guard in specific maritime law enforcement can achieve the purposes of protecting maritime security, safeguarding maritime rights and order, and guarantee-ing procedures and human rights. It is of great significance in effectively strengthening the effectiveness of maritime law enforcement. Forcible measures must be based on the requirements of restraint of law enforcement powers, temporary measures, and a last resort in law enforcement. When imposing forcible measures, it is essential to clearly define the purposes and boundaries for the coast guard to employ such measures, adhere to the principles of due process, proportionality, freedom of navigation, and reasonable prudence, and enhance the development of law enforcement capabilities and continuously improve the effectiveness and professionalism of law enforcement practices.

Keywords: Coast guard, Law Enforcement, forcible measures, requirements, principles

Received: 27 Jun 2025; Accepted: 25 Aug 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Jinhu, Yichao and Xin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Wei Yichao, China University of Political Science and Law, Changping District, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.