Abstract
Microplastic (MP) pollution has emerged as a pervasive environmental threat, with growing evidence of its accumulation across various marine trophic levels, including top predators such as cetaceans. This study investigates MP abundance, size distribution, morphology, color, and polymer composition in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of three cetacean species sampled from the southeastern Black Sea. A total of seven individuals were examined, with MP abundances ranging from 5 to 139 particles per individual. Fiber-type MPs were predominant (75%), with black, green, and transparent colors being the most frequently observed. The majority of MPs were small in size, with an average length of 2002 ± 1961 µm, suggesting possible trophic transfer from lower-level organisms such as copepods and fish. Polymer analysis revealed polyamide (PA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) as the most common polymer types, indicating both fishing gear and domestic wastewater as primary MP sources. Spatial patterns in stomach fullness and MP load suggest that local environmental conditions, such as fishing activity and tourism, influence exposure levels. The study highlights the significance of both incidental ingestion during feeding—especially through net interactions—and trophic transfer as key MP exposure pathways in cetaceans. These findings demonstrate the potential ecological risks posed by MPs at higher trophic levels and emphasize the urgent need for biodegradable alternatives to synthetic fishing gear and improved wastewater management. Moreover, collaborative efforts among local authorities and NGOs are recommended to raise awareness and support adaptive environmental management in the region.
1 Introduction
Microplastics (MPs) are contaminants smaller than 5 mm that originate from the fragmentation of plastic waste—an anthropogenic pollutant—via various driving forces (). Macro-sized plastics undergo degradation through a combination of environmental factors such as wind, sunlight, precipitation, and water currents (). Particularly through surface runoff (e.g., river and rainwater), MPs are transported to their final destinations—marine and oceanic ecosystems (Thompson, 2015). The vectoral migration of MPs is unpredictable and inevitable, and both their lethal and sublethal effects on aquatic organisms have been previously discussed (Rakib et al., 2023). MPs not only exert direct impacts on aquatic life but also induce indirect ecological consequences by altering the structure of the food web (; ). MPs ingested by organisms at lower trophic levels enter the food chain and are subsequently consumed by organisms at higher trophic levels (; ; ; ).
The effects of plastics on aquatic organisms may manifest through physical interactions such as entanglement resulting from ghost fishing (), strangulation (), and ingestion (). Ingestion of MPs by aquatic species can cause inflammatory responses and blockages in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), potentially resulting in a false sense of satiety (). Furthermore, the ingestion of MPs also leads to chemical impacts on aquatic life (). Due to their diverse polymeric structures and the presence of plasticizers (e.g., bisphenols), MPs ultimately cause secondary toxicity in aquatic organisms (Rochman et al., 2013; ; , , , ; ).
Cetaceans play a crucial role in the functioning and structural balance of marine ecosystems and are considered key indicators reflecting the overall health of these systems (). In this context, the presence of MPs in the stomach, intestines, and feces of cetaceans has been previously reviewed (Zantis et al., 2021). The European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) proposes marine mammals as biological indicators for both marine plastic debris and other organic pollutants (; ). However, direct or indirect evidence of MP ingestion by cetaceans remains limited and is largely confined to European regions (; ; van Franeker et al., 2018). Due to their wide geographic distribution and presence across diverse habitats, cetaceans are valuable sentinel species for monitoring MP pollution. Given the rising levels of MP contamination globally, there is a critical need for more baseline data on MP ingestion by marine mammals and other species in non-European regions (Xiong et al., 2018). Therefore, comprehensive research conducted in these areas will significantly enhance our understanding of the impacts of MPs on marine wildlife.
Due to its nature as a semi-enclosed sea, the southeastern Black Sea is particularly vulnerable to MP pollution, which holds significant environmental implications for both ecosystems and aquatic organisms (). The geographic characteristics of the region provide critical breeding and feeding grounds for fish and cetaceans (). However, numerous rivers from Europe discharge into the Black Sea, making surface water runoff one of the primary pathways for MP transport. For instance, the Danube River delivers tons of plastic waste into the Black Sea on a daily basis (), thereby exposing the Eastern Black Sea—an essential region for aquaculture and fisheries—to anthropogenic threats (). In one study, a total of 594 MPs were observed in river sediments flowing into the Black Sea along a 350 km Southeastern Black Sea coast (). Another study calculated the annual microplastic input from 29 rivers draining into the Black Sea to be approximately 1.49×1011 particles, with significantly higher MP concentrations identified, particularly in the eastern rivers (Terzi et al., 2025). In order to more comprehensively demonstrate the extent of microplastic (MP) pollution in the region, several studies conducted in recent years have reported significant MP accumulation in different environmental media along the Southeastern Black Sea coast. For example, microplastic concentrations of 77 ± 11 MP m-3 were detected in surface waters, 189 ± 108 MP m-3 in water column samples, and 24 ± 30 MP kg-1 in sediments (). Furthermore, an average accumulation of 108 MP kg-1 was detected in sediment samples from the region, demonstrating that this pollution has increased significantly over the years (). There is also evidence supporting regional microplastic pressure at the biological level; microplastic accumulations have been reported in the stomach contents of red mullet () and seahorses (). These findings indicate that the Southeastern Black Sea is a significant focus of microplastic pollution and make it even more important to investigate this pollution in higher-trophic species living in the region.
Within the Black Sea ecosystem, only three cetacean species—the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), and the common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)—occupy the apex of the trophic pyramid as the top predators (). These species exhibit similar feeding behaviors, being exclusively piscivorous. The cetacean population in the Black Sea had been in a continuous state of decline until direct whaling was banned in neighboring countries such as the former USSR, Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey (Özsandıkçı and Özdemir, 2024). Historical data suggest that while direct hunting was once the primary cause of cetacean mortality, current deaths predominantly occur due to by-catch, specifically through entanglement in fishing nets (Tonay, 2016; Popov et al., 2023). Although measures such as the prohibition of cetacean hunting have been implemented, these marine mammals continue to face anthropogenic contamination, including MP pollution. As a result, they serve not only as potential vectors for MPs but also suffer from the associated toxicological impacts.
According to IUCN sources, the Black Sea subspecies of cetaceans are classified at varying levels of conservation concern: the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) is listed as Vulnerable (), whereas the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) are categorized as Endangered (; ). Although the global populations of these species are generally listed as Least Concern, their Black Sea subspecies are under specific protection due to regional threats. Consequently, potential anthropogenic pollutants in the Black Sea pose a serious risk to the health of these cetaceans, as they do to all aquatic organisms. While MP pollution in the southeastern Black Sea has been investigated in prior studies (; ; ; , ), its impact on cetaceans remains underexplored. The impacts of MP pollution in the Southeastern Black Sea on ecologically critical cetaceans, which occupy the uppermost levels of the food chain, have been largely overlooked. Given the ecological importance of cetaceans as top predators and their vulnerability to plastic pollution, this study aims to address this critical gap by assessing the presence, characteristics, and possible sources of MPs in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of three cetacean species inhabiting the southeastern Black Sea. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate MP ingestion in marine mammals from this region, providing novel insights into regional MP pollution pathways and potential trophic transfer mechanisms.
2 Material and method
2.1 Study area and sampling
Cetaceans were collected from the southeastern Black Sea during the 2024 and 2025 period. The sampling area is fed by numerous rivers originating from Türkiye (). Additionally, the coastal region is characterized by industrial, touristic, agricultural, and urban activities (Figure 1). Therefore, the sampling area has a potential risk of exposure to both point and diffuse sources of pollution (). In the present study, a total of seven cetaceans belonging to three different species were examined (Table 1). These species were Tursiops truncatus (D1 and D3), Phocoena phocoena (D2, D4, and D6), and Delphinus delphis (D5 and D7). The individuals were obtained as fisheries by-catch (dead) after becoming entangled in commercial gillnets. The body lengths of the cetaceans were measured using a measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision, while body weights were recorded using a digital electronic scale with 20 g sensitivity. Samples were kept on ice during transportation to the laboratory and subsequently stored at −20°C until dissection.
Figure 1
Table 1
| Code | Species | Date | Length (cm) | Weigth (kg) | CF (g cm-3) | Gender |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| D1 | Tursiops truncatus | 24.03.2024 | 154 | 63.3 | 1.73 | Female |
| D2 | Phocoena phocoena | 25.03.2024 | 130 | 35.4 | 1.61 | Female |
| D3 | Tursiops truncatus | 29.02.2024 | 162 | 74.0 | 1.74 | Male |
| D4 | Phocoena phocoena | 10.03.2025 | 68 | 10.0 | 3.18 | Female |
| D5 | Delphinus delphis | 10.03.2025 | 85 | 12.9 | 2.10 | Female |
| D6 | Phocoena phocoena | 10.03.2025 | 130 | 34.0 | 1.55 | Female |
| D7 | Delphinus delphis | 10.03.2025 | 160 | 63.6 | 1.55 | Male |
The characteristic properties of cetaceans in the current study.
2.2 MP extraction procedure
The gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of cetaceans were carefully weighed and transferred into glass containers. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 10% v/v) was added at a ratio of 1:3 (w/v) relative to the GIT weight to ensure efficient tissue digestion. The mixture was incubated at 60 ± 5°C for 6 hours and subsequently allowed to rest overnight at room temperature to complete the digestion process. On the following day, the digested GIT contents were filtered using a vacuum filtration system equipped with a fiberglass filter (1.6 µm pore size, GF/A Whatman). The filtration procedure was finalized with successive rinses of ultrapure water. The processed samples were then transferred to glass petri dishes and stored for further microscopic examination under a stereomicroscope (Schirinzi et al., 2020). For analytical evaluation purposes, microplastics were divided into five size classes:<0.2mm, 0.2–1mm, 1–2mm, 2–5mm and >5mm.
2.3 Polymer identification
Following the filtration process, the retained materials on the filters were examined under a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ1000). Suspected plastic particles were photographed using a high-resolution camera (Nikon DSFI1) mounted on the microscope and subsequently archived. Each plastic-like particle was documented according to its color, morphological features, and size. To determine the polymer composition, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 instrument. Analyses were conducted in Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) mode, and only spectra with a match quality above 70% were considered reliable for polymer identification. The instrument’s detection limit was set at >100 µm. Spectral data were collected within the range of 4000–650 cm-¹, using 18 scan repetitions at a resolution of 1 cm-¹. Polymer types were identified through comparison with the reference spectra provided in the Perkin Elmer SEARCH Plus® library and FTIR spectrums were presented in Supplementary Material 1.
2.4 QA/QC
Given the high risk of external contamination in MP research, all laboratory procedures were conducted with utmost care and precision. In alignment with established protocols, laboratory access was strictly limited, and personnel wore cotton laboratory coats to minimize fiber shedding. Throughout the processes of filtration, storage, and microscopic examination, only glassware (e.g., vials, flasks, beakers) and metal tools (e.g., tweezers, scissors) were employed to avoid plastic contamination. Prior to use, all equipment was thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure water. Experimental procedures were carried out under a high-efficiency laminar flow cabinet to maintain a clean working environment. Sample containers, including beakers and petri dishes, were consistently covered with aluminum foil to prevent airborne contamination. During stereomicroscopic analysis, petri dishes were handled inside a fume hood to further reduce contamination risks. To assess background contamination, a single blank sample containing 10% KOH and 20% HNO3 was processed under identical conditions. No microplastic particles were observed in the procedural blank sample, indicating no airborne contamination occurred during the sample preparation and analysis process.
2.5 Data analyses
All data were shown in mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogrov-Smirnov test was used to assess normal distribution. In general, data sets showed normal distribution. Therefore, all statistical analyses were performed with parametric tests. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to determine significant differences in MP sizes between groups. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data sets were analyzed by the SPSS 25 software package for Windows.
Condition factor (CF) of the samples was calculated by following equation ().
Where CF, W, TL, and b represent condition factor, fish weight, total length, and growth constant of fish (b=3), respectively.
3 Results
3.1 MP abundance in dolphins
Figure 2 illustrates the GIT weights and the number of MPs detected within the GIT contents of seven different cetacean individuals. The highest MP abundance was recorded in individual D2, with 139 MPs. In contrast, the lowest MP abundance was observed in individual D5, with only 5 MPs. The GIT weights showed a similar trend to the MP abundances, ranging from 38 g to 324 g.
Figure 2
3.2 Size groups of MPs
Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of MP sizes and the proportional composition of MP size groups in individual cetaceans. No statistically significant difference was observed in MP sizes among the cetaceans (p>0.05; η² = 0.031). Overall, MPs exhibited a wide range of variation, with an average size of 2002 ± 1961 µm across all individuals. Although the largest MP size group (>5 mm) was most prominent in individual D7, the presence of a greater number of smaller-sized MPs contributed to a balanced overall MP size profile. Conversely, individual D5, which had a relatively lower proportion of >5 mm particles, showed a comparatively larger MP size distribution due to a high percentage of MPs in the 2–5 mm size group.
Figure 3
3.3 MP classification
The chord diagram displays the relationships between MP categories (fiber, fragment) and colors (e.g., black, blue, transparent, red, green, etc.) with individual cetaceans (Figure 4). The most prevalent MP type was fiber (75%), while fragments accounted for 25% of total MPs. Among colors, black, transparent, and green were frequently observed. A large proportion of MPs found in individual D6 were transparent and classified as fragments. In contrast, individuals D1 and D2, which exhibited the highest MP abundances, predominantly contained black and green-colored fibers, respectively. In individual D3, MPs were evenly distributed between fibers and fragments, each comprising approximately half of the total MP count.
Figure 4
In the Figure 5, the Sankey diagram illustrates the relative proportions of eight identified polymer types: polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyamide (PA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), and polyacrylonitrile (PAN). PA, EVA and PAN were the most frequently detected polymers, with D6 showing the highest PAN proportion (67%), while D1 and D2 showed a more balanced distribution across multiple polymer types. In addition, PA was the most abundant polymer species observed in the present study.
Figure 5
4 Discussion
The southeastern Black Sea has become a hotspot for MPs due to the currents generated by numerous rivers flowing from northern Türkiye (, ). Several studies conducted in this region have demonstrated the presence of ingested MPs in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of various aquatic organisms (, ; ; ; , ). However, while most existing studies have focused on fish species, research on marine mammals in the region remains quite limited (Zantis et al., 2021). Therefore, the present study aims to fill this gap by investigating MP ingestion potential in three different cetacean species. While the detection of microplastics in all individuals provides important information about pollution trends, the limited sample size (n=7) reduces the power of statistical analyses in the current study. This is due to the ethical and logistical challenges encountered in accessing cetacean individuals that have washed up on shore or were obtained as bycatch from fisheries. Additionally, the limited sample size (n = 7) reduces statistical power and limits the generalizability of the results; therefore, the apparent relationship between GIT weight and MP abundance should be considered descriptive rather than inferential. No clear relationship was observed between body weight and stomach fullness among the cetacean individuals examined. For instance, although cetaceans D1 and D3 belong to the same species and exhibit similar body weights, D1 had a full stomach, whereas D3’s stomach was nearly empty. This finding is consistent with previous research indicating no correlation between cetacean body length and MP content in the stomach (). Cetaceans with empty stomachs generally exhibited lower MP abundance. The two cetaceans with the highest stomach fullness were sampled from closely located sites, and their MP ingestion trends mirrored their stomach content levels. However, rather than an active tendency to ingest MPs, this is likely a result of incidental ingestion during feeding activities (). The low MP abundance observed in empty stomachs may be attributed to the ability of fish, as prey items, to excrete ingested MPs and nanoplastics (NPs) via feces (). Alternatively, the absence of MPs in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may be due to their translocation across the intestinal epithelial membrane into other fish tissues (). In the present study, the primary factor influencing stomach fullness in cetaceans was found to be their geographic location. The region with the highest stomach fullness—Derepazarı, where cetaceans D1 and D2 were sampled—is characterized by relatively low fishing activity, which may allow prey species to utilize the area as a refuge and feeding ground. Consequently, cetaceans are likely to exploit the potentially high fish abundance in this area. The elevated stomach fullness in these individuals suggests a possible relationship between MP ingestion and location. In fact, the site where the highest number of MPs were observed in the GITs of two different cetacean species (Station 10) had previously been studied and reported to exhibit high MP abundance in water samples (Terzi et al., 2025). This elevated MP abundance is likely associated with short-term tourism pressure in the region. Nearby beaches such as Sarayköy and adjacent sandy shores support recreational activities like swimming and sunbathing, thereby contributing to increased anthropogenic pollution. Prior studies conducted on similar sandy shores in the vicinity have also highlighted elevated MP concentrations, particularly at the end of the tourist season (). Microplastic abundance increased from 21.4 ± 13.95 items/kg before the tourism season to 28.85 ± 31.97 items/kg after the season, based on 270 sediment samples collected from Sarayköy and nearby beaches. Statistical analysis confirmed that this increase was significantly influenced by time, beach cleaning frequency, and proximity to city centers (GLMM, time × cleaning frequency × proximity, z = 6.596, p < 0.001). Furthermore, seasonal population increases likely raise airborne MP concentrations, which in turn may exert additional pressure on the riverine systems discharging into the area (). Therefore, this spatial variability in microplastic abundance may be further shaped by the hydrodynamic inputs of rivers emptying into the Southeastern Black Sea. Previous studies have shown that these rivers, particularly those flowing through areas with high population and industrial density, are major persistent sources of MP pollution in the region (; Terzi et al., 2025). Cetaceans that feed in near-coastal waters and exhibit opportunistic feeding behavior are top-level predators most likely to encounter MPs originating from these rivers. Therefore, variation in MP abundance observed among individuals may depend not only on biological factors but also on proximity to active MP discharge zones. Earlier studies investigating MP abundance in cetacean GITs across different locations consistently reported the presence of at least one MP particle in each individual (Xiong et al., 2018; ). Many studies have reported MP ingestion rates of nearly 100% in cetacean species from different regions (Zantis et al., 2021). Species studied include Phocoena phocoena, Delphinus delphis, Stenella coeruleoalba, and Tursiops truncatus. In our study, the presence of MP in all three cetacean species sampled in the Southeastern Black Sea corresponds to the highest detection range compared to global data and highlights the serious MP pollution in the region. Even before the attention to MP pollution, it was well established that large plastic debris negatively affected cetaceans either through ingestion or entanglement, often as a result of ghost fishing (). Although large debris and MPs may not pose the same mechanical risks, fragmentation driven by various environmental forces increases the risk of contaminant transfer. For instance, MPs can serve as vectors for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals, which may be indirectly ingested by dolphins. Some studies have identified a correlation between MP abundance and the concentration of phthalate esters in fin whales (, ; ).
MPs have been shown to be generally similar in size to the prey and forage organisms consumed by aquatic species (). However, direct ingestion of MPs as food items by cetaceans is considered unlikely due to their small particle size (). Therefore, MP ingestion by cetaceans is most plausibly the result of accidental intake (Xiong et al., 2018) or trophic transfer through prey species (). The trophic transfer of MPs has previously been investigated and confirmed in predator-prey relationships, such as between grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) (). A similar mechanism has been suggested for cetaceans, with evidence from a study conducted in Northeast Asia showing that MPs can be transferred to cetaceans via the ingestion of contaminated prey fish (). In the Southeastern Black Sea, the predominant prey species in the feeding regime of dolphins (especially Delphinus delphis) is anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus). Studies on this species have confirmed the ingestion of microplastics by anchovies, suggesting that microplastics can be passed to top-level predators through trophic transfer (). In addition to anchovies, microplastics have also been detected in other benthopelagic cetacean diets, such as red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) (; ). These species-specific findings strongly support the possibility that dolphins in the region are exposed to microplastics through contaminated prey species.
In general, the size of MPs found in the GITs of aquatic organisms is associated with the size of the organism’s mouth opening. However, this phenomenon is less applicable to cetaceans, as MP ingestion in these species is largely attributed to accidental intake or trophic transfer. This mechanism also explains the presence of small-sized MPs observed in the present study. Considering a potential indirect trophic transfer pathway starting with copepods, the detection of small MPs becomes predictable (). In addition to trophic transfer, incidental ingestion of microplastics through water filtration or during feeding has been increasingly recognized as a plausible exposure route for cetaceans. Cetaceans, particularly those feeding in nearshore areas similar to our study, may unintentionally ingest MPs suspended in the water column or associated with prey movement (Zhu et al., 2019). The presence of MPs in individuals with low stomach content further supports the possibility of non-dietary, passive exposure. Including this exposure route provides a more comprehensive understanding of MP accumulation mechanisms in marine mammals and highlights the ecological complexity of pollution pathways. Moreover, MPs have been shown to be generally similar in size to the prey and forage organisms consumed by aquatic species (). Therefore, the observation of relatively larger MPs in the present study, compared to those reported in fish-based studies, may be explained by differences in prey size and feeding strategies specific to cetaceans.
Due to methodological limitations, it is not possible to precisely determine the specific sources of individual MPs. Therefore, characteristics such as color, type, and polymer composition of MPs can offer insight into their potential origins. In the present study, the proportion of fiber-type MPs was significantly higher than that of fragments. The most frequently observed colors were green, black, and transparent, with the majority of fragment MPs being transparent. Among aquatic organisms, ingestion of MPs based on color has been documented as a behavioral response (). However, since MPs are considerably smaller than typical prey items for cetaceans, the observed color trends are more likely explained by trophic transfer mechanisms. In this context, the transparent exoskeletons of certain crustaceans may lead to smaller organisms ingesting transparent MPs under the assumption they are prey (). Furthermore, preference-based MP ingestion studies have reported that fish tend to favor transparent MPs (). Another study demonstrated that, in the absence of food, fish ingested black-colored MPs, revealing a strong association between MP ingestion and color (). The predominance of black and transparent MPs in grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) scat also aligns with the findings of the current study (). Regarding the relationship between incidental MP ingestion and MP color, it is important to consider that cetaceans in the southeastern Black Sea feed on a variety of fish species throughout the year. In addition, they have been known to attack fishing nets as an opportunistic feeding behavior (; ). Since the cetaceans in this study were sampled outside of the official fishing season in Türkiye, it is likely that they attempted to feed by attacking set gillnets. Indeed, there have been previous reports of cetaceans becoming entangled in turbot gillnets in the southeastern Black Sea (). These gillnets, typically used outside the regular fishing season, are often green in color to enhance fishing efficiency (Steinberg and Bohl, 1985). Furthermore, trawl codends are known to be constructed from highly durable green-colored materials. Therefore, we suggest that the high abundance of green-colored MPs observed in the present study may be linked to the incidental ingestion of plastic fibers resulting from cetaceans’ interactions with such fishing gear.
Among the identified polymer types, PA was the most frequently observed. The high occurrence of PA in cetacean samples may be attributed to its extensive use as a primary polymer in fishing nets, thereby contributing to incidental MP ingestion (). Nylon (PA) polymers are commonly utilized in gillnets due to their high durability, which makes them persistent in marine environments and a potential source of both ghost fishing and MP pollution (Standal et al., 2020). Another frequently detected polymer was PAN, which is mainly found in acrylic textiles and is introduced into aquatic environments via domestic wastewater, laundry effluents, and textile fibers (; ; Plastic Europe, 2021). In the current study area, domestic wastewater is discharged into the sea through deep-sea outfall systems (). Consequently, MPs originating from domestic sources—particularly laundry effluents—may enter lower trophic level aquatic organisms and be transferred to higher trophic levels through trophic transfer mechanisms. Additionally, EVA is commonly used in packaging materials and auxiliary fishing gear such as buoys and floating devices (Silva and Masini, 2023). The presence of EVA in the samples reflects the extent of anthropogenic pollution in the region.
5 Conclusion
Although various studies have previously investigated MPs in the southeastern Black Sea, findings on MP abundance in cetaceans emphasize that these particles can be transferred not only through direct ingestion but also via trophic pathways. A critical consideration emerging from this study is the incidental ingestion of MPs by cetaceans during feeding activities, particularly when attacking fishing nets. The prolonged persistence of gillnets in the marine environment may serve as a significant contributor to MP abundance affecting aquatic organisms. Therefore, exploring the use of biodegradable materials could offer protection not only to lower trophic level marine species but also to top predators such as cetaceans. In addition, polymer composition analysis suggests that another major source of MPs in the region may be domestic wastewater discharged via deep-sea outfall systems. Future research should focus on the environmental distribution and ecological impacts of MPs in this biodiversity-rich region. In this context, awareness campaigns led by local governments and non-governmental organizations are essential to combat plastic pollution. Immediate measures must be implemented to safeguard aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity within the watershed, along with promoting adaptive management strategies to ensure long-term ecosystem and human health protection.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
Ethical approval was not required for the study involving animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because Because already dead cetacean (by-catch) were used. No need to take ethical approval for this study.
Author contributions
HO: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. AE: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. MM: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization. ME: Resources, Writing – review & editing. YC: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. TA: Resources, Writing – review & editing. BK: Writing – review & editing. GD: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study has been supported by the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation (Grant number: 02025007021615).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1657648/full#supplementary-material
References
1
AdegbolaT. A.AgboolaO.FayomiO. S. I. (2020). Review of polyacrylonitrile blends and application in manufacturing technology: recycling and environmental impact. Results Eng.7, 100144. doi: 10.1016/J.RINENG.2020.100144
2
AkkanT.GedikK.MutluT. (2023). Protracted dynamicity of microplastics in the coastal sediment of the Southeast Black Sea. Mar. pollut. Bull.188, 114722. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114722
3
AlexiadouP.FoskolosI.FrantzisA. (2019). Ingestion of macroplastics by odontocetes of the Greek Seas, Eastern Mediterranean: Often deadly! Mar. pollut. Bull.146, 67–75. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2019.05.055
4
AlkanA.SerdarS.FidanD.AkbaşU.ZenginB.KılıçM. B. (2022). Spatial, temporal, and vertical variability of nutrients in the Southeastern Black Sea. Chemosphere302, 134809. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.134809
5
AlkanN.AlkanA.SalihB.YilmazC.ÜçüncüO. (2025). Environmental distributions of phthalates in sediments affected by municipal wastewater in the South-eastern Black Sea. Chemosphere377, 144364. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2025.144364
6
AytanU.EsensoyF. B.SenturkY. (2022). Microplastic ingestion and egestion by copepods in the Black Sea. Sci. Total Environ.806, 150921. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150921
7
AytanU.EsensoyF. B.SenturkY.ArifoğluE.KaraoğluK.CeylanY.et al. (2021). Plastic occurrence in commercial fish species of the black sea. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.22, 20504. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS20504
8
AytanÜ.KocaY. Ş.PasliS.GüvenO.CeylanY.BasaranB. (2025). Microplastics in commercial fish and their habitats in the important fishing ground of the Black Sea: Characteristic, concentration, and risk assessment. Mar. pollut. Bull.221, 118434. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2025.118434
9
BainiM.MartelliniT.CincinelliA.CampaniT.MinutoliR.PantiC.et al. (2017). First detection of seven phthalate esters (PAEs) as plastic tracers in superficial neustonic/planktonic samples and cetacean blubber. Anal. Methods9, 1512–1520. doi: 10.1039/c6ay02674e
10
Balıkİ. (2016). Dolphins inhabiting in black sea and effects of fisheries. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem.2, 185–185. doi: 10.15671/hjbc.20164418127
11
BarbozaL. G. A.LopesC.OliveiraP.BessaF.OteroV.HenriquesB.et al. (2020). Microplastics in wild fish from North East Atlantic Ocean and its potential for causing neurotoxic effects, lipid oxidative damage, and human health risks associated with ingestion exposure. Sci. Total Environ.717, 134625. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.134625
12
BaulchS.PerryC. (2014). Evaluating the impacts of marine debris on cetaceans. Mar. pollut. Bull.80, 210–221. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2013.12.050
13
BesselingE.FoekemaE. M.Van FranekerJ. A.LeopoldM. F.KühnS.Bravo RebolledoE. L.et al. (2015). Microplastic in a macro filter feeder: Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Mar. pollut. Bull.95, 248–252. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2015.04.007
14
BhatR. A. H.SidiqM. J.AltinokI. (2024). Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on fish health and reproduction. Aquaculture590, 741037. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2024.741037
15
BilginS.OnayH.KöseO.YeşİlçİçekT. (2018). Karadeniz ‘ de Karaya Vuran ve Kazara Yakalanan Yunuslar ( Cetacea ) Hakkında : Ölüm Nedenleri, Beslenme Özellikleri ve Gebelik Durumu About Stranding and Accidentally Caught Cetaceans in the Black Sea : Death Reasons, Feeding Characteristics and Pregna. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci.5, 447–454. doi: 10.30910/turkjans.471239
16
BirkunA. J. (2008). Delphinus delphis ssp. ponticus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T133729A3875256. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T133729A3875256.en
17
BirkunA. (2012). Tursiops truncatus ssp. ponticus. IUCN Red List Threatened Species, 2012, e.T133714A17771698. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS.T133714A17771698.en
18
BirkunA. J.CañadasA.DonovanG.HolcerD.LaurianoG.NotarbartoloG.et al. (2006). “Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area,” in Conservation Plan for Black Sea Cetaceans (ACCOBAMS), 50.
19
BirkunJ. A. A.FrantzisA. (2008). Phocoena phocoena ssp. relicta. IUCN Red List Threatened Species. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T17030A6737111.en
20
BrowneM. A.DissanayakeA.GallowayT. S.LoweD. M.ThompsonR. C. (2008). Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environ. Sci. Technol.42, 5026–5031. doi: 10.1021/ES800249A/SUPPL_FILE/ES800249A-FILE002.PDF
21
CerbuleK.LarsenR. B.VollstadJ.AlvestadA. H. (2025). Comparison of fishing performance of biodegradable and nylon gillnets with different twine diameter. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci.87, 104247. doi: 10.1016/J.RSMA.2025.104247
22
DavidsonK.DudasS. E. (2016). Microplastic ingestion by wild and cultured manila clams (Venerupis philippinarum) from baynes sound, british Columbia. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.71, 147–156. doi: 10.1007/S00244-016-0286-4/FIGURES/3
23
DerraikJ. G. B. (2002). The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar. pollut. Bull.44, 842–852. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5
24
DilerÖ.ÖzilÖ.Naneİ.D.NazıroğluM.MinazM.AslankoçR.et al. (2022). The effects of bisphenol A on oxidative stress, antioxidant defence, histopathological alterations and lysozyme activity in narrow-clawed crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.22. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS19877
25
Domínguez-LópezM.BellasJ.Sánchez-RuilobaL.PlanasM.Hernández-UrceraJ. (2022). First evidence of ingestion and retention of microplastics in seahorses (Hippocampus reidi) using copepods (Acartia tonsa) as transfer vectors. Sci. Total Environ.818, 151688. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151688
26
Eerkes-MedranoD.ThompsonR. C.AldridgeD. C. (2015). Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res.75, 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.012
27
EryaşarA. R.GedikK.MutluT. (2022). Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish species from the southern Black Sea coast. Mar. pollut. Bull.177, 113535. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2022.113535
28
EryaşarA. R.GedikK.ŞahinA.ÖztürkR. Ç.YılmazF. (2021). Characteristics and temporal trends of microplastics in the coastal area in the Southern Black Sea over the past decade. Mar. pollut. Bull.173, 112993. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2021.112993
29
FAO. (2022). Fisheries and Aquaculture Division (Mediterr. BLACK SEA (Major Fish. Area 37): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Available online at: https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/Area37/en (Accessed August 21, 2025).
30
FossiM. C.CoppolaD.BainiM.GiannettiM.GuerrantiC.MarsiliL.et al. (2014). Large filter feeding marine organisms as indicators of microplastic in the pelagic environment: The case studies of the Mediterranean basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus). Mar. Environ. Res.100, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/J.MARENVRES.2014.02.002
31
FossiM. C.MarsiliL.BainiM.GiannettiM.CoppolaD.GuerrantiC.et al. (2016). Fin whales and microplastics: The Mediterranean Sea and the Sea of Cortez scenarios. Environ. pollut.209, 68–78. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.11.022
32
FultonT. W. (1904). The rate of growth of fishes. Available online at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570291225855291904 (Accessed July 06, 2022).
33
GalganiF.ClaroF.DepledgeM.FossiC. (2014). Monitoring the impact of litter in large vertebrates in the Mediterranean Sea within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD): Constraints, specificities and recommendations. Mar. Environ. Res.100, 3–9. doi: 10.1016/J.MARENVRES.2014.02.003
34
GalganiF.HankeG.MaesT. (2015). Global distribution, composition and abundance of marine litter. Mar. Anthropog. Litter100, 29–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_2/TABLES/3
35
GedikK.EryaşarA. R.EmanetM.ŞahinC.CeylanY. (2023). Monthly microplastics change in European anchovy’s (Engraulis encrasicolus) gastrointestinal tract in the Black Sea. Mar. pollut. Bull.194, 115303. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2023.115303
36
GedikK.GozlerA. M. (2022). Hallmarking microplastics of sediments and Chamelea gallina inhabiting Southwestern Black Sea: A hypothetical look at consumption risks. Mar. pollut. Bull.174, 113252. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2021.113252
37
GriniH.MetallaouiS.González-FernándezD.BensouilahM. (2022). First evidence of plastic pollution in beach sediments of the Skikda coast (northeast of Algeria). Mar. pollut. Bull.181, 113831. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2022.113831
38
GülM. R. (2023). Short-term tourism alters abundance, size, and composition of microplastics on sandy beaches. Environ. pollut.316, 120561. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2022.120561
39
HajisamaeS.SoeK. K.PraditS.ChaiyvareesajjaJ.FazrulH. (2022). Feeding habits and microplastic ingestion of short mackerel, Rastrelliger brachysoma, in a tropical estuarine environment. Environ. Biol. Fishes105, 289–302. doi: 10.1007/S10641-022-01221-Z/TABLES/5
40
HartL. B.DziobakM.WellsR. S.ErtelB.WeinsteinJ. (2022). Microplastics in gastric samples from common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) residing in Sarasota Bay FL (USA). Front. Mar. Sci.9. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.947124
41
Hernandez-GonzalezA.SaavedraC.GagoJ.CoveloP.SantosM. B.PierceG. J. (2018). Microplastics in the stomach contents of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) stranded on the Galician coasts (NW Spain 2005–2010). Mar. pollut. Bull.137, 526–532. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2018.10.026
42
JabeenK.SuL.LiJ.YangD.TongC.MuJ.et al. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environ. pollut.221, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.11.055
43
JepsonP. D.DeavilleR.BarberJ. L.AguilarÀ.BorrellA.MurphyS.et al. (2016). PCB pollution continues to impact populations of orcas and other dolphins in European waters. Sci. Rep.6, 1–17. doi: 10.1038/SREP18573
44
JinhuiS.SudongX.YanN.XiaP.JiahaoQ.YongjianX. (2019). Effects of microplastics and attached heavy metals on growth, immunity, and heavy metal accumulation in the yellow seahorse, Hippocampus kuda Bleeker. Mar. pollut. Bull.149, 110510. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2019.110510
45
KabaM. O.MinazM.KayaC.JouyT.KurtulI.AytanÜ. (2025). Silent invaders of freshwater ecosystems: Unveiling the microplastic crisis threatening the world’s largest soda lake (Lake Van, Türkiye). J. Great Lakes Res.51, 102604. doi: 10.1016/J.JGLR.2025.102604
46
KayaC.MinazM.Şentürk KocaY.Oral KabaM.KurtulI.AytanÜ.. (2025). Monitoring microplastics in a region with sensitive fish biodiversity: Tigris, Euphrates and Van Lake drainages in Irano-Anatolian hotspot. Environ. Sci. Eur.37, 102. doi: 10.1186/s12302-025-01125-6
47
KernchenS.LöderM. G. J.FischerF.FischerD.MosesS. R.GeorgiC.et al. (2022). Airborne microplastic concentrations and deposition across the Weser River catchment. Sci. Total Environ.818, 151812. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151812
48
KhayyamH.JazarR. N.NunnaS.GolkarnarenjiG.BadiiK.FakhrhoseiniS. M.et al. (2020). PAN precursor fabrication, applications and thermal stabilization process in carbon fiber production: Experimental and mathematical modelling. Prog. Mater. Sci.107, 100575. doi: 10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2019.100575
49
KlangnurakW.ChunniyomS. (2020). Screening for microplastics in marine fish of Thailand: the accumulation of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of different foraging preferences. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.27, 27161–27168. doi: 10.1007/S11356-020-09147-8/FIGURES/5
50
KrausS. D. (2018). Entanglement of whales in fishing gear. Encycl. Mar. Mammals Third Ed.336. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804327-1.00120-5
51
LechnerA.KeckeisH.Lumesberger-LoislF.ZensB.KruschR.TritthartM.et al. (2014). The Danube so colourful: A potpourri of plastic litter outnumbers fish larvae in Europe’s second largest river. Environ. pollut.188, 177–181. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2014.02.006
52
LimontaG.ManciaA.BenkhalquiA.BertolucciC.AbelliL.FossiM. C.et al. (2019). Microplastics induce transcriptional changes, immune response and behavioral alterations in adult zebrafish. Sci. Rep.9, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52292-5
53
LusherA. L.Hernandez-MilianG.BerrowS.RoganE.O’ConnorI. (2018). Incidence of marine debris in cetaceans stranded and bycaught in Ireland: Recent findings and a review of historical knowledge. Environ. pollut.232, 467–476. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2017.09.070
54
LusherA. L.Hernandez-MilianG.O’BrienJ.BerrowS.O’ConnorI.OfficerR. (2015). Microplastic and macroplastic ingestion by a deep diving, oceanic cetacean: The True’s beaked whale Mesoplodon mirus. Environ. pollut.199, 185–191. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.01.023
55
MinazM.ErA.AkK.Kurtoğluİ.Z.KayışŞ. (2024a). Acute toxicity and histopathologicalAssessment of bisphenol A in danube sturgeon(Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) larvae. Polish J. Environ. Stud.33, 1–6. doi: 10.15244/PJOES/171760
56
MinazM.ErA.AkK.Naneİ.D.İpekZ. Z.AslankoçR. (2023). Bisphenol A used in plastic industry negatively affects wild vimba bream (Vimba vimba). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci.23. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS22598
57
MinazM.ErA.AkK.Naneİ.D.İpekZ. Z.Kurtoğluİ.Z.et al. (2022a). Short-term Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) as a Plastic Precursor: Hematological and Behavioral Effects on Oncorhynchus mykiss and Vimba vimba. Water Air Soil pollut.233, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/S11270-022-05585-X
58
MinazM.ErA.AkK.NaneI. D.IpekZ. Z.YalcınA.et al. (2022b). Investigation of long-term bisphenol A exposure on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Hematological parameters, biochemical indicator, antioxidant activity, and histopathological examination. Chemosphere303, 135136. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.135136
59
MinazM.IpekZ. Z.BayçelebiE.OralM.MutluT.KarsliB.et al. (2024b). Effect of parasitic infection on microplastic ingestion in a native leuciscid hybrid species (Alburnus derjugini x Squalius orientalis) from Kürtün Dam Lake, Türkiye. Chemosphere363, 142978. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2024.142978
60
MinazM.Kurtoğluİ.Z. (2024). Long-term exposure of endangered Danube sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) to bisphenol A (BPA): growth, behavioral, histological, genotoxic, and hematological evaluation. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.31, 30836–30848. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33168-2
61
MitchellE. D. (1975). Porpoise, Dolphin, and Small Whale Fisheries of the World: Status and Problems - Edward D. Mitchell - Google Kitaplar. Available online at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=9C8YAQAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA8&dq=porpoise,+dolphin+and+small+whale&ots=i6LP58vP2s&sig=Y8Ya0lK3zKz71sKmrVSoLztJUTU&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q=porpoise%2Cdolphinandsmallwhale&f=false (Accessed May 19, 2025).
62
MooreS. E. (2008). Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels. J. Mammal.89, 534–540. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-S-312R1.1
63
MutluT.MinazM.BaytaşoğluH.GedikK. (2024a). Microplastic pollution in stream sediments discharging from Türkiye’s eastern Black sea basin. Chemosphere352, 141496. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2024.141496
64
MutluT.MinazM.BaytaşoğluH.GedikK. (2024b). Monitoring of microplastic pollution in sediments along the Çoruh River Basin, NE Türkiye. J. Contam. Hydrol.263, 104334. doi: 10.1016/J.JCONHYD.2024.104334
65
NadalM. A.AlomarC.DeuderoS. (2016). High levels of microplastic ingestion by the semipelagic fish bogue Boops boops (L.) around the Balearic Islands. Environ. pollut.214, 517–523. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.04.054
66
NelmsS. E.GallowayT. S.GodleyB. J.JarvisD. S.LindequeP. K. (2018). Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators. Environ. pollut.238, 999–1007. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.02.016
67
OguzT.AkogluE.SalihogluB. (2012). Current state of overfishing and its regional differences in the Black Sea. Ocean Coast. Manage.58, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2011.12.013
68
OkamotoK.NomuraM.HorieY.OkamuraH. (2022). Color preferences and gastrointestinal-tract retention times of microplastics by freshwater and marine fishes. Environ. pollut.304, 119253. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119253
69
OnayH.KarslıB.MinazM.DalgıçG. (2023a). Seasonal monitoring of microplastic pollution in the Southeast Black Sea: An example of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) gastrointestinal tracts. Mar. pollut. Bull.191, 114886. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2023.114886
70
OnayH.MinazM.AkK.ErA.EmanetM.KarslıB.et al. (2023b). Decade of microplastic alteration in the southeastern black sea: An example of seahorse gastrointestinal tracts. Environ. Res.218, 115001. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.115001
71
OryN. C.GallardoC.LenzM.ThielM. (2018). Capture, swallowing, and egestion of microplastics by a planktivorous juvenile fish. Environ. pollut.240, 566–573. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.04.093
72
ÖzsandıkçıU.ÖzdemirS. (2024). Seasonal abundance estimates of cetaceans in the southern Black Sea (Sinop), Türkiye. Mar. Mammal Sci.40, e13092. doi: 10.1111/MMS.13092
73
Plastic Europe (2021). Plastics - the Facts 2021 - An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. Available online at: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2021/ (Accessed December 01, 2022).
74
PopovD.MeshkovaG.VishnyakovaK.IvanchikovaJ.PaiuM.TimofteC.et al. (2023). Assessment of the bycatch level for the Black Sea harbour porpoise in the light of new data on population abundance. Front. Mar. Sci.10. doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2023.1119983/BIBTEX
75
RakibM. R. J.SarkerA.RamK.UddinM. G.WalkerT. R.ChowdhuryT.et al. (2023). Microplastic toxicity in aquatic organisms and aquatic ecosystems: a review. Water Air Soil pollut.234, 1–28. doi: 10.1007/S11270-023-06062-9
76
RochmanC. M.BrowneM. A.HalpernB. S.HentschelB. T.HohE.KarapanagiotiH. K.et al. (2013). Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nat.494, 169–171. doi: 10.1038/494169a
77
SchirinziG. F.PedàC.BattagliaP.LafaceF.GalliM.BainiM.et al. (2020). A new digestion approach for the extraction of microplastics from gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of the common dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) from the western Mediterranean Sea. J. Hazard. Mater.397, 122794. doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.122794
78
SilvaC. R.MasiniJ. C. (2023). Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer is an efficient and alternative passive sampler of hydrophobic organic contaminants. A comparison with silicone rubber. Environ. pollut.323, 121258. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2023.121258
79
StandalD.GrimaldoE.LarsenR. B. (2020). Governance implications for the implementation of biodegradable gillnets in Norway. Mar. Policy122, 104238. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2020.104238
80
SteinbergR.BohlH. (1985). Experimental fishing with gillnets in the Southern North Sea. Inf. Fischwirtsch32, 132–134.
81
TerziY.ÖztürkR. Ç.EryaşarA. R.Yandiİ.ŞahinA.YılmazF.et al. (2025). Riverine microplastic discharge along the southern Black Sea coast of Türkiye. Environ. Res. Lett.20. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/adaf47
82
ThompsonR. C. (2015). Microplastics in the marine environment: Sources, consequences and solutions. In: Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M. (eds) Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer, Cham. 185–200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_7/FIGURES/6
83
TonayA. M. (2016). Estimates of cetacean by-catch in the turbot fishery on the Turkish Western Black Sea Coast in 2007 and 2008. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom96, 993–998. doi: 10.1017/S0025315416000060
84
van FranekerJ. A.Bravo RebolledoE. L.HesseE.IjsseldijkL. L.KühnS.LeopoldM.et al. (2018). Plastic ingestion by harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in the Netherlands: Establishing a standardised method. Ambio47, 387–397. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1002-y
85
XiongX.ChenX.ZhangK.MeiZ.HaoY.ZhengJ.et al. (2018). Microplastics in the intestinal tracts of East Asian finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis sunameri) from Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea of China. Mar. pollut. Bull.136, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.006
86
ZantisL. J.CarrollE. L.NelmsS. E.BoskerT. (2021). Marine mammals and microplastics: A systematic review and call for standardisation. Environ. pollut.269, 116142. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2020.116142
87
ZhuJ.YuX.ZhangQ.LiY.TanS.LiD.et al. (2019). Cetaceans and microplastics: First report of microplastic ingestion by a coastal delphinid, Sousa chinensis. Sci. Total Environ.659, 649–654. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.389
Summary
Keywords
microplastics, cetaceans, trophic transfer, polymer composition, southeastern black sea
Citation
Onay H, Er A, Minaz M, Emanet M, Ceylan Y, Akdemir T, Karslı B and Dalgıç G (2025) Assessing microplastic pollution in marine mammals: evidence from three cetacean species in the southeastern Black Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1657648. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1657648
Received
01 July 2025
Accepted
12 August 2025
Published
29 August 2025
Volume
12 - 2025
Edited by
Jingzhen Wang, Beibu Gulf University, China
Reviewed by
Mohamed Hamed, Louisiana State University, United States
Sivakumar Karthikeyan, Alagappa University, India
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Onay, Er, Minaz, Emanet, Ceylan, Akdemir, Karslı and Dalgıç.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mert Minaz, mert.minaz@erdogan.edu.tr
†ORCID: Hatice Onay, orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-7360; Akif Er, orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-5590; Mert Minaz, orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-9807; Muhammet Emanet, orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-1442; Yusuf Ceylan, orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-4957; Tolga Akdemir, orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-6406; Barış Karslı, orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-6988; Göktuğ Dalgıç, orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-6160
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.