Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci., 29 August 2025

Sec. Marine Megafauna

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1657648

This article is part of the Research TopicImpacts of Climate Change and Human Activities on Marine Mammals Using Integrated Monitoring MethodsView all articles

Assessing microplastic pollution in marine mammals: evidence from three cetacean species in the southeastern Black Sea

Hatice Onay&#x;Hatice Onay1†Akif Er&#x;Akif Er1†Mert Minaz*&#x;Mert Minaz1*†Muhammet Emanet&#x;Muhammet Emanet1†Yusuf Ceylan&#x;Yusuf Ceylan1†Tolga Akdemir&#x;Tolga Akdemir2†Bar&#x; Karsl&#x;&#x;Barış Karslı1†Gktu Dalg&#x;&#x;Göktuğ Dalgıç1†
  • 1Faculty of Fisheries, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Türkiye
  • 2Vocational School of Technical Sciences, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Türkiye

Microplastic (MP) pollution has emerged as a pervasive environmental threat, with growing evidence of its accumulation across various marine trophic levels, including top predators such as cetaceans. This study investigates MP abundance, size distribution, morphology, color, and polymer composition in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of three cetacean species sampled from the southeastern Black Sea. A total of seven individuals were examined, with MP abundances ranging from 5 to 139 particles per individual. Fiber-type MPs were predominant (75%), with black, green, and transparent colors being the most frequently observed. The majority of MPs were small in size, with an average length of 2002 ± 1961 µm, suggesting possible trophic transfer from lower-level organisms such as copepods and fish. Polymer analysis revealed polyamide (PA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), and ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) as the most common polymer types, indicating both fishing gear and domestic wastewater as primary MP sources. Spatial patterns in stomach fullness and MP load suggest that local environmental conditions, such as fishing activity and tourism, influence exposure levels. The study highlights the significance of both incidental ingestion during feeding—especially through net interactions—and trophic transfer as key MP exposure pathways in cetaceans. These findings demonstrate the potential ecological risks posed by MPs at higher trophic levels and emphasize the urgent need for biodegradable alternatives to synthetic fishing gear and improved wastewater management. Moreover, collaborative efforts among local authorities and NGOs are recommended to raise awareness and support adaptive environmental management in the region.

1 Introduction

Microplastics (MPs) are contaminants smaller than 5 mm that originate from the fragmentation of plastic waste—an anthropogenic pollutant—via various driving forces (Galgani et al., 2015). Macro-sized plastics undergo degradation through a combination of environmental factors such as wind, sunlight, precipitation, and water currents (Grini et al., 2022). Particularly through surface runoff (e.g., river and rainwater), MPs are transported to their final destinations—marine and oceanic ecosystems (Thompson, 2015). The vectoral migration of MPs is unpredictable and inevitable, and both their lethal and sublethal effects on aquatic organisms have been previously discussed (Rakib et al., 2023). MPs not only exert direct impacts on aquatic life but also induce indirect ecological consequences by altering the structure of the food web (Eerkes-Medrano et al., 2015; Kaya et al., 2025). MPs ingested by organisms at lower trophic levels enter the food chain and are subsequently consumed by organisms at higher trophic levels (Davidson and Dudas, 2016; Jabeen et al., 2017; Minaz et al., 2024b; Kaba et al., 2025).

The effects of plastics on aquatic organisms may manifest through physical interactions such as entanglement resulting from ghost fishing (Kraus, 2018), strangulation (Derraik, 2002), and ingestion (Alexiadou et al., 2019). Ingestion of MPs by aquatic species can cause inflammatory responses and blockages in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT), potentially resulting in a false sense of satiety (Limonta et al., 2019). Furthermore, the ingestion of MPs also leads to chemical impacts on aquatic life (Barboza et al., 2020). Due to their diverse polymeric structures and the presence of plasticizers (e.g., bisphenols), MPs ultimately cause secondary toxicity in aquatic organisms (Rochman et al., 2013; Diler et al., 2022; Minaz et al., 2022b, 2022a, 2023, 2024a; Minaz and Kurtoğlu, 2024).

Cetaceans play a crucial role in the functioning and structural balance of marine ecosystems and are considered key indicators reflecting the overall health of these systems (Moore, 2008). In this context, the presence of MPs in the stomach, intestines, and feces of cetaceans has been previously reviewed (Zantis et al., 2021). The European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) proposes marine mammals as biological indicators for both marine plastic debris and other organic pollutants (Galgani et al., 2014; Jepson et al., 2016). However, direct or indirect evidence of MP ingestion by cetaceans remains limited and is largely confined to European regions (Besseling et al., 2015; Baini et al., 2017; van Franeker et al., 2018). Due to their wide geographic distribution and presence across diverse habitats, cetaceans are valuable sentinel species for monitoring MP pollution. Given the rising levels of MP contamination globally, there is a critical need for more baseline data on MP ingestion by marine mammals and other species in non-European regions (Xiong et al., 2018). Therefore, comprehensive research conducted in these areas will significantly enhance our understanding of the impacts of MPs on marine wildlife.

Due to its nature as a semi-enclosed sea, the southeastern Black Sea is particularly vulnerable to MP pollution, which holds significant environmental implications for both ecosystems and aquatic organisms (Eryaşar et al., 2022). The geographic characteristics of the region provide critical breeding and feeding grounds for fish and cetaceans (Oguz et al., 2012). However, numerous rivers from Europe discharge into the Black Sea, making surface water runoff one of the primary pathways for MP transport. For instance, the Danube River delivers tons of plastic waste into the Black Sea on a daily basis (Lechner et al., 2014), thereby exposing the Eastern Black Sea—an essential region for aquaculture and fisheries—to anthropogenic threats (FAO, 2022). In one study, a total of 594 MPs were observed in river sediments flowing into the Black Sea along a 350 km Southeastern Black Sea coast (Mutlu et al., 2024a). Another study calculated the annual microplastic input from 29 rivers draining into the Black Sea to be approximately 1.49×1011 particles, with significantly higher MP concentrations identified, particularly in the eastern rivers (Terzi et al., 2025). In order to more comprehensively demonstrate the extent of microplastic (MP) pollution in the region, several studies conducted in recent years have reported significant MP accumulation in different environmental media along the Southeastern Black Sea coast. For example, microplastic concentrations of 77 ± 11 MP m-3 were detected in surface waters, 189 ± 108 MP m-3 in water column samples, and 24 ± 30 MP kg-1 in sediments (Aytan et al., 2025). Furthermore, an average accumulation of 108 MP kg-1 was detected in sediment samples from the region, demonstrating that this pollution has increased significantly over the years (Akkan et al., 2023). There is also evidence supporting regional microplastic pressure at the biological level; microplastic accumulations have been reported in the stomach contents of red mullet (Onay et al., 2023a) and seahorses (Onay et al., 2023b). These findings indicate that the Southeastern Black Sea is a significant focus of microplastic pollution and make it even more important to investigate this pollution in higher-trophic species living in the region.

Within the Black Sea ecosystem, only three cetacean species—the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis), and the common bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus)—occupy the apex of the trophic pyramid as the top predators (Birkun et al., 2006). These species exhibit similar feeding behaviors, being exclusively piscivorous. The cetacean population in the Black Sea had been in a continuous state of decline until direct whaling was banned in neighboring countries such as the former USSR, Bulgaria, Romania, and Turkey (Özsandıkçı and Özdemir, 2024). Historical data suggest that while direct hunting was once the primary cause of cetacean mortality, current deaths predominantly occur due to by-catch, specifically through entanglement in fishing nets (Tonay, 2016; Popov et al., 2023). Although measures such as the prohibition of cetacean hunting have been implemented, these marine mammals continue to face anthropogenic contamination, including MP pollution. As a result, they serve not only as potential vectors for MPs but also suffer from the associated toxicological impacts.

According to IUCN sources, the Black Sea subspecies of cetaceans are classified at varying levels of conservation concern: the common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) is listed as Vulnerable (Birkun, 2008), whereas the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) are categorized as Endangered (Birkun and Frantzis, 2008; Birkun, 2012). Although the global populations of these species are generally listed as Least Concern, their Black Sea subspecies are under specific protection due to regional threats. Consequently, potential anthropogenic pollutants in the Black Sea pose a serious risk to the health of these cetaceans, as they do to all aquatic organisms. While MP pollution in the southeastern Black Sea has been investigated in prior studies (Eryaşar et al., 2021; Aytan et al., 2022; Gedik and Gozler, 2022; Onay et al., 2023b, 2023a), its impact on cetaceans remains underexplored. The impacts of MP pollution in the Southeastern Black Sea on ecologically critical cetaceans, which occupy the uppermost levels of the food chain, have been largely overlooked. Given the ecological importance of cetaceans as top predators and their vulnerability to plastic pollution, this study aims to address this critical gap by assessing the presence, characteristics, and possible sources of MPs in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of three cetacean species inhabiting the southeastern Black Sea. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate MP ingestion in marine mammals from this region, providing novel insights into regional MP pollution pathways and potential trophic transfer mechanisms.

2 Material and method

2.1 Study area and sampling

Cetaceans were collected from the southeastern Black Sea during the 2024 and 2025 period. The sampling area is fed by numerous rivers originating from Türkiye (Alkan et al., 2022). Additionally, the coastal region is characterized by industrial, touristic, agricultural, and urban activities (Figure 1). Therefore, the sampling area has a potential risk of exposure to both point and diffuse sources of pollution (Aytan et al., 2021). In the present study, a total of seven cetaceans belonging to three different species were examined (Table 1). These species were Tursiops truncatus (D1 and D3), Phocoena phocoena (D2, D4, and D6), and Delphinus delphis (D5 and D7). The individuals were obtained as fisheries by-catch (dead) after becoming entangled in commercial gillnets. The body lengths of the cetaceans were measured using a measuring tape with 0.1 cm precision, while body weights were recorded using a digital electronic scale with 20 g sensitivity. Samples were kept on ice during transportation to the laboratory and subsequently stored at −20°C until dissection.

Figure 1
Map of the Rize region in Turkey showing land cover types with a color-coded legend. It includes urban and rural areas, forests, agricultural lands, and water bodies. Inset map at the top left shows the location within Turkey. Compass rose for orientation included. Locations marked as D1 to D7.

Figure 1. Location of sampling sites for cetaceans.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The characteristic properties of cetaceans in the current study.

2.2 MP extraction procedure

The gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of cetaceans were carefully weighed and transferred into glass containers. Potassium hydroxide (KOH, 10% v/v) was added at a ratio of 1:3 (w/v) relative to the GIT weight to ensure efficient tissue digestion. The mixture was incubated at 60 ± 5°C for 6 hours and subsequently allowed to rest overnight at room temperature to complete the digestion process. On the following day, the digested GIT contents were filtered using a vacuum filtration system equipped with a fiberglass filter (1.6 µm pore size, GF/A Whatman). The filtration procedure was finalized with successive rinses of ultrapure water. The processed samples were then transferred to glass petri dishes and stored for further microscopic examination under a stereomicroscope (Schirinzi et al., 2020). For analytical evaluation purposes, microplastics were divided into five size classes:<0.2mm, 0.2–1mm, 1–2mm, 2–5mm and >5mm.

2.3 Polymer identification

Following the filtration process, the retained materials on the filters were examined under a stereomicroscope (Nikon SMZ1000). Suspected plastic particles were photographed using a high-resolution camera (Nikon DSFI1) mounted on the microscope and subsequently archived. Each plastic-like particle was documented according to its color, morphological features, and size. To determine the polymer composition, Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was employed using a Perkin Elmer Spectrum 100 instrument. Analyses were conducted in Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) mode, and only spectra with a match quality above 70% were considered reliable for polymer identification. The instrument’s detection limit was set at >100 µm. Spectral data were collected within the range of 4000–650 cm-¹, using 18 scan repetitions at a resolution of 1 cm-¹. Polymer types were identified through comparison with the reference spectra provided in the Perkin Elmer SEARCH Plus® library and FTIR spectrums were presented in Supplementary Material 1.

2.4 QA/QC

Given the high risk of external contamination in MP research, all laboratory procedures were conducted with utmost care and precision. In alignment with established protocols, laboratory access was strictly limited, and personnel wore cotton laboratory coats to minimize fiber shedding. Throughout the processes of filtration, storage, and microscopic examination, only glassware (e.g., vials, flasks, beakers) and metal tools (e.g., tweezers, scissors) were employed to avoid plastic contamination. Prior to use, all equipment was thoroughly rinsed with ultrapure water. Experimental procedures were carried out under a high-efficiency laminar flow cabinet to maintain a clean working environment. Sample containers, including beakers and petri dishes, were consistently covered with aluminum foil to prevent airborne contamination. During stereomicroscopic analysis, petri dishes were handled inside a fume hood to further reduce contamination risks. To assess background contamination, a single blank sample containing 10% KOH and 20% HNO3 was processed under identical conditions. No microplastic particles were observed in the procedural blank sample, indicating no airborne contamination occurred during the sample preparation and analysis process.

2.5 Data analyses

All data were shown in mean ± standard deviation. The Kolmogrov-Smirnov test was used to assess normal distribution. In general, data sets showed normal distribution. Therefore, all statistical analyses were performed with parametric tests. One-way ANOVA and Tukey tests were used to determine significant differences in MP sizes between groups. p-values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All data sets were analyzed by the SPSS 25 software package for Windows.

Condition factor (CF) of the samples was calculated by following equation (Fulton, 1904).

CF=W/(TLb)×100

Where CF, W, TL, and b represent condition factor, fish weight, total length, and growth constant of fish (b=3), respectively.

3 Results

3.1 MP abundance in dolphins

Figure 2 illustrates the GIT weights and the number of MPs detected within the GIT contents of seven different cetacean individuals. The highest MP abundance was recorded in individual D2, with 139 MPs. In contrast, the lowest MP abundance was observed in individual D5, with only 5 MPs. The GIT weights showed a similar trend to the MP abundances, ranging from 38 g to 324 g.

Figure 2
Box plot with color shading displaying the number of MPs on the left vertical axis, ranging from 0 to 180, and GIT weight in grams on the right vertical axis, ranging from 0 to 360. Data points labeled D1 to D7 are connected with lines and distributed around the plot, indicating various GIT weights corresponding to MP numbers. The box plot shows median, interquartile range, and possible outliers.

Figure 2. MP abundance and GIT weight distribution among cetacean individuals. The bar plot on the left represents the number of MPs detected per individual (D1–D7), while the overlaid violin plot illustrates the data distribution. The grey bars on the right indicate the GIT weights (g) of each cetacean, with corresponding individual IDs. The dual-axis format visually demonstrates the relationship between MP load and GIT mass. Although a partial visual trend appears between GIT weight and MP abundance, no statistical correlation test was performed due to the limited sample size (n = 7); thus, this relationship is presented descriptively.

3.2 Size groups of MPs

Figure 3 illustrates the distribution of MP sizes and the proportional composition of MP size groups in individual cetaceans. No statistically significant difference was observed in MP sizes among the cetaceans (p>0.05; η² = 0.031). Overall, MPs exhibited a wide range of variation, with an average size of 2002 ± 1961 µm across all individuals. Although the largest MP size group (>5 mm) was most prominent in individual D7, the presence of a greater number of smaller-sized MPs contributed to a balanced overall MP size profile. Conversely, individual D5, which had a relatively lower proportion of >5 mm particles, showed a comparatively larger MP size distribution due to a high percentage of MPs in the 2–5 mm size group.

Figure 3
Two adjacent graphs display data on microplastic (MP) sizes. The left graph is a box plot showing MP sizes in micrometers across seven different days (D1 to D7). The right graph is a stacked bar chart presenting the percentage distribution of MP size groups (>5 mm, 2-5 mm, 1-2 mm, 0.2-1 mm, <0.2 mm) over these days. Different colors indicate size groups.

Figure 3. Distribution of MP sizes and the percentage composition of MP size groups in individual cetaceans. The left panel shows the size distribution of MPs (in µm) detected in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of seven cetacean individuals (D1–D7), represented as boxplots with overlaid density curves. The right panel presents the proportional distribution (%) of MPs across five defined size categories (<0.2 mm, 0.2–1 mm, 1–2 mm, 2–5 mm, and >5 mm) for each individual. Variations in size distribution indicate individual-specific exposure patterns and potential ingestion sources.

3.3 MP classification

The chord diagram displays the relationships between MP categories (fiber, fragment) and colors (e.g., black, blue, transparent, red, green, etc.) with individual cetaceans (Figure 4). The most prevalent MP type was fiber (75%), while fragments accounted for 25% of total MPs. Among colors, black, transparent, and green were frequently observed. A large proportion of MPs found in individual D6 were transparent and classified as fragments. In contrast, individuals D1 and D2, which exhibited the highest MP abundances, predominantly contained black and green-colored fibers, respectively. In individual D3, MPs were evenly distributed between fibers and fragments, each comprising approximately half of the total MP count.

Figure 4
Chord diagram illustrating relationships between different categories labeled as Fiber, D1 through D7, and colors like White, Brown, Red, Blue, Black, Transparent, Green, and Fragment. Percentages indicate proportions in each segment, with various colored arcs connecting and representing flows between categories.

Figure 4. MP types and color distribution among cetacean individuals. Each ribbon indicates the proportion of a specific MP type or color found in each cetacean.

In the Figure 5, the Sankey diagram illustrates the relative proportions of eight identified polymer types: polypropylene (PP), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyamide (PA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA), and polyacrylonitrile (PAN). PA, EVA and PAN were the most frequently detected polymers, with D6 showing the highest PAN proportion (67%), while D1 and D2 showed a more balanced distribution across multiple polymer types. In addition, PA was the most abundant polymer species observed in the present study.

Figure 5
Sankey diagram showing the percentage distribution of materials PP, PVA, PA, PVC, PET, EVA, and PAN across seven days (D1 to D7). Each color band represents a material, with flow width indicating percentage contribution. Percentages are labeled within each column.

Figure 5. Polymer type distribution of MPs detected in the GITs of individual cetaceans (D1–D7).

4 Discussion

The southeastern Black Sea has become a hotspot for MPs due to the currents generated by numerous rivers flowing from northern Türkiye (Mutlu et al., 2024a, 2024b). Several studies conducted in this region have demonstrated the presence of ingested MPs in the gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of various aquatic organisms (Aytan et al., 2021, 2022; Eryaşar et al., 2022; Gedik et al., 2023; Onay et al., 2023b, 2023a). However, while most existing studies have focused on fish species, research on marine mammals in the region remains quite limited (Zantis et al., 2021). Therefore, the present study aims to fill this gap by investigating MP ingestion potential in three different cetacean species. While the detection of microplastics in all individuals provides important information about pollution trends, the limited sample size (n=7) reduces the power of statistical analyses in the current study. This is due to the ethical and logistical challenges encountered in accessing cetacean individuals that have washed up on shore or were obtained as bycatch from fisheries. Additionally, the limited sample size (n = 7) reduces statistical power and limits the generalizability of the results; therefore, the apparent relationship between GIT weight and MP abundance should be considered descriptive rather than inferential. No clear relationship was observed between body weight and stomach fullness among the cetacean individuals examined. For instance, although cetaceans D1 and D3 belong to the same species and exhibit similar body weights, D1 had a full stomach, whereas D3’s stomach was nearly empty. This finding is consistent with previous research indicating no correlation between cetacean body length and MP content in the stomach (Hernandez-Gonzalez et al., 2018). Cetaceans with empty stomachs generally exhibited lower MP abundance. The two cetaceans with the highest stomach fullness were sampled from closely located sites, and their MP ingestion trends mirrored their stomach content levels. However, rather than an active tendency to ingest MPs, this is likely a result of incidental ingestion during feeding activities (Hajisamae et al., 2022). The low MP abundance observed in empty stomachs may be attributed to the ability of fish, as prey items, to excrete ingested MPs and nanoplastics (NPs) via feces (Bhat et al., 2024). Alternatively, the absence of MPs in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may be due to their translocation across the intestinal epithelial membrane into other fish tissues (Browne et al., 2008). In the present study, the primary factor influencing stomach fullness in cetaceans was found to be their geographic location. The region with the highest stomach fullness—Derepazarı, where cetaceans D1 and D2 were sampled—is characterized by relatively low fishing activity, which may allow prey species to utilize the area as a refuge and feeding ground. Consequently, cetaceans are likely to exploit the potentially high fish abundance in this area. The elevated stomach fullness in these individuals suggests a possible relationship between MP ingestion and location. In fact, the site where the highest number of MPs were observed in the GITs of two different cetacean species (Station 10) had previously been studied and reported to exhibit high MP abundance in water samples (Terzi et al., 2025). This elevated MP abundance is likely associated with short-term tourism pressure in the region. Nearby beaches such as Sarayköy and adjacent sandy shores support recreational activities like swimming and sunbathing, thereby contributing to increased anthropogenic pollution. Prior studies conducted on similar sandy shores in the vicinity have also highlighted elevated MP concentrations, particularly at the end of the tourist season (Gül, 2023). Microplastic abundance increased from 21.4 ± 13.95 items/kg before the tourism season to 28.85 ± 31.97 items/kg after the season, based on 270 sediment samples collected from Sarayköy and nearby beaches. Statistical analysis confirmed that this increase was significantly influenced by time, beach cleaning frequency, and proximity to city centers (GLMM, time × cleaning frequency × proximity, z = 6.596, p < 0.001). Furthermore, seasonal population increases likely raise airborne MP concentrations, which in turn may exert additional pressure on the riverine systems discharging into the area (Kernchen et al., 2022). Therefore, this spatial variability in microplastic abundance may be further shaped by the hydrodynamic inputs of rivers emptying into the Southeastern Black Sea. Previous studies have shown that these rivers, particularly those flowing through areas with high population and industrial density, are major persistent sources of MP pollution in the region (Mutlu et al., 2024a; Terzi et al., 2025). Cetaceans that feed in near-coastal waters and exhibit opportunistic feeding behavior are top-level predators most likely to encounter MPs originating from these rivers. Therefore, variation in MP abundance observed among individuals may depend not only on biological factors but also on proximity to active MP discharge zones. Earlier studies investigating MP abundance in cetacean GITs across different locations consistently reported the presence of at least one MP particle in each individual (Xiong et al., 2018; Hart et al., 2022). Many studies have reported MP ingestion rates of nearly 100% in cetacean species from different regions (Zantis et al., 2021). Species studied include Phocoena phocoena, Delphinus delphis, Stenella coeruleoalba, and Tursiops truncatus. In our study, the presence of MP in all three cetacean species sampled in the Southeastern Black Sea corresponds to the highest detection range compared to global data and highlights the serious MP pollution in the region. Even before the attention to MP pollution, it was well established that large plastic debris negatively affected cetaceans either through ingestion or entanglement, often as a result of ghost fishing (Baulch and Perry, 2014). Although large debris and MPs may not pose the same mechanical risks, fragmentation driven by various environmental forces increases the risk of contaminant transfer. For instance, MPs can serve as vectors for persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and heavy metals, which may be indirectly ingested by dolphins. Some studies have identified a correlation between MP abundance and the concentration of phthalate esters in fin whales (Fossi et al., 2014, 2016; Baini et al., 2017).

MPs have been shown to be generally similar in size to the prey and forage organisms consumed by aquatic species (Jinhui et al., 2019). However, direct ingestion of MPs as food items by cetaceans is considered unlikely due to their small particle size (Lusher et al., 2015). Therefore, MP ingestion by cetaceans is most plausibly the result of accidental intake (Xiong et al., 2018) or trophic transfer through prey species (Lusher et al., 2018). The trophic transfer of MPs has previously been investigated and confirmed in predator-prey relationships, such as between grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) and Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) (Nelms et al., 2018). A similar mechanism has been suggested for cetaceans, with evidence from a study conducted in Northeast Asia showing that MPs can be transferred to cetaceans via the ingestion of contaminated prey fish (Jabeen et al., 2017). In the Southeastern Black Sea, the predominant prey species in the feeding regime of dolphins (especially Delphinus delphis) is anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus). Studies on this species have confirmed the ingestion of microplastics by anchovies, suggesting that microplastics can be passed to top-level predators through trophic transfer (Gedik et al., 2023). In addition to anchovies, microplastics have also been detected in other benthopelagic cetacean diets, such as red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and whiting (Merlangius merlangus) (Eryaşar et al., 2022; Onay et al., 2023a). These species-specific findings strongly support the possibility that dolphins in the region are exposed to microplastics through contaminated prey species.

In general, the size of MPs found in the GITs of aquatic organisms is associated with the size of the organism’s mouth opening. However, this phenomenon is less applicable to cetaceans, as MP ingestion in these species is largely attributed to accidental intake or trophic transfer. This mechanism also explains the presence of small-sized MPs observed in the present study. Considering a potential indirect trophic transfer pathway starting with copepods, the detection of small MPs becomes predictable (Domínguez-López et al., 2022). In addition to trophic transfer, incidental ingestion of microplastics through water filtration or during feeding has been increasingly recognized as a plausible exposure route for cetaceans. Cetaceans, particularly those feeding in nearshore areas similar to our study, may unintentionally ingest MPs suspended in the water column or associated with prey movement (Zhu et al., 2019). The presence of MPs in individuals with low stomach content further supports the possibility of non-dietary, passive exposure. Including this exposure route provides a more comprehensive understanding of MP accumulation mechanisms in marine mammals and highlights the ecological complexity of pollution pathways. Moreover, MPs have been shown to be generally similar in size to the prey and forage organisms consumed by aquatic species (Jinhui et al., 2019). Therefore, the observation of relatively larger MPs in the present study, compared to those reported in fish-based studies, may be explained by differences in prey size and feeding strategies specific to cetaceans.

Due to methodological limitations, it is not possible to precisely determine the specific sources of individual MPs. Therefore, characteristics such as color, type, and polymer composition of MPs can offer insight into their potential origins. In the present study, the proportion of fiber-type MPs was significantly higher than that of fragments. The most frequently observed colors were green, black, and transparent, with the majority of fragment MPs being transparent. Among aquatic organisms, ingestion of MPs based on color has been documented as a behavioral response (Okamoto et al., 2022). However, since MPs are considerably smaller than typical prey items for cetaceans, the observed color trends are more likely explained by trophic transfer mechanisms. In this context, the transparent exoskeletons of certain crustaceans may lead to smaller organisms ingesting transparent MPs under the assumption they are prey (Nadal et al., 2016). Furthermore, preference-based MP ingestion studies have reported that fish tend to favor transparent MPs (Klangnurak and Chunniyom, 2020). Another study demonstrated that, in the absence of food, fish ingested black-colored MPs, revealing a strong association between MP ingestion and color (Ory et al., 2018). The predominance of black and transparent MPs in grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) scat also aligns with the findings of the current study (Nelms et al., 2018). Regarding the relationship between incidental MP ingestion and MP color, it is important to consider that cetaceans in the southeastern Black Sea feed on a variety of fish species throughout the year. In addition, they have been known to attack fishing nets as an opportunistic feeding behavior (Mitchell, 1975; Balık, 2016). Since the cetaceans in this study were sampled outside of the official fishing season in Türkiye, it is likely that they attempted to feed by attacking set gillnets. Indeed, there have been previous reports of cetaceans becoming entangled in turbot gillnets in the southeastern Black Sea (Bilgin et al., 2018). These gillnets, typically used outside the regular fishing season, are often green in color to enhance fishing efficiency (Steinberg and Bohl, 1985). Furthermore, trawl codends are known to be constructed from highly durable green-colored materials. Therefore, we suggest that the high abundance of green-colored MPs observed in the present study may be linked to the incidental ingestion of plastic fibers resulting from cetaceans’ interactions with such fishing gear.

Among the identified polymer types, PA was the most frequently observed. The high occurrence of PA in cetacean samples may be attributed to its extensive use as a primary polymer in fishing nets, thereby contributing to incidental MP ingestion (Cerbule et al., 2025). Nylon (PA) polymers are commonly utilized in gillnets due to their high durability, which makes them persistent in marine environments and a potential source of both ghost fishing and MP pollution (Standal et al., 2020). Another frequently detected polymer was PAN, which is mainly found in acrylic textiles and is introduced into aquatic environments via domestic wastewater, laundry effluents, and textile fibers (Adegbola et al., 2020; Khayyam et al., 2020; Plastic Europe, 2021). In the current study area, domestic wastewater is discharged into the sea through deep-sea outfall systems (Alkan et al., 2025). Consequently, MPs originating from domestic sources—particularly laundry effluents—may enter lower trophic level aquatic organisms and be transferred to higher trophic levels through trophic transfer mechanisms. Additionally, EVA is commonly used in packaging materials and auxiliary fishing gear such as buoys and floating devices (Silva and Masini, 2023). The presence of EVA in the samples reflects the extent of anthropogenic pollution in the region.

5 Conclusion

Although various studies have previously investigated MPs in the southeastern Black Sea, findings on MP abundance in cetaceans emphasize that these particles can be transferred not only through direct ingestion but also via trophic pathways. A critical consideration emerging from this study is the incidental ingestion of MPs by cetaceans during feeding activities, particularly when attacking fishing nets. The prolonged persistence of gillnets in the marine environment may serve as a significant contributor to MP abundance affecting aquatic organisms. Therefore, exploring the use of biodegradable materials could offer protection not only to lower trophic level marine species but also to top predators such as cetaceans. In addition, polymer composition analysis suggests that another major source of MPs in the region may be domestic wastewater discharged via deep-sea outfall systems. Future research should focus on the environmental distribution and ecological impacts of MPs in this biodiversity-rich region. In this context, awareness campaigns led by local governments and non-governmental organizations are essential to combat plastic pollution. Immediate measures must be implemented to safeguard aquatic and terrestrial biodiversity within the watershed, along with promoting adaptive management strategies to ensure long-term ecosystem and human health protection.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for the study involving animals in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements because Because already dead cetacean (by-catch) were used. No need to take ethical approval for this study.

Author contributions

HO: Writing – review & editing, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. AE: Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Methodology. MM: Data curation, Writing – original draft, Visualization. ME: Resources, Writing – review & editing. YC: Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. TA: Resources, Writing – review & editing. BK: Writing – review & editing. GD: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study has been supported by the Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University Development Foundation (Grant number: 02025007021615).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmars.2025.1657648/full#supplementary-material

References

Adegbola T. A., Agboola O., and Fayomi O. S. I. (2020). Review of polyacrylonitrile blends and application in manufacturing technology: recycling and environmental impact. Results Eng. 7, 100144. doi: 10.1016/J.RINENG.2020.100144

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Akkan T., Gedik K., and Mutlu T. (2023). Protracted dynamicity of microplastics in the coastal sediment of the Southeast Black Sea. Mar. pollut. Bull. 188, 114722. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114722

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alexiadou P., Foskolos I., and Frantzis A. (2019). Ingestion of macroplastics by odontocetes of the Greek Seas, Eastern Mediterranean: Often deadly! Mar. pollut. Bull. 146, 67–75. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2019.05.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alkan A., Serdar S., Fidan D., Akbaş U., Zengin B., and Kılıç M. B. (2022). Spatial, temporal, and vertical variability of nutrients in the Southeastern Black Sea. Chemosphere 302, 134809. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.134809

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alkan N., Alkan A., Salih B., Yilmaz C., and Üçüncü O. (2025). Environmental distributions of phthalates in sediments affected by municipal wastewater in the South-eastern Black Sea. Chemosphere 377, 144364. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2025.144364

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aytan U., Esensoy F. B., and Senturk Y. (2022). Microplastic ingestion and egestion by copepods in the Black Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 806, 150921. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.150921

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aytan U., Esensoy F. B., Senturk Y., Arifoğlu E., Karaoğlu K., Ceylan Y., et al. (2021). Plastic occurrence in commercial fish species of the black sea. Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 22, 20504. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS20504

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aytan Ü., Koca Y. Ş., Pasli S., Güven O., Ceylan Y., and Basaran B. (2025). Microplastics in commercial fish and their habitats in the important fishing ground of the Black Sea: Characteristic, concentration, and risk assessment. Mar. pollut. Bull. 221, 118434. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2025.118434

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baini M., Martellini T., Cincinelli A., Campani T., Minutoli R., Panti C., et al. (2017). First detection of seven phthalate esters (PAEs) as plastic tracers in superficial neustonic/planktonic samples and cetacean blubber. Anal. Methods 9, 1512–1520. doi: 10.1039/c6ay02674e

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Balık İ. (2016). Dolphins inhabiting in black sea and effects of fisheries. Hacettepe J. Biol. Chem. 2, 185–185. doi: 10.15671/hjbc.20164418127

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Barboza L. G. A., Lopes C., Oliveira P., Bessa F., Otero V., Henriques B., et al. (2020). Microplastics in wild fish from North East Atlantic Ocean and its potential for causing neurotoxic effects, lipid oxidative damage, and human health risks associated with ingestion exposure. Sci. Total Environ. 717, 134625. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2019.134625

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Baulch S. and Perry C. (2014). Evaluating the impacts of marine debris on cetaceans. Mar. pollut. Bull. 80, 210–221. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2013.12.050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Besseling E., Foekema E. M., Van Franeker J. A., Leopold M. F., Kühn S., Bravo Rebolledo E. L., et al. (2015). Microplastic in a macro filter feeder: Humpback whale Megaptera novaeangliae. Mar. pollut. Bull. 95, 248–252. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2015.04.007

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhat R. A. H., Sidiq M. J., and Altinok I. (2024). Impact of microplastics and nanoplastics on fish health and reproduction. Aquaculture 590, 741037. doi: 10.1016/J.AQUACULTURE.2024.741037

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Bilgin S., Onay H., Köse O., and Yeşİlçİçek T. (2018). Karadeniz ‘ de Karaya Vuran ve Kazara Yakalanan Yunuslar ( Cetacea ) Hakkında : Ölüm Nedenleri, Beslenme Özellikleri ve Gebelik Durumu About Stranding and Accidentally Caught Cetaceans in the Black Sea : Death Reasons, Feeding Characteristics and Pregna. Turk. J. Agric. Nat. Sci. 5, 447–454. doi: 10.30910/turkjans.471239

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Birkun A. J. (2008). Delphinus delphis ssp. ponticus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2008: e.T133729A3875256. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T133729A3875256.en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Birkun A. (2012). Tursiops truncatus ssp. ponticus. IUCN Red List Threatened Species, 2012, e.T133714A17771698. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012.RLTS.T133714A17771698.en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Birkun A. J., Cañadas A., Donovan G., Holcer D., Lauriano G., Notarbartolo G., et al. (2006). “Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and Contiguous Atlantic Area,” in Conservation Plan for Black Sea Cetaceans (ACCOBAMS), 50.

Google Scholar

Birkun J. A. A. and Frantzis A. (2008). Phocoena phocoena ssp. relicta. IUCN Red List Threatened Species. doi: 10.2305/IUCN.UK.2008.RLTS.T17030A6737111.en

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Browne M. A., Dissanayake A., Galloway T. S., Lowe D. M., and Thompson R. C. (2008). Ingested microscopic plastic translocates to the circulatory system of the mussel, Mytilus edulis (L.). Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 5026–5031. doi: 10.1021/ES800249A/SUPPL_FILE/ES800249A-FILE002.PDF

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cerbule K., Larsen R. B., Vollstad J., and Alvestad A. H. (2025). Comparison of fishing performance of biodegradable and nylon gillnets with different twine diameter. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 87, 104247. doi: 10.1016/J.RSMA.2025.104247

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Davidson K. and Dudas S. E. (2016). Microplastic ingestion by wild and cultured manila clams (Venerupis philippinarum) from baynes sound, british Columbia. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 71, 147–156. doi: 10.1007/S00244-016-0286-4/FIGURES/3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Derraik J. G. B. (2002). The pollution of the marine environment by plastic debris: a review. Mar. pollut. Bull. 44, 842–852. doi: 10.1016/S0025-326X(02)00220-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Diler Ö., Özil Ö., Nane İ.D., Nazıroğlu M., Minaz M., Aslankoç R., et al. (2022). The effects of bisphenol A on oxidative stress, antioxidant defence, histopathological alterations and lysozyme activity in narrow-clawed crayfish (Pontastacus leptodactylus). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 22. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS19877

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Domínguez-López M., Bellas J., Sánchez-Ruiloba L., Planas M., and Hernández-Urcera J. (2022). First evidence of ingestion and retention of microplastics in seahorses (Hippocampus reidi) using copepods (Acartia tonsa) as transfer vectors. Sci. Total Environ. 818, 151688. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151688

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eerkes-Medrano D., Thompson R. C., and Aldridge D. C. (2015). Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res. 75, 63–82. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.02.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eryaşar A. R., Gedik K., and Mutlu T. (2022). Ingestion of microplastics by commercial fish species from the southern Black Sea coast. Mar. pollut. Bull. 177, 113535. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2022.113535

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Eryaşar A. R., Gedik K., Şahin A., Öztürk R. Ç., and Yılmaz F. (2021). Characteristics and temporal trends of microplastics in the coastal area in the Southern Black Sea over the past decade. Mar. pollut. Bull. 173, 112993. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2021.112993

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO. (2022). Fisheries and Aquaculture Division (Mediterr. BLACK SEA (Major Fish. Area 37): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Available online at: https://www.fao.org/fishery/en/area/Area37/en (Accessed August 21, 2025).

Google Scholar

Fossi M. C., Coppola D., Baini M., Giannetti M., Guerranti C., Marsili L., et al. (2014). Large filter feeding marine organisms as indicators of microplastic in the pelagic environment: The case studies of the Mediterranean basking shark (Cetorhinus maximus) and fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus). Mar. Environ. Res. 100, 17–24. doi: 10.1016/J.MARENVRES.2014.02.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fossi M. C., Marsili L., Baini M., Giannetti M., Coppola D., Guerranti C., et al. (2016). Fin whales and microplastics: The Mediterranean Sea and the Sea of Cortez scenarios. Environ. pollut. 209, 68–78. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.11.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Fulton T. W. (1904). The rate of growth of fishes. Available online at: https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1570291225855291904 (Accessed July 06, 2022).

Google Scholar

Galgani F., Claro F., Depledge M., and Fossi C. (2014). Monitoring the impact of litter in large vertebrates in the Mediterranean Sea within the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD): Constraints, specificities and recommendations. Mar. Environ. Res. 100, 3–9. doi: 10.1016/J.MARENVRES.2014.02.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Galgani F., Hanke G., and Maes T. (2015). Global distribution, composition and abundance of marine litter. Mar. Anthropog. Litter 100, 29–56. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_2/TABLES/3

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gedik K., Eryaşar A. R., Emanet M., Şahin C., and Ceylan Y. (2023). Monthly microplastics change in European anchovy’s (Engraulis encrasicolus) gastrointestinal tract in the Black Sea. Mar. pollut. Bull. 194, 115303. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2023.115303

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gedik K. and Gozler A. M. (2022). Hallmarking microplastics of sediments and Chamelea gallina inhabiting Southwestern Black Sea: A hypothetical look at consumption risks. Mar. pollut. Bull. 174, 113252. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2021.113252

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Grini H., Metallaoui S., González-Fernández D., and Bensouilah M. (2022). First evidence of plastic pollution in beach sediments of the Skikda coast (northeast of Algeria). Mar. pollut. Bull. 181, 113831. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2022.113831

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Gül M. R. (2023). Short-term tourism alters abundance, size, and composition of microplastics on sandy beaches. Environ. pollut. 316, 120561. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2022.120561

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hajisamae S., Soe K. K., Pradit S., Chaiyvareesajja J., and Fazrul H. (2022). Feeding habits and microplastic ingestion of short mackerel, Rastrelliger brachysoma, in a tropical estuarine environment. Environ. Biol. Fishes 105, 289–302. doi: 10.1007/S10641-022-01221-Z/TABLES/5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hart L. B., Dziobak M., Wells R. S., Ertel B., and Weinstein J. (2022). Microplastics in gastric samples from common bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) residing in Sarasota Bay FL (USA). Front. Mar. Sci. 9. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2022.947124

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Hernandez-Gonzalez A., Saavedra C., Gago J., Covelo P., Santos M. B., and Pierce G. J. (2018). Microplastics in the stomach contents of common dolphin (Delphinus delphis) stranded on the Galician coasts (NW Spain 2005–2010). Mar. pollut. Bull. 137, 526–532. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2018.10.026

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jabeen K., Su L., Li J., Yang D., Tong C., Mu J., et al. (2017). Microplastics and mesoplastics in fish from coastal and fresh waters of China. Environ. pollut. 221, 141–149. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.11.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jepson P. D., Deaville R., Barber J. L., Aguilar À., Borrell A., Murphy S., et al. (2016). PCB pollution continues to impact populations of orcas and other dolphins in European waters. Sci. Rep. 6, 1–17. doi: 10.1038/SREP18573

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Jinhui S., Sudong X., Yan N., Xia P., Jiahao Q., and Yongjian X. (2019). Effects of microplastics and attached heavy metals on growth, immunity, and heavy metal accumulation in the yellow seahorse, Hippocampus kuda Bleeker. Mar. pollut. Bull. 149, 110510. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2019.110510

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaba M. O., Minaz M., Kaya C., Jouy T., Kurtul I., and Aytan Ü. (2025). Silent invaders of freshwater ecosystems: Unveiling the microplastic crisis threatening the world’s largest soda lake (Lake Van, Türkiye). J. Great Lakes Res. 51, 102604. doi: 10.1016/J.JGLR.2025.102604

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaya C., Minaz M., Şentürk Koca Y., Oral Kaba M., Kurtul I., and Aytan Ü.. (2025). Monitoring microplastics in a region with sensitive fish biodiversity: Tigris, Euphrates and Van Lake drainages in Irano-Anatolian hotspot. Environ. Sci. Eur. 37, 102. doi: 10.1186/s12302-025-01125-6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kernchen S., Löder M. G. J., Fischer F., Fischer D., Moses S. R., Georgi C., et al. (2022). Airborne microplastic concentrations and deposition across the Weser River catchment. Sci. Total Environ. 818, 151812. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2021.151812

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Khayyam H., Jazar R. N., Nunna S., Golkarnarenji G., Badii K., Fakhrhoseini S. M., et al. (2020). PAN precursor fabrication, applications and thermal stabilization process in carbon fiber production: Experimental and mathematical modelling. Prog. Mater. Sci. 107, 100575. doi: 10.1016/J.PMATSCI.2019.100575

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Klangnurak W. and Chunniyom S. (2020). Screening for microplastics in marine fish of Thailand: the accumulation of microplastics in the gastrointestinal tract of different foraging preferences. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 27, 27161–27168. doi: 10.1007/S11356-020-09147-8/FIGURES/5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Kraus S. D. (2018). Entanglement of whales in fishing gear. Encycl. Mar. Mammals Third Ed. 336. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-804327-1.00120-5

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lechner A., Keckeis H., Lumesberger-Loisl F., Zens B., Krusch R., Tritthart M., et al. (2014). The Danube so colourful: A potpourri of plastic litter outnumbers fish larvae in Europe’s second largest river. Environ. pollut. 188, 177–181. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2014.02.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Limonta G., Mancia A., Benkhalqui A., Bertolucci C., Abelli L., Fossi M. C., et al. (2019). Microplastics induce transcriptional changes, immune response and behavioral alterations in adult zebrafish. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52292-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lusher A. L., Hernandez-Milian G., Berrow S., Rogan E., and O’Connor I. (2018). Incidence of marine debris in cetaceans stranded and bycaught in Ireland: Recent findings and a review of historical knowledge. Environ. pollut. 232, 467–476. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2017.09.070

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Lusher A. L., Hernandez-Milian G., O’Brien J., Berrow S., O’Connor I., and Officer R. (2015). Microplastic and macroplastic ingestion by a deep diving, oceanic cetacean: The True’s beaked whale Mesoplodon mirus. Environ. pollut. 199, 185–191. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2015.01.023

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M., Er A., Ak K., Kurtoğlu İ.Z., and Kayış Ş. (2024a). Acute toxicity and histopathologicalAssessment of bisphenol A in danube sturgeon(Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) larvae. Polish J. Environ. Stud. 33, 1–6. doi: 10.15244/PJOES/171760

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M., Er A., Ak K., Nane İ.D., İpek Z. Z., and Aslankoç R. (2023). Bisphenol A used in plastic industry negatively affects wild vimba bream (Vimba vimba). Turkish J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 23. doi: 10.4194/TRJFAS22598

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M., Er A., Ak K., Nane İ.D., İpek Z. Z., Kurtoğlu İ.Z., et al. (2022a). Short-term Exposure to Bisphenol A (BPA) as a Plastic Precursor: Hematological and Behavioral Effects on Oncorhynchus mykiss and Vimba vimba. Water Air Soil pollut. 233, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/S11270-022-05585-X

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M., Er A., Ak K., Nane I. D., Ipek Z. Z., Yalcın A., et al. (2022b). Investigation of long-term bisphenol A exposure on rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss): Hematological parameters, biochemical indicator, antioxidant activity, and histopathological examination. Chemosphere 303, 135136. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2022.135136

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M., Ipek Z. Z., Bayçelebi E., Oral M., Mutlu T., Karsli B., et al. (2024b). Effect of parasitic infection on microplastic ingestion in a native leuciscid hybrid species (Alburnus derjugini x Squalius orientalis) from Kürtün Dam Lake, Türkiye. Chemosphere 363, 142978. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2024.142978

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Minaz M. and Kurtoğlu İ.Z. (2024). Long-term exposure of endangered Danube sturgeon (Acipenser gueldenstaedtii) to bisphenol A (BPA): growth, behavioral, histological, genotoxic, and hematological evaluation. Environ. Sci. pollut. Res. 31, 30836–30848. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-33168-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mitchell E. D. (1975). Porpoise, Dolphin, and Small Whale Fisheries of the World: Status and Problems - Edward D. Mitchell - Google Kitaplar. Available online at: https://books.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=9C8YAQAAIAAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA8&dq=porpoise,+dolphin+and+small+whale&ots=i6LP58vP2s&sig=Y8Ya0lK3zKz71sKmrVSoLztJUTU&redir_esc=yv=onepage&q=porpoise%2Cdolphinandsmallwhale&f=false (Accessed May 19, 2025).

Google Scholar

Moore S. E. (2008). Marine mammals as ecosystem sentinels. J. Mammal. 89, 534–540. doi: 10.1644/07-MAMM-S-312R1.1

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mutlu T., Minaz M., Baytaşoğlu H., and Gedik K. (2024a). Microplastic pollution in stream sediments discharging from Türkiye’s eastern Black sea basin. Chemosphere 352, 141496. doi: 10.1016/J.CHEMOSPHERE.2024.141496

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Mutlu T., Minaz M., Baytaşoğlu H., and Gedik K. (2024b). Monitoring of microplastic pollution in sediments along the Çoruh River Basin, NE Türkiye. J. Contam. Hydrol. 263, 104334. doi: 10.1016/J.JCONHYD.2024.104334

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nadal M. A., Alomar C., and Deudero S. (2016). High levels of microplastic ingestion by the semipelagic fish bogue Boops boops (L.) around the Balearic Islands. Environ. pollut. 214, 517–523. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2016.04.054

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Nelms S. E., Galloway T. S., Godley B. J., Jarvis D. S., and Lindeque P. K. (2018). Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators. Environ. pollut. 238, 999–1007. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.02.016

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Oguz T., Akoglu E., and Salihoglu B. (2012). Current state of overfishing and its regional differences in the Black Sea. Ocean Coast. Manage. 58, 47–56. doi: 10.1016/J.OCECOAMAN.2011.12.013

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Okamoto K., Nomura M., Horie Y., and Okamura H. (2022). Color preferences and gastrointestinal-tract retention times of microplastics by freshwater and marine fishes. Environ. pollut. 304, 119253. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119253

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Onay H., Karslı B., Minaz M., and Dalgıç G. (2023a). Seasonal monitoring of microplastic pollution in the Southeast Black Sea: An example of red mullet (Mullus barbatus) gastrointestinal tracts. Mar. pollut. Bull. 191, 114886. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2023.114886

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Onay H., Minaz M., Ak K., Er A., Emanet M., Karslı B., et al. (2023b). Decade of microplastic alteration in the southeastern black sea: An example of seahorse gastrointestinal tracts. Environ. Res. 218, 115001. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVRES.2022.115001

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ory N. C., Gallardo C., Lenz M., and Thiel M. (2018). Capture, swallowing, and egestion of microplastics by a planktivorous juvenile fish. Environ. pollut. 240, 566–573. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2018.04.093

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Özsandıkçı U. and Özdemir S. (2024). Seasonal abundance estimates of cetaceans in the southern Black Sea (Sinop), Türkiye. Mar. Mammal Sci. 40, e13092. doi: 10.1111/MMS.13092

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Plastic Europe (2021). Plastics - the Facts 2021 - An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data. Available online at: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2021/ (Accessed December 01, 2022).

Google Scholar

Popov D., Meshkova G., Vishnyakova K., Ivanchikova J., Paiu M., Timofte C., et al. (2023). Assessment of the bycatch level for the Black Sea harbour porpoise in the light of new data on population abundance. Front. Mar. Sci. 10. doi: 10.3389/FMARS.2023.1119983/BIBTEX

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rakib M. R. J., Sarker A., Ram K., Uddin M. G., Walker T. R., Chowdhury T., et al. (2023). Microplastic toxicity in aquatic organisms and aquatic ecosystems: a review. Water Air Soil pollut. 234, 1–28. doi: 10.1007/S11270-023-06062-9

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Rochman C. M., Browne M. A., Halpern B. S., Hentschel B. T., Hoh E., Karapanagioti H. K., et al. (2013). Classify plastic waste as hazardous. Nat. 494, 169–171. doi: 10.1038/494169a

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Schirinzi G. F., Pedà C., Battaglia P., Laface F., Galli M., Baini M., et al. (2020). A new digestion approach for the extraction of microplastics from gastrointestinal tracts (GITs) of the common dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) from the western Mediterranean Sea. J. Hazard. Mater. 397, 122794. doi: 10.1016/J.JHAZMAT.2020.122794

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva C. R. and Masini J. C. (2023). Ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer is an efficient and alternative passive sampler of hydrophobic organic contaminants. A comparison with silicone rubber. Environ. pollut. 323, 121258. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2023.121258

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Standal D., Grimaldo E., and Larsen R. B. (2020). Governance implications for the implementation of biodegradable gillnets in Norway. Mar. Policy 122, 104238. doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOL.2020.104238

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Steinberg R. and Bohl H. (1985). Experimental fishing with gillnets in the Southern North Sea. Inf. Fischwirtsch 32, 132–134.

Google Scholar

Terzi Y., Öztürk R. Ç., Eryaşar A. R., Yandi İ., Şahin A., Yılmaz F., et al. (2025). Riverine microplastic discharge along the southern Black Sea coast of Türkiye. Environ. Res. Lett. 20. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/adaf47

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Thompson R. C. (2015). Microplastics in the marine environment: Sources, consequences and solutions. In: Bergmann, M., Gutow, L., Klages, M. (eds) Marine Anthropogenic Litter. Springer, Cham. 185–200. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_7/FIGURES/6

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Tonay A. M. (2016). Estimates of cetacean by-catch in the turbot fishery on the Turkish Western Black Sea Coast in 2007 and 2008. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 96, 993–998. doi: 10.1017/S0025315416000060

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

van Franeker J. A., Bravo Rebolledo E. L., Hesse E., Ijsseldijk L. L., Kühn S., Leopold M., et al. (2018). Plastic ingestion by harbour porpoises Phocoena phocoena in the Netherlands: Establishing a standardised method. Ambio 47, 387–397. doi: 10.1007/s13280-017-1002-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong X., Chen X., Zhang K., Mei Z., Hao Y., Zheng J., et al. (2018). Microplastics in the intestinal tracts of East Asian finless porpoises (Neophocaena asiaeorientalis sunameri) from Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea of China. Mar. pollut. Bull. 136, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.09.006

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zantis L. J., Carroll E. L., Nelms S. E., and Bosker T. (2021). Marine mammals and microplastics: A systematic review and call for standardisation. Environ. pollut. 269, 116142. doi: 10.1016/J.ENVPOL.2020.116142

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu J., Yu X., Zhang Q., Li Y., Tan S., Li D., et al. (2019). Cetaceans and microplastics: First report of microplastic ingestion by a coastal delphinid, Sousa chinensis. Sci. Total Environ. 659, 649–654. doi: 10.1016/J.SCITOTENV.2018.12.389

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: microplastics, cetaceans, trophic transfer, polymer composition, southeastern black sea

Citation: Onay H, Er A, Minaz M, Emanet M, Ceylan Y, Akdemir T, Karslı B and Dalgıç G (2025) Assessing microplastic pollution in marine mammals: evidence from three cetacean species in the southeastern Black Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1657648. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1657648

Received: 01 July 2025; Accepted: 12 August 2025;
Published: 29 August 2025.

Edited by:

Jingzhen Wang, Beibu Gulf University, China

Reviewed by:

Mohamed Hamed, Louisiana State University, United States
Sivakumar Karthikeyan, Alagappa University, India

Copyright © 2025 Onay, Er, Minaz, Emanet, Ceylan, Akdemir, Karslı and Dalgıç. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Mert Minaz, bWVydC5taW5hekBlcmRvZ2FuLmVkdS50cg==

ORCID: Hatice Onay, orcid.org/0000-0003-3463-7360
Akif Er, orcid.org/0000-0002-0052-5590
Mert Minaz, orcid.org/0000-0003-1894-9807
Muhammet Emanet, orcid.org/0000-0002-9970-1442
Yusuf Ceylan, orcid.org/0000-0002-7513-4957
Tolga Akdemir, orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-6406
Barış Karslı, orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-6988
Göktuğ Dalgıç, orcid.org/0000-0001-8619-6160

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.