ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci., 22 September 2025

Sec. Marine Fisheries, Aquaculture and Living Resources

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2025.1659376

Effect of different fishmeal levels in diets on growth performance, tissue morphology, intestinal microflora, and muscle volatile compounds of grass carp

  • GW

    Guangwei Wang 1

  • WL

    Wenle Luo 2

  • XZ

    Xuexue Zhang 2

  • GS

    Gege Sun 2

  • FT

    Fangle Tong 2

  • ZW

    Zehong Wei 2

  • WL

    Wenjie Luo 1,2*

  • 1. School of Medical Information and Engineering, Hunan University of Medicine, Huaihua, China

  • 2. Engineering Research Center of Polyploid Fish Reproduction and Breeding of the State Education Ministry, College of Life Sciences, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China

Abstract

Introduction:

Fishmeal is beneficial to the growth performance of grass carp. However, it remains unclear whether fishmeal can enhance the flavor of muscle, and contribute to the regulatory mechanisms involved in its interaction with the intestinal microbiome.

Methods:

In this study, grass carp (70.01 ± 5.34 g) were fed with diets containing 0% (FL), 3% (FM), and 6% (FH) fishmeal for 60 days. The growth performance, intestinal and muscle histomorphology, intestinal microflora, and muscle volatile compounds (VOCs) were evaluated.

Results:

The results showed that compared with the FL group, the final body weight (FBW), weight gain rate (WGR), specific growth rate (SGR), and intestinal villus height of grass carp in the FM and FH groups were significantly increased. Compared with the FL and FM groups, the muscle fiber density in the FH group was significantly increased, and the muscle fiber diameter was significantly reduced. Microbial data analysis found that the three treatment groups were well separated in the NMDS plot, and different levels of fishmeal had a significant impact on microbial community composition (Stress = 0.084). In the LefSe analysis (LDA value > 3.0), Actinobacteria in the FL group, Petrimonas in the FM group, Bacteroides paurosaccharolyticus, and Erysipelatostridiaceae in the FH group all showed significant responses. The intestinal microbiota composition was closer in the FM and FH groups compared with the FL group. GC-IMS analysis indicated that 53 VOCs were detected in the muscle. The FL group had fewer VOCs, and most of the VOCs had lower contents than those in the FH group. Spearman correlation analysis showed that aldehydes were significantly positively correlated with Corynebacterium, Bacteroides, Cetobacterium, Erysipelatoclostridium, Aeromonas, Shewanella, and Vibrio.

Discussion:

Based on the evaluation of growth performance, intestinal morphology, and microflora, the diet containing 3% fishmeal is suitable. However, the muscle fiber characteristics and VOCs profile of grass carp fed with 6% fishmeal diet is superior to that of the 3% fishmeal group.

1 Introduction

The grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus) belongs to the carp and minnow family (Cyprinidae) () and is the most productive freshwater fish species in aquaculture in China. It is reported that the annual production of grass carp exceeded 5.94 million tons in 2023 (China Fishery Statistical Yearbook, 2024). In its natural habitat, grass carp primarily feeds on riparian and aquatic plants (). Plant proteins such as soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and cottonseed meal are widely used in grass carp feed. However, the anti-nutritional factors in rapeseed meal and cottonseed meal have negative impacts on the health of grass carp, such as reducing growth performance and impairing intestinal function (; ). The addition of an appropriate level of fishmeal has been proven to enhance the growth performance of grass carp (). Fishmeal is a valuable source of animal protein and is widely used in aquaculture feed due to its balanced amino acid profile, high crude protein content, and good digestibility. The inclusion of fishmeal in feed has been shown to promote grass carp growth by improving feed conversion efficiency, increasing palatability, and facilitating the digestion and absorption of nutrients (). Nonetheless, the impact of increased levels of fishmeal in the feed on muscle flavor in farmed grass carp remains unclear.

The interaction between the intestine and the endogenous microbiota contributes to the growth, maintaining intestinal homeostasis, enhancing immunity, and disease resistance in aquatic animals (). The intestinal microbiota of fish is involved in the synthesis of vitamins, digestive enzymes, and metabolic products (). The absence of probiotics such as Lactobacillus () and Bacteroides may lead to the host suffering from inflammatory bowel disease (). Dietary factors have been proven to affect the composition of the gut microbiota (; ). Ringø et al. observed that the dominance of Gram-positive bacteria belonging to Brochothrix and Carnobacterium species in the gastrointestinal tract of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) fed with fishmeal, while Chryseobacterium spp, Psychrobacter glacincola and Gram-positive bacteria belonging to Carnobacterium dominated the gastrointestinal tract when fed with soybean meal. In the context of grass carp farming, replacing fishmeal with rapeseed meal has been found to decreased the relative abundance of Proteobacteria while increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria in the fish intestine, potentially causing enteritis and inhibiting growth (). Replacing fishmeal with rapeseed meal reduces the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the gut of grass carp, while increasing the relative abundance of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and may lead to enteritis and growth inhibition ().

Volatile compounds (VOCs) play a key role in determining the aroma of fish products (). Dietary components, such as fishmeal and meat meal, have been proven to affect the composition of VOCs in fish muscle, thereby influencing the overall flavor profile of the meat (). For instance, a low-fishmeal diet has been shown to reduce the content of certain categories of VOCs in the muscle tissue of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) (). Gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) leverages the separation characteristics of GC, the advantages of fast response and high sensitivity of IMS, and is capable of detecting a large number of compounds with different chemical groups (). The application of GC-IMS enables more complex analysis of VOCs in fish products (). Moreover, GC-IMS requires a lower injection temperature, which can retain the original flavor information of the sample, making the analytical results more authentic and convincing (). In this study, GC-IMS was employed to investigate the effects of fishmeal levels on the variations of VOCs in grass carp muscle and to establish distinct flavor profiles.

Typically, fishmeal is included at a 3% level in grass carp feeds. Building on this, we therefore investigated the effects of zero supplementation and excessive supplementation on muscle flavor and the intestinal microbiota of grass carp through application of GC-IMS to analyze VOCs profiles, and high-throughput sequencing (HTS) in grass carp. Ultimately, the central question is not merely how much fishmeal can be omitted or added, but how these low-, standard- and high-fishmeal treatments will translate into consumer acceptance. By deliberately designing this gradient, we seek to pinpoint the exact formulation that best elevates flesh texture, flavour and overall sensory appeal—turning grass carp from a routine staple into a product that shoppers actively reach for. Additionally, a Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between the predominant microbiome and VOCs.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Experiment diets

The experiment utilized soybean meal, cottonseed meal, and rapeseed meal as primary protein sources, soybean oil and fish oil as primary lipid sources. The composition and formulation of the experimental diets are detailed in Table 1. The feed fishmeal-free (FL) is used as the basal diet. Experimental diets are prepared by adding 3% (medium level) fishmeal (referred to as FM) and 6% (high level) fishmeal (referred to as FH) to the basal diet. All diets ingredients were ground and filtered through a 40-mesh screen, and then pelletized using a twin screw extruder (TSE65, Modern Yanggong Machinery Technology Development Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) (2 mm × 2 mm). The pellets are subsequently dried in a dryer at 60°C and stored in sealed bags at room temperature until feeding.

Table 1

Ingredients (%)Treatments
FLFMFH
Fish meal0.003.006.00
Soybean meal24.0024.0024.00
Cottonseed meal14.0014.0014.00
Rapeseed meal35.0029.0025.00
DL-Met (98.5%)0.050.050.05
Wheat flour17.920.9021.9
Ca (H2PO4)22.002.002.00
Fish oil2.502.502.50
Soybean oil1.251.251.25
Vitamin premixa1.001.001.00
Mineral premixa2.002.002.00
Choline chlorideb0.250.250.25
Ethoxyquinb0.050.050.05
Total100100100
Nutrient contents
Crude proteinc37.5837.7237.89
Crude lipidc4.925.125.04
Water contentd,%101010
Crude fiberd,%7.77.67.5
Ashd,%9.29.19.0
Nitrogen-free extractd,%34.935.435.9
Digestible energyd, MJ/kg12.813.013.0

Formulation and proximate composition of the experimental diets (% dry matter).

a

Vitamin premix (g/kg): retinyl acetate (500,000 IU g-1), 0.386; cholecalciferol (500,000 IU g-1), 0.40; D, L-a-tocopherol acetate (50%), 23.23; menadione (22.9%), 0.83; cyanocobalamin (1%), 0.94; D-biotin (2%), 0.75; folic acid (95%), 0.42; thiamine nitrate (98%), 0.09; ascorhyl acetate (95%), 9.77; niacin (99%), 4.04; meso-inositol (98%), 19.39; calcium-D-pantothenate (98%), 3.85; riboflavin (80%), 0.73; pyridoxine hydrochloride (98%), 0.62. All ingredients were diluted with maize starch to 1 kg; Mineral premix (g/kg): MnSO4·H2O (31.8% Mn), 2.6590; MgSO4·H2O (15.0% Mg), 200.0000; FeSO4·H2O (30.0% Fe), 12.2500; ZnSO4·H2O (34.5% Zn), 8.2460; CuSO4·5H2O (25.0% Cu), 0.9560; KI (76.9% I), 0.0650; Na2SeO3 (44.7% Se), 0.0168. All ingredients were diluted with maize starch to 1 kg.

b

Choline chloride with a purity of 50%; Ethoxyquin with a purity of 30%.

c

Nutrient contents were actual values.

d

Nutrient levels were theoretical values.

2.2 Experimental fish and feeding trial

The experiment was carried out in a fish farm in Xidongting district (Changde, Hunan, China). Grass carps were obtained from a commercial farm (Changde, Hunan, China). The grass carp are acclimated in cages for two weeks. The grass carps were subjected to a 24-hour fasting period before the formal experiment. A total of 270 healthy grass carps (average weight 70.01 ± 5.34 g) were selected and randomly divided into nine floating cages (2.0 × 1.5 × 1.5 m). The experiment was divided into three treatment groups, each with three replicates (n = 30). After the experiment begins, the fish are fed three times a day (at 7:00, 12:00, and 17:00). During the 60-day experimental period, the mortality and feeding conditions of the grass carp are recorded daily. Culture unit: 20-hectare earthen pond, average depth 2 m. Water volume: ~400,000 m³. Water exchange: 10% of pond volume per day via continuous inflow/outflow. Throughout the experiment, water quality parameters are monitored: water temperature ranges from 24.5 to 30.3°C, pH values range from 7.3 to 7.8, and dissolved oxygen levels range from 6.5 to 7.5 mg/L.

2.3 Sample collection

At the end of the experiment, grass carp were fasted for 8 h. Then, three fish were randomly selected from each cage. Their body weight was measured, and samples of the posterior intestine contents were collected. These samples are rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored in a -80°C freezer. The samples from three fish in the same net cage were pooled into one sample for further analysis of the intestinal microbial community. The remained grass carp are then fasted for another 16h, and the total number and body weight in each cage were recorded. Additionally, three fish from each cage were randomly selected and anesthetized, and then the body length, body weight, visceral, and liver weight were measured. The section of posterior intestine (1 cm×1 cm) and the left dorsal muscle samples (1 cm×1 cm×1 cm) were collected for histomorphology analysis. The right dorsal muscle samples were collected. The samples from the three fish in the same cage are mixed into one sample, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C, and stored in a -80°C freezer for the subsequent measurement of VOCs.

The growth performance of the grass carp was determined as follows:

2.4 Histomorphology analysis

Intestinal and muscle sections are prepared according to the method of T. Tang (). Sections are photographed using a fluorescence microscopy (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The complete intestinal villus height and villus width are measured by ImageJ software. The number of intact myofibers in various regions of the transected muscle is measured, and the fiber density was calculated as the number of fibers per square millimeter (fibers/mm ()), and the fiber diameter (≥ 10 µm) is calculated based on the area = π × r².

2.5 Intestinal microflora analysis

Total DNA is extracted from intestinal contents using the sodium dodecyl sulfate method according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Next-generation HTS is employed to analyze the composition of the gut microbiota. The V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene is amplified using specific primers with barcodes, 515F (5’-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3’) and 806R (5’-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3’), followed by sequencing on the NovaSeq 6000 platform. Samples are annotated using the SILVA database and the Mothur method. After dereplication of valid tags, singletons are removed based on abundance, and then clustering at 97% similarity. Weighted UniFrac distance is used to calculate the sample distance matrix to investigate similarities among different samples. The UPGMA clustering tree is generated using the QIIME software (version 1.9.1). A species abundance clustering heatmap (top 30) is created based on species annotation and abundance information at the genus level using R software (version 3.1.0). Non-Metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis is conducted using the vegan package in R software. LEfSe (LDA Effect Size) analysis is performed using LEfSe software (version 1.0) to identify species with significant differences among groups (). Sequencing and routine data analysis were conducted by Novogen Co., Ltd. (Novogen, Beijing, China).

2.6 Muscle gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry analysis

VOCs in muscle samples are analyzed using an integrated system composed of an Agilent 490 Gas Chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and IMS instrument (FlavorSpec®, Gesellschaft für Analytische Sensorsysteme mbH, Dortmund, Germany). The detection method follows the protocol outlined by Zhang Q et al (; ). N-Ketones C4-C9 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) are used as external references to calculate the retention indices (RI) of aromatic compounds. Aromatic compounds in muscle samples are identified by comparing their RI values with standards in the GC-IMS library. Quantification of each VOC in muscle samples is performed using established calibration curves, with results expressed as the relative content of each VOC relative to the total aroma content (n=3) (). For downstream analysis, individual VOCs were grouped into chemical classes (aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, etc.). The abundance of each class was calculated as the sum of the peak areas of all compounds belonging to that class.

2.7 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 23 software (IBM, Armonk, USA). Data were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD), the analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA, with a significance threshold level set at P< 0.05. Laboratory Analytical Viewer (LAV, G.A.S., Dortmund, Germany) software and GC-IMS Library Search were used to analyzed the aroma profiles “Fingerprint” gallery plots and principal component analysis (PCA) of muscle samples are analyzed using laboratory analytical viewer (LAV, G.A.S., Dortmund, Germany) software and GC-IMS Library Search. In R software, Spearman correlation is used to calculate the correlation between the top 30 bacterial genera in gut microbiota abundance and VOCs with statistical differences.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Growth performance

The growth performance results of grass carp are shown in Table 2. Compared with the FL group, the FBW, WGR, and SGR of the FM and FH groups are significantly increased (P<0.05). This is similar to the results obtained by Peng, K.-S. et al. regarding the impact of fish meal substitution for soybean meal on the growth performance of grass carp (). Fishmeal is a widely used feed ingredient which contains a higher percentage of protein, energy, minerals, and vitamins (). Fishmeal applied with other animal and vegetable proteins in the diet had synergistic effects which could balance the amino acid composition, promote fast growth of fish, and reduce feeding costs (). Therefore, completely or partially replacing plant protein with fishmeal can positively impact the growth performance of grass carp.

Table 2

ParametersTreatments
FLFMFH
  • IBW (g)

70.09 ± 0.0770.00 ± 0.3269.95 ± 0.18
  • FBW (g)

209.15 ± 7.48a236.72 ± 10.47b238.18 ± 11.25b
  • WGR (%)

198.39 ± 10.94a238.22 ± 15.87b240.52 ± 16.96b
  • SGR (%)

1.73 ± 0.06a1.93 ± 0.08b1.94 ± 0.08b
  • FCR

3.22 ± 0.132.85 ± 0.342.59 ± 0.32
  • HSI (%)

1.94 ± 0.162.27 ± 0.571.83 ± 0.17
  • VSI (%)

12.20 ± 0.2213.23 ± 1.0912.15 ± 0.25
  • CF (%)

2.10 ± 0.182.10 ± 0.122.06 ± 0.13

Effect of dietary fishmeal on growth performance of grass carp.

IBW, initial body weight; FBW, final body weight; WGR, weight gain rate; SGR, specific growth rate; FCR, feed conversion ratio; HSI, hepatosomatic index; VSI, viscerosomatic index; CF, condition factor. FL: grass carp fed diet without fishmeal; FM: grass carp fed diet with 3% fishmeal; FH: grass carp fed diet with 6% fishmeal. Data are expressed as means ± SD. Value with different superscripts are significantly different (P< 0.05, n ≥ 3).

This experiment adopts a stepwise feed formulation: fishmeal increases from 0% to 6% while rapeseed meal decreases from 35% to 25%. Rapeseed meal contains several known antinutritional factors—such as glucosinolates, tannins, and phytates—that suppress fish growth and disturb the gut microbiota. Hence, part of the observed improvements in growth performance and gut microbiota cannot be ruled out as arising from the reduction of rapeseed meal rather than from the increase in fishmeal, and the overall feed effect may concurrently benefit from the lower rapeseed meal level.

Ethoxyquin was included at 0.05% of the diet as a necessary antioxidant to ensure feed stability during storage. Ethoxyquin was added only as an antioxidant. However, published data indicate that even this level can transiently suppress respiratory burst and lysozyme activity in tilapia () and accumulate as dimer residues in salmonid tissues (). Such mild immunomodulation could have dampened diet-related inflammatory responses, although growth performance remained unaffected (). At current ingredient prices, the 6% formulation increases feed cost by approximately 8%–10% per tonne compared with the 3% formulation. Therefore, based on the effect–cost trade-off, 3% fishmeal represents the economically optimal recommendation; a 6% fishmeal formulation is considered only if the market offers a premium for “flavour” that exceeds 10%. Subsequent studies quantify the actual revenue gain from this flavour improvement through consumer sensory tests and economic modelling to confirm the strategy’s feasibility.

3.2 Tissue morphology

The morphological results of grass carp intestines and muscles are shown in Figures 1A and 1B. The results in Figure 1C indicate that, compared with the FL group, the intestinal villus height of the FM and FH groups is significantly increased (p< 0.05). The intestine is the primary site for the digestion and absorption of nutrients, and the height of intestinal villi is positively correlated with nutrient absorption (). Therefore, the addition of 3% and 6% fishmeal may enhance the intestinal digestive and absorptive capacity of grass carp, thereby promoting their growth, by increasing the height of intestinal villi to expand the intestinal absorptive surface area. The results in Figures 1E and 1F show that, compared to the FL and FM group, the fiber diameter of the FH group significantly decreased while the fiber density significantly increased (p< 0.05). Changes in muscle fiber size are achieved through the balance between protein synthesis and degradation (). Nutritional status is mirrored in the muscle fibers’ characteristics, including their size, shape, and classification (). An increase in fiber density and a decrease in fiber diameter can improve meat tenderness (). Therefore, a fishmeal level of 6% may elevate the quality of grass carp by improving the morphology of muscle fibers.

Figure 1

3.3 Intestinal microflora

The sequencing result of the intestinal microbiome is shown in Figure 2. The results of the UPGMA phylogenetic tree analysis indicate that Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Fusobactariota were the predominant bacteria at the phylum and species level in all groups (Figures 2A, B). This is consistent with the findings of Wu, S. and Zhang, X. et al (; ). Furthermore, the composition of bacterial phyla in the FM and FH groups was closer to each other than to the FL group. Intestinal Firmicutes possess genes responsible for fermenting dietary fiber and interact with the intestinal mucosa to help maintain host homeostasis (). Actinobacteria, especially Bifidobacteria, are crucial for gut homeostasis and widely used as probiotic with beneficial effects in various pathological conditions (). Bacteroidetes play an important role in gut health by producing butyrate, which is the end product of colonic fermentation and is considered to have antineoplastic properties (). Fusobacteria activate the host’s inflammatory response to prevent pathogens from promoting tumor growth (). Dysbiosis, characterized by an imbalance in the taxonomic composition, often manifests as an increase in Firmicutes relative to Bacteroidetes in metabolic disorders (). Studies have shown that an increase in Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, and a decrease in Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria, are similar to the microbial patterns of diseased fish (). Compared with the FM and FH groups, we observed this disease-like microbial pattern in the FL group. The gut microbiota may indirectly affect intestinal inflammatory pathways and the synthesis and catabolism of nutrients (). There are complex interactions among different groups within the gut microbial community, including competition and symbiosis (). Changes in fishmeal levels may disrupt the balance of these interactions, leading to changes in the relative abundance of certain groups. In the absence of fish meal, certain microbial populations may become more prominent. For example, Photobacterium was highly represented in gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) fed with a fishmeal-free diet (). Some studies have also found that when fishmeal is used to replace cottonseed protein, the proportion of the relative abundance of the phylum Proteobacteria, which encompasses both pathogenic and beneficial symbionts in the gut of juvenile golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus) gradually decreased with the increase in fish meal levels (). Proteobacteria is a metabolically diverse phylum that includes not only opportunistic pathogens but also beneficial commensals such as Vibrio alginolyticus, which can act as a probiotic and reduce mortalities caused by Aeromonas and Vibrio spp (). Similarly, with the increasement of fishmeal levels, probiotic bacteria (Lactococcus) increase while pathogenic bacteria (Enterococcus) decrease in the common carp (Cyprinus carpio) intestine (). Therefore, increasing fishmeal levels can balance the gut microbiota and maintain intestinal health.

Figure 2

The clustering heatmap based on the top 30 bacterial genera with relative abundance is shown in Figure 2C. ANOSIM analysis of dietary fishmeal on intestinal microflora of grass carp: FL vs. FM and FM vs. FH were showed in Figure 2D. The FL group is dominated by Staphylococcus, Paeniclostridium, Lactobacillus, Kocuria, and Corynebacterium. In contrast, Butyricicoccus, Acinetobacter, Rothia, Dermacoccus, Ralstonia, Pseudomonas, Alteromonas, Brevinema, Geobacter, and Pseudoalteromonas are enriched in the FM group. The dominant genera in the FH group include Dielma, Romboutsia, Clostridium sensu stricto 1, Erysipelatoclostridium, Aeromonas, Shewanella, Anaerostignum, and Vibrio. Recent studies have identified various pathogenic microorganisms (Staphylococcus (), Paeniclostridium (), Acinetobacter (), Corynebacterium (), and Brevinema ()) and beneficial microorganisms (such as Dermacoccus ()) in the intestines of different species. In our study, the three pathogenic microorganisms Staphylococcus, Paeniclostridium, and Corynebacterium accumulate in the FL group. Additionally, the butyrate-producing genera Butyricicoccus and Rothia are enriched in the FM group. Pseudomonas (lipase) (), Alteromonas (), and Pseudoalteromonas (amylase and chitinase) () known for their vigorous metabolic capabilities, are more abundant in the FM group. Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1 () and Romboutsia () are important for amino acid utilization in animal protein diets, displaying a range of metabolic capabilities, including carbohydrate utilization, fermentation of single amino acids, anaerobic respiration, and production of metabolic end products. Clostridium can induce regulatory T cells in the colonic lamina propria of mice, thereby providing protective effects in mouse models of colitis and allergies (). Clostridium and Romboutsia can enhance the digestion of cellulose (), and they are enriched in the FH group.

Through non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis, as shown in Figure 2E, we visualized the structure of microbial communities fed with different levels of fish meal. The results indicate that the three treatment groups are well separated in the NMDS plot, with a Stress value of 0.084. This demonstrates that different levels of fish meal significantly affect the composition of microbial communities and that our two-dimensional ordination plot effectively represents the original distances between samples, ensuring high reliability of the results ().

In the LefSe analysis (Figure 2F), different levels of fish meal exert significant effects on microbial community structure. The LDA value, used to assess the impact of microbial groups that show significant differences between groups, indicates that an LDA value greater than 3 is generally considered to represent biomarkers with high credibility (). In the FL group, Actinobacteria, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_11,Sva0485,Clostridium_sp_HY_34_8,Tetrasphaera, and Intrasporangiaceae; in the FM group, Petrimonas, AEGEAN_169_marine_group, Dysgonomonadaceae, and Breznakia; and in the FH group, Bacteroides paurosaccharolyticus, Erysipelatostridiaceae, Enterobacterales,Subdoligranulum, and Coprococcus all exhibit significant responses, with LDA values exceeding the threshold. This highlights the clear response of these microbial groups to different levels of fish meal feeding.

PICRUSt2-level-2 functional profiling revealed that the 3% fish-meal group was significantly enriched in pathways related to metabolism, energy metabolism, lipid metabolism, and cell growth and death (Figure 2G). These enriched functions provide mechanistic insight into the improved growth performance and enhanced muscle flavour observed with fish-meal supplementation, thereby furnishing more direct evidence for the hypothesis that gut-microbiota modulation mediates flavour development.

3.4 Muscle volatile compounds

In Figure 3A, the PCA model is selected as the separation model. Samples with similar aroma characteristics overlap or are closely positioned in their respective figures (). The cumulative variance contribution rate of PC1 (57.9%) and PC2 (25.28%) is 83.18%, indicating that these two PCs essentially cover the sample information and can characterize the odor composition of grass carp muscle at different fish meal levels (). A distinct separation is observed between the samples of the FH group and the other samples along PC1 (57.9%), indicating that the odor changes in muscle samples with a high level of fish meal are more pronounced.

Figure 3

The muscle VOCs of FL, FM, and FH are analyzed using GC-IMS. VOCs are significant determinants of meat flavor (), and they serve as an important basis for consumers to evaluate meat quality (). Intensity variations in different muscles are represented as a 3D topographical model in Figure 3B. The 2D topographical visualization of the VOCs is depicted in Figure 3C. Most signals are observed to be located in the retention time range of 100–400 s and a drift time of 1–1.5 s. The results in Table 3 show that 53 VOCs are detected in the samples, including 10 aldehydes, 12 alcohols, 9 ketones, 2 nitrogen compounds, 3 sulfides, and 3 esters. In addition, there are nine unknown compounds. Aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, acids, and hydrocarbons are the primary VOCs in fish and fish products (). When compared to the FM group as the background, the FL and FH groups display varying degrees of blue and red spots. The FL group has more blue spots, indicating that more VOCs and their content are lower than in the FM group; the FH group has many red spots, indicating that more VOCs and their content are higher than in the FM group (Figure 3D; Table 3).

Table 3

CountCompoundCAS#MWRIRt (sec)Dt (a.u.)Integral volume
FLFMFH
1ethanol MC6417546.1485.799.391.052166 ± 428c2777 ± 46b1399 ± 91a
2ethanol DC6417546.148298.391.131609 ± 206c644 ± 26b83 ± 22a
3ammoniaC766441717499.6103.240.9142625 ± 1389a44561 ± 690a57250 ± 3429b
42-propanoneC6764158.1510.5106.341.121587 ± 102b1451 ± 50b421 ± 26a
52-propenenitrileC10713153.1510.8106.441.09593 ± 82a833 ± 25b825 ± 76b
6methyl acetateC7920974.1522.8109.991.04**1037 ± 73
72-butanone MC7893372.1604.1137.291.07823 ± 120a923 ± 76ab1133 ± 92b
82-butanone DC7893372.1600.7136.031.24390 ± 181794 ± 122469 ± 319
91unidentified0602.7136.771.16287 ± 49298 ± 37323 ± 161
10butanalC12372872.1608.1138.791.29284 ± 34b754 ± 57c90 ± 36a
11ethyl acetate MC14178688.1619.9143.311.1331 ± 13b585 ± 71c130 ± 27a
12ethyl acetate DC14178688.1619.2143.061.33167 ± 15724 ± 231*
132-methylbutanal MC9617386.1663.7161.511.18210 ± 89a668 ± 27c526 ± 32b
142-methylbutanal DC9617386.1663.2161.31.479 ± 57a731 ± 29b877 ± 36c
161-hydroxy-2-propanoneC11609674.1684.4170.881.041015 ± 141526 ± 25*
172-pentanone MC10787986.1692.8175.671.12449 ± 73c272 ± 8b127 ± 5a
182-pentanone DC10787986.1696.6178.211.371220 ± 157509 ± 95*
192,3-pentanedioneC600146100.1698.8179.671.22377 ± 18b268 ± 38a474 ± 39c
201-penten-3-olC61625186.1700.1180.60.94975 ± 4a1126 ± 9b1405 ± 46c
212unidentified0701.4181.461.33*211 ± 12223 ± 42
22pentanal MC11062386.1704.4183.571.18415 ± 170596 ± 21552 ± 54
23pentanal DC11062386.1705.3184.161.4297 ± 70174 ± 13189 ± 20
243unidentified0708.2186.211.30*125 ± 6182 ± 15
254unidentified0746.2215.091.16598 ± 53b502 ± 54ab489 ± 10a
265unidentified0741.9211.61.28441 ± 37ab500 ± 117b299 ± 26a
273-hydroxy-2-butanoneC51386088.1743.5212.961.331778 ± 351237 ± 90*
28methyl isobutyl ketone MC108101100.2744.7213.871.18110 ± 4a106 ± 4a149 ± 12b
29methyl isobutyl ketone TC108101100.2743.7213.111.4891 ± 1883 ± 2585 ± 23
306unidentified0748.4216.891.40827 ± 81b944 ± 157c134 ± 22a
31isopentyl alcohol MC12351388.1751.6219.541.24248 ± 32a440 ± 51b294 ± 31a
32isopentyl alcohol DC12351388.1752.3220.131.49*152 ± 4*
33cyclopentanoneC12092384.1757.2224.251.11**86 ± 17
342-methyl butanolC13732688.1763.6229.841.47159 ± 13b96 ± 17a201 ± 10c
35thiolaneC11001088.2765.4231.371.32267 ± 30a275 ± 59a635 ± 17b
363-methyl-3-buten-1-olC76332686.1767.5233.221.43737 ± 22c658 ± 44b158 ± 7a
374-methyl-2-pentanol MC108112102.2768.7234.281.26459 ± 17a505 ± 18a606 ± 27b
384-methyl-2-pentanol DC108112102.2767.7233.371.551290 ± 19a1287 ± 53a1458 ± 120b
391-pentanol MC7141088.1782.8247.181.25333 ± 28a430 ± 27b405 ± 32b
401-pentanol DC7141088.1782.62471.51235 ± 33a273 ± 7a378 ± 14b
41hexanal MC66251100.2802.8265.741.251957 ± 33b1995 ± 60ab1714 ± 122a
42hexanal DC66251100.2800.8263.861.564418 ± 640a4895 ± 257a6280 ± 134b
43hexanal TC66251100.2799.4262.521.65107 ± 26a124 ± 6a247 ± 13b
447unidentified0818280.741.4674 ± 5a104 ± 15b66 ± 3a
45isovaleric acidC503742102.1822.7285.491.21195 ± 2398 ± 6*
46furfurolC9801196.1825.6288.521.10396 ± 44232 ± 14*
472-hexen-1-ol MC2305217100.2859.4325.911.18137 ± 26a174 ± 32a344 ± 20b
482-hexen-1-ol DC2305217100.2859.2325.581.3067 ± 4a70 ± 3a209 ± 12b
492-hexen-1-ol TC2305217100.2859.7326.231.51**112 ± 9
50cyclohexen-2-oneC93068796.1884.4356.61.1163 ± 10b48 ± 5a68 ± 3b
511-hexanol MC111273102.2889362.611.321087 ± 1441188 ± 1701032 ± 177
521-hexanol DC111273102.2887.3360.341.64479 ± 49a596 ± 31ab805 ± 183b
531-hexanol TC111273102.2887.5360.661.99***
548unidentified0896.9373.491.35256 ± 16a295 ± 20a522 ± 24b
552-heptanone MC110430114.2899.2376.931.26303 ± 5b240 ± 27a280 ± 10b
562-heptanone DC110430114.2897.7374.691.63434 ± 45a553 ± 53b604 ± 19b
574-heptenal (Z)C6728310112.2904.1384.101.15123 ± 30a150 ± 16a201 ± 3b
58heptanal MC111717114.2908.1390.151.33626 ± 133676 ± 32610 ± 103
59heptanal DC111717114.2908.3390.41.40167 ± 5a181 ± 13a263 ± 33b
60heptanal TC111717114.2908.4390.551.68357 ± 138a493 ± 50a745 ± 111b
615-methyl-2-furanmethanolC3857258112.1955.6469.221.2650 ± 7a44 ± 10a87 ± 10b
622-heptenal (E) MC18829555112.2968492.291.25272 ± 55ab195 ± 57a333 ± 48b
632-heptenal (E) DC18829555112.2967.8491.961.38126 ± 19a119 ± 25a257 ± 17b
64benzaldehyde MC100527106.1983.9523.731.15450 ± 66a708 ± 105b730 ± 69b
65benzaldehyde DC100527106.1984.1524.141.28118 ± 50a236 ± 25b360 ± 15c
66benzeneamineC6253393.1993.5543.491.43865 ± 162a944 ± 62a2225 ± 57b
67dimethyl trisulfideC3658808126.3996.7550.221.31370 ± 93b170 ± 26a154 ± 9a
681-octen-3-oneC4312996126.21001.8559.031.68**118 ± 11
692-pentylfuranC3777693138.21002559.321.25175 ± 15a137 ± 31a246 ± 24b
70octen-3-ol MC3391864128.21008.8571.381.162764 ± 226a2606 ± 291a3678 ± 62b
712-ethyl-1-hexanol MC104767130.21019.7590.971.4832 ± 354a1020 ± 125a1542 ± 132b
722-ethyl-1-hexanol DC104767130.21018.2588.271.46182 ± 83a226 ± 30a469 ± 39b
732-ethyl-1-hexanol TC104767130.21018.5588.711.81134 ± 95a170 ± 27a403 ± 85b
749unidentified01049.8648.851.2683 ± 2572 ± 783 ± 9
75isopentyl isovalerateC659701172.31073.1697.371.45**55 ± 9
762-octenal (E) MC2548870126.21073.8699.031.33147 ± 14130 ± 21160 ± 15
77n-nonanal MC124196142.21107.4775.661.47874 ± 158a829 ± 41a1396 ± 153b
78n-nonanal DC124196142.21107774.641.94**180 ± 50

Identification of muscle volatile compounds based on GC-IMS.

MW, formula weight; GI, gas chromatography retention index; Rt, gas chromatography retention time; Dt, drift-time. M, D, and T after the substance represented an aggregation state of monomer and dimer, respectively. FL, grass carp fed diet without fishmeal; FM, grass carp fed diet with 3% fishmeal; FH, grass carp fed diet with 6% fishmeal. Data are expressed as means ± SD. Value with different superscripts are significantly different (P< 0.05, n ≥ 3).

The comparison of VOC fingerprints among the three groups is shown in Figure 3E. The VOCs with significant differences are roughly categorized into aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, esters, sulfur compounds, and furans, and a radar chart is created as shown in Figure 3F. Compared with the FL and FM groups, a large number of aldehydes are significantly increased in the FH group, including 2-methylbutanal D, hexanal D, T, 4-heptenal (Z), heptanal, 2-heptenal (E) D, benzaldehyde D, and n-nonanal M (P< 0.05); the content of butanal and 2-methylbutanal M is highest in the FM group (P< 0.05). Aldehydes are highly volatile and have a robust fatty aroma (). They are crucial to the flavor of fish due to their diversity and low odor thresholds (). It has been reported that butanal, hexanal, heptanal, and benzaldehyde are the key aroma compounds in Hypophthalmichthys molitrix, Aristichthys nobilis, Lateolabrax japonicus, and Parabramis pekinensis (). Most linear aldehydes are produced through autoxidation reactions initiated by enzymes or microorganisms present in fish (; ). Genomic and transcriptomic data have confirmed that the cecal microbial community affects the VOCs of duck meat, especially pentanal, hexanal, and heptanal, by modulating metabolic pathways related to fatty acid synthesis and degradation (). Hexanal has been recognized as a unique aroma-active component in fresh tuna () and raw red seabream (), and it exerts a major influence on flavor perception in silver carp samples (). Previous research has indicated that (Z)-4-heptenal is present in extracts from turbot, characterized by a fishy or potato-like odor (). These aldehydes, which significantly contribute to the aroma of fish meat, impart a pleasant nutty, grassy, and fruity fragrance to the fish.

Compared to the FL and FM groups, the content of many alcohols is significantly increased in the FH group, including 1-penten-3-ol, 4-methyl-2-pentanol, 1-pentanol, 2-hexen-1-ol, 5-methyl-2-furanmethanol, octen-3-ol, and 2-ethyl-1-hexanol (P< 0.05). Alcohols are primarily derived from the oxidative decomposition of lipids or the reduction synthesis of carbonyl groups. They have higher thresholds compared to aldehydes and are closely related to the characteristic fatty flavor of meat (; ). Alcohols generally impart fruity, floral, and grassy notes to fish (). Unsaturated alcohols typically have much lower thresholds than saturated alcohols and can significantly influence the flavor of food (). In our study, the content of ethanol is highest in the FL group, and the content of isopentyl alcohol M is highest in the FM group (P< 0.05). The elevated content of ethanol in the FL group suggests that it may not be conducive to preservation and can lead to the generation of unpleasant odors (). High concentrations of 1-hexanol and 1-pentanol have been detected in mature cod roe, and they may play a critical role in the product’s aroma (). The compound 1-octen-3-ol, originating from the hydroperoxide degradation product of linoleic acid, has been identified as one of the most important aroma-active compounds in fish samples (; ). This may be one of the reasons why fish flavor compounds are affected.

Compared with the FL group, the content of many ketone compounds is significantly increased in the FH group, including 2-butanone M, 2,3-pentanedione, methyl isobutyl ketone M, and 2-heptanone D (P< 0.05); compared with the FH group, the content of 2-propanone and 2-pentanone M is significantly increased in the FL and FM groups (P< 0.05). Ketones may originate from the thermal oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids, the degradation of amino acids, or microbial oxidation (). Ketones have a unique buttery and fruity flavor (). 2-Heptanone, primarily produced by the oxidation of linoleic acid, has been identified as a compound that can modulate the flavor of meat and meat products (). Studies have shown that 2-heptanone helps enhance the aromatic characteristics of silver carp (). In addition, among the esters, the content of ethyl acetate M is highest in the FM group, and the content of thiolane is highest in the FH group (P< 0.05). Esters are well-known for their significant contribution to fruity flavors () and play a crucial role in the unique aroma of fish (). Ethyl acetate, with its slight fruity aroma, is considered a VOC that can enhance the aroma of fish (). The content of the sulfur compound dimethyl trisulfide is highest in the FL group (P< 0.05). Sulfur compounds, with their low thresholds, play an important role in the overall flavor of food, and thiols are generated from the Strecker degradation of methionine. Furans are one of the important compounds that produce meaty flavors (). The content of the furan compound 2-pentylfuran is highest in the FH group (P< 0.05), and it makes a positive contribution to the flavor of grass carp. The diet-induced shifts in key volatile compounds are known to enhance the fresh, sweet, and umami notes while reducing ‘fishy’ odours. Consequently, fillets from fish fed the higher-fish-meal diets are expected to command better market prices and broader consumer acceptance, providing a clear economic incentive for producers.

3.5 Correlation analysis of microflora and muscular VOCs

Studies have proven that microbial communities are associated with muscle metabolic characteristics (). Changes in the gut microbiota can regulate muscle fiber diameter (). Short-chain fatty acids are produced during the fermentation process of gut microbiota, which promote the formation of oxidative muscle fibers (). Studies have shown that fecal microbiota transplantation is beneficial for the muscle growth and development of germ-free piglets (). The microbial communities in the animal gut are diverse and play an important role in meat quality (). VOCs with significant differences are categorized into aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, esters, sulfur compounds, and furans. Spearman correlation analysis is performed with the top 30 bacterial genera of the gut microbiota. The results are shown in Figure 4. Ketones and esters show no significant correlation with various bacterial genera (P > 0.05); sulfur compounds are extremely significantly correlated with Dielma (P< 0.01); furans are significantly positively correlated with Aeromonas (P< 0.05); alcohols are significantly positively correlated with Clostridium-sense-stricto-1 and Geobacter (P< 0.05). Some gut microbes can catalyze the production of acids, thereby affecting the formation of flavor compounds in fish. For example, supplementing ducks with lactic acid bacteria has been shown to significantly increase the content of many VOCs in duck meat, including 1-octen-3-ol (). Clostridium-sense-stricto-1 can produce butyric acid through the butyrate kinase pathway (). Aldehydes show significant positive correlations with multiple bacterial genera, including a significant positive correlation with Bacteroides (P< 0.05) and extremely significant positive correlations with Erysipelatoclostridium, Aeromonas, Shewanella, Cetobacterium, and Vibrio (P< 0.01). As a halophilic bacterium, Vibrio can produce a variety of flavor compounds, thereby providing different flavors to the final product (). Therefore, we speculate that the gut microbiota of grass carp shows a significant correlation with muscle VOCs.

Figure 4

4 Conclusion

Integrating growth performance, intestinal morphology, microbiota and muscle quality, the 3% fish-meal diet already fulfils production targets at the lowest cost. Raising fish-meal to 6% yields only marginal VOC increments (<15% for individual aldehydes and alcohols) without improving growth, and its 8–10% higher feed cost is economically justified only if a market flavour premium exceeds this margin. Although gut microbiota and VOCs correlate, causality remains unproven; thus, sensory tests and economic modelling are needed to verify consumer willingness-to-pay for any flavour advantage.

Statements

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The animal study was approved by Hunan Normal University Ethics Committee. The study was conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

WG: Writing – original draft. WEL: Formal Analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft. XZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. GS: Methodology, Writing – original draft. FT: Methodology, Writing – original draft. ZW: Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. WLU: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the “Engineering Research Center of Polyploid Fish Reproduction and Breeding of the State Education Ministry” for providing the laboratory facilities and resources that were essential for this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Summary

Keywords

fish meal, grass carp, growth performance, intestinal microflora, volatile compounds

Citation

Wang G, Luo W, Zhang X, Sun G, Tong F, Wei Z and Luo W (2025) Effect of different fishmeal levels in diets on growth performance, tissue morphology, intestinal microflora, and muscle volatile compounds of grass carp. Front. Mar. Sci. 12:1659376. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1659376

Received

14 July 2025

Accepted

03 September 2025

Published

22 September 2025

Volume

12 - 2025

Edited by

Luca Parma, University of Bologna, Italy

Reviewed by

Yuwen Dong, University of Pennsylvania, United States

Ercüment Genç, Ankara University, Türkiye

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Wenjie Luo,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics