POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Pollution
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1665873
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Marine Environmental Protection: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives Volume IIView all 58 articles
Multi-level governance of Arctic marine plastic pollution: effectiveness and enhancement approaches
Provisionally accepted- 1Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China
- 2Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Marine plastic pollution (MPP) poses a significant threat to the sustainable development of the Arctic. In response, a multi-level governance framework has emerged across global, regional, and national dimensions. At the global level, international agreements such as the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries (CCRF) provide foundational regulatory frameworks for marine plastic pollution governance. Regionally, the Arctic Council plays a pivotal role by leveraging initiatives such as the Protection of the Arctic Marine Environment (PAME) and the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). These mechanisms serve to integrate Arctic issues into the global agenda while facilitating knowledge sharing and implementing tailored action plans. Nationally, the eight Arctic states interact with both global and regional governance regimes, participating in collaborative efforts to mitigate marine plastic pollution. However, the effectiveness of multi-level governance of Arctic marine plastic pollution is constrained by regime robustness and state capacity. To more effectively tackle marine plastic pollution in the Arctic, it is imperative to integrate Arctic concerns into global governance agendas, actively build a multidimensional governance framework at the regional level, and enhance the Arctic states' willingness and capacity — with attention to the contributions and demands of Indigenous communities regarding this issue.
Keywords: marine plastic pollution, Arctic governance, multi-level governance, institutional effectiveness, Arctic Council
Received: 14 Jul 2025; Accepted: 06 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Zhang and Yan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Xinqi Yan, yanxq614@nenu.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.