POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Pollution
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1680697
This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Marine Environmental Protection: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives Volume IIView all 42 articles
International Law Concerning the Environmental Protection in Arctic: What is Left behind UNCLOS and the BBNJ Agreement?
Provisionally accepted
Fangling Wu1
Tiansheng Li2*- 1Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo, China
- 2Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
The Arctic region, with its unique and fragile ecosystem, faces significant challenges in environmental protection due to climate change, increasing human activities, and geopolitical tensions. This paper examines the international legal framework governing Arctic environmental protection, focusing on the roles and limitations of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and the Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement). While UNCLOS provides a foundational legal framework for ocean governance, its applicability in addressing Arctic environmental concerns should be acknowledged, as should the complementary role of the BBNJ Agreement. However, the lack of provisions specific to Arctic environmental issues creates a gap between the effectiveness of international law and the urgent need for a comprehensive legal regime tailored to the Arctic context. Furthermore, the supplementary role of the BBNJ Agreement to UNCLOS remains limited. By highlighting key challenges in the implementation of international law, including disputes over Article 234 of UNCLOS, this study underscores the urgent need for a more robust and cohesive international legal approach to ensure the sustainable future of the Arctic environment, and concludes with appropriate recommendations.
Keywords: UNCLOS, BBNJ Agreement, arctic marine environment, Article 234, Arctic thaw
Received: 06 Aug 2025; Accepted: 08 Sep 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Wu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Tiansheng Li, Guangzhou Maritime University, Guangzhou, China
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.