Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Mar. Sci.

Sec. Marine Pollution

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1683341

This article is part of the Research TopicAdvances in Marine Environmental Protection: Challenges, Solutions and Perspectives Volume IIView all 50 articles

Divergences and Challenges in the Negotiation of the Global Plastics Treaty: China's Pathway in Advancing Global Ocean Plastic Pollution Governance

Provisionally accepted
Sai  HeSai He*Xinlong  HeXinlong He
  • Heilongjiang University, Harbin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

The current international legal framework for addressing marine plastic pollution is fragmented and lacks binding legal force, making it insufficient to meet the demands of marine plastic pollution governance. Although the international community generally recognizes the necessity of establishing a Global Plastics Treaty, the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-5.2) in 2025 still failed to finalize the treaty text. An analysis of the latest Chair's Text produced during INC-5.2 reveals that significant disagreements persist among countries on key issues, including the treaty's scope of regulation, funding mechanisms, and legal enforceability. As a major global producer and consumer of plastics, China holds significant influence in shaping plastics governance. These disagreements pose challenges for China in terms of normative leadership, funding contributions, and the implementation of governance principles in addressing marine plastic pollution. China can prioritize strengthening regional cooperative governance, providing regional experiences that support the negotiation and implementation of binding provisions under the Global Plastics Treaty, thereby enhancing the institutional leadership. In terms of funding mechanisms, China can act as a bridge to coordinate interests among different groups of countries, promote the implementation of the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, and expand funding sources through mechanisms such as BRICS. Finally, China can reinforce the promotion of governance concepts, translating them into concrete systems and practices to enhance its soft power, strengthen its voice in marine plastic pollution governance, and offer Chinese approach to this global issue..

Keywords: marine plastic pollution, Marine environmental protection, plastic treaty, international environmental law, Common but differentiated responsibilities, Life Cycle Assessment, China–ASEAN Environmental Cooperation

Received: 10 Aug 2025; Accepted: 22 Sep 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 He and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Sai He, 237598136@qq.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.