ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Ecosystem Ecology
Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmars.2025.1691156
This article is part of the Research TopicAquatic Environment Changes of Vegetated Regions in Rivers, Marshes, and Coastal RegionsView all 6 articles
Extreme marine heatwaves drive divergent kelp forest trajectories and alternative stable states
Provisionally accepted- 1Centro de Investigacion Cientifica y de Educacion Superior de Ensenada, Ensenada, Mexico
- 2Universidad Autonoma de Baja California - Campus Ensenada, Ensenada, Mexico
- 3University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, United States
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Kelp forests are experiencing extreme declines globally, yet local social-ecological factors may mediate their responses to climate perturbations. Using a combination of long-term field surveys (2016–2023) and satellite data (2004–2023), we examined the regional effects of the 2014–2016 MHWs regime on kelp forest ecosystems along a 600 km latitudinal gradient in Baja California, Mexico. We documented three distinct geographical subregion trajectories: (1) a remarkable resilience of giant kelp Macrocystis pyrifera, at its thermal limits in the southern subregion, recovering 95% of the historical canopy area despite experiencing the highest temperatures; (2) understory-dominated state in the mid-subregion, with a 96% decrease in M. pyrifera canopy, where understory brown macroalgae filled the ecological niche left by declining giant kelp, maintained by moderate herbivore densities; and (3) a shift to an urchin barren alternative stable state in the northern subregion, characterized by a 2,485% increase in herbivore densities from 2016 to 2023 —dominated by purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (44%)— and a 95% reduction in giant kelp canopy area compared to pre-warming baseline. The southern subregion's resilience was associated with high predators' (10.26 ± 5.63 per 60 m²) and low herbivores' (25.20 ± 8.89 per 60 m²) densities, dominated by turban snails Megastraea spp. (83%) with S. purpuratus absent. In contrast, the northern subregion's shift from kelp forests to urchin barrens coincided with low predator abundances (5.05 ± 2.32 per 60 m²), potentially linked to fragmented fisheries management. Our findings challenge the assumption that range-edge populations are inherently more vulnerable to warming and underscore how local biological factors and management approaches can either enhance or compromise ecosystem resilience to climate stress. These divergent trajectories suggest that while temperature acts as an initial driver of change, the persistence of alternative states is governed by ecological feedback involving predator-herbivore dynamics, herbivores' assemblages, and management contexts, providing insights for developing climate-adaptive conservation strategies under intensifying global environmental change.
Keywords: Kelp forest resilience, marine heatwaves, Macrocystis pyrifera, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Trophic cascades, Ecological community
Received: 22 Aug 2025; Accepted: 15 Oct 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Bauer, Lorda, Beas-Luna, Malpica-Cruz, Abadía-Cardoso, Paz Lacavex and Olmos. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Rodrigo Beas-Luna, rbeas@uabc.edu.mx
Jorge Olmos, jolmos@cicese.mx
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.