POLICY AND PRACTICE REVIEWS article
Front. Mar. Sci.
Sec. Marine Affairs and Policy
This article is part of the Research TopicMarine Genetic Resources Beyond National JurisdictionView all articles
Form follows function: in pursuit of solutions to the unresolved issues of the benefit-sharing regime for marine genetic resources under the BBNJ Agreement
Provisionally accepted- Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
While the Agreement under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity of Areas Beyond National Jurisdiction (BBNJ Agreement) has pioneered the establishment of a benefit-sharing regime for marine genetic resources (MGRs), persistent divergences between developing and developed countries have posed substantial challenges to its implementation. The current legal framework is overly schematic and insufficient to guide practice, leaving many issues unresolved. To explore the solutions for these issues, this article adopts a legal functionalist approach grounded in the principle that "form follows function". First, this article categorizes the unresolved issues into four types: ambiguous terms in the Agreement, uncertain legal nature of benefit-sharing modalities, weak operability resulting from incomplete guiding rules, and inadequate monitoring rules. Second, it derives potential solutions from a legal functionalist perspective. This approach emphasizes the instrumental value or functionality of law. By focusing on facilitating the achievement of the Agreement's intended functions and goals. this approach can help steer ongoing international rule-making activities and overcome negotiation deadlocks. Under such an approach, the core guiding principle for problem solving is to make rules operational by addressing conflicts, giving due regard to diverse concerns, and fostering broad consensus among negotiating parties. Finally, this article tentatively applies this approach to specific unresolved issues, including: adopting broader definitions of key terms; designing relatively light monetary benefit-sharing rules that combine mandatory and voluntary mechanisms; facilitating ex situ access through multilateral mechanisms; clearly delineating the respective scope of application of different technology transfer modalities; and strengthening supporting information disclosure and traceability rules. Concurrently, this article suggests that the design and implementation of rules should take into account the needs of marine scientific research, data confidentiality, financial and administrative burdens, and the legitimate rights and interests of stakeholders.
Keywords: marine genetic resources, Benefit-sharing, Unresolved issues, Functionalism, Effective implementation, Goal-orientation, International negotiations
Received: 16 Oct 2025; Accepted: 18 Nov 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Yu, Tang, Sun and Zhang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Yuqiong Sun, yqsun@shou.edu.cn
Yanxuedan Zhang, yxdzhang@shou.edu.cn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.