CORRECTION article

Front. Med., 11 March 2021

Sec. Geriatric Medicine

Volume 8 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.659639

Corrigendum: Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • 1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States

  • 2. Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States

  • 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada

In the original article, there were mistakes in Tables 1, 3 and 4 as published. Table 1 Column 2 and Table 3 citations were incorrect, and Table 4 was mistakenly included as a duplicate of Table 3. The corrected Tables 1, 3 and 4 appear below.

Table 1

SourceDiagnostic criteriaSetting
Aharon-Peretz et al. ()DSM III-R ()/NINCDS-ADRDA ()Not stated
Ahmed et al. ()McKhann et al. ()/Gorno-Tempini et al. ()/Rascovsky et al. ()Community (home)/In Lab
Anderson et al. ()Neary criteria ()Community (home)
Brown et al. ()Medical record diagnosisNursing home
Carvalho-Bos et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()/DSM-IV ()Nursing home
David et al. ()DSM-IV ()Out-patient clinic
David et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Out-patient clinic
Eggermont and Scherder ()Medical record diagnosisNursing home
Fetveit and Bjorvatn ()Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale ()Nursing home
Fleiner et al. ()ICD-10 ()Psychiatric hospital
Gehrman et al. ()Medical record diagnosis/NINCDS-ARDA ()Nursing home
Ghali et al. ()DSM-III-R ()Dementia treatment Evaluation facility
Harper et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Hospital/clinical research center
Harper et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Hospital/clinical research center
Hatfield et al. ()DSM-IV ()/ NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)
Hooghiemstra et al. ()DSM-V ()/NINCDS-ADRDA ()/Neary Criteria ()/McKeith et al. ()/Pohjasvaara et al. ()Not stated
Ijmker and Lamoth ()Clinician/ medical record diagnosisIn laboratory
Iwata et al. ()DSM-IV ()/NINCDS-ARDA ()Not stated
James et al. ()NINCDS-ARDA ()Community (home)
Kodama et al. ()DSM-III-R ()Community (home)
König et al. ()International working group−2 criteria (IWG-2) ()Memory clinic
Kuhlmei et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()/NINDS-AIREN ()Not stated
La Morgia et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Not stated
Lamoth et al. ()Alzheimer's association criteriaClinic/hospital
Landolt et al. ()Autopsy or biopsy confirmationHospital/ nursing home
Lee et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Not stated
Leger et al. ()DSM-V ()/ NINCDS-ADRDA ()/MMSE ≤ 25 and ≥15 ()/CDR (Score of 0.5, 1, or 2) ()Out-patient clinic
McCurry et al. ()Family physician/medical record diagnosisCommunity (home)
Merrilees et al. ()Neary criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration ()Community (home)
Most et al. ()NINCDS- ADRDA ()Not stated
Moyle et al. ()Medical record diagnosisLong-term care facility
Mulin et al. ()NINCDS- ADRDA ()Community (home)
Murphy et al. ()MMSE <23 ()Nursing home
Olsen et al. ()Medical record diagnosis or MMSE <25 ()Nursing home/community (home)
Paavilainen et al. ()CDR > 0.5 ()/ MMSE <20 ()Nursing home
Pollak and Stokes ()Mattis dementia rating scale total score <123 () Mattis dementia rating scale memory score <19 ()Community (home)
Rindlisbacher and Hopkins ()DSM-III-R ()Hospital
Schwenk et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()/NINDS-AIREN ()Community (home)
Valembois et al. ()DSM-IV ()Hospital
van Alphen et al. ()Medical record diagnosisCommunity (home)/nursing home
van Someren et al. ()DSM-III-R ()/NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)/nursing home
Varma and Watts ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)
Viegas et al. ()DSM-IV ()/MMSE ≤ 24 ()Nursing home
Volicer et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()/DSM-III-R ()Hospital
Wams et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)
Weissova et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)
Wirz-Justice et al. ()DSM –IV ()Hospital
Yesavage et al. ()NINCDS-ADRDA ()Community (home)

Patient setting and diagnostic criteria for 48 observational studies testing wearable technology in participants with dementia.

Table 3

SourceDaily activityPeak daily activityMean activity countsDaytime activityNighttime activityImmobile hoursActivity patterns
Aharon-Peretz et al. ()+
Ahmed et al. ()+
Carvalho-Bos et al. ()+
David et al. ()+
David et al. ()+-
Eggermont and Scherder ()+-
Ghali et al. ()+
Harper et al. ()+
Harper et al. ()++
James et al. ()+
Kuhlmei et al. ()+
Merrilees et al. ()+
Moyle et al. ()+
Mulin et al. ()+
Olsen et al. ()+
Paavilainen et al. ()+
Pollak and Stokes. ()+
Rindlisbacher and Hopkins ()+
Wirz-Justice et al. ()+
Valembois et al. ()+
van Alphen et al. ()+
Volicer et al. ()+
Varma and Watts. ()++

Specific outcome measures of daily activity reported by included studies.

+ indicates a significant association or difference reported.

–indicates no significant association or difference reported.

Table 4

SourceWASOTSTSEIVISRAM10L5MesorAcrophaseAmplitude
Aharon-Peretz et al. ()+
Anderson et al. ()
Brown et al. ()+
Carvalho-Bos et al. ()+++++
Eggermont and Scherder ()+++
Fetveit and Bjorvatn ()++
Gehrman et al. ()
Harper et al. ()++++++
Harper et al. ()++++++
Hatfield et al. ()++++
Hooghiemstra et al. ()++++
Kodama et al. ()+++
La Morgia et al. ()+++
Landolt et al. ()+
Lee et al. ()
Leger et al. ()++
McCurry et al. ()
Most et al. ()++++
Mulin et al. ()+
Murphy et al. ()+
Olsen et al. ()
Paavilainen et al. ()+
Pollak and Stokes ()+
van Someren et al. ()++++
Viegas et al. ()++
Volicer et al. ()++
Wams et al. ()+
Weissova et al. ()+
Wirz-Justice et al. ()+++
Yesavage et al. ()++

Specific outcome measures of sleep and circadian rhythm reported by included studies.

+indicates a significant association or difference reported.

–indicates no significant association or difference reported.

IS, Interdaily stability; IV, Intradaily variability; L5, Activity of least active 5 h; M10, Activity of most active 10 h; RA, Relative amplitude; SE, Sleep efficiency; TST, Total sleep time; WASO, Wake after sleep onset.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

Summary

Keywords

technology, geriatrics, cognition, sleep, wearable

Citation

Cote AC, Phelps RJ, Kabiri NS, Bhangu JS and Thomas K“ (2021) Corrigendum: Evaluation of Wearable Technology in Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 8:659639. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.659639

Received

28 January 2021

Accepted

12 February 2021

Published

11 March 2021

Volume

8 - 2021

Edited and reviewed by

Mario Ulises Pérez-Zepeda, Dalhousie University, Canada

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Jaspreet S. Bhangu

This article was submitted to Geriatric Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics