Abstract
Background:
Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) can coexist and cause disabilities. This study aimed to assess the association between AR, asthma control, asthma-related quality of life, and other comorbidities.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted in adults with asthma in six hospitals in Thailand. The outcomes were association of asthma control assessed by the asthma control test (ACT), AR, and asthma comorbidities. Not-well-controlled asthma was defined as ACT scores ≤22. The severity of AR was determined by visual analog scale (VAS). Severe AR was defined as VAS ≥5. Asthma-related quality of life (AQLQ), comorbidities, and total IgE were recorded.
Results:
A total of 682 asthmatic patients were included. Median (IQR) age was 58.0 (47.0–64.0) years. 69.9% were female. Not-well-controlled asthma was present in 44.7%. The prevalence of AR was 86.1%. Moderate/severe persistent AR was diagnosed in 21.7% and severe AR was diagnosed in 30.2% of the patients. Inhaled corticosteroid-containing regimens were prescribed in 97.7% of patients. Intranasal corticosteroid and antihistamine were prescribed in 65.7 and 31.7%, respectively. Patients with not-well-controlled asthma had higher body mass index, VAS scores, proportions of pollution exposure, aeroallergen sensitization, severe AR, nasal polyp, urticaria, food allergy, gastroesophageal reflux disease, depression and anxiety, peptic ulcer, and asthma exacerbations, but younger age, lower AQLQ scores, and lower FEV1. Correlation was found between AR severity and ACT (r = −0.461, p < 0.001), AQLQ (r = −0.512, p < 0.001), and total IgE (r = 0.246, p < 0.023). Multiple regression analysis revealed that ACT, AQLQ, and percentage of FEV1/FVC were significantly associated with severe AR.
Conclusion:
Allergic rhinitis is prevalent in Thai asthmatic patients. AR severity is associated with asthma control, quality of life, and pulmonary function. Comprehensive care is essential for patients with uncontrolled asthma, particularly when coexisting with conditions.
1 Introduction
Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, usually characterized by chronic airway inflammation. It is defined by the history of respiratory symptoms, such as wheeze, shortness of breath, chest tightness and cough that vary over time and in intensity, together with variable expiratory airflow limitation (1). Asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR) are characterized by chronic airway inflammation and components of other diseases. Asthma presents with variable respiratory symptoms and airflow limitation (2). AR presents with nasal congestion, sneezing, running nose, and ocular itch, which affect the patient’s quality of life (3). The majority of asthmatic patients have pulmonary and extrapulmonary comorbidities. AR, a common comorbidity in patients with asthma, affects asthma outcomes (3, 4). The prevalence of AR in patients with and without asthma in the Asia Pacific region varies according to the definition and recruited population (5–11). In a systematic review, the worldwide prevalence of AR is 18.1% (ranging from 1.0 to 54.5%) (12). Prevalence of AR ranged from 3.5 to 54.5% for America, from 1.0 to 43.9% for Europe, and from 1.0 to 47.9% for Asia (12). AR and other asthma-related comorbidities increase clinical complexities and healthcare costs (11, 13). Despite recommendations of asthma management and effective medications, particularly inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), a substantial number of asthmatic patients have not controlled their diseases. Ultimately, not-well-controlled asthma affects patient quality of life and leads to exacerbations and hospitalizations (13, 14).
An epidemiological survey of physician management of AR coexisting with asthma in the Asia Pacific region including Thailand revealed many problems (14, 15). Pulmonary and extrapulmonary comorbidities with asthma have been addressed for several decades (16). Obesity, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) coexist in asthmatic patients (16–19). Comorbidities, including AR, contribute to risk factors and share inflammatory pathways with asthma. Both AR and asthma are inflammatory diseases and their inflammatory mechanisms are similar in that they are characterized by an inflammatory infiltrate made up of eosinophils, T cells, and mast cells that release several mediators, chemokines and cytokines, local and systemic IgE synthesis, and a systemic link via the bone marrow (20). These conditions drive the development of asthma and aggravate asthma control. Global and national asthma management guidelines recommend appropriate diagnosis and management of comorbidities. The interaction of asthma control, comorbidities, and health-related quality of life has never been systematically explored.
The aim of this study was to assess the association between AR and asthma control in adults in six medical centers in Bangkok and other provinces of Thailand. In addition, asthma-related quality of life and associations between asthma control and other comorbidities were assessed.
2 Methods
2.1 Study design and subjects
A cross-sectional study was conducted in asthma outpatient clinics from six tertiary medical centers in Thailand between December 2021 and December 2022. Consecutive asthmatic patients, aged 18 years or older and diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Asthma strategy, were recruited from six university teaching hospitals.
Ethic approval for this study was obtained from the institutional committee on human research in each site of patient recruitment, in full compliance with international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, CIOMS Guidelines, and the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). All methods were performed in accordance with these guidelines and regulations. All participants provided written informed consent.
2.2 Data collection
Allergic rhinitis was diagnosed by a clinician and by International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC)-based questionnaires inquiring about the prevalence of AR and ocular symptoms (5, 8). The diagnosis of AR was made when the history and physical findings were consistent with an allergic cause (e.g., clear rhinorrhea, pale discoloration of nasal mucosa, and red and watery eyes) and one or more of the following symptoms: nasal congestion, runny nose, itchy nose, or sneezing. The severity of AR was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (very severe symptoms) (3). Severe AR was defined as VAS ≥5.
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics including age, sex, age at initial asthma diagnosis, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, and indoor biomass and pollution exposure were recorded. Asthma exacerbations requiring emergency department (ED) visits in the past year and exacerbations requiring hospitalization in the past year were recorded. Current pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments including bronchial thermoplasty were reviewed. Asthma medications including ICS, long-acting beta2-agonists, long-acting muscarinic antagonists, oral theophylline, type 2 biologics, and oral low-dose prednisolone, and AR medications including intranasal corticosteroid and oral medications were recorded. The daily dose of ICS was expressed as the budesonide equivalent in micrograms per day (2). Asthmatic patients were divided into elderly (65 years or older) and younger groups (younger than 65 years).
The Thai version of the Asthma Control Test (ACT™; scores from 5 to 25) was used to assess asthma control levels. Not-well-controlled asthma was defined as ACT ≤22 and uncontrolled asthma was defined as ACT ≤19 (21, 22). The Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) Thai version, 15-items with seven-point scale (scores from 15 to 105), was used to assess the asthma-related quality of life of patients (23, 24). Higher AQLQ scores indicated better quality of life. AR-related quality of life was assessed by the Rhinoconjunctivitis QoL Questionnaire (Rcq-36); 36 questions covering six domains (25).
Comorbidities including chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, OSA diagnosed by polysomnography, peptic ulcer, food allergy, aspirin hypersensitivity, atopic dermatitis, urticaria, diabetes, hypertension, obesity, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease were assessed in the asthmatic patients and recorded. Disease-specific questionnaires for specific comorbidities were examined. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire with subscales for both anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D); scores ≥8 and ≥ 8 indicating anxiety and depression, respectively (26, 27). GERD was assessed by the Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (GerdQ); scores >9 suggesting GERD (28). A modified STOP-Bang questionnaire was used for assessing the risk of OSA; scores ≥3 suggesting risk for sleep apnea (29).
Spirometry was performed according to the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Standardization (30). Bronchodilator (BD) response test was done using salbutamol inhalation (total dose 400 μg) and repeating spirometry 15 min later. Pre-BD and post-BD forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and FEV1/FVC were recorded and expressed in liters (L), %predicted, or %. Complete blood counts including eosinophil counts, serum specific IgE and total IgE were recorded.
2.3 Statistics analysis
We hypothesized that the prevalence of severe AR in patients with not-well-controlled asthma in our study would be 50%. The sample size was calculated for a prevalence survey using 5% margin of error, 80% power, and a two-sided alpha of 0.05. Therefore, the estimated sample size would be 385. Data were expressed as number (%), mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range; IQR). Chi-squared test was used to compare categorical variables between the two groups. Independent sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables with normal distributions between the two groups. The Mann–Whitney U test was used to compare between two independent groups on continuous variables with non-normal distributions. Pearson correlation was used for assessing the correlation between two independent continuous variables and presented as correlation coefficient (R). To determine factors associated with severe AR, we employed the logistic regression model with severe AR as the dependent variable. All independent variables—ACT, AQLQ, HADS-A, HADS-D, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, and total IgE—were entered into the regression model, followed by backward selection using a p value cutoff of 0.1. We report the regression coefficients along with 95% confidence interval, and corresponding p values. A two-sided value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, United States).
3 Results
Six hundred eighty-two patients with asthma were included. Median (IQR) age was 58.0 (47.0–64.0) years. 69.8% were female. Pre-BD FEV1 was 80.00 (67.00–91.47) %. Blood eosinophil counts were 227.70 (100.00–437.51) cells/μL. Aeroallergen sensitization was 20.7%. ACT was 23.00 (20.00–24.00). The asthma was controlled in 55.3% of patients whereas in 44.7% of patients it was not well-controlled. 13.8% of patients had history of asthma exacerbations. 97.7% of patients received regular ICS treatment (Table 1).
Table 1
| Characteristics | Data (n = 682) |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.0 (47.0–64.0) |
| Male/Female | 205 (30.1)/477 (69.9) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.8 (22.4–28.1) |
| Age at initial asthma diagnosis ≤40 years | 398 (58.4) |
| Smoking history | 97 (14.2) |
| Indoor biomass exposure | 126 (18.5) |
| Pre-BD FEV1, L | 1.99 (1.53–2.53) |
| Pre-BD FEV1, % predicted | 80.00 (67.00–91.47) |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC, % | 73.77 (64.49–81.39) |
| Blood eosinophil, cells/μL | 227.70 (100.00–437.51) |
| Serum total IgE, IU/mL | 155.00 (77.02–505.62) |
| Aeroallergen sensitizationa | 141 (20.7) |
| AQLQ, total scores | 97.00 (83.00–105.00) |
| ACT, scores | 23.00 (20.00–24.00) |
| Controlled asthmab | 377 (55.3) |
| Not-well-controlled asthmac | 305 (44.7) |
| History of asthma exacerbations | 94 (13.8) |
| Exacerbation requiring ED visit in the past year | 54 (7.9) |
| Exacerbation requiring hospitalization in the past year | 17 (2.5) |
| ICS-containing therapyd | |
| No ICS or Intermittent ICS/formoterol | 16 (2.3) |
| Regular low-dose ICS | 315 (46.2) |
| Regular low-medium dose ICS | 22 (3.2) |
| Regular medium ICS | 201 (29.5) |
| Regular high-dose ICS | 128 (18.8) |
| Add-on therapy | |
| LABA | 632 (92.7) |
| LTRA | 250 (36.7) |
| LAMA | 112 (16.4) |
| Theophylline | 45 (6.6) |
| Prednisolone | 39 (5.7) |
| Bronchial thermoplasty | 20 (2.9) |
| Type 2 biologics | 7 (1.0) |
Baseline characteristics of asthmatic patients.
Data shown as n (%) or median (IQR). aDefined as positive skin prick test or specific IgE. bDefined as ACT scores > 22. cDefined as ACT scores ≤ 22. dDaily ICS dose as budesonide equivalent (μg/day); low = 200–400, medium > 400–800, and high > 800. ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; BD, Bronchodilator; ED, Emergency department; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, Forced expiratory volume; ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; kg, Kilogram; L, Liter; LABA, Long-acting beta2-agonist; LAMA, Long-acting muscarinic antagonist; LTRA, Leukotriene receptor antagonist; m, Meter.
The prevalence of ISAAC-defined AR was 86.1%. Moderate/severe persistent AR was in 21.7% and severe AR was in 30.2% of patients. Intranasal corticosteroid and antihistamine were prescribed for AR treatment in 65.7 and 31.7% of patients (Table 2). Common comorbidities included hypertension (26.2%) and diabetes (10.7%), while the prevalence of coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease was 2.8 and 2.5%, respectively. OSA was diagnosed in 12.0%, while STOP-Bang scores suggested a risk for sleep apnea in 11.0%. GERD was diagnosed by a clinician in 21.7% and by GerdQ in 1.9% (Table 2).
Table 2
| Characteristics | Data (n = 682) |
|---|---|
| Allergic rhinitis | |
| ARa | 540 (79.2) |
| AR by ISAAC criteria | 587 (86.1) |
| ISAAC questionnaire: nose symptoms ever | 577 (84.6) |
| ISAAC questionnaire: nose symptoms within 12 months | 487 (71.4) |
| ISAAC questionnaire: nose with eye symptoms | 285 (41.8) |
| ISAAC questionnaire: symptoms interfere with daily activity | 275 (40.3) |
| Moderate/severe persistent AR by ARIA criteria | 148 (21.7) |
| Severe ARb | 206 (30.2) |
| VAS for AR severity, scores | 2.0 (0–5.0) |
| INCS for AR treatment | 448 (65.7) |
| Oral antihistamine for AR treatment | 216 (31.7) |
| Comorbidities | |
| Chronic rhinosinusitisa | 93 (13.6) |
| Nasal polypsa | 48 (7.0) |
| OSA | 82 (12.0) |
| OSA treated with CPAP | 48 (7.0) |
| Risk of OSAc | 75 (11.0) |
| GERDa | 148 (21.7) |
| GERD diagnosed by GerdQd | 13 (1.9) |
| History of peptic ulcer | 24 (3.5) |
| Depression and anxietya | 38 (5.6) |
| Depression by HADS screening | 4 (0.6) |
| Anxiety by HADS screening | 6 (0.9) |
| Food allergya | 71 (10.4) |
| Aspirin hypersensitivitya | 51 (7.5) |
| Atopic dermatitisa | 83 (12.2) |
| Urticariaa | 109 (16.0) |
| Diabetes | 73 (10.7) |
| Hypertension | 179 (26.2) |
| Obesity | 46 (6.7) |
| Coronary artery disease | 19 (2.8) |
| Chronic kidney disease | 17 (2.5) |
Characteristics of allergic rhinitis and other asthma-related comorbidities.
Data shown as n (%) or median (IQR). aDiagnosis by clinician. bDefined as visual analog scale ≥ 5 points. cDefined as STOP-Bang scores ≥ 3 points. dDefined as GerdQ > 9 points. AR, Allergic rhinitis; ARIA, Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma; CPAP, Continuous positive airway pressure; GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease; GerdQ, Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire; HADS, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; INCS, Intranasal corticosteroids; ISAAC, International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood; and OSA, Obstructive sleep apnea.
Patients with not-well-controlled asthma had significantly higher BMI, higher VAS scores for AR severity, and higher proportions of indoor pollution exposure, aeroallergen sensitization, severe AR, nasal polyp, urticaria, food allergy, GERD, depression and anxiety, peptic ulcer, and asthma exacerbations, but they were younger and they had lower total AQLQ scores and FEV1 than patients with controlled asthma (Table 3). Moreover, a higher proportion of patients with not-well-controlled asthma had medium- to high-dose ICS treatment (Table 3).
Table 3
| Variables | Controlled asthma* (n = 377) | Not well-controlled asthma* (n = 305) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.0 (49.0–63.0) | 55.0 (43.0–65.0) | 0.018 |
| Female sex | 252 (67.0) | 224 (73.4) | 0.069 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.6 (22.3–27.3) | 25.0 (22.5–29.4) | 0.028 |
| Age at asthma diagnosis, years | 38.0 (22.3–50.0) | 35.0 (17.0–48.0) | 0.081 |
| Smoking history | 53 (14.2) | 44 (14.5) | 0.897 |
| Indoor pollution exposure | 57 (15.1) | 69 (22.6) | 0.012 |
| Pre-BD FEV1, %predicted | 81.0 (70.0–92.0) | 77.0 (64.0–90.3) | 0.006 |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC, % | 73.8 (65.5–81.2) | 73.3 (64.0–81.6) | 0.843 |
| Blood eosinophil, cells/μL | 228.50 (120.70–416.00) | 204.34 (73.15–472.20) | 0.280 |
| Serum total IgE, IU/mL | 114.00 (44.20–286.00) | 170.00 (110.76–557.00) | 0.054 |
| Aeroallergen sensitization | 58 (15.4) | 83 (27.2) | <0.001 |
| AQLQ, total scores | 105.00 (98.00–105.00) | 83.50 (70.00–95.00) | <0.001 |
| ARa | 300 (80.0) | 240 (79.2) | 0.799 |
| VAS for AR severity, points | 1.00 (0.00–2.00) | 3.00 (1.00–5.00) | <0.001 |
| Severe AR | 62 (16.4) | 144 (47.2) | <0.001 |
| Nasal polyp | 18 (4.8) | 30 (9.8) | 0.010 |
| Urticaria | 45 (12.0) | 64 (21.0) | 0.001 |
| Food allergy | 27 (7.2) | 44 (14.4) | 0.002 |
| GERDa | 68 (18.1) | 80 (26.2) | 0.010 |
| Depression and anxietya | 12 (3.2) | 26 (8.6) | 0.002 |
| History of peptic ulcer | 8 (2.1) | 16 (5.3) | 0.027 |
| History of asthma exacerbations | 19 (5.1) | 75 (24.8) | <0.001 |
| OSA | 39 (10.4) | 43 (14.1) | 0.137 |
| INCS for AR treatment | 243 (64.5) | 205 (67.2) | 0.451 |
| Medium to high-dose ICS for asthma treatment | 133 (35.3) | 196 (64.3) | <0.001 |
Factors associated with controlled asthma.
Data shown as n (%) or median (IQR). *Controlled asthma defined as ACT > 22, whereas not well-controlled asthma defined as ACT ≤ 22. aDiagnosis by clinician. ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; AR, Allergic rhinitis; BD, Bronchodilator; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, Forced expiratory volume; GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease; ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; INCS, Intranasal corticosteroid; IU, International unit; kg, Kilogram; L, Liter; m, Meter; mL, Milliliter; OSA, Obstructive sleep apnea; VAS, Visual analog scale; and μL, Microliter.
Correlation was found between severity of AR and ACT (r = −0.461, p < 0.001), AQLQ (r = −0.512, p < 0.001), HADS-A scores (r = 0.357, p = 0.006), HADS-D scores (r = 0.401, p = 0.002), and serum total IgE (r = 0.246, p < 0.023; Table 4). Spirometry parameters were not correlated to AR severity (Table 4). Multiple regression analysis revealed that ACT and AQLQ scores, along with percentage of FEV1/FVC, were significantly associated with severe AR (Table 5).
Table 4
| Parameters | Severity of allergic rhinitis (VAS scores) | |
|---|---|---|
| R | p value | |
| ACT scores | −0.461 | <0.001 |
| AQLQ total scores | −0.512 | <0.001 |
| AQLQ symptom | −0.487 | <0.001 |
| AQLQ activity | −0.355 | <0.001 |
| AQLQ emotion | −0.427 | <0.001 |
| AQLQ environment | −0.453 | <0.001 |
| HADS anxiety subscale | 0.357 | 0.006 |
| HADS depression subscale | 0.401 | 0.002 |
| Pre-BD FEV1 (% predicted) | −0.037 | 0.368 |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC (%) | 0.020 | 0.635 |
| Total IgE, IU/mL | 0.246 | 0.023 |
Correlation between severity of allergic rhinitis and asthma characteristics.
ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; BD, Bronchodilator; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, Forced expiratory volume; HADS, Hospital anxiety and depression scale; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; IU, International unit; mL, Milliliter; and VAS, Visual analog scale.
Table 5
| Variables | Regression coefficients | 95% CI of coefficients | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.359 | 0.439, 2.279 | 0.009 |
| ACT scores | 0.553 | 0.028, 0.107 | 0.004 |
| AQLQ scores | −0.898 | −0.035, −0.016 | <0.001 |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC (%) | −0.672 | −0.012, −0.005 | 0.001 |
Multiple logistic regression analysis for factors associated with severe allergic rhinitis in patients with asthma.
ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; BD, Bronchodilator; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; and FVC, Forced expiratory volume.
Compared to male patients, female patients exhibited lower BMI, AQLQ scores, blood eosinophil level, and proportions of smoking history, coronary artery disease, OSA, and use of medium to high-dose ICS treatment. However, they showed higher proportions of aeroallergen sensitization, severe AR and urticaria, as well as better pulmonary functions (Table 6).
Table 6
| Variables | Female (n = 477) | Male (n = 205) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 57.0 (45.0–63.5) | 58.0 (48.5–64.0) | 0.208 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.5 (22.0–27.9) | 25.2 (23.0–28.9) | 0.015 |
| Smoking history | 19 (4.0) | 78 (38.0) | <0.001 |
| Indoor pollution exposure | 88 (18.4) | 38 (18.5) | 0.978 |
| Age at asthma diagnosis, years | 36.0 (21.0–49.0) | 38.0 (20.0–50.0) | 0.869 |
| Controlled asthma* | 253 (53.0) | 124 (60.5) | 0.073 |
| Pre-BD FEV1, %predicted | 81.0 (68.0–92.2) | 78.0 (63.4–90.5) | 0.042 |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC, % | 75.6 (66.1–83.0) | 70.6 (59.9–78.0) | <0.001 |
| Blood eosinophil, cells/μL | 190.06 (80.56–437.47) | 285.30 (160.80–451.82) | 0.005 |
| Serum total IgE, IU/mL | 147.00 (51.45–505.62) | 245.00 (134.00–519.00) | 0.091 |
| Aeroallergen sensitization | 110 (23.1) | 31 (15.1) | 0.019 |
| AQLQ, total scores | 96.00 (81.00–105.00) | 101.00 (91.00–105.00) | <0.001 |
| ARa | 380 (79.7) | 160 (78.0) | 0.726 |
| VAS for AR severity, points | 2.00 (0.00–5.00) | 2.00 (0.00–4.00) | 0.200 |
| Severe AR | 155 (32.5) | 51 (24.9) | 0.034 |
| Nasal polyp | 31 (6.5) | 17 (8.3) | 0.405 |
| Urticaria | 92 (19.3) | 17 (8.4) | <0.001 |
| Food allergy | 51 (10.7) | 20 (9.8) | 0.728 |
| GERDa | 107 (22.5) | 41 (20.0) | 0.472 |
| Depression and anxietya | 30 (6.3) | 8 (3.9) | 0.209 |
| History of peptic ulcer | 20 (4.2) | 4 (2.0) | 0.146 |
| Diabetes | 47 (9.9) | 26 (12.7) | 0.281 |
| Hypertension | 122 (25.6) | 57 (27.8) | 0.544 |
| Coronary artery disease | 9 (1.9) | 10 (4.9) | 0.030 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 9 (1.9) | 8 (3.9) | 0.117 |
| Obesity | 28 (5.9) | 18 (8.8) | 0.169 |
| History of asthma exacerbations | 73 (15.4) | 21 (10.2) | 0.073 |
| OSA | 47 (9.9) | 35 (17.1) | 0.008 |
| INCS for AR treatment | 312 (65.4) | 136 (66.3) | 0.814 |
| Medium to high-dose ICS for asthma treatment | 212 (44.4) | 117 (57.1) | 0.002 |
Differences in clinical characteristics between females and males with asthma.
Data shown as n (%) or median (IQR). *Controlled asthma defined as ACT > 22, whereas not well-controlled asthma defined as ACT ≤ 22. aDiagnosis by clinician. ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; AR, Allergic rhinitis; BD, Bronchodilator; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, Forced expiratory volume; GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease; ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; INCS, Intranasal corticosteroid; IU, International unit; kg, Kilogram; L, Liter; m, Meter; mL, Milliliter; OSA, Obstructive sleep apnea; VAS, Visual analog scale; and μL, Microliter.
Elderly patients had a later age at asthma diagnosis, higher proportions of GERD, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease, but lower pulmonary functions and proportions of AR and INCS use than younger patients (Table 7).
Table 7
| Variables | Younger (n = 520) | Elderly (n = 162) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 53.0 (43.0–59.0) | 71.0 (68.0–75.3) | <0.001 |
| Female sex | 112 (69.1) | 365 (70.2) | 0.798 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 24.8 (22.4–28.3) | 24.4 (22.6–27.4) | 0.372 |
| Smoking history | 69 (13.4) | 28 (17.4) | 0.204 |
| Indoor pollution exposure | 88 (16.9) | 38 (23.5) | 0.061 |
| Age at asthma diagnosis, years | 30.0 (16.0–44.0) | 51.0 (12.3–66.0) | <0.001 |
| Controlled asthma* | 292 (56.2) | 85 (52.5) | 0.410 |
| Pre-BD FEV1, %predicted | 81.07 (69.00–93.00) | 73.00 (62.00–87.00) | <0.001 |
| Pre-BD FEV1/FVC, % | 76.68 (67.00–83.00) | 67.65 (57.75–73.99) | <0.001 |
| Blood eosinophil, cells/μL | 219.43 (84.05–443.35) | 249.60 (121.53–426.72) | 0.220 |
| Serum total IgE, IU/mL | 151.87 (67.85–443.25) | 194.50 (82.35–679.00) | 0.550 |
| Aeroallergen sensitization | 104 (20.0) | 37 (22.8) | 0.436 |
| AQLQ, total scores | 98.00 (83.00–105.00) | 96.00 (85.00–103.00) | 0.096 |
| ARa | 441 (85.3) | 99 (61.5) | <0.001 |
| VAS for AR severity, points | 2.00 (0.00–5.00) | 2.00 (0.00–4.50) | 0.673 |
| Severe AR | 158 (30.4) | 47 (29.0) | 0.739 |
| Nasal polyp | 32 (6.2) | 16 (9.9) | 0.107 |
| Urticaria | 82 (15.8) | 27 (16.9) | 0.739 |
| Food allergy | 51 (9.8) | 20 (12.3) | 0.360 |
| GERDa | 96 (18.5) | 52 (32.3) | <0.001 |
| Depression and anxietya | 29 (5.6) | 9 (5.6) | 0.983 |
| History of peptic ulcer | 14 (2.7) | 10 (6.2) | 0.037 |
| Diabetes | 34 (6.6) | 39 (24.2) | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 95 (18.3) | 84 (51.9) | <0.001 |
| Coronary artery disease | 10 (1.9) | 9 (5.6) | 0.015 |
| Chronic kidney disease | 7 (1.4) | 10 (6.2) | 0.001 |
| Obesity | 7 (4.3) | 39 (7.5) | 0.162 |
| OSA | 59 (11.4) | 23 (14.2) | 0.334 |
| History of asthma exacerbations | 77 (14.9) | 17 (10.6) | 0.175 |
| INCS for AR treatment | 369 (71.0) | 79 (48.8) | <0.001 |
| Medium to high-dose ICS for asthma treatment | 242 (46.5) | 87 (53.7) | 0.111 |
Differences in characteristics between younger and elderly patients with asthma.
Data shown as n (%) or median (IQR). *Controlled asthma defined as ACT > 22, whereas not well-controlled asthma defined as ACT ≤ 22. aDiagnosis by clinician.
ACT, Asthma Control Test; AQLQ, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire; AR, Allergic rhinitis; BD, Bronchodilator; FEV1, Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC, Forced expiratory volume; GERD, Gastroesophageal reflux disease; ICS, Inhaled corticosteroid; IgE, Immunoglobulin E; INCS, Intranasal corticosteroid; IU, International unit; kg, Kilogram; L, Liter; m, Meter, mL, Milliliter; OSA, Obstructive sleep apnea; VAS, Visual analog scale; and μL, microliter.
4 Discussion
This is a large multicenter study of correlation between asthma control, AR, and asthma-related comorbidities in Thailand. Our study revealed that AR was a common comorbidity (79% by clinician diagnosis) with asthma in Thai patients. The occurrence of AR in asthmatic patients has been addressed in previous large-scale studies and in the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines (31–33). Our AR prevalence in asthmatic patients (79%) is higher than studies in Saudi Arabia (33%) (34), Iran (47%) (35), Japan (67%) (36), Italy (60%) (37), and France (66%) (38) but is lower than the United States (94%) (39). There was concordance between the ISAAC-definition of AR and clinical diagnoses, indicating that diagnosis by clinicians was as reliable as the standard questionnaire used in epidemiological surveys. The most common AR symptoms classified by the ISAAC questionnaire reports were “nose symptoms ever” and “nose symptoms within 12 months” due to perennial AR. The prevalence of eye symptoms in our study (42%) was double the prevalence in a previous study in Thailand by Vichyanond et al. (6). These results can be explained by increased physician awareness of rhinitis coexisting with asthma (15). In addition, climate change and air pollution in Thailand aggravate AR, asthma, and other chronic respiratory diseases (40).
The majority of Thai asthmatic patients had mild AR, according to the ARIA criteria and VAS scores for symptom severity. The prevalence of mild AR in our study was comparable to the prevalence in two other studies (41, 42). This may be because the majority of AR patients were already treated with either intranasal corticosteroid or antihistamine. A relationship between rhinitis severity according to ARIA classification and medical treatment for AR and asthma was shown in a previous study by Antonicelli et al. (43). The patients in our study had controlled asthma according to ACT scores and had well-preserved lung function. The frequency of asthma exacerbation in our study (8% ED visits) was much lower than the frequency in a previous survey by Boonsawat et al. (44) (22% ED visits) in which less inhaled corticosteroid-containing regimens were used. The inverse correlation between AR and spirometry in Thai asthmatic patients resembles previous studies. They demonstrated that lung function abnormalities detected by spirometry in AR patients without clinical symptoms of asthma are directly correlated to rhinitis severity (45, 46). The frequency and severity of AR increased with the severity of asthma (33). Moreover, our results demonstrated that lower lung function determined by FEV1 was associated with not-well-controlled asthma. The effects of AR treatment and asthma treatment on the severity of both diseases have been shown. The most commonly prescribed rhinitis medication in our Thai asthmatics was intranasal corticosteroid, which was comparable to Western world studies (42, 47).
Severe AR determined by VAS score affected asthma control measured by ACT and asthma-related quality of life measured by AQLQ in our study. Low scores of symptom, activity, emotion, and environment domains of AQLQ were negatively influenced by more severe rhinitis. Our study also showed moderate negative correlations between AR severity and AQLQ score. When focusing on each domain in AQLQ, moderate correlations were found in the symptoms, emotional function, and environmental exposure domains, while a weak correlation was found in the activity limitation domain. The correlation between AR severity and AQLQ is possibly an indirect effect from AR and asthma or possibly due to overlap in the quality-of-life questionnaire as some questions are not specific to asthma morbidities but could be due to AR or other comorbidities (9, 48). Our study showed significantly negative correlations between AR severity by VAS score and ACT scores. This finding was similar to a previous report by Acevedo-Prado et al. (49). They found significant correlation between asthma symptoms and rhinitis severity in asthmatic patients.
Our study revealed a predominant proportion of females (70%), potentially explained by hormonal effects. Estrogen contributes to the inflammatory pathway by stimulating hormone receptors on dendritic cells, mast cells, CD4+ T lymphocytes (Th2), and eosinophils, possibly contributing to a higher number of asthma exacerbations in females (50). This effect might explain the higher percentage of aeroallergen sensitization observed in female asthmatic patients in our study. Additionally, we observed more severe AR and urticaria in this group. These factors might contribute to a worse asthma-related quality of life in female asthmatic patients.
Our study showed that Thai asthmatic patients have type-2 high asthma with high blood eosinophil levels and allergy driven diseases. Serum total IgE level generally tends to be higher in patients with allergy diseases compared with non-allergic individuals (51). Weak correlation between AR severity and IgE level was demonstrated in our study. Our findings were similar to a previous large population-based study which showed correlation between increased total IgE levels and asthma but not correlation between IgE levels and AR (52).
Other asthma-related comorbidities were addressed in our study including atopic dermatitis, eczema, chronic rhinosinusitis, nasal polyps, and food allergies. However, non-allergic comorbidities, for instance GERD, and anxiety and depression were commonly seen in Thai asthmatic patients. Other conditions which affect asthma control, i.e., age, BMI, AR severity, indoor pollution exposure, aeroallergen sensitization, nasal polyp, urticaria, food allergy, GERD, depression and anxiety, peptic ulcer, asthma exacerbations, and lung function, need to be considered. However, under-dose of ICS treatment is pivotal for achieving asthma control. These findings emphasize the roles of multimorbidity in asthma, association with allergic diseases, and the symptom burden (53). The interaction between GERD, OSA, and asthma is robust and complex (54). AR has been shown to be associated and it increases the risk of developing OSA. The putative mechanisms are increased airway resistance from nasal blockage and reduced pharyngeal diameter from breathing through the mouth (54). The prevalence of OSA in Thai asthmatic patients (12%) in our study is lower than a meta-analysis (49%) by Kong et al. (55). It might be because Thai asthmatic patients have near normal BMI leading to lower risk of OSA. Thai patients with not-well-controlled asthma had higher BMI than those with well-controlled asthma. These complexities of asthma and related comorbidities must be properly managed in specific clinical contexts.
Other important comorbidities in asthma are depression and anxiety. These were not uncommon in Thai asthmatic and AR patients in our study. A previous study by Rodrigues et al. (56) demonstrated that moderate/severe AR correlated with anxiety and depression scores by HADS. Our study showed higher percentage of anxiety and depression (higher HADS scores) in patients with not-well-controlled asthma. Furthermore, there was a significantly positive correlation between AR severity by VAS scores and anxiety or depression scores.
The relationship between AR severity and asthma-related parameters supports the concept of united airway disease and the link between quality of life and mental disorders. When lower airway-related symptoms are observed in AR patients, careful evaluation is strongly encouraged (57). Careful clinical evaluation and monitoring of AR patients are essential for achieving asthma control. This has been addressed in global and national asthma recommendations, including in Thailand (2, 3, 58). The prevalence and the importance of AR coexisting with asthma and other comorbidities must be addressed.
This study has some limitations. Firstly, some patient data might be missing from the multicenter study, therefore some results might not be accurate. Secondly, this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This situation might have affected clinical outcomes such as asthma exacerbation rates, which might be lower than expected due to preventions of respiratory infection (e.g., mask wearing). Thirdly, according to the study, patients were examined only once, leading to the possibility of informational bias. It is possible that during the examination, patients did not exhibit signs of AR, and there is no information about episodes of such comorbidity in the period preceding the examination. Fourthly, the study exclusively enrolled adults, excluding children. Therefore, the findings are limited in their applicability to pediatric patients with asthma. Lastly, the study recruited patients only from tertiary hospitals; hence, data on disease severity and special treatment might be biased in selection. A longer prospective study is needed to determine long-term correlations between asthma and asthma comorbidities, including allergic diseases. For future perspectives, we believe there are potential advancements in the management of asthma and allergic rhinitis comorbidities. Personalized medicine may lead to more targeted treatments for individuals with asthma and allergic rhinitis in general practice. Meanwhile, a more holistic approach to managing asthma and AR may emerge as comprehensive patient management. This approach involves not only symptom management but also addressing underlying causes and contributing factors.
5 Conclusion
Allergic rhinitis is prevalent in Thai asthmatic patients. AR severity is associated with asthma control, quality of life, and pulmonary function. Several other comorbidities and parameters are also related to asthma control. Comprehensive patient care, including assessment, treatment, monitoring, and environmental control, is essential for patients with uncontrolled asthma, particularly when coexisting with conditions such as obesity, severe AR, nasal polyp, urticaria, food allergy, GERD, peptic ulcer, and psychiatric problems.
Statements
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving humans were approved by the institutional committee on human research in each site of patient recruitment, in full compliance with international guidelines such as the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, CIOMS Guidelines, and the International Conference on Harmonization-Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. The participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
TS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. NS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. TK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. WB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. WM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. NC: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. CC: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AA: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. HK: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KK: Conceptualization, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MK: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MS: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. NO-A: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. TR: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. SS: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. ST: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. TG: Conceptualization, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. KJ: Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. OP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Thammasat University Research Unit in Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Thailand (grant number 67.04.2/0904) and Thai Asthma Council and Association (TAC), Thailand (grant number 341/2564).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Michael Jan Everts, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University, for proofreading this manuscript. This work was supported by Thammasat University Research Unit in Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Thailand and Thai Asthma Council and Association (TAC), Thailand.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1.
Global Initiative for Asthma (2023). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Available at: https://ginasthma.org/
2.
Reddel HK Bacharier LB Bateman ED Brightling CE Brusselle GG Buhl R et al . Global initiative for asthma strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes. Eur Respir J. (2022) 59:2102730. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02730-2021
3.
Bousquet J Schünemann HJ Togias A Bachert C Erhola M Hellings PW et al . Next-generation allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines for allergic rhinitis based on grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) and real-world evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2020) 145:70–80.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.06.049
4.
Pawankar R Bunnag C Chen Y Fukuda T Kim YY Le LT et al . Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma update (ARIA 2008)--western and Asian-Pacific perspective. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2009) 27:237–43. PMID:
5.
Vichyanond P Jirapongsananuruk O Visitsuntorn N Tuchinda M . Prevalence of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in children from the Bangkok area using the ISAAC (international study for asthma and allergy in children) questionnaires. J Med Assoc Thail. (1998) 81:175–84. PMID:
6.
Vichyanond P Sunthornchart S Singhirannusorn V Ruangrat S Kaewsomboon S Visitsunthorn N . Prevalence of asthma, allergic rhinitis and eczema among university students in Bangkok. Respir Med. (2002) 96:34–8. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2001.1202
7.
Valovirta E Pawankar R . Survey on the impact of comorbid allergic rhinitis in patients with asthma. BMC Pulm Med. (2006) 6:S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-6-s1-s3
8.
Trakultivakorn M Sangsupawanich P Vichyanond P . Time trends of the prevalence of asthma, rhinitis and eczema in Thai children-ISAAC (international study of asthma and allergies in childhood) phase three. J Asthma. (2007) 44:609–11. doi: 10.1080/02770900701540119
9.
Sritipsukho P Satdhabudha A Nanthapisal S . Effect of allergic rhinitis and asthma on the quality of life in young Thai adolescents. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2015) 33:222–6. doi: 10.12932/AP0548.33.3.2015
10.
Thanaviratananich S Cho SH Ghoshal AG Muttalif A Lin HC Pothirat C et al . Burden of respiratory disease in Thailand: results from the APBORD observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). (2016) 95:e4090. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004090
11.
Ghoshal AG Ravindran GD Gangwal P Rajadhyaksha G Cho SH Muttalif AR et al . The burden of segregated respiratory diseases in India and the quality of care in these patients: results from the Asia-Pacific burden of respiratory diseases study. Lung India. (2016) 33:611–9. doi: 10.4103/0970-2113.192878
12.
Savoure M Bousquet J Jaakkola JJK Jaakkola MS Jacquemin B Nadif R . Worldwide prevalence of rhinitis in adults: a review of definitions and temporal evolution. Clin Transl Allergy. (2022) 12:e12130. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12130
13.
Thompson PJ Salvi S Lin J Cho YJ Eng P Abdul Manap R et al . Insights, attitudes and perceptions about asthma and its treatment: findings from a multinational survey of patients from 8 Asia-Pacific countries and Hong Kong. Respirology. (2013) 18:957–67. doi: 10.1111/resp.12137
14.
Boonsawat W Thompson PJ Zaeoui U Samosorn C Acar G Faruqi R et al . Survey of asthma management in Thailand—the asthma insight and management study. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2015) 33:14–20. doi: 10.12932/AP0473.33.1.2015
15.
Bunupuradah T Siriaksorn S Hinds D Shantakumar S Mulgirigama A Aggarwal B . A survey of management practices in coexistent allergic rhinitis and asthma (Asia-pacific survey of physicians on asthma and allergic rhinitis): results from Thailand. Asia Pac Allergy. (2019) 9:e24. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2019.9.e24
16.
Althoff MD Ghincea A Wood LG Holguin F Sharma S . Asthma and three colinear comorbidities: obesity, OSA, and GERD. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2021) 9:3877–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.003
17.
Cardet JC Bulkhi AA Lockey RF . Nonrespiratory comorbidities in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2021) 9:3887–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.08.027
18.
Paoletti G Melone G Ferri S Puggioni F Baiardini I Racca F et al . Gastroesophageal reflux and asthma: when, how, and why. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 21:52–8. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000705
19.
Prasad B Nyenhuis SM Imayama I Siddiqi A Teodorescu M . Asthma and obstructive sleep apnea overlap: what has the evidence taught us?Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2020) 201:1345–57. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201810-1838TR
20.
Pawankar R Mori S Ozu C Kimura S . Overview on the pathomechanisms of allergic rhinitis. Asia Pac Allergy. (2011) 1:157–67. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2011.1.3.157
21.
Niyatiwatchanchai N Chaiwong W Pothirat C . The validity and reliability of the Thai version of the asthma control test. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2021). doi: 10.12932/AP-130820-0940
22.
Nathan RA Sorkness CA Kosinski M Schatz M Li JT Marcus P et al . Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2004) 113:59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.09.008
23.
Juniper EF Buist AS Cox FM Ferrie PJ King DR . Validation of a standardized version of the asthma quality of life questionnaire. Chest. (1999) 115:1265–70. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.5.1265
24.
Lertsinudom S Johns NP Chanthawong S Boonsawat W Samosorn C . Validity and reliability of the Thai Mini asthma quality of life questionnaire. J Med Assoc Thail. (2010) 93:373–7. PMID:
25.
Sapsaprang S Setabutr D Kulalert P Temboonnark P Poachanukoon O . Evaluating the impact of allergic rhinitis on quality of life among Thai students. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. (2015) 5:801–7. doi: 10.1002/alr.21540
26.
Prasithsirikul W Chongthawonsatid S Ohata PJ Keadpudsa S Klinbuayaem V Rerksirikul P et al . Depression and anxiety were low amongst virally suppressed, long-term treated HIV-infected individuals enrolled in a public sector antiretroviral program in Thailand. AIDS Care. (2017) 29:299–305. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2016.1201194
27.
Bjelland I Dahl AA Haug TT Neckelmann D . The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. (2002) 52:69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3
28.
Jonasson C Wernersson B Hoff DA Hatlebakk JG . Validation of the GerdQ questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. (2013) 37:564–72. doi: 10.1111/apt.12204
29.
Sangkum L Wathanavaha C Tantrakul V Pothong M Karnjanarachata C . Modified STOP-bang for predicting perioperative adverse events in the Thai population. BMC Anesthesiol. (2021) 21:132. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01347-0
30.
Graham BL Steenbruggen I Miller MR Barjaktarevic IZ Cooper BG Hall GL et al . Standardization of spirometry 2019 update. An official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society technical statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2019) 200:e70–88. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201908-1590ST
31.
Greisner WA 3rd Settipane RJ Settipane GA . Co-existence of asthma and allergic rhinitis: a 23-year follow-up study of college students. Allergy Asthma Proc. (1998) 19:185–8. doi: 10.2500/108854198778557836
32.
Brożek JL Bousquet J Agache I Agarwal A Bachert C Bosnic-Anticevich S et al . Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines-2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 140:950–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050
33.
Magnan A Meunier JP Saugnac C Gasteau J Neukirch F . Frequency and impact of allergic rhinitis in asthma patients in everyday general medical practice: a French observational cross-sectional study. Allergy. (2008) 63:292–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01584.x
34.
Alrasheedi SM Alkhalifah KM Alnasyan S Alwattban RR Alsubhi RA Alsamani RI et al . The prevalence and impact of allergic rhinitis on asthma exacerbations in asthmatic adult patients in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. (2023) 15:e44997. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44997
35.
Shokouhi Shoormasti R Pourpak Z Fazlollahi MR Kazemnejad A Nadali F Ebadi Z et al . The prevalence of allergic rhinitis, allergic conjunctivitis, atopic dermatitis and asthma among adults of Tehran. Iran J Public Health. (2018) 47:1749–55. PMID:
36.
Ohta K Bousquet PJ Aizawa H Akiyama K Adachi M Ichinose M et al . Prevalence and impact of rhinitis in asthma. SACRA, a cross-sectional nation-wide study in Japan. Allergy. (2011) 66:1287–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02676.x
37.
Bugiani M Carosso A Migliore E Piccioni P Corsico A Olivieri M et al . Allergic rhinitis and asthma comorbidity in a survey of young adults in Italy. Allergy. (2005) 60:165–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00659.x
38.
Demoly P Crampette L Daures JP . National survey on the management of rhinopathies in asthma patients by French pulmonologists in everyday practice. Allergy. (2003) 58:233–8. doi: 10.1034/j.1398-9995.2003.00051.x
39.
Togias A . Unique mechanistic features of allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2000) 105:S599–604. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.106885
40.
Eguiluz-Gracia I Mathioudakis AG Bartel S Vijverberg SJH Fuertes E Comberiati P et al . The need for clean air: the way air pollution and climate change affect allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergy. (2020) 75:2170–84. doi: 10.1111/all.14177
41.
Lee CH Jang JH Lee HJ Kim IT Chu MJ Kim CD et al . Clinical characteristics of allergic rhinitis according to allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma guidelines. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. (2008) 1:196–200. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2008.1.4.196
42.
Demoly P Bousquet PJ Mesbah K Bousquet J Devillier P . Visual analogue scale in patients treated for allergic rhinitis: an observational prospective study in primary care: asthma and rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. (2013) 43:881–8. doi: 10.1111/cea.12121
43.
Antonicelli L Micucci C Voltolini S Senna GE Di Blasi P Visonà G et al . Relationship between ARIA classification and drug treatment in allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergy. (2007) 62:1064–70. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01470.x
44.
Boonsawat W Charoenphan P Kiatboonsri S Wongtim S Viriyachaiyo V Pothirat C et al . Survey of asthma control in Thailand. Respirology. (2004) 9:373–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00584.x
45.
Mohammad Y Shaaban R Ibrahim M Ismail M . Lung function changes in non-asthmatic allergic rhinitis patients: a case series. Prim Care Respir J. (2011) 20:454–6. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2011.00089
46.
Saranz RJ Lozano A Valero A Lozano NA Bovina Martijena MD Agresta F et al . Impact of rhinitis on lung function in children and adolescents without asthma. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). (2016) 44:556–62. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2016.04.006
47.
Gani F Lombardi C Barrocu L Landi M Ridolo E Bugiani M et al . The control of allergic rhinitis in real life: a multicenter cross-sectional Italian study. Clin Mol Allergy. (2018) 16:4. doi: 10.1186/s12948-018-0082-y
48.
Elkholy MM Khedr MH Halawa A Elbaramawy A . Impact of allergic rhinitis on quality of life in patients with bronchial asthma. Int J Health Sci. (2012) 6:194–202. PMID:
49.
Acevedo-Prado A Seoane-Pillado T López-Silvarrey-Varela A Salgado FJ Cruz MJ Faraldo-Garcia A et al . Association of rhinitis with asthma prevalence and severity. Sci Rep. (2022) 12:6389. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10448-w
50.
Koper I Hufnagl K Ehmann R . Gender aspects and influence of hormones on bronchial asthma—secondary publication and update. World Allergy Organ J. (2017) 10:46. doi: 10.1186/s40413-017-0177-9
51.
Stone KD Prussin C Metcalfe DD . IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2010) 125:S73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.017
52.
Burrows B Martinez FD Halonen M Barbee RA Cline MG . Association of asthma with serum IgE levels and skin-test reactivity to allergens. N Engl J Med. (1989) 320:271–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198902023200502
53.
Blöndal V Malinovschi A Sundbom F James A Middelveld R Franklin KA et al . Multimorbidity in asthma, association with allergy, inflammatory markers and symptom burden, results from the Swedish GA(2) LEN study. Clin Exp Allergy. (2021) 51:262–72. doi: 10.1111/cea.13759
54.
Chirakalwasan N Ruxrungtham K . The linkage of allergic rhinitis and obstructive sleep apnea. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2014) 32:276–86. PMID:
55.
Kong DL Qin Z Shen H Jin HY Wang W Wang ZF . Association of obstructive sleep apnea with asthma: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:4088. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-04446-6
56.
Rodrigues J Pinto JV Alexandre PL Sousa-Pinto B Pereira AM Raemdonck K et al . Allergic rhinitis seasonality, severity, and disease control influence anxiety and depression. Laryngoscope. (2023) 133:1321–7. doi: 10.1002/lary.30318
57.
Saranz RJ Lozano A Lozano NA Ponzio MF Cruz ÁA . Subclinical lower airways correlates of chronic allergic and non-allergic rhinitis. Clin Exp Allergy. (2017) 47:988–97. doi: 10.1111/cea.12938
58.
Kawamatawong T Sangasapaviriya A Saiphoklang N Oer-Areemitr N Sriprasart T Kamalaporn H et al . Guidelines for the management of asthma in adults: evidence and recommendations. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. (2022) 40:1–21. doi: 10.12932/AP-210421-1118
Summary
Keywords
ACT, asthma, asthma control test, allergic rhinitis, comorbidities, IgE, quality of life, Thailand
Citation
Sriprasart T, Saiphoklang N, Kawamatawong T, Boonsawat W, Mitthamsiri W, Chirakalwasan N, Chiewchalermsri C, Athipongarporn A, Kamalaporn H, Kornthatchapong K, Kulpraneet M, Sompornrattanaphan M, Oer-Areemitr N, Rerkpattanapipat T, Silairatana S, Thawanaphong S, Gaensan T, Jirakran K and Poachanukoon O (2024) Allergic rhinitis and other comorbidities associated with asthma control in Thailand. Front. Med. 10:1308390. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1308390
Received
06 October 2023
Accepted
13 December 2023
Published
11 January 2024
Volume
10 - 2023
Edited by
Serghei Covantsev, S.P. Botkin Clinical Hospital, Russia
Reviewed by
Alexandr Ceasovschih, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Romania; Oleg Arnaut, Nicolae Testemiţanu State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Moldova; Anna Bumbu, S.P. Botkin Clinical Hospital, Russia
Updates
Copyright
© 2024 Sriprasart, Saiphoklang, Kawamatawong, Boonsawat, Mitthamsiri, Chirakalwasan, Chiewchalermsri, Athipongarporn, Kamalaporn, Kornthatchapong, Kulpraneet, Sompornrattanaphan, Oer-Areemitr, Rerkpattanapipat, Silairatana, Thawanaphong, Gaensan, Jirakran and Poachanukoon.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Narongkorn Saiphoklang, m_narongkorn@hotmail.com
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.