Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Nephrology

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1555478

Acute Kidney Injury After Myocardial Infarction: Prognostic Implications via Dual Robust Methods

Provisionally accepted
Pan  GuoPan Guo1Fang  TaoFang Tao2Lili  DuLili Du3Hongmei  YangHongmei Yang1Wenguang  WangWenguang Wang1Chunpeng  MaChunpeng Ma1Xile  BiXile Bi1Lin  RenLin Ren1Hongtao  YinHongtao Yin1Lixiang  MaLixiang Ma1*
  • 1Department of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China
  • 2Medical Department, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China
  • 3Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) notably affects patient outcomes. The impact of KDIGO AKI staging on post-discharge short- and long-term outcomes, particularly early-stage AKI, is not well understood. This study evaluates the prognostic implications of various KDIGO stages in AMI patients.Methods: Utilizing the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (version 3.0) database, this retrospective cohort study included adult patients primarily diagnosed with AMI. Statistical analyses, including doubly robust estimation, propensity score matching, logistic regression, and Cox regression, were performed. The study compared Non-AKI (KDIGO stage 0) with Mild-AKI (maximum KDIGO stage 1 during hospitalization), and Normal-or-mild AKI (KDIGO stages 0–1) with Moderate-to-severe AKI (KDIGO stages 2–3).Results: Among 5,715 patients analyzed, 4,306 (75.36%) developed AKI. Doubly robust analysis revealed no significant differences in outcomes between Non-AKI and Mild-AKI groups (28-day mortality: OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.38; 180-day mortality: HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.76-1.18; 1-year mortality: HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.81-1.20). However, Moderate-to-severe AKI was significantly associated with worse outcomes compared to Normal-or-mild AKI (28-day mortality: OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.36-2.05; 180-day mortality: HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10; 1-year mortality: HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.07-1.38; all p<0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that patients under 65 years with Mild-AKI showed higher risks of 180-day and 1-year mortality compared to Non-AKI, while Moderate-to-severe AKI consistently demonstrated worse outcomes across all subgroups (age, SOFA score, heart failure status, and renal disease status). These findings were robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.Conclusions: Patients with Mild-AKI can be considered as having “subclinical AKI,” with prognoses similar to Non-AKI patients. In contrast, Moderate-to-severe AKI significantly worsens prognosis compared to Normal-or-mild AKI.

Keywords: Myocardial Infarction, Acute Kidney Injury, prognosis, Propensity score matching, Doubly robust analysis

Received: 04 Jan 2025; Accepted: 03 Jul 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Guo, Tao, Du, Yang, Wang, Ma, Bi, Ren, Yin and Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Lixiang Ma, Department of Cardiology, Qinhuangdao First Hospital, Qinhuangdao, Qinhuangdao, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.