Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Med.

Sec. Geriatric Medicine

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1589583

Risk prediction models for sarcopenia in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Provisionally accepted
  • Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Objective: This study aims to systematically review and evaluate risk prediction models for sarcopenia in older adults. The goal is to offer a reference for clinicians in selecting or developing suitable sarcopenia risk prediction models for the elderly.Methods: A systematic search was performed across CNKI, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, SinoMed, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies on risk prediction models of sarcopenia in older adults. The time frame for the search was from the creation of these databases to August 13, 2024. The literature was independently vetted by two researchers, who also gathered data and assessed the included studies' applicability and bias risk.Results: A total of 29 studies with 70 sarcopenia prediction models were included, with a total sample size of 140,386 and 13,472 sarcopenia events. Frequently reported independent predictors in multivariate models included BMI, age, and gender. Meta-analysis showed a combined AUC of 0.9125(95% CI [0.9254-0.8996]), indicating good overall model predictive performance. Issues in modeling included inappropriate predictive factor screening methods, insufficient sample sizes, and lack of external validation, resulting in high study bias risk and limited model generalizability.Conclusion: Current elderly sarcopenia risk prediction models have considerable room for improvement in overall quality and applicability. Future modeling should follow PROBAST guidelines to reduce bias risk, incorporate predictive factors with theoretical foundation and clinical significance, and strengthen external validation. Systematic review registration: This systematic review has been registered in PROSPERO with the registration number: CRD42025636116.

Keywords: Elderly, Sarcopenia, Model, prediction, Systematic review

Received: 07 Mar 2025; Accepted: 08 May 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Yin, Xu, Cai and Fang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Yiyong Xu, Jiangxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanchang, China

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.