Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Med.

Sec. Healthcare Professions Education

Volume 12 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1625352

This article is part of the Research TopicWidening Participation and Access to Medicine as a CareerView all articles

Motivation in Medical Students: Higher Intrinsic Motivation Among Graduate-Entry Students Across Academic Stages

Provisionally accepted
  • 1School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
  • 2Clinical Academic Center-Braga (2CA), Braga, Portugal
  • 3Centro Universitário Max-Planck (UniMAX), Indaiatuba, SP, Brazil
  • 4UNESP - São Paulo State University - Medical School, Botucatu, SP, Brazil

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

Academic success and professional development are determined by several factors, being motivation an important one. In this study we explored its different dimensions of motivation among students enrolled in the undergraduate medical degree at the School of Medicine of the University of Minho, comparing students from the traditional national entry and graduate entry (PA) pathways across all curricular years.A total of 354 students (response rate: 39.4%) participated in this cross-sectional study during the 2023/2024 and 2024/2025 academic years. Motivation was assessed using the Minho Medical Academic Motivation Scale – Minho-MEDAMS, a validated scale adapted within the Self-Determination Theory framework. Motivation types examined included intrinsic motivation (IM), identified regulation (EMID), introjected regulation (EMIR), external regulation (EMER), and amotivation (AMOT), alongside the Self-Determination Index (SDI). Statistical analyses were conducted to compare motivation across academic years, entry pathways, gender, and age groups.EMID and IM were the most prevalent motivation types, while AMOT was the least reported. No significant differences were found in motivation levels across academic years. PA students showed significantly higher levels of IM, EMID, and SDI compared to traditional pathway students. Motivation levels did not vary significantly with age, and gender differences were minimal, with the exception of higher EMER scores among male students.In conclusion, these findings suggest that graduate-entry students are more self-determined in their motivation profiles, independent of age, and that motivation remains relatively stable throughout the medical curriculum.

Keywords: Medical Education, academic motivation, self-determination theory, Graduate Entry, intrinsic motivation

Received: 08 May 2025; Accepted: 02 Jun 2025.

Copyright: © 2025 Matos Sousa, Santos, Marangoni and Pereira. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Rita Matos Sousa, School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.