You're viewing our updated article page. If you need more time to adjust, you can return to the old layout.

CORRECTION article

Front. Med., 12 June 2025

Sec. Rheumatology

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1635905

Correction: Vascular ultrasound as a follow-up tool in patients with giant cell arteritis: a prospective observational cohort study

  • 1. Department of Rheumatology, Martina Hansens Hospital, Bærum, Norway

  • 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

  • 3. Department of Rheumatology, Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Haugesund, Norway

  • 4. Department of Rheumatology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States

  • 5. Department of Rheumatology, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway

  • 6. Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway

Article metrics

View details

824

Views

205

Downloads

In the published article, the Reference for ACR 1990 criteria modified by Dejaco et al. was incorrectly written as “Maz M, Chung SA, Abril A, Langford CA, Gorelik M, Guyatt G, et al. American College of Rheumatology/Vasculitis Foundation guideline for the Management of Giant Cell Arteritis and Takayasu Arteritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. (2021) 73:1349–65. doi: 10.1002/art.41774.”

It should be “Dejaco C, Duftner C, Buttgereit F, Matteson EL, Dasgupta B. The spectrum of giant cell arteritis and polymyalgia rheumatica: revisiting the concept of the disease. Rheumatology (2017) 56:506–515. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kew273.”

In the published article, there was an error. There was an error in how the modified ACR 1990 criteria were named and referenced.

A correction has been made to Methods, The prospective GCA cohort, paragraph 1. This sentence previously stated:

“All the patients were classified using the ACR 1990 criteria modified by Maz et al.”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“All the patients were classified using the ACR 1990 criteria modified by Dejaco et al.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Statements

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Summary

Keywords

giant cell arteritis, ultrasound, relapse, follow-up, large vessel vasculitis

Citation

Haaversen ACB, Brekke LK, Kermani TA, Molberg Ø and Diamantopoulos AP (2025) Correction: Vascular ultrasound as a follow-up tool in patients with giant cell arteritis: a prospective observational cohort study. Front. Med. 12:1635905. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1635905

Received

27 May 2025

Accepted

29 May 2025

Published

12 June 2025

Approved by

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Volume

12 - 2025

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Anne C. B. Haaversen

†ORCID: Anne C. B. Haaversen orcid.org/0009-0000-0984-4590

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics